Skip to main content

Table 2 Concentrations of faecal bile acids (µg/g)

From: Changes in the faecal bile acid profile in dogs fed dry food vs high content of beef: a pilot study

Dog_ida

Diet

CA

CDCA

DCA

LCA

UDCA

G-DCA

G-LCA

T-CA

T-CDCA

T-DCA

T-LCA

1

CD1

32

41

54

52

13

1

1

3

1

1

0

HMB

40

53

67

53

21

0

2

5

1

1

0

CD2

112

61

36

43

8

4

2

2

1

1

0

3

CD1

55

45

73

65

16

2

1

5

2

2

0

HMB

437

105

182

95

56

4

1

28

1

52

1

CD2

122

102

62

59

23

0

2

4

1

1

0

4

CD1

49

48

97

97

13

5

1

19

7

41

14

HMB

50

29

72

66

13

0

1

31

4

22

5

CD2

26

25

43

56

11

0

1

11

2

7

4

5

CD1

29

25

61

75

12

2

1

5

2

8

3

HMB

53

38

95

82

26

4

2

7

1

17

5

CD2

22

22

36

49

10

2

1

1

0

2

1

6

CD1

29

22

39

50

9

2

1

2

1

5

3

HMB

137

76

132

97

30

7

3

10

1

16

4

CD2

17

17

32

45

6

6

2

2

1

5

2

7

CD1

77

33

22

35

5

8

1

2

1

3

2

HMB

236

82

196

131

31

10

3

21

3

66

9

CD2

31

29

35

51

4

5

2

3

1

4

2

10

CD1

253

107

88

88

13

8

2

8

2

7

2

HMB

82

44

88

64

16

11

3

2

1

5

1

CD2

157

101

133

111

18

18

3

7

2

11

4

11

CD1

237

100

70

91

47

0

1

29

7

15

6

HMB

101

141

122

87

23

3

2

11

1

17

3

CD2

45

54

61

69

15

5

2

3

1

6

2

  1. The concentrations were determined semiquantitatively
  2. CA cholic acid, CDCA chenodeoxycholic acid, DCA deoxycholic acid, LCA litocholic, UDCA ursodeoxycholic acid, glycine-conjugated DCA (G-DCA) and LCA (G-LCA), taurine-conjugated CA (T-CA), CDCA (T-CDCA), DCA (T-DCA), and LCA (T-LCA))
  3. aDetailed demographics of these dogs are given in Table 1
Back to article page

Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica

ISSN: 1751-0147