Open Access

Prevalence of Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato and Anaplasma phagocytophilum in questing Ixodes ricinus ticks in relation to the density of wild cervids

Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica200951:47

DOI: 10.1186/1751-0147-51-47

Received: 28 April 2009

Accepted: 27 November 2009

Published: 27 November 2009

Abstract

Background

Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato and Anaplasma phagocytophilum have been considered as pathogens in animals and humans. The role of wild cervids in the epidemiology is not clear. We analyzed questing Ixodes ricinus ticks collected in spring for these pathogens from sites with high (Fjelløyvær and Strøm) and low density (Tjore, Hinnebu and Jomfruland) of wild cervids to study the spread of the pathogens in questing ticks.

Methods

For detection of Anaplasma phagocytophilum a 77-bp fragment in the msp 2 gene was used. Detection of Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato was performed using the FL6 and FL7 primers according to sequences of conserved regions of the fla gene. The Osp A gene located on the linear 49-kb plasmid was used as target in multiplex PCR for genotyping. Genospecies-specific primers were used in the PCR for Borrelia burgdorferi sensu stricto, B. afzelii and B. garinii.

Results

Infection rates with Borrelia spp. were significantly lower at Fjelløyvær and Strøm compared to Tjore and Hinnebu; Fjelløyvær vs. Tjore (χ2 = 20.27, p < 0.0001); Fjelløyvær vs. Hinnebu (χ2 = 24.04, p < 0.0001); Strøm vs. Tjore (χ2 = 11.47, p = 0.0007) and Strøm vs. Hinnebu (χ2 = 16.63, p < 0.0001). The Borrelia genospecies were dominated by. B. afzelii (82%) followed by B. garinii (9.7%) and B. burgdorferi sensu stricto (6.9%). B. burgdorferi s.s. was only found on the island of Jomfruland. The infection rate of Anaplasma phagocytophilum showed the following figures; Fjelløyvær vs Hinnebu (χ2 = 16.27, p = 0.0001); Strøm vs. Tjore (χ2 = 13.16, p = 0.0003); Strøm vs. Hinnebu (χ2 = 34.71, p < 0.0001); Fjelløyvær vs. Tjore (χ2 = 3.19, p = 0.0742) and Fjelløyvær vs. Støm (χ2 = 5.06, p = 0.0245). Wild cervids may serve as a reservoir for A. phagocytophilum. Jomfruland, with no wild cervids but high levels of migrating birds and rodents, harboured both B. burgdorferi s.l. and A. phagocytophilum in questing I. ricinus ticks. Birds and rodents may play an important role in maintaining the pathogens on Jomfruland.

Conclusion

The high abundance of roe deer and red deer on the Norwegian islands of Fjelløyvær and Strøm may reduce the infection rate of Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato in host seeking Ixodes ricinus, in contrast to mainland sites at Hinnebu and Tjore with moderate abundance of wild cervids. The infection rate of Anaplasma phagocytophilum showed the opposite result with a high prevalence in questing ticks in localities with a high density of wild cervids compared to localities with lower density.

Background

Lyme disease, an important arthropod-borne disease of humans in the northern hemisphere, can manifest in many organ systems with symptoms including skin rashes, meningitis, optic neuritis, facial nerve palsy and atrioventricular nodal block. Failure to treat infection promptly and adequately can result in long-term debilitating effect on the patient's health. Three species have been proven to be pathogenic in humans: Borrelia afzelii, B. garinii and B. burgdorferi sensu stricto [1]. These species appear to be responsible for causing different clinical syndromes [2].

It is well known that Ixodes ticks feed on deer species [3], and that high abundance of Ixodes ticks follows a high abundance of deer [4], but the role of cervid species in the epidemiology of Lyme disease is not completely understood. Although it has been suggested that adaptive immune responses may be involved in the regulation of spirochete transmission [5], the detailed mechanisms underlying differential transmission of the Borrelia genospecies by hosts are unknown. Investigators have concluded that roe deer (Capreolus capreolus) [6] and red deer (Cervus elaphus) [79] are incompetent reservoirs for B. burgdorferi. Spirochaetes that are sensitive to destruction by the complement system of a particular host species are lysed early in the midgut of the feeding tick and are thereby eliminated by the host [10]. These findings have led to the hypothesis that the host range of spirochaete strain is restricted by its repertoire of genes that encode ligands with the high binding affinities for complement inhibition [7].

Tick-borne fever caused by A. phagocytophilum has been considered a common disease in domestic ruminants along the coast of southern Norway [11]. Several other mammalian species including wild cervids have also been found infected with A. phagocytophilum [12]. Stuen et al. [13] found seroprevalences of granulocytic Ehrlichia spp. in moose (Alces alces) of 43%, red deer 55%, and roe deer 96% from I. ricinus infested counties in Norway. A study in Switzerland found serological evidence of granulocytic ehrlichial infection in roe deer [14].

Human granulocytic anaplasmosis (HGA) caused by Anaplasma phagocytophilum was first identified in 1990 in a patient who died [15]. HGA is increasingly recognized as an important and frequent cause of fever after tick bite world wide [16], including Scandinavia [17] where Ixodes ticks bite humans. Several Ixodes spp. including I. ricinus, I. arboricola, I. calidonicus, I. frontais, I. hexagonus, I. lividus, I. persulcatus, I. trianguliceps, I. urinae and I. unicavatus have been found in Fennoscandia [1820] Most human cases occur between June and August and usually appear as an undifferentiated febrile illness. The incubation period following tick-bite is 7-10 days and symptoms include high fever, rigors, generalized myalgias, severe headacke and malaise [16]. Bjöersdorff et al. [17] found a seroprevalence of 15-20% among 1000 tick-exposed patients (mainly from Sweden and Norway) and concluded a widespread exposure to granulocytic Ehrlichia (now Anaplasma spp.). In Slovenia 3.2% of I. ricinus were infected with Anaplasma, and they were 99.8% identical to those previously determined from human patients [21]. The main vector in Europe is I. ricinus. In other continents Zhang et al. [22] found a high seroprevalence rate (8.8%) for A. phagocytophilum among 365 farm-workers in China and suggested that human infections with these zoonotic bacteria are frequent and largely unrecognized. A seroprevalence between 2.3% and 5.6% was found in different locations in Mongolia and Walder et al. [23] concluded that A. phagocytophilum is endemic. Brown et al. [24] confirmed that woodland rodents can maintain A. phagocytophilum in Great Britain in the absence of other reservoir hosts which suggests that I. trianguliceps is a competent vector.

The aim of the present study was to compare the prevalence of B. burgdorferi s.l. and A. phagocytophilum in I. ricinus ticks in sites with both high and low abundance of roe deer, red deer and moose to evaluate the role of wild cervids in the epidemiology.

Materials and methods

Locations and habitats

Tick samples were collected on two islands on the coast of western Norway: at Strøm (N7048360E498426), on the island of Hitra, and on the island of Fjelløyvær (N7059209E504490) close to the main island Hitra and connected by a bridge. Both islands are largely covered with heath and a mixture of deciduous and pine forest. There are no foxes, but sea gulls and raptorial birds are common, and roe deer and red deer densities are high. There are farms on both islands with grass production and grazing cattle and sheep. Tick samples were also collected at three sites along the southern coast of Norway. These included Tjore, a coastal mainland site (N6463382E473032) located in a mixture of farmland and mixed deciduous, pine and spruce forest, and within 100 m outside of a red deer enclosure; Hinnebu (N6493848E469418) situated 30 km from the coast with similar mixed forest but no agriculture or grazing domestic animals; and Jomfruland, an island with agriculture and mixed forest (N6524446E533677). Jomfruland is frequented by many migrating birds and is grazed by sheep and cattle, but contains no wild cervids. Coordinates are given in UTM32 (Euref 89) values.

Abundance of roe deer, red deer and moose

We used the official municipal hunting statistics for 2007 for each township involved to estimate the numbers of game animals at each site (Table 1). We have defined low density as less than one animal killed per km2 and high density as more than 3.
Table 1

Number of animals killed by hunting per km2 (hunting statistics for 2007)

 

Red deer

Roe deer

Moose

Total

Fjelløyvær

0.05 (1)a

8.62 (181)

0*

8.67

Strøm

1.94 (846)

1.18 (513)

0*

3.12

Hinnebu

0.05 (30)

0.33 (198)

0.31 (194)

0.69

Tjore

0.02 (6)

0.56 (528)

0.17 (194)

0.75

Jomfruland

0**

0**

0*

0

aThe numbers in parentheses represent the total number of killed animals.

*Moose is absent.

**Red deer and roe deer are absent.

Tick collection

Questing I. ricinus ticks were collected during spring (April-May) 2006-2008 at all five locations using the standard flagging method [25] by drawing a 1 m2 piece of cotton cloth over the vegetation. Ticks attached to the towel were picked with tweezers and placed into 1.5 ml test tube filled with 70% ethanol.

DNA extraction and detection of Ixodes ricinus

A modified procedure for extracting DNA with ammonium hydroxide solution (2.5%) was performed [26, 27]. The lysates were stored at -20°C until use. For I. ricinus identification, the lysates were analysed with species-specific primers IxriF and IxriR resulting in a 150 bp segment of the 5.8 srRNA gene [28, 29]. This PCR reaction was further used as positive control. DNA bands were stained with ethidium bromide and visualised by UV transillumination (EASY Win32, Herolab, Germany).

Detection of Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato

The occurrence of Borrelia burgdorferi s.l. in ticks was determined by polymerase chain reaction by using the oligonucleotide primers FL6 and FL7 according to sequences of conserved regions of the fla gene [26]. PCR products were resolved by 1.5% agarose gel electrophoresis with addition of ethidium bromide and visualized under UV light (EASY Win32, Herolab, Germany). The achieved specific amplification products of 276 base pairs (bp) were considered a positive result. Negative and positive controls were included in all runs.

Genotyping of Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato

The OspA gene located on the linear 49-kb plasmid was used as target in multiplex PCR according to Demaershalck et al. [30]. Genospecies-specific primers were used in the PCR for B. burgdorferi sensu stricto, B. afzelii and B. garinii. PCR amplification products were resolved onto 2.0% agarose gel electrophoresis and visualized under UV light. The specific products of 544 bp (B. burgdorferi s.s.) 345 bp (B. garinii) and 189 bp (B. afzelii) were considered to represent positive results. Negative and positive controls were included in all runs.

Detection of Anaplasma phagocytophilum

I. ricinus questing ticks were examined for the prevalence of A. phagocytophilum by using the species-specific primers ApMSP2f, ApMSP2r, and TaqMan probe ApMsp2p-FAM, as described by Courtney et al. [31]. A 77-bp fragment in the msp 2 gene of A. phagocytophilum was amplified. PCR was performed using TaqMan Master Mix (Applied Biosystems, CA) in a quantitative thermal cycler (iCycler, Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc., Hercules, CA). Negative and positive controls were included in all runs.

Statistics

The data were analysed statistically by means of Pearson's χ2 test by using the statistical package STATISTICA for WINDOWS 5.5. We compared the mean isolation rate of B. burgdorferi s.l. and A. phagocytophilum for 2006-2008 in sites with different densities of wild cervids.

Results

The highest density of wild cervids was Fjelløyvær followed by Strøm (Table 1). No Borrelia was detected in questing ticks in Fjelløyvær, and low values in Strøm during the three year period (Table 2). The infection rates were significantly lower in areas with high density of wild cervids compared to sites with low density: Fjelløyvær vs. Tjore (χ2 = 20.27, p < 0.0001); Fjelløyvær vs. Hinnebu (χ2 = 24.04, p < 0.0001); Strøm vs. Tjore (χ2 = 11.47, p = 0.0007) and Strøm vs. Hinnebu (χ2 = 16.63, p < 0.0001). There were significantly lower values on Fjelløyvær vs. Jomfruland (χ2 = 10.66, p = 0.0011); Fjelløyvær vs Strøm (χ2 = 4.26, p = 0.0390) and Hinnebu vs. Jomfruland (χ2 = 6.56, p = 0.0104), but no significant difference between Tjore vs. Jomfruland (χ2 = 3.2, p = 0.0735); Strøm vs. Jomfruland (χ2 = 3.24, p = 0.0719) and Hinnebu vs. Tjore (χ2 = 0.27, p = 0.6006). The distribution of genospecies is shown in Table 3. B. afzelii dominated with 82% followed by B. garinii (9.7%) and B. burgdorferi s.s. (6.9%). B. burgdorfereri s.s. was only found on the island of Jomfruland.
Table 2

Prevalence of Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato in questing Ixodesricinus ticks 2006, 2007 and 2008.

Locations

Years

Female

Male

Nymph

Total

  

N

Prevalence

N

Prevalence

N

Prevalence

N

Prevalence

   

n

%

 

n

%

 

n

%

 

n

%

Hitra, Fjelløyvær

2008

9

0

0

8

0

0

43

0

0

60

0

0

 

2007

23

0

0

27

0

0

30

0

0

80

0

0

 

2006

2

0

0

6

0

0

56

0

0

64

0

0

           

204

0

0

Hitra, Strøm

2008

5

0

0

7

1

14.3

40

0

0

52

1

1.9

 

2007

40

0

0

32

0

0

16

0

0

88

0

0

 

2006

5

1

20

3

0

0

89

3

3.4

97

4

4.1

           

237

5

2.1

Tjore

2008

24

1

4.2

14

0

0

20

2

10

58

3

5.2

 

2007

19

2

10.5

23

3

13

38

1

2.6

80

6

7.5

 

2006

4

1

25

4

0

0

16

7

43,8

24

8

33.3

           

162

17

10.5

Hinnebu

2008

31

3

9.7

41

3

7.3

7

0

0

79

6

7.6

 

2007

52

15

28.8

57

4

7

6

0

0

115

19

16.5

 

2006

42

4

9.5

32

4

12.5

32

4

12.5

106

12

11.3

           

300

37

11.8

Jomfruland

2008

29

3

10.3

30

0

0

20

0

0

79

3

3.8

 

2007

30

3

10

20

2

10

22

0

0

72

5

6.9

 

2006

8

0

0

8

0

0

76

7

9.2

92

5

5.4

           

243

13

5.3

N = number of tested ticks; n = number of infected ticks

Table 3

Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato genospecies in questing Ixodes ricinus ticks.

Locations

B.afzelii

n/N (%)

B.garinii

n/N (%)

B.burgdorferi s.s.

n/N (%)

B.burgdorferi s.s.+ B.afzelii

n/N (%)

Hitra, Strøm

4/5 (80)

1/5 (20)

0/5 (0)

0/5 (0)

Tjore

13/17 (76.5)

4/17 (23.5)

0/17 (0)

0/17 (0)

Hinnebu

35/37 (94.6)

2/37 (5.6)

0/37 (0)

0/37 (0)

Jomfruland

7/13 (53.8)

0/13 (0)

5/13 (38.5)

1/13 (7.7)

Total

59/72 (82)

7/72(9.7)

5/72(6.9)

1/72(1.4)

N = number of tested ticks; n = number of infected ticks; (%) - prevalence of infection

The prevalence of A. phagocytophilum infections in questing ticks (Table 4) was significantly higher in localities with high density of wild cervids compared to localities with lower density (Table 1): Fjelløyvær vs. Hinnebu (χ2 = 16.27, p = 0.0001); Fjelløyvær vs. Støm (χ2 = 5.06, p = 0.0245); Strøm vs. Tjore (χ2 = 13.16, p = 0.0003) and Strøm vs. Hinnebu (χ2 = 34.71, p = 0.0000). The figures for Hinnebu vs. Tjore was (χ2 = 5.07, p = 0.0243); Hinnebu vs. Jomfruland (χ2 = 30.73, p = 0.000) and Jomfruland vs. Tjore (χ2 = 10.97, p = 0.0009). There was one exception, with no significant difference between Fjelløyvær and Tjore where a high level of A. phagocytophilum was detected in 2008 (χ2 = 3.19, p = 0.0742) (Table 4). There were no significant difference between Strøm and Jomfruland (χ2 = 0.38, p = 0.54), or Fjelløyvær and Jomfruland (χ2 = 3.78, p = 0.0519).
Table 4

Prevalence of Anaplasma phagocytophilum in questing Ixodesricinus ticks 2006, 2007 and 2008.

Locations

Years

Female

Male

Nymphs

Total

  

N

Prevalence

N

Prevalence

N

Prevalence

N

Prevalence

   

n

%

 

n

%

 

n

%

 

n

%

Hitra, Fjelløyvær

2008

9

0

0

8

0

0

42

2

4.8

59

2

3.4

 

2007

23

4

17.4

24

3

12.5

30

2

16.7

77

12

15.6

 

2006

2

1

50

6

0

0

56

2

3.6

64

3

4.7

           

200

17

8.5

Hitra, Strøm

2008

5

0

0

7

2

28.6

40

11

27.5

52

13

25

 

2007

40

9

22.5

35

9

25.7

33

3

9.1

108

21

19.4

 

2006

5

1

20

3

1

33.3

89

8

8.9

97

10

10.3

           

257

44

17.1

Tjore

2008

24

3

12.5

14

0

0

20

2

0.8

58

5

8.6

 

2007

19

0

0

22

0

0

21

0

0

63

0

0

 

2006

4

0

0

4

0

0

16

0

0

24

0

0

           

145

5

3.4

Hinnebu

2008

31

1

3.2

41

0

0

7

0

0

79

1

1.3

 

2007

27

0

0

18

0

0

5

0

0

50

0

0

 

2006

42

0

0

32

0

0

32

0

0

106

0

0

           

235

1

0.4

Jomfruland

2008

29

6

20.7

40

10

25

57

13

22.4

126

29

23.0

 

2007

50

8

16

32

3

9.4

49

4

8.2

131

15

11.5

 

2006

8

1

12.5

8

1

12.5

75

6

8

91

8

8.7

           

348

52

14.9

N = number of tested ticks; n = number of infected ticks

Discussion

Kurtenbach et al. [5] showed that sera from red deer were indiscriminating borrealicidal for the three human pathogenic strains. The reservoir incompetence of roe deer [32] and red deer [9] correlates with this borrealicidic effect. Complement appears relevant to host incompetency for Borrelia, and this carries over to prevent tick infection and lyse the spirochetes early in the midgut of the feeding tick, and are thereby eliminated by the host [10]. Low levels of B. burgdorferi s.l. in ticks werre found in both sites on Hitra (Table 2). No infected ticks were detected in Fjelløyvær during the three year period, and only a low level of B. burgdorferi s.l. in 2006 (4.1%) and in 2008 (1.9%) at Strøm (Table 2). Fjelløyvær has a very high abundance of roe deer, but red deer are nearly absent (Table 1). Strøm has a high abundance of both red and roe deer. We believe that the main route for the tick cycles is red deer and roe deer at Strøm and Fjelløyvær. The high abundance of deer gives high levels of ticks, but the serum incompetence will reduce both the infection in ticks and the risk of Lyme disease transmission.

This contrasts with the figures at Hinnebu where the infection rates with B. burgdorferi s.l. were 10%, 16.5% and 7.6% in 2006-2008 (Table 2). Hinnebu is forest-covered with a low density of moose and roe deer, and a low abundance of red deer. Harvest statistics show a much lower combined density of wild cervids at Hinnebu than at Fjelløyvær and Strøm (Table 1). Tjore has low densities of red deer and moose, and a moderate density of roe deer. Ticks collected outside a fenced red deer farm indicated that the presence of the farm had no influence on the level of B. burgdorferi s.l. The overall infection rates in ticks were 33.3% in 2006, 6.9% in 2007 and 5.2% in 2008. The capacity of deer to act as reservoirs for B. burgdorferi s.l., is controversial [33, 34]. However, our results clearly support the idea that wild cervids are incompetent reservoirs. Our results showed that the infection rates in questing ticks were significantly lower in areas with a high density of wild cervids (Fjelløyvær and Strøm) compared to sites with low density (Tjore and Hinnebu) (Tables 1 and 2).

B. afzelii genospecies from ticks dominated with 82% as shown in Table 3. This genospecies is related to rodents [7, 35, 36]. B. garinii was detected in Strøm, Tjore and Hinnebu while B. burgdorferi s.s was found on questing ticks from Jomfruland. Though Jomfruland has no wild cervids, it does have grazing domestic animals, plus migrating birds during spring and autumn. In this site we investigated 49 A. flavicollis mice and found an infection rate of 12.2% with B. burgdorferi s.l. Of 490 I. ricinus ticks feeding on rodents, 17 (3.5%) were infected with B. burgdorferi s.l., and B. burgdorferi s.l. was also detected in 15.3% (n = 262) of ticks feeding on blackbirds Turdus merula [Rosef, unpublished]. It seems that birds and rodents play an important role in maintaining Borrelia infection on Jomfruland. The prevalence of B. burgdorferi s.l. in ticks showed significantly lower values on Fjelløyvær than Jomfruland and Hinnebu than Jomfruland. In comparison there was no significance between Tjore and Jomfruland and Strøm and Jomfruland.

In contrast to infection with B. burgdorferi s.l., cervids are important reservoirs for A. phagocytophilum. Stuen et al. [13] found an overall high seroprevalence for A. phagocytophilum (formerly granulocytic Ehrlichia spp.) in moose, red deer and roe deer in Norway with 43%, 55% and 96% respectively. Experimental Anaplasma infection in red deer has shown subclinical persistent infection [37]. These wild ruminants are exposed to A. phagocytophilum and comprise the most widespread tick-borne infection in animals in Europe [38]. In Wisconsin, Michalski et al. [39] found a prevalence in ticks between 5.8% and 8.9%, and in white-tailed deer between 11.5% and 26% using PCR and DNA sequencing. A paretic condition in an A. phagocytophilum infected roe deer calf [40] and ehrlichiosis in a moose calf [12] has been observed in Norway. The high level of infected ticks at Fjelløyvær and Strøm (Table 4) not surprisingly shows that roe deer and red deer probably are competent reservoirs and vehicles for this bacterium.

A low prevalence of A. phagocytophilum in ticks from Hinnebu and Tjore was found in 2008 (Table 4) but it could not be detected in 2006 and 2007. The prevalence of A. phagocytophilum in host seeking I. ricinus ticks in Norway varied from zero to 19.4% in 18 sites investigated, with the highest prevalence occurring in Hitra [41]. The prevalence of A. phagocytophilum infections in ticks was significantly higher in localities with high density of wild cervids (Fjelløyvær and Strøm) compared to localities with lower densities (Tjore and Hinnebu) (Tables 1 and 4). An exception that cannot be explained occurred in 2008 when the prevalence of A. phagocytophilum was high in Tjore and low in Fjellværøy.

In Europe B. burgdorferi s.l. and A. phagocytophilum are transmitted by the same vector (I. ricinus), but it is unclear whether both pathogens use the same range of host species as reservoirs on a smaller scale. In Europe, studies conducted in the United Kingdom, Switzerland, Germany and the Czech Republic demonstrated that small rodents including Myodes glareolus, Microtus arvalis, Microtus agrestis, Apodermus flavicollis and Apodermus sylvaticus harbored A. phagocytophilum and were suggested as potential reservoirs [24, 4245]. In a study in Northern England, Bown et al. [42] described the maitainance of the enzootic cycle of A. phagocytophilum in the rodent -I. trianguliceps system. In a study conducted in Germany [43] A. phagocytophilum was detected in 13.4% of red bank voles and 6.2% of field voles. In contrast, only 0.5% of A. flavicollis was A. phagocytophilum positive. Investigations from Switzerland, England and Norway have shown that deer and sheep can be reservoir hosts [14, 40, 46]. Migrating birds have also been considered important in the dispersal of A. phagocytophilum infected I. ricinus in Europe and in the distribution of HGA [17, 38].

A. phagocytophilum could not be detected in 49 rodents and in 24 I. ricinus nymphs feeding on rodents investigated on Jomfruland, possibly because I. trianguliceps is the main vector for Anaplasma in rodents [24, 42]. A. phagocytophilum was found in ticks feeding on birds on Jomfruland [47]. This indicates that birds are involved in the maintenance of Anaplasma here, but rodents play only a minor role in the epidemiology of Anaplasma in the investigated areas in Norway. Hinnebu is located inland and is not on the main route of migrating birds. Tjore is near the coast, but not a typical site for migrating birds. Migrating birds, however, may play an important role as hosts for I. ricinus larvae and nymphs and probably for the infection route of Anaplasma (as for B. burgdorferi s.l.) [47]. On the island of Jomfruland the figures for A. phagocytophilum were 8.7%, 11.5% and 23% in 2006-2008. However, A. phagocytophilum was found on ticks feeding on birds in 33 out of 308 ticks investigated [47] on Jomfruland and also in questing ticks (Table 4). This indicates that birds are a possible reservoir. Both B. burgdorferi s.l. and A. phagocytophilum were found in ticks feeding on migrating birds and in questing ticks.

Conclusion

A high prevalence of A. phagocytophilum in questing ticks in sites with high abundance of deer (>3 killed animals per km2) and low prevalence of B. burgdorferi s.l. was found, and we conclude that deer may be important reservoirs of A. phagocytophilum and incompetent carriers for B. burgdorferi s.l., thereby reducing the infection rate on questing Ixodes ricinus ticks.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

We thank the Lithuanian State Science and Studies Foundation and Telemark University College for financial support.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Telemark University College
(2)
Vytautas Magnus University

References

  1. Wang G, van Dam AP, Schwartz I, Dankert J: Molecular typing of Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato: taxonomic, epidemiological, and clinical implications. Clin Microbiol Rev. 1999, 12: 633-653.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Balmelli T, Piffaretti JC: Association between clinical manifestations of Lyme disease and different species of Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato. Res Microbiol. 1995, 146: 329-340. 10.1016/0923-2508(96)81056-4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Lane RS, Piesman J, Burgdorfer W: Lyme borreliosis: Relation of its causative agent to its vectors and hosts in North America and Europe. Annu Rev Entomol. 1991, 36: 587-609. 10.1146/annurev.en.36.010191.003103.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Wilson ML, Telford SR, Piesman J, Spielman A: Reduced abundance of immature Ixodes dammini (Acari:Ixodidae) following elimination of deer. J Med Entomol. 1988, 25: 224-228.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Kurtenbach K, Sewell HS, Ogden NH, Randolph SE, Nuttal PA: Serum complement sensitivity as a Key factor in Lyme disease ecology. Infect Immun. 1998, 66: 1248-1251.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Thomas G, Jaenson T, Tällerklint L: Incompetence of roe deer as reservoirs of the Lyme borreliosis spirochete. J Med Entomol. 1992, 29: 813-817.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Kurtenbach K, De Michelis S, Etti S, Schäfer SM, Sewell HS, Brade V, Kraczy P: Host association of Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato- the key role of host complement. Trends Microbiol. 2002, 10: 74-79. 10.1016/S0966-842X(01)02298-3.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Matuschka F-R, Heiler M, Eiffert H, Fisher P, Lotter H, Spielman A: Diversionary role of hoofed game in the transmission of Lyme disease spirochetes. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1993, 48: 693-699.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Telford SR, Mather TN, Moore SI, Wilson ML, Spielman A: Incompetence of deer as reservoirs of the Lyme disease spirochete. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1988, 39: 105-109.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Kurtenbach K, Haninková K, Tsao JI, Margos G, Fish D, Ogden NH: Fundamental process in the evolutionary ecology of Lyme borreliosis. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2006, 4: 660-669. 10.1038/nrmicro1475.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Stuen S: Sjodogg (tick-borne fever) - a historical review. Nor Vet Tidsskr. 1998, 110: 703-706. in NorwegianGoogle Scholar
  12. Jenkins A, Handeland S, Stuen S, Schouls L, Pol Van De I, Meen RT, Kristiansen BE: Ehrlichiosis in a moose calf. J Wildl Dis. 2001, 37: 201-203.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Stuen S, Åkerstedt J, Bergstrøm K, Handeland K: Antibodies to granulocytic Ehrlichia in moose, red deer, and roe deer in Norway. J Wildl Dis. 2002, 38: 1-6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Liz JS, Sumner JW, Pfister K, Brossard M: PCR detection and serological evidence of granulocytic ehrlichial infection in roe deer (Capreolus capreolus) and chamois (Rupicapra rupicapra). J Clin Microbiol. 2002, 40: 892-897. 10.1128/JCM.40.3.892-897.2002.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Chen S-M, Dumler JS, Bakken JS, Walker D: Identification of granulocytotropic Ehrlichia species as the etiologic agent of human disease. J Clin Microbiol. 1994, 32: 589-595.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Parola P, Davoust B, Raoult D: Tick- and flea-borne rickettsial emerging zoonoses. Vet Res. 2005, 36: 469-492. 10.1051/vetres:2005004.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Bjöersdorff A, Berglund J, Kristiansen BE, Söderström C, Eliasson I: Varying clinical picture and course of human granulocytic ehrlichiosis. Twelve Scandinavian cases of the new tick borne zoonosis are presented. Läkartidningen. 1999, 96: 4200-42004. in SwedishPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Mehl R: The distribution and host relations of Norwegian ticks (Acari, Ixodides). Norw J Entomol. 1983, 30: 46-51.Google Scholar
  19. Jaenson TGT, Tällerklint L, Lundquist L, Olsén B, Chirico J, Mejlon H: Geographical distribution, host associations and vector roles of ticks (Acari, Ixodidae & Argasidae) in Sweden. J Med Entomol. 1994, 31: 240-256.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Jääskeläinen AE, Tikkakoski T, Uzcátegui NY, Alekseev AN, Vaheri A, Vapalahti O: Siberian subtype Tickborne Encephalitis Virus, Finland. Emerg Infect Dis. 2006, 12: 1568-1571.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Petrovec M, Sumner JW, Nicholson WL, Childs JE, Strle F, Barlič J, Lotrič-Furlan S, Avšič Županc T: Identity of Ehrlichial DNA sequences derivered from Ixodes ricinus ticks with those obtained from patients with human granulocytic ehrlichiosis in Slovenia. J Clin Microbiol. 1999, 37: 209-210.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Zhang L, Shan A, Mathew B, Yin J, Fu X, Zhang J, Lu J, Xu J, Dumler S: Rickettsial seroepidemiology among farm workers, Tianjin, People's Republic of China. Emerg Infect Dis. 2008, 14: 938-940. 10.3201/eid1406.071502.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Walder G, Lkhamsuren E, Shagdar A, Bataa J, Batmunckh T, Orth D, Heinz FX, Danichova A, Khasnatinov MA, Würzner R, Dierich MP: Serological evidence for tick borne encephalitis, borreliosis, and human granulocytic anaplasmosis in Mongolia. Int J Med Microbiol. 2006, 296: 69-75. 10.1016/j.ijmm.2006.01.031.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Bown KJ, Begon M, Bennett M, Woldehiwet Z, Ogden NH: Seasonal dynamics of Anaplasma phagocytophila in a rodent-tick (Ixodes trianguliceps) system, United Kingdom. Emerg Infect Dis. 2003, 9: 63-70.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Hillyard R: Ticks of North-West Europe. Synopsis of the British Fauna (New Series). Edited by: Barnes RSK, Crothers JH. The Natural Historical Museum, London, 58: 178-
  26. Stañczak J, Racewics M, Kubica-Biernat B, Kruminis-Łozowska W, Dabrownski J, Adamczyk A, Markowska M: Prevalence of Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato in Ixodes ricinus ticks (Acari, Ixodidae) in different Polish woodlands. Ann Agr Environ Med. 1999, 6: 127-132.Google Scholar
  27. Ambrasienë D, Turčinavičiene J, Vaščilo I, Žygutiene M: The prevalence of Borrelia burgdorferi in Ixodes ricinus ticks detected by PCR in Lithuania. Vet Med Zoot. 2004, 28: 45-47.Google Scholar
  28. Fukanaga M, Yabuki M, Hamase A, Oliver J, Nakao M: Molecular phylogenetic analysis of Ixodic ticks based on the ribosomal DNA spacer, internal transcribed spacer, sequenses. J Parasit. 2000, 86: 38-43. 10.2307/3284905.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Radzijevskaja J, Indriulytë R, Paulauskas A, Ambrasienë D, Turčinavičienë J: Genetic polymorphism study in Ixodes ricinus L. ticks populations of Lithuania using RAPD markers. Acta Zool Lith. 2005, 15: 341-348.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Demaerschalck I, Massaoud A, Kesel M, Hoyois B, Lobet Y, Hoet , Bigaignon G, Bollen A, Godfroid E: Simultaneous presence of different Borrelia burgdorferi genospecies in biological fluids of Lyme disease patients. J Clin Microbiol. 1995, 33: 602-608.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Cortney JW, Kostelnik LM, Zeidner NS, Massung RF: Multiplex real-time PCR for detection of Anaplasma phagocytophilum 2004. and Borrelia burgdorferi. J Clin Microbiol. 2004, 42: 3164-3168. 10.1128/JCM.42.7.3164-3168.2004.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. Jaenson TGT, Tällerklint L: Incompetence of roe deer as reservoirs of the Lyme borreliosis spirochete. J Med Entmol. 1992, 29: 813-817.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  33. Oliver JH, Stallknecht D, Chandler FW, James AM, McGuire BS, Howerth E: Detection of Borrelia burgdorferi in laboratory-related Ixodes dammini (Acari:Ixodidae) fed on experimentally inoculated white-tailed deer. J Med Entomol. 1992, 29: 980-984.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Pichon B, Mousson L, Figureau C, Rodhain F, Perez-Eid C: Density of deer in relation to the prevalence of Borrelia burgdorferi s.l. in Ixodes ricinus nymhs in Ramboillet forest, France. Exp Appl Acarol. 1999, 23: 267-275. 10.1023/A:1006023115617.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Hanincová K, Schäfer S, Etti S, Sewell H, Taragelova V, Ziak D, Labuda M, Kurtenbach K: Association of Borrelia afzelii with rodents in Europe. Parasitology. 2003, 126: 11-20. 10.1017/S0031182002002548.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Humair PF, Gern L: The wild hidden face of Lyme borreliosis in Europe. Microbes Infect. 2000, 2: 915-922. 10.1016/S1286-4579(00)00393-2.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Stuen S, Handeland K, Frammarsvik T, Bergstrøm K: Experimental Ehrlichia phagocytophila infection in red deer (Cervus elaphus). Vet Rec. 2001, 149: 390-392.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Stuen S: Anaplasma phagocytophilum - the most widespread tick-borne infection in animals in Europe. Vet Res Comm. 2007, 31 (suppl): 79-84. 10.1007/s11259-007-0071-y.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  39. Michalski M, Rosenfield C, Erickson M, Selle R, Bates K, Essar D, Massung R: Anaplasma phagocytophilum in central and western Wisconsin: a molecular survey. Parasitol Res. 2006, 99: 694-699. 10.1007/s00436-006-0217-9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Stuen S, Moum T, Bernhoft A, Sirkka V: A paretic condition in an Anaplasma phagocytophilum infected roe deer. J Wildl Dis. 2006, 42: 170-174.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Rosef O, Radzijevskaja J, Paulauskas A, Haslekås C: The prevalence of Anaplasma phagocytophilum in host-seeking Ixodes ricinus ticks in Norway. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2009, 15 (Suppl 1):
  42. Bown KJ, Begon M, Bennett M, Birtles RJ, Burthe S, Lambin X, Telfer S, Woldehiwet Z, Ogden NH: Sympatric Ixodes trianguliceps and Ixodes ricinus ticks feeding on field voles (Microtus agretis): Potential for increased risk of Anaplasma phagocytophilum in the United Kingdom?. Vector-Borne Zoonot Dis. 2006, 6: 404-410. 10.1089/vbz.2006.6.404.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  43. Hartelt K, Pluta S, Oehme R, Kimmig P: Spread of ticks and tick-borne diseases in Germany due to global warming. Parasitol Res. 2008, 103 (Suppl 1):
  44. Hulínská D, Langrová K, Pejčoch M, Pavlásek I: Detection of Anaplasma phagocytophilum in animals by real-time polymerase reaction. APMIS. 2004, 112: 239-247. 10.1111/j.1600-0463.2004.apm11204-0503.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Liz JS, Anderes L, Sumner JW, Massung RF, Gern L, Rutti B, Brossard M: PCR detection of granulocytic Ehrlichia in Ixodes ricinus ticks and wild small mammals in wester Switzerland. J Clin Microbiol. 2000, 38: 1002-1007.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Ogden NH, Casey ANJ, Woldehiwet Z, French NP: Transmission of Anaplasma phagocytophilum to Ixodes ricinus ticks from sheep in the acute and post acute phases of infection. Anaplasma phagocytophilum. 2003, 71: 2071-2078.Google Scholar
  47. Paulauskas A, Radzijevskaja J, Rosef O: Anaplasma in ticks feeding on migrating birds and questing ticks in Lithuania and Norway. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2009, 15 (Suppl 1):

Copyright

© Rosef et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2009

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Advertisement