Skip to content

Advertisement

  • Research
  • Open Access

Benzimidazole resistance of sheep nematodes in Norway confirmed through controlled efficacy test

  • 1Email author,
  • 2,
  • 3 and
  • 1
Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica201254:48

https://doi.org/10.1186/1751-0147-54-48

  • Received: 8 June 2012
  • Accepted: 20 August 2012
  • Published:

Abstract

Background

Resistance against benzimidazoles (BZ) has recently been detected in Norwegian sheep flocks through a large scale prevalence survey based on the faecal egg count reduction test (FECRT). The use of this test in combination with bulk larval culture only gives an indication of which gastrointestinal nematodes genera that are involved and these results have to be confirmed by a controlled efficacy test (CET) to get accurate information about resistant nematodes populations at species level. A CET was therefore performed with larvae from two flocks where BZ resistance was previously detected through FECRT.

Results

The latter test confirmed the previous results in both flocks. In flock A, the BZ resistant nematode population consisted solely of Haemonchus contortus, whereas H. contortus and Teladorsagia circumcincta comprised the resistant worm population in flock B.

Conclusions

Some discrepancies that have been recorded between FECRT and CET results regarding time for post-treatment coproscopical examination and a temporary suppression of faecal egg excretion are discussed.

Keywords

  • Benzimidazole
  • Anthelmintic resistance
  • FECRT
  • Controlled efficacy test
  • Sheep

Background

Anthelmintic resistance (AR) is currently threatening the small ruminant industry [1]. Multi-resistant nematodes occur worldwide, causing production losses and animal welfare concerns in the sheep industry [2, 3]. In Norway, the prevalence of AR has recently been investigated by a large-scale survey in sheep using the faecal egg count reduction test (FECRT) [4]. Post-treatment positive coproscopical results have been recorded for benzimidazoles (BZ), mainly in the coastal area of Norway. However, as FECRTs may give false-positive results in relation with drug administration issues and does not identify the resistant species properly [5], a controlled efficacy test (CET) was performed in two selected flocks with previously reported BZ resistance both to confirm the presence of resistance and to further characterize the nematode populations involved.

Methods

Selection and characteristics of the tested flocks

Based on the results from the FECRT performed by Domke et al. [4], gastrointestinal nematode (GIN) populations from two of the eight sheep flocks with BZ resistance were sampled for a controlled efficacy test. Both flocks were located in Rogaland County in south-western Norway. Norwegian white sheep (NKS, Norsk kvit sau) was the dominant breed in both flocks. Both farms used mountain pastures for half of the flock, while the rest of the animals were kept at cultivated pastures close to the farms. BZ’s has been used for several years in both flocks, however AR was not suspected before the FECRT survey.

Flock A contained approximately 180 winter-feed ewes, which are housed during the winter (December – April). Flock B had a herd size of 100 winter-feed ewes and houses the animals only during the lambing period in March - April.

In flock A, the faecal egg count reductions (FECRs) in the BZ treated group were 81% and 89%, in 2009 and 2010, respectively. In flock B, the corresponding figures were 83% and 75% [4]. Flock A used four annual anthelmintic treatments of the lambs and practiced until recently “dose-and-move” (drenching and changing of pasture strategy). Flock B had six annual deworming’s of their lambs and drenched their lambs every 4th week from May till August. This flock was still practicing “dose-and-move”.

The two flocks were selected on the basis of the results of the FECRTs in 2009 and 2010 and because of their proximity to the lab. However, these flocks had a similar use of pastures to the six remaining sheep flocks in Rogaland where BZ resistance had been previously detected [4].

Controlled efficacy test (CET)

A controlled efficacy test was performed with larvae from both sheep flocks in the autumn 2011. The test was performed according to the WAAVP guidelines [5]. In each flock faeces from at least 20 ewes and 20 first year grazing lambs were sampled rectally and used for bulk coproculture. Twenty-four lambs at an age of 5–6 months that had been raised in a zero-grazing system at Høyland Field Station were experimentally infected orally with infective L3 larvae from the bulk coproculture. Twelve lambs were used for each of flock A and B, and were designated as Group A and B, respectively. The numbers of infective larvae for inoculation were 5000 and 4000 per lamb in Group A and B, respectively. The inoculum contained infective third stage larvae (L3) of both Haemonchus and Teladorsagia/Trichostrongylus types: 42/58% and 20/80% for Group A and B respectively. The lambs were inoculated by a gastric tube. The CET protocol was ethically approved by the Norwegian Animal Research Authority (by Dr. Martha J. Ulvund, FDU ref. 2011/1237).

A FEC was performed seven days before inoculation (day −7), at day of inoculation (day 0) and at day 7, 18, 28 and 35 (only Group B) after inoculation to control the establishment of the nematode infection. When the infections had been established with a faecal egg excretion of at least 150 eggs per gram faeces (EPG) in each lamb, the 12 lambs in each group were randomly assigned to two subgroups of six animals. One subgroup (A1, B1) received 3.8 mg/kg albendazole (Valbazen vet.®Pfizer) orally, whereas the other subgroup (A2, B2) served as untreated control group. The anthelmintic treatment was performed at day 28 and day 35 post inoculation for subgroup A1 and B1, respectively.

All the lambs were euthanized eight or nine days after treatment by intravenous injection of 10% barbiturate (Pentobarbital 10%, NAF) and examined post-mortem.

The abomasum and small intestine were processed according to MAFF (1986). A worm count was conducted on 1/20 aliquots of the content of the abomasum and the four first meters of the small intestine. The mucosa of the abomasum and the small intestine were carefully washed to recover all worms. The large intestine was opened and the contents carefully examined and all living worms were collected. The recovered worms were transferred to labelled bottles with 70% ethanol for preservation. All male worms from the abomasum and the small and large intestine were examined under microscope and identified on morphological traits [6, 7].

Statistical analysis

The Mann–Whitney test with significance by p < 0.005 was used when comparing the worm burden and EPG between the control and treated group.

Results

In group A there was a significant reduction in the mean EPG of 72.6% following treatment (p < 0.005) EPG in the treated subgroup A1 (700 EPG vs 192 EPG), whereas no significant change was observed in the control group A2 (708 EPG vs 733 EPG) (Table 1). In the post-treatment coproculture of A1, Haemonchus was the only larval type recovered. Similarly, in the necroscopic examination, Haemonchus contortus was the only species identified in control and treated animals and worms of this species were detected from the abomasum from all animals. The reduction in the H. contortus adult population in subgroup A1 compared to the untreated subgroup A2 was 79%.
Table 1

Mean number (sd) of adult nematode species recovered from the abomasum from the control group and the BZ-treated group, and the reduction (in %) in number of adults and excreted eggs pre- and post-treatment

  

EPG(sd)

Abomasum (arithmetic mean (sd))

Group

Treatment

Pre-treatment

Necr. Ex

Reduction (%)

Total (arithmetic mean (sd))

T. circumcincta

Reduction (%)

H. contortus

Reduction (%)

A

Control

708 (±120)

733(±258)

0

143(±1000)

  

143(±100)

 
 

BZ

700(±247)

192(±146)

72.6

30(±20)

  

30(±20)

79

B

Control

425(±281)

508(±656)

0

126(±82)

33(±19)

 

97(±74)

 
 

BZ

533(±205)

0(±0)

100

80(±33)

45(±17)

0

63(±31)

35

In group B, there was a significant reduction in the mean EPG of 100% following treatment (p < 0.005) in the treated subgroup B1 (533 EPG vs 0 EPG), whereas a slight increase in the mean EPG was noticed in subgroup B2 (425 EPG vs 508 EPG). Post-treatment, both Teladorsagia circumcincta and H. contortus worms were collected from the subgroups. Three of the lambs in subgroup B2 and four of the six lambs in subgroup B1 had T. circumcincta present in the abomasum. The T. circumcincta worm burdens were similar between B1 and B2 (45 vs 33 worms). For the H. contortus populations, there was a reduction of 35% in the mean worm number in subgroup B1 compared to B2 (63 vs 97 worms). H. contortus was found in all abomasums of all the lambs in group B. No other nematodes in the abomasum or small intestine were found in the necropsied animals.

Discussion

This is the first report of BZ resistance in T. circumcincta and H. contortus in Norway confirmed through CET. A large scale prevalence survey on anthelmintic resistance in small ruminants in Norway in 2008–2009 using the FECRT indicated a 100% efficacy of macrocyclic lactones (ML) and a BZ resistance in 10.5% of the sheep flocks [4]. When restricting the area to Rogaland County and to at-risk sheep farms, the AR-prevalence reached 80%. The nematode genera involved in BZ resistance were identified as Teladorsagia/Trichostrongylus and Haemonchus type, based on L3 identification from the post-treatment coproculture [4]. The present study, using the controlled efficacy test, confirmed that the actual species involved were T. circumcincta and H. contortus, including a mixed infection in flock B. T. circumcincta is the most prevalent GIN in sheep in Norway (75% of farms) and is found in all parts of Norway (Domke et al. submitted). On the other hand, the blood sucking nematode H. contortus is also present in all regions of Norway (34% of farms)as north as Lofoten in Northern Norway, but is mainly located at the south western coastline (Domke et al. submitted). As far as the worm burdens are concerned, T. circumcincta and H. contortus are also the major parasites for sheep in Norway (mean number of 233 and 724 worms per animal, respectively) (Domke et al. submitted).

In group A, despite the occurrence of Teladorsagia/Trichostrongylus larval type in the inoculums, the nematode population established in the controls was only composed of H. contortus. Moreover the overall establishment rate of worms in experimentally infected lambs in both CET’s seemed rather low (around 3%). Gaba et al. [8] have shown high variability of establishment rates of T. circumcincta in sheep using a meta-analysis of 87 experiments. Amongst the main factors involved, the authors quoted the breed and age of lambs, the infection mode (single, repeated, experimental or natural), and the infective dose and suggested two hypotheses, at least for experimental conditions, related to host immune response and parasite virulence. Regarding the first hypothesis, lambs were naïve and aged 5–6 months old, which is in the range of published experiments [8]. However, it has been shown that greater FEC and worm burdens could be obtained in experimental T. circumcincta infections in quasi-naïve lambs concurrently immune-suppressed with methylprednisolone acetate [9]. Regarding the second hypothesis focusing on parasite virulence and infectivity, it cannot be further documented in our conditions a possible interaction between Teladorsagia/Trichostrongylus and Haemonchus during the host establishment as described by Hoste and Cabaret [10]. Otherwise, inoculums sizes around 7,500 to 14,000 L3 in mixed infections could have probably increased the final adult population [5].

In the treated subgroup B1, the faecal egg excretion was nil nine days after treatment, whereas adult T. circumcincta and H. contortus worms were recovered in the necropsied lambs. A temporary suppression of egg excretion by worms surviving the treatment may be expected. This phenomenon has been mentioned in particular after ML or BZ treatment and a time lag longer than eight days is recommended for BZ evaluation in FECRT [11]. A longer interval of ten days post treatment has even been suggested [12].

Conclusions

The CET’s confirmed in two flocks the results from the earlier conducted FECR tests. H. contortus and T. circumcincta are the two species involved, alone or in combination, as BZ resistant worms in these sheep flocks located in Rogaland County.

Declarations

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the Norwegian Goat Health Service, Animalia by the Norwegian Sheep Health Service, the Norwegian School of Veterinary Science and the Norwegian Research Council for financial support. We also thank the farmers for their cooperation. Thanks are due to the laboratory staff at the Norwegian School of Veterinary Science, Sandnes (Høyland Field Station) for handling all the samples.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Norwegian School of Veterinary Science, Sandnes, Norway
(2)
LUNAM Université, Oniris, Nantes-Atlantic College of veterinary medicine and food sciences and engineering, UMR BioEpAR, Nantes, F-44307, France
(3)
Norwegian School of Veterinary Science, Oslo, Norway

References

  1. Sargison ND: Pharmaceutical control of endoparasitic helminth infections in sheep. Vet Clin North Am Food Anim Pract. 2011, 27: 139-156. 10.1016/j.cvfa.2010.10.014.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Jackson F: Anthelmintic resistance--the state of play. Br Vet J. 1993, 149: 123-138. 10.1016/S0007-1935(05)80083-1.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Sargison ND, Jackson F, Bartley DJ, Wilson DJ, Stenhouse LJ, Penny CD: Observations on the emergence of multiple anthelmintic resistance in sheep flocks in the south-east of Scotland. Vet Parasitol. 2007, 145: 65-76. 10.1016/j.vetpar.2006.10.024.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Domke AVM, Chartier C, Gjerde B, Höglund J, Leine N, Vatn S, Stuen S: Prevalence of anthelmintic resistance in gastrointestinal nematodes of sheep and goats in Norway. Parasito Res. 2012, 111: 185-193. 10.1007/s00436-012-2817-x.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Wood IB, Amaral NK, Bairden K, Duncan JL, Kassai T, Malone JB, Pankavich JA, Reinecke RK, Slocombe O, Taylor SM, Vercruysse J: World Association for the Advancement of Veterinary Parasitology (W.A.A.V.P.) second edition of guidelines for evaluating the efficacy of anthelmintics in ruminants (bovine, ovine, caprine). Vet Parasitol. 1995, 58: 181-213. 10.1016/0304-4017(95)00806-2.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. MAFF: Manual of veterinary parasitological laboratory techniques. 1986, London: HMSOGoogle Scholar
  7. Lichtenfels JR, Hoberg EP: The systematics of nematodes that cause ostertagiasis in domestic and wild ruminants in North America: an update and a key to species. Vet Parasitol. 1993, 46: 33-53. 10.1016/0304-4017(93)90046-P.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Gaba S, Gruner L, Cabaret J: The establishment rate of a sheep nematode: revisiting classics using a meta-analysis of 87 experiments. Vet Parasitol. 2006, 140: 302-311. 10.1016/j.vetpar.2006.04.006.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Greer AW, Huntley JF, Mackellar A, McAnulty RW, Jay NP, Green RS, Stankiewicz M, Sykes AR: The effect of corticosteroid treatment on local immune responses, intake and performance in lambs infected with Teladorsagia circumcincta. Int J Parasitol. 2008, 38: 1717-1728. 10.1016/j.ijpara.2008.05.010.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Hoste H, Cabaret J: Intergeneric relations between nematodes of the digestive tract in lambs: a multivariate approach. Int J Parasitol. 1992, 22: 173-179. 10.1016/0020-7519(92)90098-6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Coles GC, Jackson F, Pomroy WE, Prichard RK, von Samson-Himmelstjerna G, Silvestre A, Taylor MA, Vercruysse J: The detection of anthelmintic resistance in nematodes of veterinary importance. Vet Parasitol. 2006, 136: 167-185. 10.1016/j.vetpar.2005.11.019.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Kumsa B, Wossene A: Efficacy of albendazole and tetramisole anthelmintics against Haemonchus contortus in experimentally infected lambs. Intern J Appl Res Vet Med. 2006, 4: 94-99.Google Scholar

Copyright

Advertisement