Skip to main content

Table 3 Associations between litter PWD status and individual dam- and litter-level risk factors after controlling for farm and design effects

From: Dam characteristics associated with pre-weaning diarrhea in mink (Neovison vison)

Exposure variable

N

Fixed effect of the exposure variable in the model

Fixed effect of the extraneous design variable

PWD+

PWD−

OR

CI95% of OR

P

High vs. low farm PWD prevalencea

OR

CI95% of OR

P

Only farm PWD status in the model

70

  

8.61

2.29; 32.30

0.002

Female characteristics

 Age of dam (1-year/> 1-year)

70b

25/4

20/21

8.54

1.97; 36.98

0.005

10.10

2.55; 40.05

0.002

 Number of kits observed after birth (> 5/≤ 5)

70

15/14

2/39

25.00

3.91; 159.68

0.001

8.88

2.13; 37.00

0.004

 Body mass indexb (≤ 17.7/> 17.7)

70

14/15

24/17

0.62

0.19; 2.02

0.42

8.80

2.31; 33.56

0.002

 Number of active glands per mink kit (≤ 1.5/> 1.5)

70

15/14

10/31

4.92

1.29; 18.79

0.02

11.14

2.69; 46.10

0.001

 Weight of mammary gland tissue per kit (g) (> 12.19/≤ 12.19)

68c

8/20

18/22

2.02

0.58; 7.00

0.26

9.61

2.46; 37.5

0.002

Bacteriology of mammary gland

 Bacterial growth of mammary gland (±)

70

6/23

3/38

9.08

1.25; 65.71

0.03

13.19

3.03; 57.38

0.001

Histology of mammary gland

 Infiltration of MNL (more/few)

70

13/16

16/25

0.80

0.24; 2.68

0.72

9.16

2.32; 36.18

0.002

 Infiltration of PNL (present/absent)

70

6/23

7/34

1.82

0.37; 9.01

0.45

9.30

2.36; 36.61

0.002

 Mammary tissue oedema (±)

70

11/18

15/26

0.72

0.21; 2.45

0.60

9.22

2.35; 36.18

0.002

 Mammary tissue calcification (> 2/≤ 2 per slide)

70

1/28

1/40

2.36

0.07; 76.69

0.62

8.91

2.29; 34.63

0.002

 Mammary corpora amylacea (> 4/≤ 4 per slide)

70

3/26

7/34

0.72

0.12; 4.36

0.72

8.56

2.24; 32.68

0.002

 Excess fibrous connective tissue (±)

70

2/27

2/39

0.47

0.05; 4.94

0.52

9.76

2.42; 39.45

0.002

  1. All models included Farm ID as random effect variable. All models included two fixed effects explanatory variables of which the extraneous design variable “Farm PWD status” with high farm prevalence vs. low farm prevalence of litters with PWD was forced into each model and one exposure variable of interest, e.g. “Age of dam”. Each line represents one model
  2. BMI body mass index, MNL mononuclear leucocytes, PNL polymorphonuclear leucocytes
  3. a >/<10% prevalence affected litters
  4. bThe 70 litters in the analysis are dichotomized according the the exposure level and disease status. Thus, as an example, the model with “Age of dam” had 25, 4, 20 and 21 litters in the categories and sums up to 70
  5. cInformation was missing for two dams