Skip to main content
Download PDF

Risk factors for Toxoplasma gondii infection in dogs: a serological survey

Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica volume 66, Article number: 14 (2024) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Dogs, as well as a wide variety of other warm-blooded animals, act as intermediate host of Toxoplasma gondii. In dogs, most cases of toxoplasmosis are subclinical, although clinical disease has been sporadically reported. Beyond its role in diagnostic pathways, seropositivity also functions as a reflection of the parasite’s spread within the dog’s living environment. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the possible risk factor associated with seropositivity to T. gondii in dogs in Central-Northern Italy, analysing 120 dogs sera for the presence of IgG antibodies by indirect fluorescence antibody test (IFAT).

Results

The population examined was composed of 54.2% hunting dogs, 24.2% companion dogs, 14.2% truffle dogs and 7.5% watchdogs. Thirty-four (29.2%) dogs tested positive for T. gondii IgG, with titres ranging from 1:40 to 1:1280. Seroprevalence and antibodies titres were not related to dog gender, age or function. The logistic regression and ordered logistic regression results indicated that seroprevalence, and antibody titres were significantly higher in dogs cohabiting with cats, exhibiting coprophagy habits, and living constantly outdoors. Notably, the lifestyle factor showed the highest odds-ratios in the study: dogs living constantly outdoors were found to be at approximately 5 times greater risk of testing positive and having higher antibody titres compared to dogs living both indoors and outdoors.

Conclusion

Both logistic and ordered logistic regression results support the key role of living with cats, engaging in coprophagy behaviours, and maintaining an outdoor lifestyle in increasing the risk of T. gondii infection in dogs. These identified risk factors collectively suggest that both ingesting oocysts, as observed through cat cohabitation and coprophagy, and engaging in predatory behaviours, as possible for outdoor living dogs, are indicating likely sources of T. gondii infection in this host species.

Background

Toxoplasma gondii is a worldwide Apicomplexan protozoan that infects virtually all warm-blooded species including humans, livestock, birds, and pets [1]. It has been estimated that approximately one third of the world human population is infected with T. gondii, with the prevalence varying greatly depending on the geographical area [2, 3]. Domestic and wild felids are definitive host, harbouring the sexual stages of the parasite in their small intestine, releasing environmentally resistant oocysts. In all the other hosts, after the infection, asexual reproduction occurs, leading to bradyzoites cyst formation in several tissues. However, T. gondii can also undergo asexual reproduction in felids, that can therefore act also as intermediate host [4].

In many animal species, infection is typically subclinical, although toxoplasmosis can be lethal in several host species, including pets. Toxoplasma infection in dogs is often associated with low morbidity and mortality rates; indeed, primary clinical toxoplasmosis is infrequently observed in dogs, which is usually associated with previous immunosuppression [5]. The clinical aspects of canine toxoplasmosis range from nonspecific symptoms such as fever, lymphadenopathy, dyspnoea and gastrointestinal signs, to neurological signs characterized by epilepsy, cranial nerve deficits, tremors, ataxia, paresis, and paralysis. Other clinical features described are noise sensitivity, myositis, ocular diseases, and cutaneous signs associated with immunosuppressant therapies [5,6,7,8,9,10].

Seropositivity for Toxoplasma in dogs is not only an aid in the differential diagnosis of clinical cases, but has also epidemiological significance, reflecting the circulation of the parasite in the environment [1]. The seroprevalence of T. gondii in free-living animals, like stray dogs, serves as a valuable indicator for environmental contamination by T. gondii oocysts. These animals, sharing similar environmental risks with humans and wildlife, act as sentinel species. Monitoring their seroprevalence provides an indirect yet effective strategy to assess the distribution of T. gondii exposure in the environment [11,12,13,14]. The contact with oocysts may have other consequences besides infection of the dog. Indeed, it has been shown that dogs can act as mechanical transporters of T. gondii oocysts. They can excrete infective oocyst after ingestion of infected cat faeces, suggesting that coprophagy, with a subsequent intestinal passage by dogs, plays a role in the dissemination of T. gondii [15]. Additionally, dogs can vehicle oocysts on the fur after rolling over cat stool [16, 17]. As a result, mechanical transmission of T. gondii oocysts to humans can occur from dogs via their body surface, mouth, and feet [1].

Toxoplasma gondii infection has a cosmopolitan distribution, and seroprevalence in dogs depends on geographical region, living environment, and lifestyle of the dog. In general, according to the data reported in literature, the risk of infection with T. gondii increases throughout life, due to an increasing cumulative risk of exposure, and the seroprevalence is higher in rural than in urban areas [1, 18, 19]. In addition, it has been observed in several studies that dogs living outdoors have a higher risk of infection than indoor dogs [20,21,22,23,24].

As in humans, dogs can become infected with T. gondii through a variety of sources, including ingestion of water or food/feed containing sporulated oocysts, ingestion of raw or inadequately cooked meat containing cysts with bradyzoites, or transplacental infection [4]. Depending on the living environment of the dog, seropositivity may have different epidemiological implications. On the one hand, dogs living in anthropogenic areas have been shown to mirror seropositivity in humans, probably due to similar exposure to contaminated water and the environment [25]. On the other hand, stray or hunting dogs, whose Toxoplasma exposure is also related to the consumption of small wild prey, may be an indicator of the spread of the parasite in a wild area [20, 26].

The aim of the present work was to evaluate the risk factors for T. gondii infection in dogs with different uses, in an area of Italy where Toxoplasma infection previously have been detected in dogs [27] and in wild animals [27,28,29].

Methods

The study was based on convenience sampling involving the use of sera from 120 dogs collected for other research/diagnostic purposes from 20 municipalities in three provinces (Bologna, Rimini and Pesaro-Urbino) in 2018–2019 (Fig. 1). Blood sampling was carried out by venipuncture. Sera were obtained by centrifugation for 10 min at 980 g and stored at -20 °C until use. Inclusion criteria for enrolment included: regular outdoor access; no treatment for internal worms (including Dirofilaria immitis prophylaxis) in the month before the study, six months of age or older, and signed informed consent of the owner. A questionnaire was submitted to the owners in order to obtain information about age, gender, main use or function, housing (hosted or not in house during the night), lifestyle (living exclusively outdoor or hosted in house/boxes when not in activity), cohabitation with cats and coprophagy habits.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Geographical distribution of the dogs included in the study. Legend: Highlighted in blue are the provinces of Italy where sampling was conducted, specifically Bologna, Rimini, and Pesaro-Urbino. Black icons represent negative cases, while red icons denote positive cases Toxoplasma gondii infection, positioned within their respective geographic areas of origin

Full size image

Toxoplasma gondii indirect fluorescent antibody test (IFAT) for IgG (MegaFLUO TOXOPLASMA g, MegaCor Diagnostik, Hoerbranz, Austria) was performed on serum samples, following the manufacturer’s instructions. Briefly, slides coated with T. gondii infected cells were probed with 20µL of serum diluted in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) with a starting dilution of 1:40. Slides were incubated for 30 min at 37 °C and washed two times with PBS. Canine positive and negative control sera were included on each slide. The slides were thereafterprobed with 20µL of fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC) conjugated anti-dog IgG antibody diluted in PBS at a concentration of 1:32 (Anti-Dog IgG-FITC antibody, Sigma-Aldrich, Saint Louis, MO) and incubated for 30 min at 37 °C. After two further washing steps with PBS, they were examined under a fluorescent microscope. The highest dilution showing fluorescence was the final antibody titre. Serum samples with antibody titre ≥ 1:40 were assessed positive, as 1:40 is the cut-off adopted for diagnostic purpose in different diagnostic facilities in the same area [27].

Statistical analysis was conducted using STATA 12.1. Prior to the analysis, the age of the dogs was grouped into three categories: ≤3 years, > 3 years and ≤ 7 years, > 7 years in order to obtain a uniform distribution of dogs in three age groups. The relationship between the prevalence of toxoplasmosis and various dog-related factors (such as age categories, gender, function, housing, lifestyle, cohabitation with cats, and coprophagy habits) was assessed using multivariable logistic regression. This approach allowed us to estimate the odds-ratio while keeping all other factors in the model constant; odds-ratio is a common approximation of the relative risk in cross-sectional surveys, indicating the likelihood of testing positive for toxoplasmosis in relation to each factor. To evaluate the relationship between antibody titres and the same dog-related factors considered for the prevalence analysis, multivariable ordered logistic regression was employed. Before this analysis, positive titres were log-transformed as log2(titre/10) to create a more manageable scale for calculations. The transformation did not alter the significance of the model, but it facilitated result interpretation. The dependent variable of the model, the transformed titre, represents an ordinal scale reflecting an underlying continuous measure, i.e., the concentration of antibodies. By using this model, we were able to estimate the odds ratio for each tested factor, considering the influence of each factor on increasing or decreasing antibody titres while keeping all other factors in the model constant.

Results

The dogs were uniformly distributed in gender and age categories (Table 1). Concerning their function, hunting dogs made up the largest group (51.7%). All the dogs had regular outdoor access, as inclusion criteria, and most of them (71.7%) were not hosted in the house during the night. Nevertheless, only a small part of dogs lived exclusively outdoors (19.2%). The main function of the dogs influenced the housing and the lifestyle: all the hunting dogs (100%) were hosted outside (in kennel boxes) during the night, significantly differing from the other categories (Chi-square test: p < 0.01). In fact, most pet dogs (96.5%), and some truffle dogs (20%) and watchdogs (22.2%) were housed inside the owners’ homes during the night. On the other hand, considering lifestyle, hunting dogs lived in kennels when not actively engaged in hunting activities, but only 12.7% of them had a complete outdoor lifestyle (not differing significantly from pets: 3.4%). The predominant lifestyle for watchdogs was to remain outdoor (88.9%), differing from the other categories (Chi-square test: p < 0.05).

Table 1 Descriptive statistics and serological test results
Full size table

Of the dogs in the study, 39.2% were reported to cohabit with cats, irrespective of the function of the dog. Interestingly, the habit of coprophagy, i.e., consuming faeces, was primarily observed in truffle dogs, with 65% of them exhibiting this behaviour. Companion dogs ranked second, with 50% of them having records of coprophagy according to the owner report.

Concerning the serological analysis, 35 out of 120 serum samples examined tested positive for T. gondii antibodies, resulting in a seroprevalence of 29.2% (95% CI = 21.1-37.2%).

The logistic regression results (Table 2) indicate that the seroprevalence, representing the probability of having been infected, is significantly higher in dogs cohabiting with cats, exhibiting coprophagy habits, and living constantly outdoors. This finding is consistent with the results from the ordered logistic regression (Table 3), where the antibody titres were significantly higher in dogs living with cats, having coprophagy habits, and constant outdoor living. Notably, the lifestyle factor showed the highest odds-ratios in the study. Dogs living outdoors constantly were found to be at approximately five times greater risk of testing positive and having higher antibody titres compared to dogs living both indoors and outdoors. In seropositive dogs, there appears to be a tendency for the antibody titres to increase with the age category; however, the differences observed were not statistically significant.

Table 2 Result of the logistic regression model having seropositivity as dependent variable
Full size table
Table 3 Result of Ordered logistic regression model having the log-transformed titre as dependent variable
Full size table

Discussion

In the current investigation, a comprehensive spectrum of factors encompassing age categories, gender, function, housing arrangements, lifestyle, cohabitation with cats, and coprophagy habits was systematically scrutinized to discern and assess the risk factors intrinsically associated with T. gondii infection in dogs.

Recent data available on T. gondii seroprevalence in dogs in different countries of the world are quite divergent, even in the context of the same country: in Brazil it varies from 7.9 to 48.8% [30, 31], in China, T. gondii prevalence ranges from 4.4 to 40.3% [32, 33]. Of owned dogs in Bangkok, Thailand, 7.9% were found to be T. gondii positive in 2021 [24]. In the Americas, varying prevalence rates of T. gondii infection in dogs have been documented. Notably, studies have reported a prevalence of 16.8% in Colombia [34], and higher rates of 21% and 42.8% in the United States [1]. Particularly noteworthy are the elevated seroprevalence figures recorded in Mexican dogs, with rates of 59% [35] 61.7% [36] and 67.3% [14]. Regarding Europe, the prevalence reported in dogs (from Spain and Poland) was about 30% [20, 37], showing a similarity with our results. The seroprevalence observed in the present study, quantified at 29.2%, corresponds with seroprevalence data recently revealed in Northern Italy [27] pertaining to owned dogs, but with no concurrent risk factor analysis. It is noteworthy that the seroprevalence figures available in Italy are marked by notable variability. In the Campania Region, a survey involving a canine cohort of 398 hunting dogs unveiled a prevalence of 24% [38], in accordance with our findings. In contrast, findings presented by Macrì et al. [39] in Rome, encompassing both public kennel occupants and privately-owned dogs, disclosed a prevalence of 64%. The conspicuous divergence in these infection indexes is attributed, in part, to the utilization of disparate cut-off titres for seropositivity determination, being 1:50 and 1:20, respectively, for the aforementioned studies [38, 39]. This variance in cut-off titres unquestionably has had impact on the reported prevalence figures. The overarching challenge arising from these dissimilarities is the absence of standardized serological techniques and universally accepted initial cut-offs for diagnosing dog toxoplasmosis. Information available in scientific literature shows that the cut-off values employed for serological diagnosis of T. gondii in dogs using IFAT vary between 1:16 and 1:64 [1]. The absence of a standardized approach compromises the comparability of epidemiological data across studies, thereby precluding a comprehensive analysis of the actual epidemiological landscape prevalent within a given region.

The outcomes of the logistic regression analysis offer notable insights into the factors associated with T. gondii infection in the canine population under study.

Firstly, it is noteworthy that the seroprevalence exhibited a noticeable increase in dogs cohabiting with cats. This observation aligns with the findings of the ordered logistic regression analysis, where higher antibody titres were consistently observed in dogs sharing a living environment with cats. This correspondence across both regression analyses reinforces the notion that feline cohabitation serves as a significant predictor of heightened T. gondii infection risk. Following the excretion of the parasite in the faeces of infected felids, T. gondii oocysts have the potential to contaminate soil [40]. Given the restricted spectrum of definitive host species for T. gondii, limited exclusively to felids, the distribution of oocysts within the soil does not occur randomly. Instead, there is a discernible propensity for oocysts to aggregate in proximity to or within sites of cat defecation [41, 42]. These factors imply that living alongside cats increases the probability of being exposed to an environment contaminated with Toxoplasma oocysts, consequently increasing the potential for infection in the dogs that share the living space with felids.

Secondly, the coprophagy habits exhibited a similar pattern of association. Dogs displaying this behaviour showed an increased likelihood of seropositivity, as substantiated by their high antibody titres. The inclination to coprophagy, predominantly observed in this study among truffle dogs, followed by pet dogs, seemed to be less prevalent among hunting dogs based on the data analysis. However, the unique housing conditions associated with this dog category might lead to an underestimation of this variable, as these animals frequently remain out of the owner’s direct observation, potentially resulting in a lack of documentation for this behaviour. Coprophagy is a common behaviour among dogs. Dogs may consume their own faeces, faeces of other dogs and/or faeces of other species [43], including cats. Given that cats can shed millions of oocysts through their faeces during the course of sexual reproduction of T. gondii [4], the consistent habit of coprophagy, where dogs consume feline stool, places them at a significantly heightened risk of infection through oocysts.

The identification of heightened infection risk in dogs with behaviours such as cohabitating with cats or engaging in coprophagy emphasizes the environmental origin of these infections. This underscores the important role of dogs as sentinels, highlighting their importance in detecting and signalling environmental contamination with T. gondii oocysts [11,12,13,14].

Thirdly, the consistent outdoor residency of dogs emerged as a particularly prominent risk factor. It is noteworthy that this is true regardless of the dog’s function.

Actually, it might be expected that hunting dogs, that can more easily engage in predatory behaviour and are more likely exposed to game meat, would have been at higher risk of infection [44] Our results, thanks to multivariable analysis that evaluated different covariates avoiding possible confounding effects among them, did not support this assumption disentangling the importance of function and lifestyle as risk factors.

The consistency of the association between toxoplasmosis and “living outdoor” underscores the significance of the outdoor environment as a risk factor; it implies that the dog is subjected to prolonged exposure to potential sources of infection, including environmental oocysts, feline faeces and potentially infected small mammals or avian prey, independently to their function.

Conclusions

In essence, both the logistic and the ordered logistic regression findings substantiated the pivotal role of cohabitation with cats, coprophagy behaviours, and perpetual outdoor habitation in amplifying the risk of T. gondii infection among dogs. This comprehensive understanding of the interplay between these factors and infection likelihood contributes to the broader comprehension of the epidemiological landscape and underscores the necessity for targeted preventive strategies, particularly for dogs exhibiting these risk-associated behaviours and conditions. Furthermore, the results of our study indicate that gender, age category, and function do not have a significant influence on toxoplasmosis seroprevalence. Instead, the findings suggest that habits play a more substantial role as risk factors for this zoonotic agent, compared to the individual’s function or receptivity.

Data availability

All data are included in this published article.

References

  1. Dubey JP, Murata FHA, Cerqueira-Cézar CK, Kwok OCH, Yang Y, Su C. Toxoplasma gondii infections in dogs: 2009–2020. Vet Parasitol. 2020;31:287:109223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetpar.2020.109223.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Montoya JG, Liesenfeld O, Toxoplasmosis. Lancet. 2004;363:1965-76. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(04)16412-X. PMID: 15194258.

  3. Dubey JP, Lago EG, Gennari SM, Su C, Jones JL. Toxoplasmosis in humans and animals in Brazil: high prevalence, high burden of disease, and epidemiology. Parasitol. 2012;139:1375–424.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Dubey JP. Toxoplasmosis of Animals and Humans, third edition, CRC Press, Boca Raton, London New York. 2022.

  5. Calero-Bernal R, Gennari SM. Clinical toxoplasmosis in Dogs and cats: an update. Front Vet Sci. 2019;26:6:54. https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2019.00054.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Wolfer J, Grahn B. Diagnostic ophthalmology. Case report of anterior uveitis and endophthalmitis. Can Vet J. 1996;37:506–7.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Patitucci AN, Alley MR, Jones BR, Charleston WAG. Protozoal encephalomyelitis of dogs involving Neospora caninum and Toxoplasma Gondii in New Zealand. N Z Vet J. 1997;45:231–5. https://doi.org/10.1080/00480169.1997.36035.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Papini R, Mancianti F, Saccardi E. Noise sensitivity in a dog with toxoplasmosis. Vet Rec. 2009;165:62. https://doi.org/10.1136/vetrec.165.2.62-b.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Swinger RL, Schmidt KA Jr, Dubielzig RR. Keratoconjunctivitis associated with Toxoplasma Gondii in a dog. Vet Ophthalmol. 2009;12:56–60. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1463.5224.2009.00675.x12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Migliore S, La Marca S, Stabile C, Di Marco Lo Presti V, Vitale M. A rare case of acute toxoplasmosis in a stray dog due to infection of T. Gondii clonal type I: public health concern in urban settings with stray animals? BMC Vet Res. 2017;13:249. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12917-017-1176-3.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Meireles LR, Galisteo AJ, Pompeu E, Andrade HF. Toxoplasma gondii spreading in an urban area evaluated by seroprevalence in free-living cats and dogs. Trop Med Int Health. 2004;9:876–81. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3156.2004.01280.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Salb AL, Barkema HW, Elkin BT, Thompson R, Whiteside DP, et al. Dogs as sources and sentinels of parasites in humans and wildlife, northern Canada. Emerg Infect Dis. 2008;14:60–3. https://doi.org/10.3201/eid1401.071113.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Yan C, Fu LL, Yue CL, Tang RX, Liu YS, Lv L, Shi N, Zeng P, Zhang P, Wang DH, Zhou DH, Zhu XQ, Zheng KY. Stray dogs as indicators of Toxoplasma Gondii distributed in the environment: the first report across an urban-rural gradient in China. Parasit Vectors. 2012;5:5. https://doi.org/10.1186/1756-3305-5-5.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Alvarado-Esquivel C, Romero-Salas D, Cruz-Romero A, García-Vázquez Z, Peniche-Cardeña A, Ibarra-Priego N, Ahuja-Aguirre C, Pérez-de-León AA, Dubey JP. High prevalence of Toxoplasma gondii antibodies in dogs in Veracruz, Mexico. BMC Vet Res. 2014;10:191. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12917-014-0191-x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Schares G, Pantchev N, Barutzki D, Heydorn AO, Bauer C, Conraths FJ. Oocysts of Neospora Caninum, Hammondia Heydorni, Toxoplasma Gondii and Hammondia Hammondi in faeces collected from dogs in Germany. Int J Parasitol. 2005;35:1525–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpara.2005.08.008.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Lindsay DS, Dubey JP, Butler JM, Blagburn BL. Mechanical transmission of Toxoplasma gondii oocysts by dogs. Vet Parasitol. 1997;73:27–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0304-4017(97)00048-4. PMID: 9477489.

  17. Frenkel JK, Lindsay DS, Parker BB, Dobesh M. Dogs as possible mechanical carriers of Toxoplasma, and their fur as a source of infection of young children. Int J Infect Dis. 2003;7:292–3. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1201-9712(03)90112-3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Cañón-Franco WA, Bergamaschi DP, Labruna MB, Camargo LM, Silva JC, Pinter A, et al. Occurrence of anti-Toxoplasma gondii antibodies in dogs in the urban area of Monte Negro, Rondônia, Brazil. Vet Res Commun. 2004;28:113–8. https://doi.org/10.1023/b:verc.0000012114.71235.73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Azevedo SS, Batista CS, Vasconcellos SA, Aguiar DM, Ragozo AM, Rodrigues AA, Alves CJ, Gennari SM. Seroepidemiology of Toxoplasma Gondii and Neospora Caninum in dogs from the state of Paraíba, Northeast region of Brazil. Res Vet Sci. 2005;79:51–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rvsc.2004.10.001.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Cano-Terriza D, Puig-Ribas M, Jiménez-Ruiz S, Cabezón Ó, Almería S, Galán-Relaño Á, et al. Risk factors of Toxoplasma gondii infection in hunting, pet and watchdogs from southern Spain and northern Africa. Parasitol Int. 2016;65:363–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Ding H, Gao YM, Deng Y, Lamberton PHL, Lu. DB A systematic review and meta-analysis of the seroprevalence of Toxoplasma Gondii in cats in mainland China. Parasit Vectors. 2017;10:2–9. 10.1186/ s13071-017-1970-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 18, Wang S, Zhou YH, Xie Q, Zheng B, Zhang HZ, Yao ZJ, et al. Prevalence of Toxoplasma Gondii antibodies in dogs in central China. Isr J Vet Med. 2017;2:11–5.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Zarra-Nezhad F, Borujeni MP, Mosallanejad B, Hamidinejat H. A seroepidemiological survey of Toxoplasma gondii infection in referred dogs to Veterinary Hospital of Ahvaz, Iran. Int J Vet Sci Med. 2017;5:148–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijvsm.2017.08.006. PMID: 30255064; PMCID: PMC6137845.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Huertas-López A, Sukhumavasi W, Álvarez-García G, Martínez-Subiela S, Cano-Terriza D, Almería S, Dubey JP, García-Bocanegra I, Cerón JJ, Martínez-Carrasco C. Seroprevalence of Toxoplasma Gondii in outdoor dogs and cats in Bangkok, Thailand. Parasitology. 2021;148:843–9. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0031182021000421.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Mortari APG, Tagarra LG, de Souza ML, Roman IJ, Ratzlaff FR, Braunig P, de Andrade CM, Cargnelutti JF, Sangioni LA, Vogel FSF. Increased seroprevalence of anti-Toxoplasma gondii antibodies in dogs in southern Brazil after an outbreak of human toxoplasmosis. Parasitol Res. 2023;122:1009–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00436-023-07808-4. Epub 2023 Mar 7. PMID: 36881160.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Cabezón O, Millán J, Gomis M, Dubey JP, Ferroglio E, Almería S. Kennel dogs as sentinels of Leishmania infantum, Toxoplasma gondii, and Neospora caninum in Majorca Island, Spain. Parasitol Res. 2010;107:1505-8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00436-010-2015-7.

  27. Dini FM, Morselli S, Marangoni A, Taddei R, Maioli G, Roncarati G, Balboni A, Dondi F, Lunetta F, Galuppi R. Spread of Toxoplasma Gondii among animals and humans in Northern Italy: a retrospective analysis in a one-health framework. Food Waterborne Parasitol. 2023a;832:e00197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fawpar.2023.e00197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Dini FM, Graziosi G, Lupini C, Catelli E, Galuppi R. Migratory wild birds as potential long-distance transmitters of Toxoplasma Gondii infection. Pathogens. 2023;18:478. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens12030478.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Dini FM, Musto C, De Nigris VM, Bellinello E, Sampieri M, Merialdi G, et al. Sero-epidemiological investigation on Toxoplasma gondii infection in Apennine wolf (Canis lupus italicus) and wild boar (Sus scrofa) in Italy. BMC Vet Res. 2024;20:62. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12917-024-03922-2.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Da Cunha GR, Pellizzaro M, Martins CM, Rocha SM, Yamakawa AC, Da Silva EC et al. Spatial serosurvey of anti-Toxoplasma gondii antibodies in individuals with animal hoarding disorder and their dogs in Southern Brazil. PLoS ONE. 2020; 15, e0233305.

  31. Magalhães FJ, Ribeiro-Andrade M, Souza FM, Filho CDL, Biondo AW, Vidotto O, et al. Seroprevalence and spatial distribution of Toxoplasma gondii infection in cats, dogs, pigs and equines of the Fernando De Noronha Island. Brazil Parasitol Int. 2017;66:43–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Zhu N, Yang L, Xin S, Huang W, Jiang Y, Yang Y. Low prevalence of Toxoplasma Gondii in Dogs from Central China. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2022;12:885348. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcimb.2022.885348.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Yan C, Fu LL, Yue CL, Tang RX, Liu YS, Lv L, et al. Stray dogs as indicators of Toxoplasma Gondii distributed in the environment: the first report across an urban-rural gradient in China. Parasit Vectors. 2012;5:5. https://doi.org/10.1186/1756-3305-5-5.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Dubey JP, Cortés-Vecino JA, Vargas-Duarte JJ, Sundar N, Velmurugan GV, Bandini LM, Polo LJ, Zambrano L, Mora LE, Kwok OC, Smith T, Su C. Prevalence of Toxoplasma Gondii in dogs from Colombia, South America and genetic characterization of T. Gondii isolates. Vet Parasitol. 2007;145:45–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetpar.2006.12.001.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Cruz-Vázquez C, Maldonado-López L, Vitela-Mendoza I, Medina-Esparza L, Aguilar-Marcelino L, de Velasco-Reyes I. Seroprevalence of Toxoplasma gondii infection and associated risk factors in different populations of dogs from aguascalientes, Mexico. Acta Parasitol. 2023;68:683–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11686-023-00703-z.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Cedillo-Peláez C, Díaz-Figueroa ID, Jiménez-Seres MI, Sánchez-Hernández G, Correa D. Frequency of antibodies to Toxoplasma Gondii in stray dogs of Oaxaca, México. J Parasitol. 2012;98:871–2. https://doi.org/10.1645/GE-3095.1.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Turlewicz-Podbielska H, Ruszkowski JJ, Gogulski M, Pomorska-Mól M. Seroprevalence of Toxoplasma Gondii in domestic cats, dogs and rabbits from Poland. Vet Res Commun. 2023. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11259-022-10055-0.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Machacova T, Bartova E, Sedlak K, Slezakova R, Budikova M, Piantedosi D, et al. Seroprevalence and risk factors of infections with Neospora Caninum and Toxoplasma Gondii in hunting dogs from Campania region, southern Italy. Folia Parasitol. 2016;6. https://doi.org/10.14411/fp.2016.012.;63:2016.012.

  39. Macrì G, Sala M, Linder AM, Pettirossi N, Scarpulla M. Comparison of indirect fluorescent antibody test and modified agglutination test for detecting Toxoplasma Gondii immunoglobulin G antibodies in dog and cat. Parasitol Res. 2009;105:35–40. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00436-009-1358-4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Gilot-Fromont E, Lélu M, Dardé ML, Richomme C, Aubert D, Afonso E, et al. In: Djaković OD, editor. The life cycle of Toxoplasma Gondii in the natural environment. London, UK: Toxoplasmosis. IntechOpen; 2012.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  41. Shapiro K, Bahia-Oliveira L, Dixon B, Dumètre A, de Wit LA, VanWormer E, et al. Environmental transmission of Toxoplasma Gondii: oocysts in water, soil and food. Food Waterborne Parasitol. 2019;15:e00049. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fawpar.2019.e00049.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Afonso E, Thulliez P, Pontier D, Gilot-Fromont E. Toxoplasmosis in prey species and consequences for prevalence in feral cats: not all prey species are equal. Parasitology. 2007;134:1963–71. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0031182007003320.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Nijsse R, Mughini-Gras L, Wagenaar JA, Ploeger HW. Coprophagy in dogs interferes in the diagnosis of parasitic infections by faecal examination. Vet Parasitol. 2014;204:304–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetpar.2014.05.019.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Mendoza Roldan JA, Otranto D. Zoonotic parasites associated with predation by dogs and cats. Parasit Vectors. 2023;16:55. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-023-05670-y.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This study received no external funding.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Veterinary Medical Sciences, Alma Mater Studiorum - University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy

    Filippo Maria Dini, Laura Stancampiano, Giovanni Poglayen & Roberta Galuppi

Authors
  1. Filippo Maria Dini
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Laura Stancampiano
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Giovanni Poglayen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Roberta Galuppi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Filippo Maria Dini and Roberta Galuppi wrote the main manuscript text, Filippo Maria Dini, Roberta Galuppi and Giovanni Poglayen performed sampling. Filippo Maria Dini carried out the serological analyses. Laura Stancampianoo performed the statistical analysis. Filippo Maria Dini, Laura Stancampiano and Roberta Galuppi revised the manuscript. All authors reviewed the manuscript and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Filippo Maria Dini.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Informed consent was obtained from the owner of each dog included in this study prior to their participation.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Declaration of competing interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Dini, F.M., Stancampiano, L., Poglayen, G. et al. Risk factors for Toxoplasma gondii infection in dogs: a serological survey. Acta Vet Scand 66, 14 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13028-024-00734-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13028-024-00734-0

Keywords

Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica

ISSN: 1751-0147