Skip to main content

Table 3 Proportion of resistance of Enterococcus faecalis and Enterococcus faecium isolates originating from faecal samples of healthy cattle and swine in 2010–2015 in Estonia

From: Antimicrobial resistance of Escherichia coli and Enterococcus spp. isolated from Estonian cattle and swine from 2010 to 2015

Antimicrobial

Cut-off values for resistance (mg/L)*

Healthy animals

Dairy cattle (n = 51)

Swine (n = 60)

%

(95% CI)

%

(95% CI)

Ampicillin

> 4

0.0

NA

1.7

(− 1.6 to 5.0)

Erythromycin

> 4

21.6

(10.3 to 21.9)

26.7

(15.5 to 37.9)

Virginiamycin

E. faecalis

> 32

1.9

(− 1.9 to 5.7)

5.0

(− 0.5 to 10.5)

E. faecium

> 4

Gentamycin

> 32

1.9

(− 1.9 to 5.7)

1.7

(− 1.6 to 5.0)

Streptomycin**

E. faecalis

> 512

11.7

(2.9 to 20.5)

35.0

(22.9 to 47.1)

E. faecium

> 128

Kanamycin**

> 1024

3.9

(− 1.4 to 9.2)

26.7

(1.5 to 37.9)

Tetracycline

> 4

33.3

(20.4 to 46.2)

40.4

(27.6 to 52.4)

Chloramphenicol

> 32

1.9

(− 1.9 to 5.7)

6.7

(0.8 to 13.3)

Vancomycin

> 4

5.9

(− 0.63 to 9.4)

10.0

(2.4 to 17.6)

Narasin

> 2

3.9

(− 1.4 to 9.2)

3.3

(− 1.2 to 7.8)

Bacitracin

> 32

3.9

(− 1.4 to 9.2)

6.6

(0.4 to 13.3)

Linezolid

> 4

0.0

NA

1.7

(− 1.6 to 5.0)

  1. * Swedres-Svarm 2015. Consumption of antibiotics and occurrence of antibiotic resistance in Sweden. Solna/Uppsala ISSN 1650-6332, 117, Table 2.17
  2. ** Statistically significant difference (P < 0.05) between resistant Enterococcus spp. isolates from healthy dairy cattle and swine. Corresponding percentages are also presented in italics face