Table 3 The distribution of resistance phenotypes among Escherichiacoli isolates from pups in two kennels (A and B).
From: Clonal spread of antimicrobial-resistant Escherichia coli isolates among pups in two kennels
| Resistance patternsa | No. of resistant isolates (%)/No. of pups that harboured resistant isolate (s) (%) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Total | Kennel A | Kennel B | |
| (n = 86/43) | (n = 50/25) | (n = 36/18) | |
| AMP-CFZ-CFT-OTC-CHL-NAL-ENR | 5 (5.8)/3 (7.0) | 0 (0)/0 (0) | 5 (13.9)/3 (16.7) |
| AMP-DHS-GEN-KAN-OTC-CHL-SXT | 3 (3.5)/2 (4.7) | 3 (6.0)/2 (8.0) | 0 (0)/0 (0) |
| AMP-DHS-GEN-OTC-CHL-NAL-SXT | 1 (1.2)/1 (2.3) | 1 (2.0)/1 (4.0) | 0 (0)/0 (0) |
| AMP-DHS-GEN-OTC-CHL-SXT | 11 (12.8)/9 (20.9) | 11 (22.0)/9 (36.0) | 0 (0)/0 (0) |
| AMP-DHS-GEN-CHL-SXT | 1 (1.2)/1 (2.3) | 1 (2.0)/1 (4.0) | 0 (0)/0 (0) |
| AMP-DHS-OTC-SXT | 2 (2.3)/1 (2.3) | 2 (4.0)/1 (4.0) | 0 (0)/0 (0) |
| AMP-DHS-CHL-SXT | 1 (1.2)/1 (2.3) | 1 (2.0)/1 (4.0) | 0 (0)/0 (0) |
| AMP-DHS-SXT | 16 (18.6)/13 (30.2) | 8 (16.0)/8 (32.0) | 8 (22.2)/5 (27.8) |
| AMP-DHS-CHL | 1 (1.2)/1 (2.3) | 1 (2.0)/1 (4.0) | 0 (0)/0 (0) |
| AMP-DHS | 10 (11.6)/6 (14.0) | 0 (0)/0 (0) | 10 (27.8)/6 (33.3) |
| DHS-SXT | 1 (1.2)/1 (2.3) | 0 (0)/0 (0) | 1 (2.8)/1 (5.6) |
| AMP | 1 (1.2)/1 (2.3) | 1 (2.0)/1 (4.0) | 0 (0)/0 (0) |
| DHS | 10 (11.6)/7 (16.3) | 7 (14.0)/5 (20.0) | 3 (8.3)/2 (11.1) |
| OTC | 1 (1.2)/1 (2.3) | 1 (2.0)/1 (4.0) | 0 (0)/0 (0) |
| NAL | 1 (1.2)/1 (2.3) | 1 (2.0)/1 (4.0) | 0 (0)/0 (0) |
| Susceptible | 21 (24.4)/13 (30.2) | 12 (24.0)/7 (28.0) | 9 (25.0)/6 (33.3) |
