Open Access

Cryptosporidium parvum and Giardia intestinalis in Calf Diarrhoea in Sweden

  • C Björkman1,
  • C Svensson2,
  • B Christensson3 and
  • K de Verdier4
Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica200344:145

https://doi.org/10.1186/1751-0147-44-145

Received: 24 April 2003

Accepted: 25 August 2003

Published: 30 September 2003

Abstract

The objective of this study conducted in 75 herds was to investigate the presence and significance of Cryptosporidium parvum and Giardia intestinalis in Swedish dairy calves in comparison with rotavirus, coronavirus and Escherichia coli K99+. The farmers were asked to collect faecal samples from each heifer calf that had diarrhoea between birth and 90 days of age, and also from a healthy calf of the same age. In total, 270 samples were collected and analysed. C. parvum, either alone or together with G. intestinalis and/or rotavirus, was detected in 16 (11%) and 6 (5%) of the samples from diarrhoeic and healthy calves, respectively. Even though a higher proportion of diarrhoeic calves shed C. parvum, the difference between the groups was not statistically significant (p = 0.067), possibly due to the low number of positive samples. G. intestinalis was found in 42 (29%) of the diarrhoea samples and in 29 (23%) of the samples from healthy calves. Rotavirus and coronavirus were demonstrated in 24% and 3% of the diarrhoea samples, respectively, whereas E. coli K99+ was only found in samples from 2 healthy calves. C. parvum and G. intestinalis were found in samples from calves 7 to 84 days of age and during all seasons. The results confirm that C. parvum is present in Swedish dairy herds and might have clinical significance. G. intestinalis was the most common agent found but the importance of this parasite remains unclear. Both parasites have suggested zoonotic potential and thus warrant further attention. In addition, rotavirus is a major pathogen in neonatal enteritis in Sweden, whereas coronavirus and E. coli K99+ seem to be of less importance.

Keywords

Cryptosporidium parvum Giardia intestinalis rotavirus coronavirus Escherichia coli calf diarrhoea

Sammandrag

Cryptosporidium parvum och Giardia intestinalis vid kalvdiarré i svenska mjölkkobesättningar.

Avsikten med denna studie var att undersöka förekomst och betydelse av Cryptosporidium parvum och Giardia intestinalis hos svenska kalvar, jämfört med rotavirus, coronavirus och Escherichia coli K99+. Djurägarna i 75 mjölkkobesättningar tog träckprover från upp till 90 dagar gamla kalvar som hade diarré, samt från friska kalvar i samma ålder. Totalt insamlades och analyserades 270 prover. C. parvum, enbart eller tillsammans med G. intestinalis och/eller rotavirus, påvisades i 16 (11%) av proverna från kalvar med diarré och 6 (5%) av de friska kalvarna. Skillnaden mellan grupperna var inte statistiskt signifikant (p=0,067), möjligen beroende på det låga antalet positiva prover. G. intestinalis påvisades hos 42 (29%) prover från kalvar med diarré och hos 29 (23%) friska kalvar. Rotavirus påvisades i 24% och coronavirus i 3% av proverna från diarrékalvarna medan E. coli K99+ bara återfanns i prover från 2 friska kalvar. C. parvum och G. intestinalis påvisades i prover från kalvar mellan 7 och 84 dagars ålder och under hela året. Resultaten bekräftar att C. parvum förekommer i svenska mjölkkobesättningar och kan ha klinisk betydelse. G. intestinalis var det agens som påvisades hos flest kalvar, men parasitens betydelse för kalvhälsan är oklar. Fynden är intressanta då båda parasiterna anses ha zoonotisk potential. Resultaten styrker även tidigare iakttagelser att rotavirus är den vanligaste infektiösa orsaken till kalvdiarré i Sverige.

Introduction

Cryptosporidium parvum is an intracellular protozoan parasite causing gastrointestinal disease and diarrhoea in a variety of animal species including cattle, sheep and man. The first report on bovine cryptosporidiosis was published in 1971, when C. parvum parasites were identified in the faeces from an 8-month-old heifer with chronic diarrhoea [17]. Today C. parvum is recognised as an important infection in young calves. The most prominent finding in an infected calf is diarrhoea, sometimes accompanied by depression, inappetence, fever, dehydration and/or poor condition. The calf most often recovers spontaneously within 1–2 weeks even though there is a large variation between individuals in how they respond to and recover from infection [26, 14]. Concomitant infection with other enteric pathogens can aggravate the clinical signs and prolong the duration of disease [14]. C. parvum is transmitted as microscopic oocysts that are excreted in the faeces from infected animals. Finding oocysts in diarrhoeic faeces is indicative of C. parvum being the cause of the disease. During the first two weeks of infection a calf can shed millions of oocysts [7, 27] which ensures efficient dissemination of the parasite.

The intestinal flagellate Giardia intestinalis (synonyms G. duodenalis and G. lamblia) has a global distribution and is a common protozoan parasite in many animal species and in man [32, 10]. In calves it can cause diarrhoea, malabsorption and growth retardation. However, the severity of disease is highly variable and many G. intestinalis infections are asymptomatic [32, 18]. An infected individual sheds microscopic cysts with the faeces and in calves intermittent cyst shedding can continue for several weeks [33]. Infections with rotavirus and coronavirus are well-known causes of acute diarrhoea in young calves, usually occurring in calves at 1–3 weeks of age [13, 19]. The clinical picture is similar to that of cryptosporidiosis and comprises diarrhoea, depression, anorexia and mild fever. In several surveys, rotavirus has been the most commonly detected infectious agent in bovine neonatal enteritis [21, 19]. Other infectious agents – Eimeria spp, bredavirus, calicivirus, astrovirus, parvovirus, Salmonella spp., Campylobacter spp., Clostridium perfringens – are also reported as enteric pathogens in neonatal calf diarrhoea [25]. Bovine viral diarrhoea virus has the ability to cause immunosuppression and enhance the severity of calf diseases, including neonatal calf diarrhoea. Enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli (E. coli) K99+ causes diarrhoea in very young calves and the clinical outcome may be fatal. A rapid and extensive loss of body water and electrolytes can cause severe weakness, recumbence and hypothermia [3].

From a zoonotic point of view the most interesting of the calf enteric pathogens are C. parvum, G. intestinalis and Salmonella spp. However, Salmonella spp. are uncommon in Swedish dairy herds as a result of many years of intensive control measures [29]. Information about the presence of C. parvum infection in Swedish cattle is limited. In a study comprising 279 dairy calves aged 0–14 days, 5% of the calves harboured C. parvum [31]. In a more recent investigation, C. parvum oocysts were detected in 3 out of 14 herds with calf diarrhoea problems [5]. Bovine G. intestinalis infection has been reported in Sweden [1] but the prevalence and importance of giardiosis in the Swedish cattle population is not known.

The objective of the present study was to investigate the presence and significance of C. parvum and G. intestinalis in Swedish dairy calves in comparison with rotavirus, coronavirus and E. coli K99+.

Materials and methods

Animals and samples

The study was conducted in dairy herds in the former Skaraborg county in the southwest of Sweden between 1 January 1998 and 31 March 1999. The herds participated in an a long-term research project about health and growth rate in dairy heifer calves. Details about the herds, which had 29–94 cows, considered a reasonably representative sample of Swedish dairy farms, have been reported elsewhere [22]. The farmers were requested to take faecal samples from each up to 90 day-old heifer calf born in 1998 that had diarrhoea, and from a healthy calf of the same age. Diarrhoea was defined as faeces with a consistency that was looser than normally observed in calves, continuing for ≥2 days. Healthy was defined as absence of diarrhoea. The samples were to be collected the second day after the onset of diarrhoea and before any possible antibiotic treatment was given. The samples together with information about date of birth of the calves were sent by mail to the laboratory. The age of a calf was calculated as days between date of birth and date of arrival of sample to the laboratory. For healthy calves kept in group pens, the birth date was calculated as the mean between the birth dates of the youngest and oldest calf in the pen. At arrival, the samples were immediately analysed for presence of C. parvum, rotavirus and coronavirus. An aliquot of each sample was stored at -70°C and later analysed for G. intestinalis and E. coli K99+.

Laboratory methods

Presence of C. parvum oocysts was demonstrated by microscopic examination of faecal smears stained with the modified Ziehl-Neelsen technique [8]. Rotavirus was analysed by a group A rotavirus ELISA [23] using an optical density value of 0.1 to discriminate between positive and negative samples. Coronavirus was analysed by ELISA with an in-house method developed and used for routine diagnosis at the Swedish National Veterinary Institute. Commercially available ELISAs were used for demonstration of G. intestinalis (Prospect Giardia microplate assay, Alexon-Trend, Ramsey, MN, USA) and E. coli K99+ (BioX, Bruxelles, Belgium).

Statistical analysis

Associations between presence of enteric pathogens and diarrhoea were investigated by Chi square test (Stata Statistical Software Release 7.0, Stata Corp., College Station, TX, USA).

Results

Of 122 herds invited to participate in the study, 75 (61%) submitted samples. In total, samples from 146 diarrhoeic and 124 healthy calves were sent to the laboratory and analysed. The farmers sometimes submitted samples from several diseased calves but only a single sample from a healthy calf, and this is the reason for the discrepancy between the number of diarrhoeic and healthy calves. Of the 3081 heifer calves born in the study herds during 1998, 302 developed diarrhoea before 90 days of age [22]. Thus, faecal samples were submitted from 48% of the diarrhoeic calves in the herds.

C. parvum, either alone or together with G. intestinalis and/or rotavirus, was detected in 16 (11%) of the 146 samples from diarrhoea calves, whereas G. intestinalis, rotavirus, coronavirus and E. coli K99+ were demonstrated in 42 (29%), 35 (24%), 5 (3%) and 0 of the diarrhoea samples, respectively (Table 1). The presence of rotavirus was significantly associated with diarrhoea (P = 0.001) and a tendency to an association was found between diarrhoea and the presence of C. parvum oocysts (P = 0.067). C. parvum, G. intestinalis and rotavirus were found in 17/75 (23%), 38/75 (51%) and 28/75 (37%) or the herds, respectively.
Table 1

Detection of enteropathogens in faecal samples from diarrhoeic and healthy calves younger than 90 days in a study comprising 75 dairy herds from south-east Sweden.

 

C. parvum only

G. intestinalis only

Rotavirus only

Coronavirus only

E. coli K99+ only

C. parvum + G. intestinalis

C. parvum + rotavirus

G. intestinalis + rotavirus

Rotavirus + coronavirus

C. parvum + G. intestinalis + rotavirus

Diarrhoea (n = 146)

10 (7%)

31 (21%)

25 (17%)

3 (2%)

0

4 (3%)

1 (0.5%)

6 (4%)

2 (1%)

1 (0.5%)

Healthy (n = 124)

4 (3%)

26 (21%)

10 (8%)

0

2 (2%)

2 (2%)

0

1 (1%)

0

0

Total (n = 270)

14 (5%)

57 (21%)

35 (13%)

3 (1%)

2 (1%)

6 (2%)

1 (0.5%)

7 (3%)

2 (1%)

1 (0.5%)

C. parvum, G. intestinalis and rotavirus were found in calves that were between 7–84, 9–84 and 5–78 days old, respectively (Figure 1). These agents were found in the faecal samples throughout the year.
Figure 1

Distribution of infectious agents in diarrhoeic and healthy calves (n = 268) younger than 3 months of age in 75 Swedish dairy herds.

Discussion

This is the first large scale investigation of C. parvum and G. intestinalis infections in Swedish dairy calves. Giardia antigen was found in almost a quarter of the investigated samples, and 50% of the 75 herds that sent samples to the laboratory had at least one positive calf. This agrees with the relatively high prevalences of Giardia infection in calves reported from point prevalence studies performed in other parts of the world [18, 15, 2]. The only previous investigation of G. intestinalis in Swedish farm animals was done in sheep and revealed that 22% and 68% of investigated lambs and sheep flocks, respectively, harboured the infection [11]. G. intestinalis is assumed to be a potential pathogen in cattle [33] but in the present study the parasite was equally common in diarrhoeic as in healthy calves, giving an ubiquitous impression. Similar findings have also been reported by others [18, 9].

The zoonotic potential for Giardia is under debate. However, the high prevalence of infection in Swedish cattle and sheep together with recent reports that cattle and sheep can shed cysts of a genotype that infect humans [15, 30] warrant further attention. C. parvum in livestock is by current knowledge indicated to be an important reservoir for cryptosporidiosis in humans, and contaminated water may be a key vector for the parasite. It is therefore noteworthy that 8% of the calves in the present study showed oocyst shedding, which was not restricted to scouring calves.

These overall results regarding cryptosporidiosis are in accordance with international studies showing that rotavirus and C. parvum are the infectious agents most often found in young calves with enteritis [21, 12]. They are also consistent with a previous finding that rotavirus and C. parvum are the predominant agents causing neonatal diarrhoea in Swedish cattle herds [5]. That E. coli K99+ was not found in any of the diarrhoea samples and in only 2 samples collected from clinically healthy calves, partly contradict results from a Swedish investigation performed in 1987–88. In that study, E. coli K99+ was demonstrated in 11.5% of faecal samples from dairy calves younger than 14 days and a similar percentage of diarrhoeic and healthy calves were infected [31]. However, our results support a previous suggestion that there was a substantial over-treatment with antimicrobial drugs in the farms included in the present study; 30% of the calves ≤90 days with diarrhoea were treated with antibiotics [16].

In the present study C. parvum and rotavirus were found throughout the 90 days sampling period, except for the first neonatal days. A similar observation was reported by e.g. [18] who in an epidemiological investigation found that even though C. parvum infection was more common among neonatal calves, 30% of the 1.5–4 month-old calves were infected. Also asymptomatic adult cattle have been found to excrete C. parvum oocysts [20] and have been implied to transmit the infection in cattle herds.

Although C. parvum is recognised as an enteric pathogen in calves, an association between shedding of oocysts and presence of diarrhoea is not always seen [21, 33]. A lack of relationship between oocyst shedding and diarrhoea has been reported from an investigation of a Swedish herd with cryptosporidiosis [24]. In the present study the higher proportion of C. parvum infected calves in the diarrhoea group compared with the healthy calves was not statistically significant. However, further studies to investigate any association between diarrhoea and C. parvum are desirable since the number of infected calves in this study was low (n = 22). There is a great variability in the clinical outcome of infection depending on e.g. the infection dose and the immune status of the calf [4]. It is therefore not surprising that subclinical C. parvum infection does occur. Further, it has been shown that there is a difference in the oocyst shedding pattern between individuals; the shedding often continues for several days and can start before the onset of scouring and continue after the diarrhoea has ceased [7, 6]. In the present study C. parvum was found in faeces from calves sampled during all seasons. An absence of association between season of the year and prevalence of the parasite was reported by [28]. However, others have found seasonal variation in the prevalence of bovine C. parvum infection, maybe owing to climate factors and various managemental factors such as seasonal production of livestock [4].

Concomitant infections with C. parvum and other enteric pathogens increase the risk for diarrhoea and might aggravate the clinical signs [4, 6]. In the present study it is noteworthy that the calves with both C. parvum and rotavirus had diarrhoea and were very young, 7 and 9 days old. To conclude, our results confirm that C. parvum is present in Swedish dairy herds and might have clinical significance. G. intestinalis was the most common agent found but the importance of this parasite remains unclear. Both parasites have suggested zoonotic potential and thus warrant further attention. In addition, rotavirus is a major pathogen in neonatal enteritis in Sweden whereas coronavirus and E. coli K99+ seem to be of less importance.

Notes

Declarations

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the participating farmers for submitting samples and Helena Reineck, Karin Lundborg and Jonica Östlund for valuable assistance throughout the study. We are grateful to Patrik Öhagen for advice on the statistical analysis and to Arvid Uggla for constructive criticism on the manuscript. The investigation was financially supported by Agria Insurances, the Swedish Society for Protection of Animals, the Swedish Council for Forestry and Agricultural Research and the Swedish Farmers' Foundation for Agricultural Research.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Ruminant Medicine and Veterinary Epidemiology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences
(2)
Department of Animal Environment and Health, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences
(3)
Department of Parasitology, National Veterinary Institute and Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences
(4)
Department of Ruminant and Porcine Diseases, National Veterinary Institute

References

  1. Anonymous: SWEPAR Triennial report 1998–2000. 2001, Swedish National Veterinary Institute and Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, 71-Google Scholar
  2. Appelbee AJ, Frederick LM, Heitman TL, Olson ME: Prevalence and genotyping of Giardia duodenalis from beef calves in Alberta, Canada. Vet Parasitol. 2003, 112: 289-294. 10.1016/S0304-4017(02)00422-3.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Butler DG, Clarke RC: Diarrhoea and dysentery in calves. Escherichia coli in domestic animals and humans. Edited by: Gyles CL. 1994, CAB International, Oxon, 91-116.Google Scholar
  4. de Graaf DC, Vanopdenbosch E, Ortega-Mora LM, Abbassi H, Peeters JE: A review of the importance of cryptosporidiosis in farm animals. Int J Parasitol. 1999, 29: 1269-1287. 10.1016/S0020-7519(99)00076-4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. de Verdier Klingenberg K, Svensson L: Group A rotavirus as a cause of neonatal enteritis in Sweden. Acta Vet Scand. 1998, 39: 195-199.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Enemark HL: Cryptosporidium. Studies of molecular characteristics and pathogenicity. PhD thesis. 2002, The Royal Veterinary and Agricultural University. CopenhagenGoogle Scholar
  7. Fayer R, Gasbarre L, Pasquali P, Canals A, Almeria S, Zarlenga D: Cryptosporidium parvum infection in bovine neonates: dynamic clinical, parasitic and immunologic patterns. Int J Parasitol. 1998, 28: 49-56. 10.1016/S0020-7519(97)00170-7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Henriksen SA, Pohlenz JFL: Staining of Cryptosporidia by a modified Ziehl-Neelsen technique. Acta Vet Scand. 1981, 22: 594-596.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Huetink REC, Giessen JWBvd, Noordhuizen JPTM, Ploeger HW: Epidemiology of Cryptosporidium parvum and Giardia duodenalis on a dairy farm. Vet Parasitol. 2001, 102: 53-67. 10.1016/S0304-4017(01)00514-3.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Kulda J, Nohýková E: Giardia in humans and animals. Parasitic protozoa. Edited by: Kreier JP. 1995, Academic Press, San Diego, 10: 225-430. 2View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Ljungström B-L, Svärd S, Schwan O: Förekomst och klinisk betydelse av giardiainfektion hos lamm i Sverige. Presence and clinical importance of Giardia infection in Swedish lambs. Svensk VetTidn. 2001, 53: 693-695. In SwedishGoogle Scholar
  12. McDonough SP, Stull CL, Osburn BI: Enteric pathogens in intensively reared veal calves. Am J Vet Res. 1994, 55: 1516-1520.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Mebus CA, Stair EL, Rhodes MB, Twiehaus MJ: Pathology of neonatal calf diarrhea induced by a coronavirus-like agent. Vet Pathol. 1973, 10: 45-64.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. O'Donoghue PJ: Cryptosporidium and cryptosporidiosis in man and animals. Int J Parasitol. 1995, 25: 139-195. 10.1016/0020-7519(94)E0059-V.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. O'Handley RM, Olson ME, Fraser D, Adams P, Thompson RCA: Prevalence and genotypic characterisation of Giardia in dairy calves from Western Australia and Western Canada. Vet Parasitol. 2000, 90: 193-200. 10.1016/S0304-4017(00)00235-1.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Ortman K, Svensson C: Antimicrobial use in Swedish dairy calves and replacement heifers. Vet Record. 2003,Google Scholar
  17. Panciera RJ, Thomassen RW, Garner FM: Cryptosporidial infection in a calf. Vet Pathol. 1971, 8: 479-484.Google Scholar
  18. Quílez J, Sánchez-Acedo C, Cacho Ed, Clavel A, Causapé AC: Prevalence of Cryptosporidium and Giardia infections in cattle in Aragón (northeast Spain). Vet Parasitol. 1996, 66: 139-146. 10.1016/S0304-4017(96)01015-1.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Saif LJ, Rosen BI, Parwani AV: Bovine rotavirus. Viral infections of the gastrointestinal tract. Edited by: Kapikian AZ. 1994, Marcel Dekker Inc., New York, 279-368. 2Google Scholar
  20. Scott CA, Smith HV, Mtambo MMA, Gibbs HA: An epidemiological study of Cryptosporidium parvum in two herds of adult beef cattle. Vet Parasitol. 1995, 277-288. 10.1016/0304-4017(94)00694-8.Google Scholar
  21. Snodgrass DR, Terzolo HR, Sherwood D, Campbell I, Menzies JD, Synge BA: Aetiology of diarrhoea in young calves. Vet Record. 1986, 119: 31-34.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Svensson C, Lundborg K, Emanuelson U, Olsson S-O: Morbidity in Swedish dairy calves from birth to 90 days of age and individual calf-level risk factors for infectious diseases. Prev Vet Med. 2003, 58: 179-197. 10.1016/S0167-5877(03)00046-1.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Svensson L, Uhnoo I, Grandien M, Wadell G: Molecular epidemiology of rotavirus infections in Uppsala, Sweden. J Med Virol. 1986, 18: 101-111. 10.1002/jmv.1890180202.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Tråvén M, Uggla A, Viring S, Ewerlöf N: Cryptosporidios hos kalvar i mjölkkobesättning. Outbreak of cryptosporidiosis in dairy calves. Svensk VetTidn. 1989, 41: 533-538. In SwedishGoogle Scholar
  25. Tzipori S: The aethiology and diagnosis of calf diarrhoea. Vet Record. 1981, 108: 510-515.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Tzipori S, Smith M, Halpin C, Angus KW, Sherwood D, Campbell I: Experimental cryptosporidiosis in calves: clinical manifestations and pathological findings. Vet Record. 1983, 112: 116-120.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Uga S, Matsuo J, Kono E, Kimura K, Inoue M, Rai SK, Ono K: Prevalence of Cryptosporidium parvum infection and pattern of oocyst shedding in calves in Japan. Vet Parasitol. 2000, 94: 27-32. 10.1016/S0304-4017(00)00338-1.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Wade SE, Mohammed HO, Schaaf SL: Prevalence of Giardia sp., Cryptosporidium parvum and Cryptosporidium muris (C. andersoni) in 109 dairy herds in five counties of southeastern New York. Vet Parasitol. 2000, 93: 1-11. 10.1016/S0304-4017(00)00337-X.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Wahlström H: Zoonoses in Sweden up to and including 1999. 2001, National Veterinary Institute, Uppsala, 48-Google Scholar
  30. van Keulen Hv, Macechko PT, Wade S, Schaaf S, Wallis PM, Erlandsen SL: Presence of human Giardia in domestic, farm and wild animals, and environmental samples suggests a zoonotic potenital for giardiasis. Vet Parasitol. 2002, 108: 97-107. 10.1016/S0304-4017(02)00181-4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Viring S, Olsson S-O, Alenius S, Emanuelsson U, Jacobsson S-O, Larsson B, Linde N, Uggla A: Studies of enteric pathogens and -globulin levels of neonatal calves in Sweden. Acta Vet Scand. 1993, 34: 271-279.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Xiao L: Giardia infection in farm animals. Parasitology Today. 1994, 10: 436-438. 10.1016/0169-4758(94)90178-3.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Xiao L, Herd RP: Infection patterns of Cryptosporidium and Giardia in calves. Vet Parasitol. 1994, 55: 257-262. 10.1016/0304-4017(93)00645-F.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s) 2002

Advertisement