Volume 43 Supplement 1

Proceedings of the 14th Internordic Symposium of the Nordic Committee for Veterinary Scientific Cooperation (NKVet)

Open Access

May Organically Farmed Animals Pose a Risk for Campylobacter Infections in Humans?

  • Anders Engvall1
Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica200243(Suppl 1):S85

DOI: 10.1186/1751-0147-43-S1-S85

Published: 31 March 2002

Abstract

Organic farming of meat producing poultry like broilers, means that the animals should be kept outdoors as much as possible. This pose a risk that they get infected with Campylobacter. At slaughter, carcasses may be contaminated with campylobacter. If cross contamination occurs in the kitchen or if the meat is undercooked people may ingest the bacteria and suffer from enteritis. It seems possible that close to 100 percent of organically farmed flocks may be infected with campylobacter while under Swedish conditions only 10 percent of conventionally reared flocks are infected.

Keywords

Campylobacter organic farming poultry broiler out-door rearing

Introduction

Campylobacter, a Gram-negative, curved, spiral, non-sporing bacteria, is a common cause of diarrheal illness among humans in industrialised and developing countries. Its importance as a cause of gastroenteritis was recognised in the 1970's when the development of selective growth media allowed laboratories to test large amounts of stool specimens [7]. The genus Campylobacter consists of several species and the taxonomy has changed considerably over time. At present there are 15 species and 6 subspecies. Only a few of these are considered significant as causes of gastroenteritis in humans; they are C. jejuni, C. coli, C. lari, C. upsaliensis and C. concisus. All but C. concisus have also been found in animals. C. jejuni is by far the most often isolated species, followed by C. coli [9]. Besides the common symptoms of gastroenteritis, serious sequele to infections have been reported. In approximately 1% of patients with campylobacteriosis, a reactive arthropathy is seen and in an estimated 1 promille, Guillain-Barré syndrome, a debilitating disorder, occurs [2].

Campylobacter species have been found in a multitude of animal species including food-producing animals. Several sources of infection, such as surface water, un-pas-teurised milk, chicken, turkey and red meat, have been identified, and contacts with dogs and cats have also been found to be risk factors. Several studies have shown that during the slaughter process, carcasses may be contaminated with campylobacter and that this contamination still persists at the retail level. This has been especially significant for broilers, and broiler meat is considered one of the most important sources of infection for humans [1, 7].

The EU regulation 2092/91 with Annex 1B (399R1804) [4] stipulates conditions for organic farming of animals within the European Union. In addition to this regulation, there are in Sweden two non-governmental organisations, KRAV and Svenska Demeterförbundet, that have stipulated national rules for organic farming. KRAV is subsidiary to International Federation of Organic Agriculture Movements (IFOAM). Important parts of the organic farming philosophy are that animals should have access to outdoor areas and be able to graze and exert natural behaviour. In addition only organic fertilisers, i.e. manure, sludge etc., may be used. Animals should be slaughtered as close to the production site as possible, thereby avoiding the stress that long distance transportation may incur.

In Sweden, goals have been set up for an increase in organic farming. In a recent report by the Swedish Board of Agriculture [3], organic production of beef, mutton, pork, poultry meat and table eggs were planned to be 20%, 20%, 5%, 5% and 10% respectively of total production in 2005.

Is it possible that the organic farming of animals poses a higher risk for campylobacter infections in humans than conventional farming? The aim of the present study is to review factors related to organic farming that may possibly influence campylobacter infections in animals, contamination of food and risks for human beings.

Conventional farming

In conventionally farmed animals for production, campylobacter infection rates may vary considerably [5]. Pigs are normally colonised to a very high extent (C. coli) while for cattle and sheep varying figures (10–90%) have been shown. The reason for this variation in figures is not clear. In poultry, colonisation rates normally are very high. In poultry, cattle and sheep, C. jejuni is normally the dominant species. Table eggs are not infected with campylobacter, but their shells may be contaminated with droppings containing campylobacter.

In broilers the rate of colonisation of campylobacter is influenced by rearing systems and hygienic measures. In the Nordic countries of Norway, Sweden and Finland, flock prevalence has been decreased to less than 10%, mainly due to a high biosecurity level of rearing establishments, while flock prevalence is 40% or more in many other countries. Bacterial contamination of carcasses from broilers, coming from different flocks but slaughtered at the same slaughter house, is unavoidable with present slaughter technique. Thus, a single flock infected with campylobacter may constitute a significant contamination risk for other, campylobacter free flocks.

Organic farming

Organic or ecological farming of cattle, sheep and pigs probably will not exert a higher risk for campylobacter infections. Conventionally farmed cattle and sheep are kept out-doors to a high extent and other factors related to organic farming probably will not influence carrier rates significantly. A majority of pigs are already today carriers, and this will probably not change, if pigs are kept outdoors. However, as regards pigs, there are some indications that a high level of biosecurity might decrease number of carriers [8].

Egg production under organic conditions, will probably not increase the risk for Campylobacter infections. In most cases, campylobacter bacteria contaminating the shell, will die off, due to unfavourable conditions, e.g. dehydration.

In broilers and other meat producing poultry organic production may exert a major influence on carrier rates, at least under Swedish conditions. At present, annual incidence of infected broiler flocks in Sweden is 9%. If broilers were allowed to stay out-doors, flock carrier rates may increase to 70–100%. A 100% carrier rate in organic flocks is not unreasonable as shown by [6] in a Danish study. This is due to the high contamination rate of Campylobacter, occurring in the environment. If slaughtered in slaughter houses where conventional broilers are processed, also these broilers would be contaminated to a high degree. At present it is calculated that approximately six million contaminated broiler carcasses are produced in Sweden annually. If 10% of total broiler production were to be produced organically, an additional six million contaminated carcasses could reach the market, introducing an additional risk for human beings.

Other possible risks that may show up should be mentioned. In a society where organic farming constitutes a considerable part of food production, new consumer habits may develop, e.g. consumption of unpasteurised milk. Unpasteurised milk is a well known vehicle for Campylobacter and should consumption increase, so would probably incidence of campy-lobacter infections.

Another risk may be the use of very small slaughter houses or even slaughter at home of animals. It is generally considered more difficult to keep slaughter hygiene at a high level in very small slaughter houses, and so the risk of faecal contamination of carcasses would increase.

In conclusion the major risk seems to be associated with broilers and other poultry for meat production. There seems for the moment, not to exist technical ways of solving this problem, and more research is needed.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Disease Control and Biosecurity, National Veterinary Institute

References

  1. Altekruse SF, Hunt JM, Tollefson LK, Madden JM: Food and animal sources of human Campylobacter jejuni infection. Public Vet Medicine: Public Health. JAVMA. 1994, 204: 57-61.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Altekruse SF, Stern NJ, Fields PI, Swerdlow DL: Campylobacter jejuni – An Emerging Foodborne Pathogen. Emering Infectious Diseases. 1999, 5:Google Scholar
  3. Anonymous 1991: Mål för ekologisk production 2005 (Goals for ecologic production 2005). Jordbruksverket, Djurmiljöenheten. Rapport. 1999, 16-(In Swedish)Google Scholar
  4. EU-regulation: EU-regulation on organic farming (2092/91, Annex 1B, 399R1804).
  5. Berndtson E: Campylobacter in Broiler Chickens. Thesis. Uppsala. 1996Google Scholar
  6. Heuer O, Pedersen K, Andersen JS, Madsen M: Prevalence of thermophilic Campylobacter and antimicrobial susceptibility patterns of zoonotic and indicator bacteria from organic and conventional broilers in Denmark. NKVet. Veterinary challenges in organic farming. Hveragerdi, Iceland, 5–8. 2000, OctoberGoogle Scholar
  7. Skirrow MB: Campylobacteriosis. Zoonoses. Edited by: Palmer SR, Lord Soulsby, Simpson DIH. 1998, Oxford University Press, 37-46.Google Scholar
  8. Urlings BAP, Weijtens MJBM, Bijker PGH, van der Plas J: Spread of Campylobacter in a superhealth-status (S-H-S) pig farm. Campylobacter, Helicobacter related organisms. 9th International workshop, 1997. Edited by: Lastovica, Newell, Lastovica. 1998, Institute of Child Health. University Cape Town, 72-74.Google Scholar
  9. Vandamme P, Goossens H: Taxonomy of Campylobacter, Arcobacter, and Helicobacter: A Review. Zbl Bakt. 1992, 276: 447-472.View ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s); licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2002

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Advertisement