Open Access

Propagation of Asian isolates of canine distemper virus (CDV) in hamster cell lines

  • Serageldeen Sultan1,
  • Nguyen Thi Lan2, 3,
  • Toshiki Ueda2,
  • Ryoji Yamaguchi2,
  • Ken Maeda1 and
  • Kazushige Kai1Email author
Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica200951:38

https://doi.org/10.1186/1751-0147-51-38

Received: 6 July 2009

Accepted: 16 October 2009

Published: 16 October 2009

Abstract

Backgrounds

The aim of this study was to confirm the propagation of various canine distemper viruses (CDV) in hamster cell lines of HmLu and BHK, since only a little is known about the possibility of propagation of CDV in rodent cells irrespective of their epidemiological importance.

Methods

The growth of CDV in hamster cell lines was monitored by titration using Vero.dogSLAMtag (Vero-DST) cells that had been proven to be susceptible to almost all field isolates of CDV, with the preparations of cell-free and cell-associated virus from the cultures infected with recent Asian isolates of CDV (13 strains) and by observing the development of cytopathic effect (CPE) in infected cultures of hamster cell lines.

Results

Eleven of 13 strains grew in HmLu cells, and 12 of 13 strains grew in BHK cells with apparent CPE of cell fusion in the late stage of infection. Two strains and a strain of Asia 1 group could not grow in HmLu cells and BHK cells, respectively.

Conclusion

The present study demonstrates at the first time that hamster cell lines can propagate the majority of Asian field isolates of CDV. The usage of two hamster cell lines suggested to be useful to characterize the field isolates biologically.

Background

Canine distemper virus (CDV) is a negative-strand RNA virus that belongs to the genus Morbillivirus in the family Paramyxoviridae. The CDV induce distemper in dogs, raccoons [1] and ferrets [2]. Outbreaks of distemper in seals on Lake Baikal [3], in leopards and other feline animals in zoos [4], and in lions in the Serengeti National Park [5], indicate additional animal hosts other than the generally accepted hosts.

CDV has been isolated by a few cell lines other than the cells derived from dog as follows. Vero [6] and B95a B-cell line [7] were derived from monkey, and MV1Lu lung cells were derived from mink [8]. Recently, the gene of dog signaling lymphocyte activation molecule (also known as dog SLAM or CD150) [9], was introduced into Vero cells and Vero.dogSLAMtag (Vero-DST) cells were established [10]. By Vero-DST cells, various field strains were isolated [1012]. Thus there are only a few cell lines derived from other than generally accepted hosts.

During a study on the molecular characterization of the hemagglutinin (H) and fusion (F) protein genes using mouse retrovirus vectors, the hamster HmLu cell line was suggested to be susceptible to CDV infection. Hamsters are not generally accepted hosts and there is little knowledge of the propagation of CDV in rodent cells.

Methods

Cells and Viruses

Vero-DST cells were established as described above [10]. HmLu cells were derived from hamster lung cells [13]. BHK cells were derived from baby hamster kidney cells [14]. All cells were passaged and maintained in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (D-MEM; autoclavable; Nissui Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum in a CO2 incubator at 37°C.

Thirteen strains of CDV were isolated and propagated, one or a few times, in Vero-DST cells and stored at -80°C until use. Specimens were collected from diseased dogs in Japan except for strain Th12, which was sampled in Thailand. Nine strains were newly isolated except for strains of 007 Lm, 009L, 011C [11], and Ac96I [12]. The phylogenetic relationship of nine new strains were determined by the sequencing of their (H) genes [15] where strains 55L, M25CR, 50Con and 50Cbl were assigned as members of Asia 2 group, while strains Th12, 50Sc, 81ND, 82Con and 83mLN were assigned as members of Asia 1 group. The vaccine strain of Onderstepoort (Ond) was used as a control.

Virus titration

Vero-DST cells were seeded on 24-well multi-plates (Sumitomo-Bakelite, Tokyo, Japan) at a concentration of 1 × 105 cells per well and incubated overnight. After the removal of media, the cultures were overlaid with 0.1 ml of each serial 10-fold-diluted virus suspensions in duplicate manner, and incubated for 1 h with rocking at 15-min intervals. After virus adsorption, the suspensions were removed by suction and the cultures were washed once with culture media. The cultures were then overlaid with medium (1 ml) containing 1% methyl cellulose-4,000 (Nacalai Tesque, Kyoto, Japan; methyl cellulose media), incubated for 3 days, then fixed with formalin, stained with crystal violet solution, and plaques were counted. Virus titers were shown as mean value after two independent titrations which were carried out in a duplicate form.

Passage of HmLu and BHK cells infected with various CDV strains

Sub-confluent cultures of HmLu or BHK cells were infected with strains Ond, 007Lm, 55L, 009L, M25CR, 011C, 50Con, 50Cbl, Ac96I, Th12, 50Sc, 81ND, 82Con, or 83mLN of CDV at a multiplicity of infection (MOI) = 1 in culture bottles. When the cultures became confluent (usually after 3-day incubation) the supernatant media was harvested, centrifuged at 3,000 rpm for 10 min to remove cell debris, aliquotted, and stored at -80°C until use as cell-free virus. The residual cells were liberated by trypsinization, and one tenth of the liberated cells underwent further cultivation, while the residual nine-tenths were used to liberate the cell-associated virus by freezing at -80°C, thawing under flowing water, and centrifugation at 3,000 rpm for 10 min to remove cell debris. The supernatant fraction was aliquotted and stored at -80°C until use as cell-associated virus. The cycle of passage was repeated, and all cell-free and cell-associated virus samples were titrated on Vero-DST cells.

Results

Propagation of CDV strains in HmLu and BHK cells

To find out whether the hamster cell lines can propagate CDV, a study was started with HmLu cells and CDV strains of Ond and 007Lm (Asia 2 group). When the HmLu cells were infected with the Ond strain at a MOI = 1, the virus induced the cytopathic effect (CPE) of giant cell formation, almost throughout the entire culture within 3-days. The obtained titers of cell-free and cell-associated viruses were 1.3 and 0.6 × 106 PFU/ml, respectively, at the 1st passage. The passage of infected cells resulted in a low cell density and low virus titer, as shown in Fig. 1. The cell-associated virus titer obtained from HmLu cells infected with the 007Lm strain was 2 × 102 PFU/ml at the 1st passage. The cell-free virus showed a titer that was about 10-fold lower (1.5 × 101 PFU/ml) than that of the cell-associated. The cell-free and cell-associated titers increased gradually up to the 9th passage, and the highest virus titer (1.3 × 106 PFU/ml) was found for the cell-associated virus obtained at the 9th passage. This score is comparable with that obtained for HmLu cells infected with the Ond strain. The persistent infection lasted during passages, although the CPE of giant cell formation appeared and increased gradually after the 4th passage. The infected culture could be transferred up to the 15th passage. On the other hand, the BHK cells infected with strain 007Lm were revealed to be transferred up to the 6th passage (data not shown). According to these results, seven passages for infected HmLu and five passages for infected BHK cultures were preset for testing residual 12 CDV strains.
Figure 1

Growth profiles of CDV strains of Ond and 007Lm in HmLu cells. Viruses were harvested at every passage as cell-free viruses of Ondestepoort (open circle), or 007Lm (open diamond) and cell-associated viruses of Ondestepoort (black circle), or 007Lm (black diamond) and were titrated on Vero-DST cells as described in Materials and Methods. The obtained virus titers (PFU/ml) were plotted against passages number.

As shown in Table 1, all strains of Asia 2 group could grow in both HmLu and BHK cells. Among the strains of Asia 1 group, Ac96I could not grow in either HmLu or BHK cells and Th12 grew in BHK cells but not in HmLu cells. Moreover, strains 50Sc, 81ND, 82Con, and 83mLN could grow in either HmLu or BHK cells. The cultures of BHK cells infected with strains 50Cb1, Th12, or 81ND could not be transferred over 3 passages, the cultures of both HmLu and BHK cells infected with strain 82Con could not be transferred over 4 passages, and the cultures of HmLu cells infected with strains 55L, 009L, 50Sc, 81ND, and 83mLN also could not be transferred over 7 passages because the massive detachment of giant cells occurred, resulting in a low cell density with extensive appearance of CPE. A typical observation was that strain Th12 grew in BHK cells in a very short period of 3 passages but not in HmLu cells.
Table 1

The recovered virus titer from HmLu and BHK cells after several passages.

  

Titer (PFU/ml) recovered from

Virus

Strain

HmLu (7P) a)

BHK (5P) a)

  

Cell-free

Cell-associated

Cell-free

Cell-associated

 

007Lm

3.4 × 103

6.3 × 104

6.0 × 105

1.2 × 106

 

55L

2.5 × 105

2.2 × 106(7P)b)

1.6 × 105

2.4 × 105

 

009L

1.0 × 105

9.2 × 105(7P)b)

3.0 × 105

4.0 × 105

Asia 2

M25CR

2.0 × 103

8.0 × 105

4.0 × 105

2.0 × 105

 

011C

5.0 × 103

2.0 × 104

0.6 × 105

1.6 × 105

 

50Con

6.0 ×103

3.0 × 104

2.5 × 105

0.5 × 105

 

50Cb1

3.0 × 101

2.2 × 102

1.0 × 104

7.0 × 103 (3P)b)

 

Ac96I

< 5

≤ 5

< 5

< 5

 

Th12

< 5

< 5

1.0 × 104

8.0 × 103 (3P)b)

Asia 1

50Sc.

1.0 × 105

1.9 × 105(7P)b)

1.1 × 105

1.9 × 105

 

81ND.

1.5 × 104

2.5 × 104(7P)b)

5.5 × 103

1.5 × 104 (3P)b)

 

82Con

1.2 × 106

1.2 × 106(4P)b)

4.5 × 105

5.5 × 105(4P)b)

 

83mLN

2.0 × 105

1.0 × 105(7P)b)

1.3 × 105

1.5 × 105

a) Preset passage level.

b) Cultures at these passages were unable to be transferred further.

Characterization of the CPE induced in hamster cells infected with CDV isolates

The culture of HmLu cells infected with strain 007Lm showed no CPE by the 3rd passage as if strain 007Lm induced persistent infection. However, the culture showed CPE of giant cell formation (Fig. 2A) after the 4th passage, and the population of giant cells increased gradually with increasing numbers of passages as the giant cells detached from the substrate as floating giant cells. This giant cell formation did not proceed to the formation of typical syncytia of fusion plaques that were observed in infection of Vero-DST cells with strain 007Lm by the 15th passage although the population of giant cells increased. At the final stage, the culture showed extensive spread of giant cell formation and floating giant cells (round cells) throughout the entire culture (Fig. 2B). With regard to the infected BHK culture, similar process of CPE development was observed (Fig. 2A and 2B). To characterize giant cell formation, the culture of HmLu cells infected with strain 007Lm was liberated by trypsinization at the 8th passage and plated into dishes to form colonies.
Figure 2

The cytopathic effect (CPE) found in the cultures of HmLu cells and BHK cells infected with strain 007Lm. The CPE were indicated by arrows. (A) Infected cultures at the middle stage of infection showing individual CPE among infected cells. (B) Infected cultures at the final stage showing destruction of cell layer and many CPE.

The dishes were incubated for 7 days. Colonies of various sizes and morphologies were obtained and classified into three categories as shown in Fig. 3(A - C). Colonies with normal cell morphology, which represented the majority of colonies, as shown in Fig. 3A, hybrid colonies composed of normal and giant cell morphology are shown in Fig. 3B and 3B' (low incidence), and colonies composed of giant cells are shown in Fig. 3C (low incidence). Among the giant cells, a typical body, which seemed to be a nucleolus, was found as condensed material in the center area surrounded with a suggested nuclear membrane (Fig. 3D; indicated with an arrow). In other giant cells, several condensed materials were found in a circle (Fig. 3E; indicated with arrows).
Figure 3

Process of giant cell formation estimated by colony formation. The morphology of colonies of HmLu cells infected with strain 007Lm at the 8th passage. Colonies of normal cell shape (A). Hybrid colonies of normal and giant cells (B, B'). A colony composed of giant cells (C). A multinucleated giant cell had several individual nuclei, as indicated by arrow (D) magnified from D in (B'). Giant cells of big nuclei with several condensed materials as indicated by arrows (E). Magnification: 40× (A-C), and 200× (D and E).

Strains 55L, 009L, M25CR, 011C, 50Con, 50Cb1, 50Sc, 81ND, 82Con, and 83mLN induced similar CPE of giant cell formation in the infected HmLu culture at the middle and late stage of infection except at the first infection. Similar CPE of giant cell formation were also induced in the culture of BHK cells infected with every Asian isolate except for strain Ac96I.

Discussion

BHK cells had a tendency to propagate field CDV strains more efficiently than HmLu cells as shown in the cases of strains 50Cbl, Th12 and 81ND (Table 1) and strain 007Lm. Fujita et al. [16] reported that BHK cells showed a low susceptibility to recombinant Yanaka virus but showed a high level CDV transcription. This high level CDV transcription might correlate to the rapid destruction of BHK cultures infected with strains 007Lm, 50Cbl, Th12 and 81ND when compared with the infected cultures of HmLu cells. However, strain 82Con grew in HmLu cells as rapidly as in BHK cells. Strain Ac96I could not grow in both HmLu and BHK cells and Th12 could grow in BHK cells but not in HmLu cells although it is not known what factor controls the growth of CDV in hamster cells at present. Thus, each virus strain behaved differently against the two hamster cell lines (Table 1). These results indicate that the usage of two hamster cell lines is useful to characterize various field strains by their biological nature.

In this report, all of Asian isolates induced no CPE at the initial stage of infection in the hamster cell lines of both HmLu and BHK, and this result is coincided with the reports [11, 17] that both groups of Asia 1 and Asia 2 showed no CPE in Vero cells at the first infection. However, repeated passage of infected hamster cells resulted in the fact that even Asia 1 isolates except for Ac96I, could grow in hamster cell lines with apparent CPE of giant cell formation. Thus, it is necessary to characterize the infection to a cell line not only at the initial stage but also at the late stage of infection.

The HmLu cells infected with 007Lm had a high passage level of 15 passages, whereas the HmLu cells infected with Ond strain induced massive detachment of giant cells after the 1st passage and were unable to be transferred further. These observations indicated that the development of CPE of giant cell formation in the 007Lm-infected HmLu cells was very slow. The slow development of CPE enabled the observation of various types of colonies at the 8th passage as shown in Fig. 3. Giant cells seemed to be produced gradually from the infected cells with normal shape by cell fusion. Once giant cells were formed, they had a tendency to detach from the surface of the dish and turn into the floating giant cells.

Conclusion

This report demonstrated at the first time that the majority of Asian field isolates tested were propagated in hamster cell lines of HmLu and BHK. Each virus strain behaved differently against the two cell lines. Since there is no effective method to characterize the field isolates of CDV biologically, the usage of two hamster cell lines can be useful.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

Serageldeen Sultan received financial support in the form of a PhD degree scholarship from the Egyptian government.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Veterinary Microbiology, Faculty of Agriculture, Yamaguchi University
(2)
Department of Veterinary Pathology, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Miyazaki
(3)
Department of Veterinary Pathology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Hanoi University of Agriculture

References

  1. Hoff GL, Bigler WJ, Proctor SJ, Stallings LP: Epizootic of canine distemper virus infection among urban raccoons and gray foxes. J Wildl Dis. 1974, 10: 423-428.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Carpenter JW, Appel MJG, Erikson RC, Novilla MN: Fatal vaccine-induced canine distemper virus infection in black-footed ferrets. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 1976, 169: 961-964.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Visser IKG, Kumarev VP, Orvell C, de Vries P, Broeders HWJ, Bildt van de MWG, Greon J, Teppema JS, Burger MC, UytdeHaag FGCM, Osterhaus ADME: Comparison of two morbilliviruses isolated from seals during outbreaks of distemper in North West Europe and Siberia. Arch Virol. 1990, 111: 149-164. 10.1007/BF01311050.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Appel MJG, Yates RA, Foley GL, Bernstein JJ, Santinelli S, Spelman LH, Miller LD, Arp LH, Anderson M, Barr M, Pearce-Kelling S, Summers BA: Canine distemper epizootic in lions, tigers, and leopards in North America. J Vet Diagn Investig. 1994, 6: 277-288.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Roelke-Parker ME, Munson L, Packer C, Kock R, Cleaveland S, Carpenter M, O'Brien SJ, Pospischil A, Hofmann-Lehmann R, Lutz H, Mwamengele GLM, Mgasa MN, Machange GA, Summers BA, Appel MJG: A canine distemper virus epidemic in Serengeti lions (Panthera leo). Nature. 1996, 379: 441-445. 10.1038/379441a0.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Haig DA: Canine distemper-immunization with avianized virus. Onderstepoort J Vet Res. 1956, 17: 149-153.Google Scholar
  7. Kai C, Ochikubo F, Okita M, Iinuma T, Mikami T, Kobune F, Yamanouchi K: Use of B95a cells for isolation of canine distemper virus from clinical cases. J Vet Med Sci. 1993, 55: 1067-1070.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Lednicky JA, Meehan TP, Kinsel MJ, Dubach J, Hungerford LL, Sarich NA, Witecki KE, Braid MD, Pedrak C, Houde CM: Effective primary isolation of wild-type canine distemper virus in MDCK, MV1Lu and Vero cells without nucleotide sequence changes within the entire haemagglutinin protein gene and in subgenomic sections of the fusion and phospho protein genes. J Virol Methods. 2004, 118: 147-157. 10.1016/j.jviromet.2004.02.004.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Tatsuo H, Ono N, Yanagi Y: Morbilliviruses use signaling lymophocyte activation molecule (CD150) as cellular receptors. J Virol. 2001, 75: 5842-5850. 10.1128/JVI.75.13.5842-5850.2001.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Seki F, Ono N, Yamaguchi R, Yanagi Y: Efficient isolation of wild strains of canine distemper virus in Vero cells expressing canine SLAM (CD150) and their adaptability to marmoset B95a cells. J Virol. 2003, 77: 9943-9950. 10.1128/JVI.77.18.9943-9950.2003.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Lan NT, Yamaguchi R, Uchida K, Sugano S, Tateyama S: Growth profiles of recent canine distemper isolates on Vero cells expressing canine signaling lymphocyte activation molecule (SLAM). J Comp Path. 2005, 133: 77-81. 10.1016/j.jcpa.2005.01.006.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Lan NT, Yamaguchi R, Inomata A, Furuya Y, Uchida K, Sugano S, Tateyama S: Comparative analyses of canine distemper viral isolates from clinical cases of canine distemper in vaccinated dogs. Vet Microbiol. 2006, 115: 32-42. 10.1016/j.vetmic.2006.01.010.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Kurogi H, Inaba Y, Takahashi E, Sato K, Omori T, Miura Y, Goto Y, Fujiwara Y, Hatano Y, Kodama K, Fukuyama S, Sasaki N, Matumoto M: Epizootic congenital arthrogryposis-hydranencephaly syndrome in cattle: Isolation of akabane virus from affected fetuses. Arch Virol. 1976, 51: 67-74. 10.1007/BF01317835.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. McPherson I, Stoker M: Polyoma transformation of hamster cell clones an investigation of genetic factors affecting cell competence. Virology. 1962, 16: 147-151. 10.1016/0042-6822(62)90290-8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Sultan S, Charoenvisal N, Lan NT, Yamaguchi R, Maeda K, Kai K: The Asia 2 specific signal peptide region and other domains in fusion protein genes characterized Asia 1 and Asia 2 canine distemper viruses. Virology Journal. 2009, 6: 157-10.1186/1743-422X-6-157.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Fujita K, Miura R, Yoneda M, Shimizu F, Sato H, Muto Y, Endo Y, Tsukiyama-Kohara K, Kai C: Host range and receptor utilization of canine distemper virus analyzed by recombinant viruses: Involvement of heparin-like molecule in CDV infection. Virology. 2007, 359: 324-335. 10.1016/j.virol.2006.09.018.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Lan NT, Yamaguchi R, Hirai T, Kai K, Morishita K: Relationship between growth behavior in Vero cells and molecular Characteristics of Asia 1 and Asia 2 groups of recently isolated canine distemper viruses. J Vet Med Sci. 2009, 71: 457-461. 10.1292/jvms.71.457.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Sultan et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2009

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Advertisement