- Original article
- Open Access
Verotoxinogenic Escherichia coli(VTEC) O157:H7 – A Nationwide Swedish Survey of Bovine Faeces
© The Author(s) 2002
- Received: 08 October 2002
- Accepted: 22 January 2003
- Published: 31 March 2003
In the autumn of 1995 the first outbreaks of enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli O157:H7 including ca 100 human cases were reported in Sweden. From outbreaks in other countries it is known that cattle may carry these bacteria and in many cases is the source of infection. Therefore, the present study was performed to survey the Swedish bovine population for the presence of verotoxin-producing E. coli (VTEC) of serotype O157:H7. Individual faecal samples were collected at the 16 main Swedish abattoirs from April 1996 to August 1997. Of 3071 faecal samples, VTEC O157 were found in 37 samples indicating a prevalence of 1.2% (CI95% 0.8–1.6). All 37 isolates carried genes encoding for verotoxin (VT1 and/or VT2), intimin, EHEC-haemolysin and flagellin H7 as determined by PCR. Another 3 strains were of serotype O157:H7 but did not produce verotoxins. The 37 VTEC O157:H7 strains were further characterised by phage typing and pulsed-field gel electrophoresis. The results clearly show that VTEC O157:H7 is established in the Swedish bovine population and indicate that the prevalence of cattle carrying VTEC O157:H7 is correlated to the overall geographical distribution of cattle in Sweden. Results of this study have formed the basis for specific measures recommended to Swedish cattle farmers, and furthermore, a permanent monitoring programme was launched for VTEC O157:H7 in Swedish cattle at slaughter.
Verotoxinproducerande Escherichia coli (VTEC) O157:H7 i Sverige - en landstäckande undersökning av nötträck efter slakt.
Under hösten 1995 drabbades Sverige för första gången av ett utbrott av enterohemoragisk Escherichia coli O157:H7, då ett 100-tal humanfall rapporterades kliniskt. Från studier i andra länder har det visats att idisslare kan vara bärare av bakterien, och anses ofta vara direkt eller indirekt källa till human smitta. För att undersöka om även svensk nötboskap bär verotoxinproducerande E. coli (VTEC) av serotypen O157:H7, gjordes en studie genom provtagning av nötträck på slakterier. Mellan april 1996 och augusti 1997 samlades 3071 träckprover in vid de 16 största slakterierna i Sverige. Av dessa prov var 37 (1,2%) positiva för verotoxin-producerande (VT1 och/eller VT2) E. coli av serotypen O157:H7. Alla dessa isolat bar på generna eaeA, EHEC hlyA och H7. Ytterligare 3 isolat var av serotypen O157, men producerade inte verotoxin. De 37 verotoxinproducerande isolaten karakteriserades vidare genom fagtypning och makrorestriktionsenzymanalys. Undersökningen visade att VTEC O157:H7 finns etablerad hos svensk nötboskap och prevalensen är väl korrelerad med den geografiska förekomsten av nötboskap i Sverige. Resultaten från denna studie har legat till grund för specifika rekommendationer till svenska djurägare. Studien övergick direkt efter avslutande till ett permanent övervakningsprogram för VTEC O157:H7 vid slakt.
- between phage typing
The first case of enterohemorrhagic colitis due to infection with verotoxin-producing Escherichia coli (VTEC) O157:H7 in Sweden was reported in 1988 . Since then, and until the second half of 1995, not more than 3 annual cases of the infection have been recorded. However, in 1995, 114 human cases of infection caused by VTEC O157:H7 were reported. In 1996 and 1997 more than 100 cases were reported each year, but since 1998 the number has declined to below 100 cases per year http://www.smittskyddsinstitutet.se, during these years most infections being reported during the summer.
In Sweden, infections with VTEC O157:H7 in humans have been compulsorily notifiable since January 1, 1996 http://www.sva.se/pdf/zoonosrapp2001.pdf. Other VTEC serotypes than O157:H7 are not notifiable, but may be an emerging problem also in Sweden as in other European countries. However, other VTEC serotypes have, so far, occurred only in sporadic cases, and not in community outbreaks. The source of infection for verified human VTEC O157:H7 cases in Sweden has been determined only occasionally. When epidemio-logical investigations have indicated connections to farm animals or consumption of non-pasteurised milk, investigations on farm level have been initiated. Between 1995 and 2002, VTEC O157:H7 was detected in animal samples on 19 farms in such investigations (unpublished data).
Experiences from outbreaks in other countries show that dairy and beef cattle in many cases carry E. coli O157:H7 [6, 24, 34]. In 1995 it was not known whether VTEC O157:H7 was present in the Swedish bovine population. Hence, a nationwide monitoring programme was initiated in April 1996 to survey the Swedish bovine population for the presence of VTEC O157:H7, and if found, to what extent. Furthermore, isolates of VTEC O157:H7 were to be characterised by their virulence genes (vtx1; vtx2; eaeA and EHEC hlyA), phage typing and pulsed-field gel electrophoresis.
The study design
This study was designed as a nationwide monitoring study, with the aim to detect a prevalence in the population of at least 0.1% with a 90% confidence level . The total population of cattle in Sweden is about 1.8 million. Faecal samples were collected at the 16 main abattoirs; producing 90% of all Swedish beef, and 3000 cattle were aimed to be individually sampled. The collection of samples was performed from April 1996 to August 1997. All abattoirs sent samples each second week with a few exceptions when the premises were closed due to bank holidays, and the number of samples was proportional to the number of cattle passing through the abattoir. The local veterinary staff at each abattoir performed sampling, according to detailed instructions. Age of sampled animals was noted according to the abattoir classification system, i.e. older calves (mainly 5–8 months), young stock (mainly 12–24 months) or adult cattle (mainly 36 months or more). The breed was noted as dairy, beef or crossbreed. Surplus dairy calves may be raised as beef cattle, and in this study these animals are most often recorded as dairy breed. Due to legal aspects the supplier's identity was coded in order to protect identity. The sampling veterinarians were asked to, as far as possible, avoid multiple sampling from the same supplier. Individual samples were collected from ampulla recti after the digestive tract had been separated from the body. Samples were sent as refrigerated to the National Veterinary Institute and analysed within 24 h of sampling for the presence of E. coli serogroup O157 strains.
Isolation of VTEC O157
From each sample 10 grams of faeces were pre-enriched in 90 ml buffered peptone water (Oxoid CM 509; Oxoid, Basingstoke, England) for 6 ± 0.5 h in 37°C. After pre-enrichment, 1 ml broth was processed by immunomagnetic separation (IMS) using paramagnetic beads coated with antibodies to E. coli O157 (Dynabeads anti E. coli O157; Dynal, Oslo, Norway). IMS was performed according to the manufacturer's instructions. The IMS step was performed either directly after 6 ± 0.5 h incubation or after storing the pre-enrichment broth in cold storage overnight, 16–20 h at 6–8°C. After IMS, the beads were spread out on sorbitol McConkey agar supplemented with 0.05 mg/l cefixime and 2.5 mg/l of potassium tellurite (CT SMAC; Dynal, Oslo, Norway). After incubation at 37°C for 18–24 h, the agar plates were screened for suspected sorbitole negative colonies of E. coli O157. From every sample up to 5 suspected colonies (if available) were picked for agglutination with a latex kit (Oxoid DR 622; Oxoid, Basingstoke, England). Colonies positive by agglutination were further confirmed with biochemistry using the API 20 E system (bioMérieux, Lyon, France).
From each sample that yielded sorbitol negative E. coli O157 colonies, one colony was analysed by PCR to identify genes coding for verotoxin 1 and 2 (vtx1 and vtx2) according to , H7 (fliC) according to  and intimin (eaeA) and EHEC-haemolysin (EHEC-hlyA) according to .
Genotyping of E. coli O157:H7 isolates by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE)
Chromosomal DNA for pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) analysis was prepared essentially according to , but with the following modifications. Bacteria were grown overnight at 37°C on Luria Broth-agar plates. Four colonies were suspended in 250 μl EC-buffer (1 M NaCl, 10 mM Tris, 200 mM EDTA, 0.5% sarcosyl, 0.2% sodium deoxycholate, pH 8.0) warmed to 37°C and then mixed with 350 μl prewarmed Agarose Prep (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech, Uppsala, Sweden; 1.5% in EC-buffer) and 30 μl lysozyme-stock solution (20 mg/ml) (Roche Diagnostics Scandinavia AB, Bromma, Sweden). The mixture was distributed into disposable agarose plug moulds (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech, Uppsala, Sweden) and left to solidify for 15 min at 4°C. The agarose plugs were transferred to 10 ml Falcon tubes containing 2.5 ml EC-buffer and 1 mg proteinase K/ml buffer solution, and incubated at 56°C for at least 20 h. After the proteinase K incubation the plugs were washed with TE-buffer (10 mM Tris, 1 mM EDTA, pH 8.0) and proteinase K was inactivated by adding 50 μl from a stock solution of 20 mM Pefablock (Roche Diagnostics Scandinavia AB, Bromma, Sweden) into 5 ml TE-buffer, leaving the plugs at 37°C for 2 h. Finally, the plugs were washed with 5 ml TE-buffer at 37°C (2 × 30 min), and then stored in TE-buffer at 4°C until further use.
Restriction endonuclease digestion and pulsed-field gel electrophoresis
The restriction endonuclease XbaI was used as recommended by the manufacturer (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech, Uppsala, Sweden). A thin slice of the gel plug (1 mm) was loaded onto a 1.2% agarose gel (NA Agarose; Amersham Pharmacia Biotech, Uppsala, Sweden) and run in a Gene Navigator unit (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech, Uppsala, Sweden), at 175 V and 12°C with buffer circulation. The programme was 10s, 3 h/15s, 6 h/20s, 6 h/40s, 5 h/60s, 4 h. After electrophoresis was completed the gels were stained with ethidium bromide for 20 min (0.1% in water), washed in water for 20 min and then photographed under UV-light. λ DNA (New England Biolabs, Hitchin, UK) was used as marker for molecular size.
Polaroid photographs of macro restriction profiles were scanned with a UMAX Vista-S6E scanner (UMAX Technologies Inc, Dallas, Texas, USA) and digitalised using Adobe Photoshop 3.0.5 for Windows, and saved in TIFF format. These files were analysed using the GelCompar computer software version 4.0 (Applied Maths, Kortrijk, Belgium). Banding patterns were compared by the UPGMA (Unweighted Pair Group Method with Arithmetic Averages) clustering method, by using the Dice coefficient, according to the manufacturer's instruction.
Inter pretation and nomenclature of PFGE patterns
Any difference in banding patterns (disregarding bands less than 50 kB in size, i.e. below the lowest band of the molecular size marker used) between 2 genomic restriction profiles, was considered to be sufficient to regard the profiles as non-identical.
The differences in frequencies of positive isolates between age groups and breeds of animals, and between different seasons, respectively, were analysed by chi square analysis within the FREQ procedure in the SAS software package . Differences with p-values less than 0.05 were regarded as significant. The 95% confidence interval was also calculated in the SAS software package.
A total of 3071 samples were analysed and 37 were positive for VTEC O157, indicating a prevalence of 1.2% (CI95% 0.8–1.6). All 37 isolated strains carried the genes encoding for verotoxin (VT1 and/or VT2), intimin, EHEC-haemolysin and flagellin H7. According to the farm number given to each farm by the abattoir, the 3071 samples were collected from 2328 different premises. In 7 of the 3071 cases the farm number was not stated by the abattoir. Also, in some instances a cattle farm may have been given more than one farm number, and thus the exact number of premises sampled in this study is not known.
Number of faecal samples from which verotoxin-positive O157:H7 was isolated from a total of 3071 samples tested, and their corresponding virulence genes as determined by PCR.
Number of isolates
% of total number of sampled animals
Cattle with VTEC O157:H7-positive faecal samples, distributed according to age group.
Cattle with VTEC O157:H7-positive faecal samples, distributed according to breed.
Cattle with VTEC O157:H7-positive faecal samples, distributed according to sampling season.
Before 1996, verotoxin producing E. coli O157:H7 had never been diagnosed in Swedish cattle. However, only about 200 calves had been investigated in different research studies, and the methods used did not include E. coli O157:H7 antibody based immunomagnetic separation (IMS) (A. Franklin, National Veterinary Institute, Uppsala, Sweden, personal communication).
The results from the present study show that VTEC O157:H7 is present in the Swedish cattle population at a prevalence of ca 1.2% (CI95% 0.8–1.6). The prevalence of VTEC O157:H7-positive healthy cattle is in the range of what has been reported (0.4%-15.7%) in other western countries where extended studies have been performed on faecal samples from animals at slaughter [4, 6, 14, 15, 17, 20, 12, 23, 29, 30]. However, it is precarious to compare the prevalence between different studies, as different methods have been used. It has been shown in several studies that IMS is superior in detecting VTEC O157:H7, as compared with direct plating on selective agar media or plating after incubation in enrichment broth [5, 14, 20].
The geographical distribution of animals harbouring VTEC O157:H7 showed a concentration in the south part of Sweden, where most cattle are kept. This may indicate that the occurrence of cattle carrying VTEC O157:H7 is correlated to the geographical distribution of the cattle population. It must be mentioned that this may not be an appropriate description of the geographic distribution of VTEC O157:H7-harbouring cattle, as some abattoirs drain a large geographical area, and the region covered by each abattoir is not clearly defined. Also, the study was designed to answer the question if VTEC O157:H7-harbouring cattle were present in Sweden, not to show statistically relevant differences between the prevalence of this infection in different regions of Sweden.
The distribution according to age group of the animals showed that young animals (older calves) (3.9%) were more often found to be positive than adult cattle (0.6%). In other studies, it is also noted that young animals are more often found to be positive for VTEC O157:H7 than adult cattle [13, 19, 30]. In one study,  found that after experimental infection of calves and adult cattle with E. coli O157:H7, calves remained positive for longer periods.
The distribution according to breed of the animals showed that dairy cattle were more often positive than beef cattle, 1.4% versus 0.5%. However, fewer beef than dairy cattle were sampled. Also, surplus dairy calves may be raised as beef cattle, but were recorded as a dairy breed at slaughter. Other studies have shown a slight and probably not significantly higher rate of VTEC O157:H7 in beef than in dairy cattle, examples beeing  who found 0.71 and 0.28% respectively, and  who found 16.6% and 16.1%, respectively. Conversely,  found 13.4% and 16.1% for beef and dairy cattle, respectively.
During summer and early autumn, i.e. the grazing period, more positive samples were found compared with other seasons. However, in February, many samples (3.1%) were found to be positive. Five of these 7 samples were collected at one slaughterhouse on the same day, and it was later found that 4 of these samples were from young stock reared on one farm (see below). However, a peak in incidence in cattle during summer and early autumn has been described by several authors studying VTEC O157:H7 epidemiology on cattle farms or prevalence of VTEC O157:H7 on carcasses at slaughter [4, 6, 12, 13, 17, 19, 21, 29, 30].
Subtyping of E. coli O157:H7 has been performed in many studies to support epidemio-logical relationships between isolates within outbreaks or when transmission from cattle to humans has been suspected [2, 8, 18, 31, 32]. Among many methods suggested, phage typing and pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) seem to be preferable, and although phage typing was found to be less discriminatory than PFGE in many studies, it was considered valuable to support PFGE, as PFGE may be more difficult to interpret. The authors found that isolates differing by more than one band with XbaI from the outbreak strain were clearly not outbreak related, but isolates differing by one band were difficult to classify [3, 11]. Authors investigating large numbers of strains from human outbreaks reported high clonal stability within outbreaks [2, 31], whereas investigations on cattle farms suggest a fairly rapid mutation rate, with several, only slightly different, XbaI banding patterns found in cattle isolates from the same farm [8, 18].
In our study, the VTEC O157:H7 strains isolated from Swedish cattle were divided between 5 known phage types (PT 2, PT 4, PT 8, PT 14 and PT 32). In addition, 6 strains belonged to phage types not previously described. The 5 phage types identified in our study have all been found in cattle faeces in similar studies performed in Great Britain, Holland and Belgium [6, 14, 21, 25, 29]. PFGE could further discriminate within phage types.
Five groups of isolates with identical XbaI banding patterns were found in our study. To elucidate whether isolates were from the same source, we asked for further information from the abattoir, where the suppliers were coded with unique but anonymous numbers. In the case of the 2 isolates from Kil slaughterhouse, they were isolated on the same day and had the same supplier number. As for the 2 isolates from Uppsala slaughterhouse, they were collected on different dates (in 1996 and 1997, respectively) and were marked with different supplier numbers. Four isolates that grouped together by PFGE, came from 3 different abattoirs situated in different parts of Sweden. However, of these 4, 2 isolates from Visby slaughterhouse were collected on the same day and were marked with the same supplier number. From the slaughterhouse in Skara, 5 positive samples were collected on one day, in February 1996 (see above), with 4 different supplier numbers, indicating that they were from 4 different farms. However, as they all shared the same PFGE pattern, further investigations were made with the abattoir. It was thus revealed that the calves had been bought by the same cattle trader and kept on one farm before slaughter. Finally, of the isolates from Varberg slaughterhouse, 6 out of 7 showed identical PFGE patterns (Fig. 1). All but one of the 6 identical isolates shared supplier number, indicating that these 5 isolates originated from the same farm. Furthermore, the samples found positive from this particular supplier had been taken on 4 different occasions. The seventh positive sample from Varberg slaughterhouse had a different supplier number, and a different phage type as well as PFGE profile. Thus, PFGE analysis of the material has provided further information valuable to the evaluation of this monitoring study.
To reduce the risk of spreading the infection to other farms and to humans, the national authorities have issued a number of recommended restrictions for farms harbouring animals carrying the VTEC O157:H7 bacteria. These include restrictions concerning visits to farms, and guidelines on personal hygienic behaviour, cleaning of stables, no consumption of non-pasteurised milk, animals should be clean when sent to the abattoir, no on-farm slaughter of cattle for the farmer's own consumption, slurry should not be spread on grassland, slurry should not drain off to running water or lakes, and grazing cattle should be fenced-off from recreational areas, etc. Based on the results of the present study, the Swedish Board of Agriculture has introduced permanent monitoring at slaughter to continually screen for the presence of VTEC O157:H7 in the Swedish bovine population. The results of this permanent monitoring will be reported elsewhere.
To conclude, the results clearly show that VTEC O157:H7 is present in the Swedish bovine population and indicate that the distribution of cattle testing positive for VTEC O157:H7 is correlated to the overall geographical distribution of cattle in Sweden.
The authors wish to thank Ulla Zimmerman, Verena Rehbinder and Eva Tysén for excellent technical assistance, Anders Engvall, Anders Franklin and Anders Gunnarsson for valuable comments on the manuscript, The Swedish Board of Agriculture and the Swedish Council for Forestry and Agricultural Research for financial support and the veterinary staff at the abattoirs for collecting faeces samples.
- Ahmed R, Bopp C, Borcqyk A, Kasatiya S: Phage-typing scheme for Escherichia coli O157:H7. J Infect Dis. 1987, 155: 806-809.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Allison L, Stirra A, Thomson-Carter FM: Genetic heterogeneity of Escherichia coli O157:H7 in Scotland and its utility in strain subtyping. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 1998, 17: 844-848. 10.1007/s100960050204.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Barrett TJ, Lior H, Green JH, Khakhria R, Wells JG, Bell BP, Greene KD, Lewis J, Griffin PM: Laboratory investigation of a multistate food-borne outbreak of Escherichia coli O157:H7 by using pulsed-field gel electrophoresis and phage typing. J Clin Microbiol. 1994, 32: 3013-3017.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bonardi S, Maggi E, Bottarelli A, Pacciarini ML, Ansuin A, Vellini G, Moabito S, Caprioli A: Isolation of verocytotoxin-producing Escherichia coli O157:H7 from cattle at slaughter in Italy. Vet Microbiol. 1999, 67: 203-211. 10.1016/S0378-1135(99)00039-5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Chapman PA, Wright DJ, Siddons CA: A comparison of immunomagnetic separation and direct culture for the isolation of verocytotoxin-producing Escherichia coli O157 from bovine faeces. J Med Microbiol. 1994, 40: 424-427.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Chapman PA, Siddons CA, Cerdan Malo AT, Harkin MA: A 1-year study of Escherichia coli O157 in cattle, sheep, pigs and poultry. Epidemiol Infect. 1997, 119: 245-250. 10.1017/S0950268897007826.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Christensen JP, Skov MN, Hinz KH, Bisgaard M: Salmonella enterica serovar Gallinarum biovar gallinarum in layers: epidemiological investigations of a recent outbreak in Denmark. Avian Pathol. 1994, 23: 489-501. 10.1080/03079459408419019.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Crampin M, Willshaw G, Hancock R, Djuretic T, Elstob C, Rouse A, Cheasty T, Stuart J: Outbreak of Escherichia coli O157 infection associated with a music festival. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 1999, 18: 286-288. 10.1007/s100960050278.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Cray WC, Moon HW: Experimental infection of calves and adult cattle with Escherichia coli O157:H7. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1995, 61: 1586-1590.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Gannon VP, D'Souza S, Graham T, King RK, Rahn K, Read S: Use of the flagellar H7 gene as a target in multiplex PCR assays and improved specificity in identification of enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli strains. J Clin Microbiol. 1997, 35: 656-662.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Grif K, Karch H, Schneider C, Daschner FD, Beutin L, Cheasty T, Smith H, Rowe B, Dierich MP, Allerberger F: Comparative study of five different techniques for epidemiological typing of Escherichia coli O157. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 1998, 32: 165-176. 10.1016/S0732-8893(98)00103-5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hancock DD, Besser TE, Kinsel ML, Tarr PI, Rice DH, Paros MG: The prevalence of Escherichia coli O157:H7 in dairy and beef cattle in Washington State. Epidemiol Infect. 1994, 113: 199-297.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hancock DD, Besser TE, Rice DH, Herriott DE, Tarr PI: A longitudinal study of Escherichia coli O157 in fourteen cattle herds. Epidemiol Infect. 1997, 188: 193-195. 10.1017/S0950268896007212.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Heuvelink AE, van den Biggelaar FLAM, de Boer E, Herbes RG, Melchers WJG, Huis In'T Veld JHJ, Monnens LAH: Isolation and characterization of verocytotoxin-producing Escherichia coli O157 strains from Dutch cattle and sheep. J Clin Microbiol. 1998, 36: 878-882.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Johnsen G, Wasteson Y, Heir E, Berget OI, Herikstad H: Escherichia coli O157:H7 in faeces from cattle, sheep and pigs in the southwest part of Norway during 1998 and 1999. Int J Food Microbiol. 2001, 10: 193-200. 10.1016/S0168-1605(00)00518-3.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Khakhria R, Duck D, Lior H: Extended phage-typing scheme for Escherichia coli 0157:H7. Epidemiol Infect. 1990, 105: 511-520.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lahti E, Keskimaki M, Rantala L, Hyvonen P, Siitonen A, Honkanen-Buzalski T: Occurrence of Escherichia coli O157 in Finnish cattle. Vet Microbiol. 2001, 79: 239-251. 10.1016/S0378-1135(00)00355-2.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Louie M, Read S, Louie L, Ziebel K, Rahn K, Borczyk A, Lior H: Molecular typing methods to investigate transmission of Escherichia coli O157:H7 from cattle to humans. Epidemiol Infect. 1999, 123: 17-24. 10.1017/S0950268899002551.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Mechie SC, Chapman PA, Siddons CA: A fifteen month study of Escherichia coli O157:H7 in a dairy herd. Epidemiol Infect. 1997, 118: 17-25. 10.1017/S0950268896007194.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Meyer-Broseta S, Bastian SN, Arne PD, Cerf O, Sanaa M: Review of epidemiological surveys on the prevalence of contamination of healthy cattle with Escherichia coli serogroup O157:H7. Int J Hyg Environ Health. 2001, 203: 347-361. 10.1078/1438-4639-4410041.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Paiba GA, Gibbens JC, Pascoe SJ, Wilesmith JW, Kidd SA, Byrne C, Ryan JB, Smith RP, McLaren M, Futter RJ, Kay AC, Jones YE, Chappell SA, Willshaw GA, Cheasty T: Faecal carriage of verocytotoxin-producing Escherichia coli O157 in cattle and sheep at slaughter in Great Britain. Vet Rec. 2002, 150: 593-598.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Paton AW, Paton JC: Detection and characterization of Shiga toxigenic Escherichia coli by using multiplex PCR assays for stx1, stx2, eaeA, enterohemorrhagic E. coli hlyA, rfbO111, and rfbO157. J Clin Microbiol. 1998, 36: 598-602.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Pradel N, Livrelli V, de Champs C, Palcoux J-B, Reynaud A, Scheutz F, Sirot J, Joly B, Forestier C: Prevalence and characterization of Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli isolated from cattle, food, and children during a one-year prospective study in France. J Clin Microbiol. 2000, 38: 1023-1031.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Rasmussen MA, Cray WC, Casey TA, Whipp SC: Rumen contents as a reservoir of enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 1993, 114: 79-84. 10.1111/j.1574-6968.1993.tb06554.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Richards MS, Corkish JD, Sayers AR, McLaren IM, Evans SJ, Wray C: Studies of the presence of verocytotoxic Escherichia coli O157 in bovine faeces submitted for diagnostic purposes in England and Wales and on beef carcases in abattoirs in the United Kingdom. Epidemiol Infect. 1998, 120: 187-192. 10.1017/S0950268897008583.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- SAS Institute Inc: SAS/STAT User's Guide. Version 6. 1989, Cary, NC, SAS Institute Inc, USA, 1: 851-889. 4Google Scholar
- Sjöblad S, Larsson B, Kahlmeter G, Wadström T: Pojke fick SLT-associerat hemolytiskt uremiskt syndrom. Läkartidningen. 1989, 86: 2595-2596. (In Swedish)PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Thrusfield M: Veterinary Epidemiology. 1995, Blackwell Science, Oxford UK, 479-2Google Scholar
- Tutenel AV, Pierard D, Uradzinski J, Jozwik E, Pastuszczak M, Van Hende J, Uyttendaele M, Debevere J, Cheasty T, Van Hoof J, De Zutter L: Isolation and characterization of enterohaemorrhagic Escherichia coli O157:H7 from cattle in Belgium and Poland. Epidemiol Infect. 2002, 129: 41-47. 10.1017/S0950268802007197.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- van Donkersgoed J, Graham T, Gannon V: The prevalence of verotoxins, Escherichia coli 0157:H7, and Salmonella in the feces and rumen of cattle at processing. Can Vet J. 1999, 40: 332-338.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Watanabe H, Terajima J, Izumiya H, Wada A, Tamura K: Molecular analysis of enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli isolates in Japan and its application to epidemiological investigation. Pediatr Int. 1999, 41: 202-208. 10.1046/j.1442-200X.1999.4121043.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Willshaw GA, Smith HR, Cheasty T, Wall PG, Rowe B: Vero cytotoxin-producing Escherichia coli O157 outbreaks in England and Wales, 1995: phenotypic methods and genotypic subtyping. Emerg Infect Dis. 1997, 3: 561-565.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Woodward MJ, Carroll PJ, Wray C: Detection of entero- and verocyto-toxin genes in Escherichia coli from diarrhoeal disease in animals using the polymerase chain reaction. Vet Microbiol. 1992, 31: 251-261. 10.1016/0378-1135(92)90083-6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Wray C, McLaren IM, Carroll PJ: Escherichia coli isolated from farm animals in England and Wales between 1986 and 1991. Vet Rec. 1993, 133: 439-442.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar