Skip to main content

Table 2 Distribution and univariable analysis of management routines in 42 herds experiencing neonatal porcine diarrhoea (NPD herds) and 56 herds with no or occasional cases (Non-NPD herds)

From: Farm characteristics and management routines related to neonatal porcine diarrhoea: a survey among Swedish piglet producers

Variablea

NPD herds

n (%)

Non-NPD herds

n (%)

P valueb

Manual cleaning of the farrowing unit (times/day) c

  

0.12d

0–1

27 (64)

26 (46)

 

2–3

15 (36)

30 (58)

 

Washing of the farrowing unit between batches

  

<0.01e

Always

35 (83)

32 (57)

 

During summer

5 (12)

9 (16)

 

No

2 (5)

15 (27)

 

Disinfection of the farrowing unit between batches

  

0.07d

Yes

28 (67)

26 (46)

 

No

14 (33)

30 (54)

 

Maternal vaccination against NPD

  

0.02e

Yes

40 (95)

43 (83)

 

No

2 (5)

13 (25)

 

Employment of nurse sows

  

0.01d

Yes

24 (57)

17 (30)

 

No

18 (43)

39 (70)

 

Monitoring of farrowings

  

0.17e

Only if indicated

3 (7)

11 (20)

 

During daytime

35 (83)

38 (68)

 

During day and night

4 (10)

7 (13)

 

Efforts made to save weak-born piglets

  

<0.01d

None/some

18 (43)

43 (77)

 

Moderate/ambitious

24 (57)

13 (23)

 

Type of supplemental heating in the creep area

  

0.19e

Heat lamp

11 (26)

24 (43)

 

Floor heating

4 (10)

6 (10)

 

Lamp and floor heating

27 (64)

25 (45)

 

Other

0 (0)

1 (2)

 
  1. aRespondents were requested to base their answers on an average farrowing batch during the last 12 months
  2. bP value of the entire variable
  3. cFirst week after farrowing
  4. dχ2-test
  5. eFisher’s exact test