- Published:
Staphylococcal and other Bacterial Species Associated with Intramammary Infections in Danish Dairy Herds
Stafylokokker og andre bakteriearter associeret med intramammære infektioner i danske malkekvægsbesætninger
Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica volume 36, pages 475–487 (1995)
Abstract
Four thousand six hundred forty– five quarter milk samples from 1179 cows from 20 commercial dairy herds were examined in order to determine the prevalence of bacterial species. A total of 859 isolates from 839 (18.1%) culture positive samples could be assigned to 34 different species and subspecies. Diagnostics of staphylococcal species was based on conventional procedures able to differentiate between all 36 species and subspecies presently acknowledged. Staphylococcus aureus was found in 10.2% of the samples and was the most common species isolated. Streptococcus dysgalactiae (1.6%) and Streptococcus uberis (1.4%) were the second and third most common species isolated. Seventeen different coagulase negative staphylococcal species (CNS) were found in 4.1% of the samples. The most frequently isolated CNS were S. epidermidis (1.3%), S. chromogenes (1.0%) and S. simulans (0.7%). Isolates of S. aureus were phage typed, and isolates of S. epidermidis were investigated by phage typing, antibiogram typing, and biotyping. A total of 378 (79.9%) isolates of S. aureus could be typed by phages, assigning them to 18 different phage types. However, 6 phage types accounted for 92.1% of the typable isolates. One to 2 phage types predominated within each herd. Eleven (18%) isolates of S. epidermidis could be typed by phages, assigning the isolates to 3 different types. Biotyping of S. epidermidis produced a total of 8 different types, the most common accounting for 29.5% of the isolates. A total of 6 different antibiogram types were observed among all isolates of S. epidermidis. Resistance towards penicillin (36.1%), tetracycline (9.8%) and streptomycin (9.8%), were recorded in the isolates of S. epidermidis. However, 35 (57.4%) of the isolates were susceptible to all 12 antibiotics tested.
Sammendrag
For at bestemme den relative fordeling af forskellige bakteriearter fra bovin mastitis blev 4645 kirtelprøver fra 20 danske malkekvægsbesætninger undersøgt. Fra 839 af kirtlerne blev der isoleret 859 frjrskcllige bak teri ei so later, som kunne inddeles i 34 forskellige bakteriearter og underarter. Stafylokok-diagnostikken var baseret på konventionelle procedurer som var i stand til at skeine mellem alle 36 anerkendte arter og underarter. Staphylococcus aureus blev isoleret fra 10,2% af kirtlerne og var den oftest isolerede patogen. Den næst mest almindelige patogen var Streptococcus dysgalactiae (1,6%) og trejde Streptococcus uteris (1,4%). Der blev isoleret 17 forskellige arter og underarter af koagulase negative stafylokokker. De mest almindelige var S. epidermidis (1,3%), S. chromogenes (1,0%) og S. simulans (0,7%). Isolateme af S. aureus blev fagtypet og isolater af S. epidermidis blev undersøgt for fagtypc, antibiogramtype og biotypc. lalt kunne 378 (79,9%) af S. aureus isolateme types med fager, som inddelte dem i 18 forskellige typer. Seks fagtyper udgjorde dog 92,1% af alle de typebare isolater En til 2 forskellige fagtyper dominerede indenfor hver besætning. Elleve (18%) af S. epidermidis isolateme kunne types med fager, som inddelte dem i 3 forskellige typer. Biotypning af S. epidermidis gav 8 forskellige typer, hvor den mest almindelige type udgjorde 29,5%. Seks forskellige antibiogramtyper forekom blandt alle isolater af S. epidermidis. Resistens mod penicillin (36,1%), tetracyclin (9,8%) og streptomycin (9,8%) blev observeret blandt S. epidermidis isolateme, Femogtredive (57,4%) af isolateme var dog følsomme over for alle 12 antibiotika, som der blev testet for.
References
Anonymous: Progress in mastitis control. Bull. no. 187. International Dairy Federation, 1985.
Anonymous: Bovine mastitis. Definition and guidelines for diagnosis. Bull. no. 211. International Dairy Federation, 1987.
Barrow GI, Feltham RKA: Cowan and Steel’s manual for the identification of medical bacteria. 3th ed. Cambridge University Press, Great Britain, 1993.
Birgersson A, Jonsson P, Holmberg Ο: Species identification and some characteristics of coagulase–negative staphylococci isolated from bovine udders. Vet. Microbiol., 1992, 31, 181–189.
Blair JW, Williams REO: Phagetyping of Staphylococci. Bull. Wld. Hlth. Org., 1961, 24, 771–784.
Bramley AJ: The effect of subclinical Staphylococ–cus epidermidis infection of the lactating bovine udder on its susceptibility to infection with Streptococcus agalactiae or Escherichia coli. Br. vet. J., 1978, 134, 146–151.
Chesneau O, Morvan A, Grimont F, Labischinski H, El Solh N: Staphylococcus pasteuri sp. nov., isolated from human, animal, and food specimens. Int. J. syst. Bacteriol., 1993, 43, 237–244.
Davidson TJ, Dohoo IR, Donald AW, Hariharan H, Collins K: A cohort study of coagulase–negative staphylococcal mastitis in selected dairy herds in Prince Edward Island. Can. J. vet. Res., 1992, 56, 275–280.
Devriese LA: Identification of clumping-factor-negative Staphylococci isolated from cow’s udders. Res. vet. Sci., 1979, 27, 313–320.
Devriese LA, De Keyser Η: Prevalence of different species of coagulase-negative staphylococci on teats and in milk samples from dairy cows. J. Dairy Res., 1980, 47, 155–158.
Devriese LA, Schleifer KH, Adegoke GO: Identification of coagulase-negative staphylococci from farm animals. J. Appl. Bacteriol., 1985, 58, 45–55.
Devriese LA: Coagulase–negative Staphylococci in animals. In: Mårdh PA, Schleifer KH (eds.): Coagulase-negative Staphylococci. Almqvist & Wiksell International, Stockholm, Sweden, 1986, pp 51–58.
Edwards SJ, Jones GW: The distribution and characters of coagulasenegative staphylococci of the bovine udder. J. Dairy Res., 1966, 33, 261–270.
Faller A, Schleifer KH: Modified oxidase and benzi-dene tests for separation of Staphylococci from Micrococci. J. clin. Microbiol., 1981, 13, 1031–1035.
Gahrn-Hansen B, Heltberg O, Rosdahl VT, Søgaard Ρ: Evaluation of a conventional routine method for identification of clinical isolates of coagulase-negative Staphylococcus and Micrococcus species. APMIS, sect. B, 1987, 95, 283–292.
Hajek V, Ludwig W, Schleifer KH, Springer Ν, Zitzel–berger W, Kroppenstedt RM, Kocur M: Staphylococcus muscae, a new species isolated from flies. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol., 1992, 42, 97–101.
Hogan JS, Smith KL, Todhunter DA, Schoenberger PS: Rate of enviromental mastitis in quarters infected with Corynebacterium bovis and Staphylococcus species. J. Dairy Sci., 1987, 71, 2520–2525.
Hugh R, Leifson E: The taxonomic significance of fermentative versus oxidative metabolism of carbohydrates by various gram–negative bacteria. J. Bacteriol., 1953, 66, 24–26.
Jarløv JO, Nissen Β, Rosdahl VT, Espersen F: Identification of coagulase-negative staphylococci and typing of Staphylococcus epidermidis by a 4 h micromethod. APMIS, 1994, 102, 272–278.
Jarp J: Classification of coagulase-negative staphylococci isolated from bovine clinical and subclinical mastitis. Vet. Microbiol., 1991, 27, 151–158.
Jelinkova J: Group Β Streptococci in the human population. Curr. topics Microbiol. Immunol., 1977, 76, 127–165.
King JS: Streptococcus uberis: A review of its role as a causative organism of bovine mastitis I. Characteristics of the organism. Br. vet. J., 1981, 137, 36–52.
Kloos WE, Schleifer KH: Isolation and characterization of staphylococci from human skin. II. Descriptions of four new species: Staphylococcus warneri, Staphylococcus capitis, Staphylococcus hominis and Staphylococcus simulans. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol., 1975, 25, 62–79.
Kloos WE, George CG: Identification of Staphylococcus species and subspecies with the Micro–Scan Pos ID and Rapid Pos Id panel system. J. Clin. Microbiol., 1991, 29, 738–744.
Lachica RVF, Genigeorgis C, Hoeprechi PD: Meta–chromatic agar–diffusion methods for detecting staphylococcal nuclease activity. Appl. Microbiol, 1971, 27, 585–587.
Langlois BE, Harmon RJ, Akers Κ: Identification of Staphylococcus species of bovine origin with the API Staph–Ident system. J. Clin. Microbiol., 1983, 18, 1212–1219.
Mackie DP, Pollock DA, Rodgers SP, Logan EF: Phage typing of Staphylococcus aureus associat–ied with subclinical bovine mastitis. J. Dairy. Res., 1987, 54, 1–5.
Maniatis T, Fritsch EF, SambrookJ: Molecular cloning. A laboratory manual. Cold Spring Habor Laboratory, New York, 1982.
Matthews KR, Oliver SP, King SH: Comparison of Vitek gram–positive identification system with API Staph–Trac system for species identification of staphylococci of bovine origin. J. Clin. Micro–biol., 1990, 25, 1649–1651.
Parisi JT, Baldwin J: The incidense and persistence of certain strains of Staphylococcus aureus in dairy herds. Amer. J. vet. Res., 1963, 24, 551–556.
Parker MT: The significance of phage-typing patterns in Staphylococcus aureus. In: Easmon CSF, Adlam C (eds.): Staphylococci and Staphylococ–cal infections. Academic Press, London, 1983, pp 33–62.
Price P, Neave FK, Rippon JE, Williams REO: The use of phage typing and penicillin sensitivity tests in studies of Staphylococci from bovine mastitis. J. Dairy Res., 1954, 21, 342–353.
Rosdahl VT, Gahrn–Hansen B, Møller JK, Kjældgård Ρ: Phage-typing of coagulase–negative staphylococci. Factors influencing typability. APMIS, 1990, 98, 299–304.
Schleifer KH: Micrococcaceae. In: Sneath PHA (ed.). Bergey’s Manual of Systematic Bacteriology. Williams and Wilkins, Baltimore, 1986.
Schleifer KH, Kloos WE: Isolation and characterization of staphylococci from human skin. I. amended descriptions of Staphylococcus epider–midis and Staphylococcus saprophyticus and descriptions of three new species: Staphylococcus cohnii, Staphylococcus haemolyticus and Staphylococcus xylosus. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol., 1975, 25, 50–61.
Smith RE, Hagstad HV: Infection of the bovine udder with coagulase-negative staphylococci. Prev. Vet. Med., 1986, 4, 35–43.
Stuart CA, Stratum Ε van, Rustigian R: Further studies on urease production by Proteus and related organisms. J. Bacteriol., 1945, 49, 437.
Tanasupawat S, Hashimoto Y, Ezaki T, Kozaki M, Ko–magata K: Staphylococcus piscifermentans sp. nov., from fermented fish in Thailand. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol., 1992, 42, 577–581.
Timms LL, Schultz LH: Dynamics and significance of coagulase–negative staphylococcal intramam–mary infections. J. Dairy Sci., 1987, 70, 2648–2657.
Todhunter DA, Cantwell LL, Smith KL, Hoblet KH, Hogan JS: Characteristics of coagulase–negative Staphylococci isolated from bovine intramam–mary infections. Vet. Microbiol., 1993, 34, 373–380.
Watts JL, Owens WE: Prevalence of staphylococcal species in four dairy herds. Res. Vet. Sci., 1989, 46, 1–4.
Watts JL, Washburn PJ: Evaluation of the Staph–Zym system with staphylococci isolated from bovine intramammary infections. J. Clin. Microbiol., 1991, 29, 59–61.
Watts JL, Yancey RJ: Identification of veterinary pathogens by use of commercial identification systems and new trends in antimicrobial susceptibility testing of veterinary pathogens. Clin. Microbiol. Rev., 1994, 7, 346–356.
Watts JL, Pankey JW, Nickerson SC: Evaluation of the Staph-Ident and Staphase systems for identification of staphylococci from bovine intramammary infections. J. Clin. Microbiol., 1984, 20, 448–452.
Webster JA, Bannerman TL, Hubner RJ, Ballard DN, Cole EM, Bruce JL, Fiedler F, Schubert K, Kloos WE: Identification of The Staphylococcus sciuri species group with EcoRl fragments containing rRNA sequences and description of Staphylococcus vitulus sp. nov. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol., 1994, 44 454–460.
Acknowledgments
We are very grateful to Mr. René Hendriksen for his effort to constantly keep track of all samples and records. We are greateful to Johannes Jensen, DVM for help in collecting the bacterial isolates. This work was supported by a grant from Danish Ministry of Agriculture (VEL 92–8).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Aarestrup, F., Wegener, Η., Rosdahl, V. et al. Staphylococcal and other Bacterial Species Associated with Intramammary Infections in Danish Dairy Herds. Acta Vet Scand 36, 475–487 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1186/BF03547662
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/BF03547662