Skip to main content

Table 4 Synthesis of results of eligible studies reporting outcomes from immunomodulatory and immunosuppressive drug protocols in the treatment of canine primary ITP

From: Immunomodulatory and immunosuppressive drug protocols in the treatment of canine primary immune thrombocytopenia, a scoping review

Study

Bianco et al. [28]

Balog et al. [18]

Huang et al. [29]

Putsche and Kohn [8]

Kohn et al. [10]

Yau and Bianco [17]

Characteristics

Randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled, clinical trial

(Randomized), multicenter, blinded, clinical trial

Retrospective (case–control study)

Retrospective case series with a nested cohort study

Prospective case series

Prospective case series

Critical appraisal

LOE 1++

Very small number of dogs in each group

Strongly supportive enrollment

Low statistical power and risk of confounding

LOE 1+

Small number of dogs in each group

Uncertain enrollment

Low statistical power and risk of confounding

LOE 3

Small to very small number of dogs in each group

Uncertain enrollment

LOE 3

Small to very small number of dogs in each group

Uncertain enrollment

LOE 3

Very small number of dogs in each group

Uncertain enrollment

LOE 3

Very small number of dogs in each group

Uncertain enrollment

Results of individual sources

Tx1: CS + hIVIG

C: CS

Improvementa(Tx1): Platelet recovery Duration of hospitalization

No improvementb: Complete platelet recovery

Survival 6-month

Tx1: CS + hIVIG

C: CS + Vinc

No improvementb: Platelet recovery

Duration of hospitalization Survival to discharge

Survival 6-month

Survival 1-year

N/A

Tx1: CS

Tx2: CS + Vinc

Tx3: CS + Aza

Tx4: CS + Cyclo

C: Tx2 + Tx3 + Tx4

No improvementb: Mortality 1684-days

Relapse 1684-days

N/A

N/A

  1. Summary of the study characteristics, the level of evidence and methodological quality by critical appraisal, and the results of comparative studies
  2. Synthesis of results of eligible studies reporting outcomes from immunomodulatory and immunosuppressive drug protocols in the treatment of canine primary ITP. Summary of the study characteristics, the level of evidence and methodological quality by critical appraisal, and the results of comparative studies
  3. Aza, azathioprine; C, comparator; Cyclo, cyclosporine; CS, Corticosteroids; (case–control study), investigating association between recent vaccination and ITP but case series for the therapeutic intervention; hIVIG, human intravenous immunoglobulin; (randomized), study claimed to be randomized but procedure not described; LOE, level of evidence; Tx1-4, Immunomodulatory and/or immunosuppressive treatment; Vinc, Vincristine
  4. aImprovement in outcome was defined when a significant difference in outcome measures between treatment and comparator was detected and if the treatment was superior to the comparator
  5. bNo improvement in outcome was defined when no significant difference in outcome measures between treatment and comparator was detected
  6. N/A, Non-applicable, as these studies did not provide statistical information between groups