Skip to main content
  • Published:

Pharmacokinetics of Sulphadiazine-Trimethoprim in Lactating Dairy Cows

Sulfadiazin-trimetoprims farmakokinetik hos lakterande mjölkkor

Abstract

Five Finnish Ayrshire cows in mid or end-lactation were treated with 40 mg sulphadiazine/kg and 8 mg trimethoprim/kg using intravenous (i.v.), intramuscular (i.m.) and subcutaneous (s.c.) routes. Elimination of sulphadiazine was not affected by the route of administration (median t½4.4–5.0 h) while elimination of trimethoprim was strongly limited by slow absorption from the injection site after s.c. and i.m. administration (median for apparent t½. 21–25 h) compared to that after i.v. administration (median t½ 1.2 h; p<0.05). The median bioavailability of trimethoprim was also decreased, being 37% and 55% after s.c. and i.m. administration, respectively. When i.v. administration was used, trimethoprim concentration exceeded 0.1 mg/l in milk between 0.15–8 h while sulphadiazine concentrations above 2 mg/l were maintained from 0.5–2 h to 8 h. After s.c. and i.m. administration sulphadiazine in milk behaved similar to that after i.v. administration, while trimethoprim time-concentration curves were flat and trimethoprim concentrations were around 0.1 mg/l for an extended period of time (8–12 h). Median Cmax values in milk were only 0.07 mg/l and 0.10 mg/l for s.c. and i.m. administrations, respectively After s.c. administration, 4 out of 5 cows showed signs of pain. After i.m. administration, 2 of the cows showed clear signs of pain and one had some local tenderness at the site of injection.

Sammanfattning

Fem finska Ayrshirekor i mitt- eller slutfasen av mjölkproduktionsperioden behandlades intravenöst, intramuskulärt och subkutant med 40 mg sulfadiazin och 8 mg trimetoprim per kg kroppsvikt. Administreringssättet påverkade inte elimineringen av sulfadiazin (median t½ 4.3–5.0 h). Halveringstiden för trimetoprim var på grund av dålig absorption från injektionsstället efter subkutan och intramuskulär behandling mycket längre (median för skenbar t½ 21–25 h) än efter intravenös administration (t½ 1.2 h; p<0.05). Medianen for trimetoprimets biotillgänglighet var också lägre (37% och 55% efter subkutan respektive intramuskulär behandling). Trimetoprimkoncentrationen var högre än 0.1 mg/l i mjölk 0.15 h–8 h efter intravenös behandling, medan sulfadiazinkoncentrationen överskred 2 mg/l efter 0.5–2 h till 8 h. Sulfadiazins farmakokinetik var likartad oberoende av administrationssätt. Tid-koncentrationskurvan for trimetoprim i mjölk var flack efter intravenös behandling och cirka 0.1 mg/l uppmättes under en längre tidsperiod (8–12 h). Efter subkutan och intramuskulär behandling uppgick maximalkoncentrationernas medianvärden endast till 0.07 respektive 0.1 mg/l. Efter subkutan behandling visade 4 av 5 kor tecken på smärta. Efter intramuskulär behandling visade 2 av 5 behandlade kor tydliga smärtsymptom och hos en ko påvisades lindrig omhet på injektionsstället.

References

  • Atef M, Salem AA, Al-Samarrae SA, Zafer SA: Ruminai and salivary excretion of some sulphoamides in cows and their effect on rumen flora. J. vet. Med. A 1981, 28, 113–121.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bishop YM: The Veterinary Formulary. 3rd ed. The Pharmaceutical Press, London, 1996, 513 pp.

  • Casals JB, Pringler N: Antimicrobial sensitivity testing using Neo-Sensitabs. 1984, A/S Rosco, Denmark.

  • Clarke CR, Short CR, Corstvet RE, Nobles D: Effect of Pasteurella haemolytica infection on the distribution of sulfadiazine and trimethoprim into tissue chambers implanted subcutaneously in cattle. Am. J. Vet. Res. 1989, 50, 1551–1556.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Davitiyananda D, Rasmussen F: Half-lives of sulphadoxine adn trimethoprim after a single intravenous infusion in cows. Acta Vet. Scand. 1974, 15, 356–365.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Franklin A, Persson L, Wierup M: Ny gruppindelning vid antibiotikaresistensundersökning. (New grouping in antimicrobial susceptibility testing). Svensk Vettidn. 1979, 31, 7–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guard CL, Schwark WS, Friedman DS, Blackshear P, Haluska M: Age-related alterations in trimethoprim-sulfadiazine disposition following oral or parenteral administration in calves. Can. J. Vet. Res. 1986, 50, 342–346.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Luthman J, Jacobsson S-O: Serumkoncentrationer av sulfonamider efter oral och parenteral tillförsel. (Sulphonamide concentrations in serum after oral and parenteral administration). Svensk Veterinärtidning 1979, 31, 783–787.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mandell GL, Sande MA: Antimicrobial agents. Sulphonamides, Trimethoprim-Sulfamethoxazole, Quinolones, and Agents for Urinary Tract Infections. In: Goodman, Gilman (eds.): The Pharmacological Basis of Therapeutics. 8th ed. Pergamon Press: New York, 1990, 1047–1064.

  • Nielsen P, Rasmussen F: Half-life, apparent volume of distribution and protein-binding for some sulphonamides in cows. Res. Vet. Sci. 1977, 22, 205–208.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen P, Romvary A, Rasmussen F: Sulphadoxine and trimethoprim in goats and cows: absorption fraction, half-lives and the degrading effect of the ruminai flora. J. Vet. Pharmacol. Therap. 1978, 1, 37–46.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nouws JFM, Mevius D, Vree TB, Baakman M, Degen M: Pharmacokinetics, metabolism, and renal clearance of sulfadiazine, sulfamerazine, and sulfamethazine and of their N4-acetyl and hydroxy metabolites in calves and cows. Am. J. Vet. Res. 1988, 49, 1059–1065.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nouws JFM, Vree TB, Breukink HJ, Baakman M, Driessens F, Smulders A: Dose dependent disposition of sulphadimidine and of its N4-acetyl and hydroxy metabolites in plasma and milk of dairy cows. Vet. Quartely 1985, 7, 177–186.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Prescott JF, Baggot JD (eds.): Antimicrobial Therapy in Veterinary Medicine. 2nd ed. Ames: Iowa State Univ Press, 1993, 612 p.

  • Pyörälä S, Manner E, Kesti E, Sandholm M: Local tissue damage in cows after intramuscular injections of eight different antimicrobial agents. Brief communication. Acta vet. Scand. 1994, 35, 107–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pyörälä S, Myllys V: Resistance of bacteria to antimicrobials. In: M. Sandholm, T. Honkanen-Buzalski, L. Kaartinen, and S. Pyörälä, (eds). The Bovine Udder and Mastitis. Gummerus, Helsinki, Finland. 1995, 194–200.

  • Shoaf SE, Schwark WS, Guard CL: The effect of age and diet on sulfadiazine/trimethoprim disposition following oral and subcutaneous administration to calves. J. Vet. Pharmacol. Therap. 1987, 10, 331–345.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shoaf SE, Schwark WS, Guard CL, Schwartsman RV: Pharmacokinetics of trimethoprim/sulfadiazine in neonatal calves: influence of synovitis. J. Vet. Pharmacol. Therap. 1986, 9, 446–454.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yamaoka K, Nakagawa T, Uno T: Statistical moments in pharmacokinetics. J. Pharmacokin. Biopharm. 1978, 6, 547–558.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ødegaard SA, Råstad A: Pharmacokinetics of sulphaphenazole in cattle. J. Vet. Pharmacol. Therap. 1987, 10, 83–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kaartinen, L., Löhönen, K., Wiese, B. et al. Pharmacokinetics of Sulphadiazine-Trimethoprim in Lactating Dairy Cows. Acta Vet Scand 40, 271–278 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1186/BF03547025

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/BF03547025

Keywords