- Published:
Immune Response to other Agents of Calves Persistently Infected with Bovine Virus Diarrhoea Virus (BVDV)
Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica volume 34, pages 305–310 (1993)
Abstract
The ability of calves persistently infected (PI) with bovine virus diarrhoea virus BVDV to respond immunologically to defined antigens other than BVDV was studied. Five clinically healthy PI calves were studied together with 5 non-PI calves serving as controls. The humoral immune response was tested by measuring the serum antitoxin titre following immunization against tetanus. The cellular immune response was tested by the ability to develop a positive reaction in a cutaneous tuberculin test performed 1 month after immunization against Johne’s disease (paratuberculosis). Finally, a skin-sensitizing agent, dinitrochlorobenzene (DNCB), was employed to study whether PI calves would react by hypersensitization following skin exposure to DNCB for 7 consecutive days followed by application of DNCB to a new skin area remote from the area that had first been exposed.
The response of PI calves to the various types of antigenic stimuli applied was not significantly different from that of the control calves. Thus, PI calves developed a potent antitoxin response after tetanus immunization, they showed a positive reaction to tuberculin skin test after immunization against paratuberculosis, and were skin sentitized with DNCB.
References
Barber DML, Nettleton PF, Herring JA: Disease in a dairy herd associated with the introduction and spread of bovine virus diarrhoea virus. Vet. Rec. 1985,117,459–464.
Bielefeldt Ohmann H, Rønsholt L, Bloch B: Demonstration of bovine viral diarrhoea virus in peripheral blood mononuclear cells of persistently infected, clinically normal cattle. J. Gen. Virol. 1987, 68, 1971–1982.
Bolin SR, Sacks JM, Crowder, SV: Frequency of association of non cytopathic bovine viral diarrhea virus with mononuclear leukocytes from persistently infected cattle. Amer. J. vet. Res. 1987,48, 1441–1445.
Brown, GB, Bolin SR, Frank DE, Roth JA: Defective function of leucocytes from cattle persistently infected with bovine viral diarrhea virus, and the influence of recombinant cytokines. Amer. J. vet. Res. 1991,52, 381–387.
Brownlie J, Clarke MC, Howard CJ: Experimental production of fatal mucosal disease in cattle. Vet. Rec. 1984,114, 535–536.
Brummerstedt E, Andresen E, Basse A, Flagstad T: Lethal trait A 46 in cattle. Immunological investigations. Nord. Vet.-Med. 1974,26, 279–293.
Coulibaly COZ, Liess B, Trautwein G, Schieuter G: Quantitative analysis of immunoglobulins G1 and G2 in blood samples of cattle persistently infected with bovine virus diarrhoea virus. J. vet. Med. B 1986,33, 685–696.
Done JT, Terlecki S, Richardson C, Harkness JW, Sands JJ, Patterson DSP, Sweasey D, Shaw IG, Winkler CE, Duffel SJ: Bovine virus diarrhoea-mucosal disease virus: Pathogenicity for the fetal calf following maternal infection. Vet. Rec. 1980, 106, 473–479.
Houe H: Age distribution of animals persistently infected with bovine virus diarrhoea virus in 22 Danish dairy herds. Can. J. vet. Res. 1992, 56, 194–198.
Houe H: Survivorship of animals persistently in-fected with bovine virus diarrhoea virus (BVDV). Prev. Vet. Med. 1993,15, 275–283.
Houe H, Eriksen L, Jungersen G, Pedersen D, Krogh HV: Sensitivity, specificity and predictive value of blood cultures from cattle clinically suspected of bacterial endocarditis. Vet. Rec. (In press.)
Howard CJ: Immunological responses to bovine virus diarrhoea virus infections. Rev. Sci. Tech. Off. Int. Epiz. 1990, 9, 95–103.
Larsson B: Increased suppressor cell activity in cattle persistently infected with bovine virus diarrhoea virus. J. vet. Med. B 1988,35, 271–279.
Larsson B, Fossum C, Alenius S: A cellular analysis of immunosuppression in cattle with mucosal disease. Res. Vet. Sci. 1988, 44, 71–75.
McClurkin AW, Litdedike ET, Cutlip RC, Frank GH, Coria MF, Bolin SR: Production of cattle immu-notolerant to bovine viral diarrhea virus. Can. J. Comp. Med. 1984, 48, 156–161.
Meyling A, Houe H, Jensen AM: Epidemiology of bovine virus diarrhoea virus. Rev. Sci. Tech. Off. Int. Epiz. 1990,9, 75–93.
Muscoplat CC, Johnson DW, Teuscher E: Surface immunoglobulin of circulating lymphocytes in chronic bovine diarrhea: Abnormalities in cell populations and cell function. Amer. J. vet. Res. 1913,34, 1101–1104.
Nielsen K: Glutaraldehydpr0ven, en metode til påvisning af forhøjet immunglobulinkoncentra-tion i blod. (The glutataldehyde gelatination test. A methot for demonstratation of increased im-munoglobulinkoncentration in blood). Dansk Vet.tidsskrift 1975, 4, 652–655.
Roberts DH, Lucas MH, Wibberley G, Westcott D: Response of cattle persistently infected with bovine virus diarrhea virus to bovine leukosis virus. Vet. Rec. 1988,122, 293–296.
Sandholm M: A preliminary report of a rapid method for the demonstration of abnormal gammaglobulin levels in bovine whole blood. Res. Vet. Sci. 1974,17,32–35.
Simonsen O, Bentzon MW, Heron I: ELISA for the routine determination of antitoxic immunity to tetanus. Journal of Biological Standardization. 1986,14, 231–239.
Steck F, Lazary S, Fey H, Wandeler A, Huggler C, Oppliger G, Baumberger H, Kaderli R, Martig J: Immune responsiveness in cattle fatally affected by bovine virus diarrhoea-mucosal disease. Zen-tralbl. Vet.-Med. B 1980,27, 429–445.
Werdin RE, Ames TR, Goyal SM, De Vries GP: Diagnostic investigation of bovine viral diarrhea infection in a Minnesota dairy herd. J. vet. diagn. Invest. 1989,1, 57–61.
Westenbrink F, Straver PJ, Kimman TG, de Leeuw PW: Development of a neutralising antibody response to an inoculated cytopathic strain of bovine virus diarrhoea virus. Vet. Rec. 1989, 125, 262–265.
Acknowledgments
This study was made with support from R. N0rtoft Thomsens Foundation, Viktor A. Goldschmidts Fund and Upjohn’s Jubilee Foundation.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Houe, H., Heron, I. Immune Response to other Agents of Calves Persistently Infected with Bovine Virus Diarrhoea Virus (BVDV). Acta Vet Scand 34, 305–310 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1186/BF03548195
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/BF03548195