Skip to main content

Table 4 Studies that investigated the linear regression between surface (measured by infrared devices) and body temperature

From: Infrared skin temperature measurements for monitoring health in pigs: a review

Source

N

Breed

Size/Age

Surface area(s)

Thermal window (X: yes)

T ambient [°C]

Regression ( A )

Remarks

Constant, T 0 [°C]

Coefficient, b

Dewulf et al. [54]

12

Belgian LR

12–15 kg

Ear

 

~20

38.80

0.015

 

Flank

 

37.82

0.044 (**)

 

Legs (carpus and tarsus)

 

38.24

0.032 (**)

 

Anus

X

38.02

0.038 (**)

 

Warriss et al. [7]

384

 

~91 kg

Inner side of ear pinna

XB

21

4.93

1.12 (***)

r = 0.71 , (C)

Chung et al. [38]

10

Yorkshire × LR (Gnoto-biotic)

Piglets

Eyelid, ear, parietal and axilla

XB

21 ± 1

  

No significant relationship

Central abdomen

X

28.07

0.304 (***)

Adj. R2 = 0.34

Central dorsum

 

34.03

0.152 (***)

Adj. R2 = 0.09

Perianal region

X

33.88

0.157 (***)

Adj. R2 = 0.19

Kammersgaard et al. [55]

91

(LR × Yorkshire) × Duroc

1–48 hours

Entire piglet from dorsal view and sagittal view

XB

15, 20, and 25

14.72

0.63 (***)

Avg. of max. IR pixel temp. from dorsal view and sagittal view

  1. ARegression formula: Tbody = T0 + b*Tskin. Body temperature measurement site was the rectum if not otherwise mentioned. **:P < 0.01 and ***:P < 0.001.
  2. BIndicates measurement sites that are both thermal windows and not thermal windows.
  3. CTemperature was the mean of the 3 spots of the ear (base, middle, and tip). Body temperature was measured by aiming IR spotmeter on blood on concrete floor, lost from sticking neck vessels.