Skip to main content

Table 3 Progress towards the development of suitable platforms for PPRV isolation, maintenance and production of biosafe antigen

From: Paradigm shift in the diagnosis of peste des petits ruminants: scoping review

Platform

Strength (s)

Limitation (s)

References

Primary cell culture

Cheap and easily accessible

Variations in batches and low quality due to the presence of endogenous viruses

[53, 77, 80,81,82]

Vero cells

Easy to maintain in culture

Low infection efficiency compared to lymphoid cells

[42, 81, 83]

Madin-Darby bovine kidney epithelial cell line (MDBK)

Suitable for PPRV isolation.

Requires multiple sequential blind passages for visible cytopathic effect

[84]

MDBK-nectin-4 cell line

Rapid for clinical isolation of PPRV

Only limited to Nectin-4 and high overhead cost

[85, 86]

Baby hamster kidney (BHK-21)

Suitable for growth kinetics of PPRV

PPRV replicates at relatively lower titers in BHK-21 cells

[87, 88]

Vero-SLAM

Highly efficient for PPRV isolation

Prone to fungal and bacterial contaminations

[79, 89, 90]

Vero dog SLAM-L protein (VDS-L)

Produces biosafe antigens in low level biocontainment

Prone to fungal and bacterial contaminations

[91]

Alpine goats

Suitable for in vivo pathological studies

Require high level containment

[92]