Housing of Pregnant Sows in Loose and Confined Systems–a Field Study 1. Vulva and Body Lesions, Culling Reasons and Production Results
Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica volume 36, pages 185–200 (1995)
A field study was carried out in 18 herds with loose housing of pregnant sows (loose herds) and in 18 herds with tethered or stalled pregnant sows (confined herds). Three of the loose herds were excluded due to different kind of flooring from the rest of the herds. The remaining 15 herds had partly slatted concrete floors and electronic sow feeding. The frequencies of sows with vulva and body lesions, thin sows as well as the culling reasons and production results were used as animal welfare indicators for the herds. Vulva lesions were found only in the loose herds and the mean prevalence proportion of sows with lesions within these herds was 15.2%. All vulva lesions observed in this study seemed to be caused by biting. The relative risk of vulva lesions was 2.6 times higher in the loose herds with no roughage feeding as compared to loose herds with appetite feeding of roughage. The sows in the loose herds, that had a feeding station with a mechanical hind gate had 1.8 greater risk of vulva lesions than sows in the loose herds that used a feeding station with an electronic gate.
The mean prevalence proportion of sows with body lesions was 13.1% in the loose herds and 4.0% in the confined herds. Aggression between sows seemed to be the main cause of body lesions in the loose herds, while decubitus ulcers on the shoulders were the main cause of body lesions in the confined herds. Sows in loose herds that were not fed additional roughage feeding had 1.7 times greater risk of body lesions than sows in herds that used additional roughage feeding.
The main culling reasons and production results were similar in the loose and confined herds. This study showed that there were welfare problems both in confined and loose herds, however, with improved management, many of the welfare problems associated with loose housing can be reduced.
Barnett JL, Hemsworth PH, Cronin GM, Newman EA, McCallum TH, Chilton D: Effects of pen size, partial stalls and method of feeding on welfare-related behavioural and physiological responses of group-housed pigs. Appl. Anim. Behav.Sci. 1992, 34, (207–220).
Bäckstróm L: Environment and animal health in piglet production. A field study of incidences and correlations. Acta vet. scand. 1973, Suppl.41.
Bokma S: Housing and management of dry sows in groups in practice: partly slatted systems. Electronic identification in pig production. An international symposium exchanging experience between countries. Stoneleigh, 1990, 37–45.
Botermans JAM: The effect of straw on the aggression of sows during grouping. Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences Department of Farm Buildings, Lund, 1990, Report 66, App. 2, 81–96.
Burè RG: The influence of additional roughage in an electronic sow feeder on vulva biting. Proc. 42nd Ann. Meet. Europ. Ass. Anim. Prod., Berlin, 1991, p.369.
Boe K: Maternal behaviour of lactating sows in a loose-housing system. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sei. 1993, 35, (327–338).
de Koning R: On the well-being of dry sows. Thesis. Utrecht, 1985. de Koning R, Backus GBC, Vermeer HM: Welfare, behaviour and performance; partly slatted systems. Electronic identification in pig production. An international symposium exchanging experience between countries. Stoneleigh, 1990, 53-62.
Dean AG, Dean JA, Burton AH, Dicker RC: Epi Info, Version 5; a word processing, database, and statistics program for epidemiology on microcomputers. USD, Inc. Storne Mountain, Ga, 1990.
Edwards SA: Scientific perspectives on loose housing systems for dry sows. Pig vet. J. 1991, 28, (40–51).
Ekesbo I, Jensen P, Lock R: Nâgra exempel pâ beteendeförändringar vid fixering av sinsuggor. Svensk Vet.-Tidn. 1979, 31, (315–319).
Fraser D: The effect of straw on the behaviour of sows in tether stalls. Anim. Prod. 1975, 27, (59–68).
Gjein H, Larssen RB: Housing of pregnant sows in loose and confined systems - a field study. 2. Claw lesions; the impact of housing factors. 1995. Submitted.
Hansen LL,Vestergaard K: Adfærd og Produktion hos oppbundne og 10se soer. II. Produktionsresultater og sundhedsdata (Behavious and production of tethered and loose sows. II. Production and health results). Dansk Vet.- T. 1986, 69, (319–331).
Hunter EJ: Sow housing systems. Animal welfare and production in electronic sow feeding systems compared to other straw-based group-housing systems in the UK. Electronic identification in pig production. An international symposium exchanging experience between countries. Stoneleigh, 1990, 47–52.
Kroneman A, Vellenga L, van der Wilt FJ, Vermeer HM: Review of health problems in group-housed sows, with special emphasis on lameness. Vet. Quart. 1993, 75, (26–29).
Lawrence AB: The effects of different housing systems on sow welfare. Proc. 42nd Ann. Meet. Europ. Ass. Anim. Prod., Berlin, 1991, p.365.
Mount NC, Seabrook MF: A study of aggression when group housed sows are mixed. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sei. 1993, 36, (377–383).
Olsson AC, Andersson M, Lens kens P, Rantzer D, Svendsen J: Besättningsstudier av olika datorut-fodringssystem för dräktiga suggor (Herd studies of different electronic dry sow feeding systems). Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Department of Farm Buildings, Lund, 1991, Report 75.
Peet B: Housing and management in practise - straw bedded systems. Electronic identification in pig production; an international symposium exchanging experience between countries. Stone-leigh, 1990, 25–36.
SAS Institute Inc.: System ver. 6.04 for DOS. SAS Institute Inc. Cary, NC, 1989.
Svendsen J, Andersson M, Olsson AC, Rantzer D, Lundqvist P: Grupphállning av dräktiga suggor i isolerade och oisolerade stallar. En beskrivning av resultaten frän enkätundersökningar, gârds-besök och grupperingsforsök (Group housing of sows in gestation in insulated and uninsulated buildings. Results of a questionnaire survey, farm visits and grouping studies). Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Department of Farm Buildings, Lund, 1990, Report 66.
Svendsen J, Olsson AC: Innhysningssystem för dräktiga och grisande/digivande suggor for at minská spädgrisförlustarna (Housing system for pregnant, farrowing/laclating sows that reduce nea-netal mortality). Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, 1985, Fakta Teknik 16.
de Brake JHA, Bressers HPM: Applications in service management and oestrus detection. Electronic identification in pig production. An international symposium exchanging experience between countries. Stoneleigh, 1990, 63–67.
van Putten G, van de Burgwal JA: Vulva biting in group-housed sows: preliminary report. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sei. 1990, 26, (181–186).
van Putten G, van de Burgwal JA: Group housing systems for farrowing and lactating sows. Proc, of a seminar organised by the European Conference Group on the Protection of Farm Animals. Brussels, 1990, 65–78.
Weber R, Friedli K, Troxler J: The influence of the computerised feeding on the behaviour of sows and its effects with regard to injuries and alterations on their body. Proc. 42nd Ann. Meet. Europ. Ass. Anim. Prod., Berlin, 1991, p.367.
We thank Nina Lunderød for excellent technical assistance.
About this article
Cite this article
Gjein, H., Larssen, R.B. Housing of Pregnant Sows in Loose and Confined Systems–a Field Study 1. Vulva and Body Lesions, Culling Reasons and Production Results. Acta Vet Scand 36, 185–200 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1186/BF03547688