Skip to main content

Table 4 Results of cultivation of bacteria from samplesa of spoiled moose meat

From: Unexplained bacterial meat spoilage during the moose hunting in northern Norway – a review of cases 2008–2021

Sample No.

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

Shot (date)

08.10. 2008

12.10. 2008

02.10. 2009

12.10. 2009

07.09. 2010

06.09. 2011

06.10. 2011

11.10. 2011

28.09. 2015

2015

25.9. 2020

27.9. 2020

27.9. 2020

County

Fi

Fi

Fi

Tro

Fi

Fi

Fi

Fi

No

?

Tro

Tro

Tro

ID in Additional file 1 (only from Finnmark)

3

Not registered

16

-

22

29

34

35

-

-

-

-

-

Meat spoilage detected (days after shooting)

5

4

1

7

3

2

?

1

?

?

3

1

3

Sample received (days after shooting)

8

10

11

8

7

8

5

7

10

?

11

9

30

Pre-analysis handling

?

Frozen

Frozen

Delivered directly to lab

Mail with cooling

Mail without cooling

Mail without cooling

Express mail with cooling

Delivered directly to lab

Delivered directly to lab

Kept cool, delivered directly to lab

Frozen

Sub-samples /sample sites

 

Greenc

Freshc

Spoiled

Controld

Spoiled

Controld

Spoiled

Controld

  

Spoiled

Controle

     

Mixed aerobe bacteria

+

+++

-

-

-

+++

-

+++

+

+++

(+)

+++

++

++

++

++

+++

++

E. coli

+

    

+++

   

+++

 

+++

++

++

++

   

Serratia  sp.

 

+++

                

Pseudomonas  sp.

+

+++

       

+++

N. e.

  

N. e.

N. e.

N. e.

N. e.

N. e.

Gram positive cocci b

 

+++

   

+++

 

+++

        

+++

 

Clostridium perfringens

     

+++

  

+

+++

 

+++

      

Swarming Clostridium  sp.

 

+++

++

+++

 

+++

 

+++

 

+++

+++

+++

 

+++f

 

+++

+++g

 

Indole reaction of  Clostridium  sp. isolates

 

Pos

Pos

Pos

 

Pos

 

Pos

 

Pos

Not tested

Pos and neg

 

Neg

 

Pos

Pos

 
  1. a Samples received at the Norwegian Veterinary Institute, Tromsø. The samples originate from the three northernmost counties in Norway: Nordland (No), Troms (Tro) and Finnmark (Fi) in the years 2008–2020
  2. (+), single colonies; +, sparse; ++, moderate; +++, rich or dominating;
  3. N. e., Not examined (not cultured at 20 °C); Pos, positive; Neg, negative; ?, unknown
  4. b Gram positive cocci includes Micrococcus sp., Staphylococcus sp. and alfa-haemolytic Streptococcus sp
  5. c Two different sample sites, one with greenish discolouration, the other with fresh colour
  6. d Control samples taken from macroscopically unaffected parts of the carcass
  7. e Control sample from a different animal, shot the same day, treated in the same manner, not spoiled
  8. f Identified as Clostridium septicum
  9. g Identified as Clostridium sordellii