Skip to main content

Table 1 The idealized (weighted and normalized) Q-sorting within each family of farmers' perspectives.

From: A mixed methods inquiry: How dairy farmers perceive the value(s) of their involvement in an intensive dairy herd health management program

 

Statements derived from the concourse1

Family 1: Team work

Family 2: Animal welfare

Family 3: Knowledge

Family 4: Production

1

I make more money with the management program

2

0

2

0

2

Team spirit increases in the dairy setting

1

-1

-1

3

3

It makes antibiotics more available

-1

4

-1

0

4

It is an insurance of the production level

-1

-1

0

2

5

I like to be 'up front'

-3

-1

4

-1

6

I can outsource the responsibility of herd health

-3

-4

-4

-3

7

It gives the vet a chance to prove his worth

-2

-3

-2

3

8

Future insurance: The vet knows me and the herd

0

0

2

0

9

I want to make a contribution to develop the advisory service

-3

0

0

4

10

Reproduction increases

3

3

0

2

11

I get whole-farm consultancy

1

-2

2

1

12

A high management level in the stable vs. grazing

-1

0

-5

-5

13

It is preferable to the image of dairy industry – and me

-2

2

-3

2

14

Incidence of disease decreases

0

3

-3

-2

15

The vet and I share responsibility regarding herd health

-2

-1

-3

0

16

The vet updates me on the newest knowledge

-1

1

5

-2

17

More cows can be treated without paying the vet

-2

4

-2

-5

18

I like that only one vet works with me and my herd

1

3

1

4

19

Yield increases

4

1

-1

1

20

I work more systematically, when someone checks up on me

0

-2

0

-4

21

The vet has more experience than me

0

0

1

0

22

My understanding of herd dynamics as a whole increases

-1

-1

3

1

23

The vet and I work better together

4

2

1

3

24

My financial lenders requested it

-5

-5

-4

-1

25

The vet made me an offer I could not refuse

-5

-2

-5

-2

26

It is necessary for me to take in the herd size

2

-3

3

0

27

Incidence of mastitis decreases

0

3

-3

-1

28

Nothing is missed – and it increases joy in my work life

1

1

-2

-2

29

I need a loyal and independent advisor to spar with

1

-1

4

-4

30

It enhances the business aspect of my herd

-4

-3

3

-1

31

It was recommended to me (by farmers, consultant)

-4

-5

-4

-3

32

Incidence of dead animals decreases

2

-4

-2

-4

33

The vet said it was a good idea

-3

2

3

-1

34

It is a current trend – and I like new ideas

-4

-3

5

-1

35

The vet helps to educate my staff

-1

-2

-2

1

36

The vet bill decreases in the long run

0

1

2

-3

37

It gives me an opportunity to evaluate the effect of interventions

1

2

2

2

38

My knowledge on cows and herd increases

3

-2

-1

5

39

The vet is more enthusiastic regarding my problems

4

-4

0

-2

40

The vet helps to put up relevant performance indicators

3

0

4

1

41

I prefer prevention to treatment

5

5

0

4

42

The vet gets deep insight into the herd – better advices

5

1

1

2

43

I can exploit the vets knowledge more systematically

3

2

1

3

44

Time is saved due to systematic work procedures

2

1

-1

5

45

Animal welfare and herd health increases

2

4

1

1

46

Extended HHM programs reduce the use of antibiotics

-2

5

-1

-3

% variance attributable to each family of farmers' perspectives (unrotated factors(rotated factors))

37/22

12/18

9/13

7/12

  1. 1 A concourse is a 'view of the world' constructed by the researcher from various sources of data. In Q-methodology the concourse is broken down by the researcher into a number of statements that respondents rank according to 'my point of view', i.e. how well the individual statement presents an answer to the research question
  2. i.e. how a hypothetical respondent with a 100% loading on that factor would rank all the statements according to the guide for ranking