- Published:
The Effect of Post Milking Teat Dip and Suckling on Teat Skin Condition, Bacterial Colonisation, and Udder Health
Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica volume 39, pages 443–452 (1998)
Abstract
The teat skin of cows was scored (1: smooth as silk; 2: smooth; 3: slightly rough; 4: rough; 5: cracked; and 6: sores) by trained technicians who moved their fingers down the barrel of the teat with a light touch. Technicians ranked the same population of teats in the same rank order, but their mean values differed by half a score which probably could be related to the skin condition of their own fingers. Half udder experiments were carried out for 6 months at 4 farms with 35 to 52 cows each. A postmilking teat spray with 10% glycerol improved teat skin condition (p<0.10) compared with no teat spray. A postmilking teat spray with 120 ppm chlorine dioxide did not influence teat skin condition compared with no teat spray. No differences in udder health could be proven between treatments. Control studies revealed that 10% glycerol as an emollient of a postmilking teat spray improved teat skin condition within 3 weeks from being slightly rough to being smooth for lactating cows (p<0.05) but not for dry cows having smooth teat skin. Neither glycerol nor chlorine dioxide influenced absolute number of bacteria on teat skin after a challenge with Streptococcus uberis and Staphylococcus aureus but half life of S. aureus on unsprayed teats was longest (p = 0.05). Suckling made teat skin more rough than machine milking. Nevertheless, suckling lowered the number of esculin positive bacteria on the teat skin. We concluded that the condition of healthy teat skin (scores 1–4) has no influence on bacterial colonisation in the absence of cracks and sores (scores 5–6).
References
Agger JF, Willeberg P: Epidemiology of teat lesions in a dairy herd. II. Associations with subclinical mastitis. Nord. Vet.-Med. 1986, 38, 220–232.
Anonymous: National Mastitis Council Annual Meeting 1997. Summary of peer-reviewed publications on efficacy of premilking and postmilking teat disinfectants published since 1980, 36, 276–287.
Fox LK: Colonization by Staphylococcus aureus on chapped teat skin: Effect of iodine and Chlorhexidine postmilking disinfactants. J. Dairy Sci. 1992, 75, 66–71.
Fox LK, Norell RJ: Staphylococcus aureus colonization of teat skin affected by postmilking teat treatment when exposed to cold and windy conditions. J. Dairy Sci. 1994, 77, 2281–2288.
Fox LK, Nagy JA, Hillers JK, Cronrath JD, Ratkowsky DA: Effects of postmilking teat treatment on the colonization of Staphylococcus aureus on chapped teat skin. Am. J. Vet. Res. 1991, 52, 799–802.
Goldberg J J, Murdough PA, Howard AB, Drechsler PA, Pankey JW, Ledbetter GA, Day LL, Day JD: Winter evaluation of a postmilking powdered teat dip. J Dairy Sci. 1994, 77, 748–758.
Klastrup O: Scandinavian recommendations on examination of quarter milk samples. Proc. Seminar Mastitis Control. Ann. Bulletin Int. Dairy Federation, 1975, 85, 49–52.
Kloos WE, Bannerman TL: Staphylococcus and Micrococcus. In: Murray, P.R., Baron, E.J., Pfaller, M.A., Tenover, F.C, Yolken, R.H (Eds.). Manual of clinical Microbiology. ASM Press, Washington DC. 1995. pp. 282–298.
McKinzie MD, Hemling TC: The effect of teat skin condition on milk yield and milkout time. Proc. Ann. Meet. Natl. Mastitis Council, 1995, 34, 160–162.
Oliver SP, King SH, Torre PM, Shull EP, Dowlen HH, Lewis MJ, Sordillo LM: Prevention of bovine mastitis by a postmilking teat disinfectant containing chlorous acid and chlorine dioxide in a soluble polymer gel. J Dairy Sci. 1989, 72, 3091–3097.
SAS Institute Inc.: SAS/STAT® Users Guide, Version 6. 1989. 4th ed. SAS Inst, Cary, NC. 1686 pp.
Somerville JM, Rose ID: Control of bovine teat skin lesions with glycerinated iodophor teat dips. Vet. Rec. 1978, 102, 262–263.
Woodward WD, Ward ACS, Fox LK, Corbeil LB: Teat skin normal flora and colonization with mastitis pathogen inhibitors. Vet. Microbiol. 1988, 17, 357–365.
Acknowledgements
This study was supported by the Danish Research Foundation through the project “Development of organic milk and egg production systems”. Special thanks are given to the technicians who carefully undertook scoring of the teat skin and quarter milk sampling. The donation of chlorine dioxide from Jettadam Fabrikker A/S, Frederiksberg, DK and of glycerol from Novadan A/S, Kolding, DK is gratefully appreciated.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Rasmussen, M.D., Larsen, H.D. The Effect of Post Milking Teat Dip and Suckling on Teat Skin Condition, Bacterial Colonisation, and Udder Health. Acta Vet Scand 39, 443–452 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1186/BF03547770
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/BF03547770