Table 2 Overview of the 29 studies included in the review
Study focus | Reference | n | Sex, age (years), BW (kg) | Surgical procedure | Surgical category | Primary outcome | Pre-surgery inflammation | Method for CRP analysis |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Observational studies of CRP measured post-surgery | [18] | 27 | F, 2–10, 5–30 | Ovariohysterectomy | 1 | CRP | + | TIAb |
[19] | 20 | F, 2–4, 12–30 | Ovariohysterectomy | 1 | CRP, WBC, Temp | − | ELISAc | |
[20] | 49 | F, 0.75–12, 10–64 | Ovariohysterectomy | 1 | CRP | − | TIAd | |
[21] | 5 | M, 5–7, 14–21 | Orchidectomy | 1 | CRP | − | TIAb | |
[22] | 6 | F, 2–6, NS | Ovariohysterectomy | 1 | CRP | − | ELISAc | |
[23] | 20 | F, 4–12, NS | Ovariohysterectomy | 1 | CRP | + | ELISAc | |
[24] | 16 | F/M, 0.25–3, 4–39 | Balloon valvuloplasty of pulmonic stenosis | 1 | CRP | − | ELISAc | |
[25] | 20 | F, 3–12, NS | Ovariohysterectomy | 1 | CRP | ± | ELISAc | |
[9] | 19 | NS, NS, NS | 5 different procedures | 1 and 2 | CRP | ± | ELISA, RPLAe | |
Evaluation of new surgical methods | [26] | 12 | F/M, NS, 10–34 | Double balloon endoscopy of intestine | 3 | Clinical outcome | − | NS |
[27] | 12 | NS, NS, 7–9 | Endoscopic transumbilical thoracic lung biopsy | 3 | Clinical outcome | − | ELISAf | |
[28] | 14 | NS, NS, 7–11 | Transtracheal endoscopy of thorax | 3 | Clinical outcome | − | NS | |
[29] | 7 | M, NS, 13.2a | Laparoscopic assisted colopexy and sterilization | 3 | Clinical outcome | − | IPg | |
[30] | 5 | NS, NS, 20–28 | Endoscopic ovariectomy | 3 | Clinical outcome | − | NS | |
[31] | 7 | F, 2.5a, 9a | Laparoscopic-sutured gastropexy | 3 | CRP | − | ELISAh | |
Comparison of different kinds of surgery | [32] | 28 | NS, NS, 7–10 | Transoral vs. conventional thoracoscopy | 3 | Perioperative stress | − | ELISAf |
[33] | 32 | F/M, 0.5–8, NS | Sterilization, 3 techniques | 1 and 3 | CRP | − | TIAj | |
[34] | 20 | NS, NS, 6–11 | Transoral vs. conventional thoracoscopy | 2 and 3 | Perioperative stress | − | ELISAf | |
[35] | 8 | NS, 0.8–5, 15–25 | Laparoscopic vs. laparotomic colopexy | 1 and 3 | Perioperative stress | − | ELISAi | |
[36] | 24 | NS, adult, 25–30 | Sternotomy and pericardiotomy vs. atriotomy | 2 | Perioperative stress | − | ELISAb | |
[37] | 30 | F, NS, 11–38 | Ovariectomy, 3 techniques | 1 and 3 | Perioperative stress | − | ELISAh | |
[38] | 43 | F/M, >0.6, NS | Ovariohysterectomy vs. hemilaminectomy | 1 and 2 | CRP | ± | TIAj | |
[39] | 15 | F, NS, 17.4a | Splenectomy, 3 techniques | 2 and 3 | Perioperative stress | − | LATk | |
Changes in CRP due to different treatments? | [40] | 16 | F, 3–14, 17.3a | Ovariohysterectomy | 1 | CRP | − | MIAl |
[41] | 18 | F, 1.5–4, 12–20 | Ovariohysterectomy | 1 | CRP | − | ELISAb | |
[42] | 45 | F, 2.7a, 11.9a | Ovariohysterectomy | 1 | CRP | − | ELISAm | |
[43] | 46 | F/M, 2–3, 20.7a | Ovariohyster- and orchiectomy | 1 | Perioperative stress | − | ELISAb | |
[44] | 20 | F/M, 9.5a, 16.3a | Ovariohyster- and orchiectomy | 1 | CRP | − | ELISAb | |
[45] | 12 | F/M, 1.5–10, 12–45 | Cruciate ligament rupture and patella luxation | 2 | Perioperative stress | + | ELISAb |