Volume 54 Supplement 1

Environmental contaminants and animal health. Proceedings of the 26th Symposium of the Nordic Committee for Veterinary Scientific Cooperation (NKVet)

Open Access

Estrogen mimicking effects of xenobiotics in fish

  • Poul Bjerregaard1
Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica201254(Suppl 1):S12

https://doi.org/10.1186/1751-0147-54-S1-S12

Published: 24 February 2012

Sex hormones produced in humans and livestock are excreted in the urine. Naturally produced and synthetic contraceptive pill estrogens may pass low-quality waste water processing plants and feminize male fish in streams and coastal areas downstream such discharges [1, 2]. High-quality processing of the wastewater with tertiary treatment, nutrient removal and sufficient water and sludge retention times basically removes the problem [3, 4].

The feminization of male fish downstream waste water discharges has mainly been demonstrated by the presence of elevated levels of female yolk protein (vitellogenin) in the blood of male or juvenile fish or eggs (or oocytes) in the testes (intersex) [5]. Both of these phenomena are used as biomarkers for estrogenic effects and as always in the use of biomarkers, it is important to define the natural background level in an uncontaminated environment.

The first investigations on intersex in roach showed that male fish in areas not directly affected by wastewater discharges had intersex percentages between 5 and 11% [1, 6], suggesting that there might be a low, natural occurrence of this phenomenon. Recent investigations [7] in pristine areas do, however, show no intersex among the males, indicating that the natural background level of intersex roach may actually be zero.

Plasma levels in male or juvenile fish have been used as an efficient biomarker to detect estrogenic contamina-tion in both freshwater and marine areas and a number of studies [e.g. [8, 9]] have presented vitellogenin levels that are markedly and unambiguously elevated - maybe several orders of magnitude - compared to background levels. Less effort has been devoted to defining when less severe increases in plasma vitellogenin levels actually indicate a difference relative to unaffected background levels [10]. The occurrence of intersex in roach and elevated vitellogenin levels in areas not directly affected by discharges from sewage treatment plants suggests that there may be other inputs of estrogenic activity to the aquatic environment and, in fact, several possibilities – some of them associated with intensive, modern agriculture - exist.

Estrogens have been found to leach to the water draining from fields treated with pig manure [11], which generally has a high content of especially estrone and estrogenic activity has been found in streams in connection with dairy cattle farms [12].

Leguminous plants - such as clover, peas, lupine and alfalfa used as nitrogen binding crop in e.g. organic farming - produce phytoestrogens which may leach to - and are detected in - the freshwater environment [13] – most often in the ng/l range. Some phytoestrogens induce vitellogenin synthesis in the low µg/l range [14].

Houses in the open land are not all connected to central sewage treatment plants and simple waste water processing measures such as septic tanks may be employed. Septic tanks do a very poor job removing estrogens from wastewater and estrogenic activities 20 times higher than needed to feminize brown trout have been detected in discharges from such systems [15].

Recently, exposure to 17β-estradiol and octylphenol has been shown to cause malformations in embryos of viviparous eelpout at fairly high – but still environmentally realistic concentrations [16].

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Institute of Biology, University of Southern Denmark

References

  1. Jobling S, Nolan M, Tyler CR, Brighty G, Sumpter JP: Widespread sexual disruption in wild fish. Environ Sci Technol. 1998, 32: 2498-2506. 10.1021/es9710870.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Matthiessen P: Endocrine disruption in marine fish. Pure Appl Chem. 2003, 75: 2249-2261. 10.1351/pac200375112249.Google Scholar
  3. Andersen H, Siegrist H, Halling-Sorensen B, Ternes TA: Fate of estrogens in a municipal sewage treatment plant. Environ Sci Technol. 2003, 37: 4021-4026. 10.1021/es026192a.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Stuer-Lauridsen F, Kjølholt J, Høibye L, Hinge-Christensen S, Ingerslev F, Hansen M: Survey of estrogenic activity in the Danish aquatic environment. Environmental Project 977. 2005, Danish EPA, 1-170.Google Scholar
  5. Jobling S, Tyler CR: Endocrine disruption in wild freshwater fish. Pure Appl Chem. 2003, 75: 2219-2234. 10.1351/pac200375112219.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Bjerregaard LB, Korsgaard B, Bjerregaard P: Intersex in wild roach (Rutilis rutilis) from Danish sewage effluent-receiving streams. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2006, 64: 321-328. 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2005.05.018.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Geraudie P, Gerbron M, Hill E, Minier C: Roach (Rutilus rutilus) reproductive cycle: a study of biochemical and histological parameters in a low contaminated site. Fish Physiol Biochem. 2010, 36: 767-777. 10.1007/s10695-009-9351-5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Harries JE, Sheahan DA, Jobling S, Matthiessen P, Neall M, Sumpter JP: Estrogenic activity in five United Kingdom rivers detected by measurement of vitellogenesis in caged male trout. Environ Toxicol Chem. 1997, 16: 534-542. 10.1002/etc.5620160320.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Kirby MF, Allen YT, Dyer RA, Feist SW, Katsiadaki I, Matthiessen P: Surveys of plasma vitellogenin and intersex in male flounder (Platichthys flesus) as measures of endocrine disruption by estrogenic contamination in United Kingdom estuaries: Temporal trends, 1996 to 2001. Environ Toxicol Chem. 2004, 23: 748-758. 10.1897/03-166.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Bjerregaard P, Hansen P, Larsen KJ, Erratico C, Korsgaard B, Holbech H: Vitellogenin as a biomarker for oestrogenic effects in brown trout, Salmo trutta: Laboratory and field investigations. Environ Toxicol Chem. 2008, 27: 2387-2396. 10.1897/08-148.1.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Kjaer J, Olsen P, Bach K, Barlebo HC, Ingerslev F, Hansen M: Leaching of estrogenic hormones from manure-treated structured soils. Environ Sci Technol. 2007, 41: 3911-3917. 10.1021/es0627747.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Matthiessen P, Arnold D, Johnson AC, Pepper TJ, Pottinger TG, Pulman KGT: Contamination of headwater streams in the United Kingdom by oestrogenic hormones from livestock farms. Sci Total Environ. 2006, 367: 616-630. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2006.02.007.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Ribeiro C, Tiritan ME, Rocha E, Rocha MJ: Seasonal and spatial distribution of several endocrine-disrupting compounds in the Douro River Estuary, Portugal. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol. 2009, 56: 1-11. 10.1007/s00244-008-9158-x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Bjerregaard P, Schröder KD, Nielsen ML, Brande-Lavridsen N, Holbech H: Estrogenic effect of biochanin A in zebrafish Danio rerio and brown trout Salmo trutta. In prep. 2011Google Scholar
  15. Stuer-Lauridsen F, Kjølholt J, Høibye L, Hinge-Christensen S, Ingerslev F, Hansen M: Survey of estrogenic activity in the Danish aquatic environment- B. Environmental Project 1077. 2006, Danish EPA, 1-49.Google Scholar
  16. Bjerregaard P, Brande-Lavridsen N, Nielsen RV, Rasmussen TH, Korsgaard B: A novel type of endocrine disrupting effect: Octylphenol and 17β-estradiol cause abnormal development in embryos of the viviparous eelpout Zoarces viviparus. In prep. 2011Google Scholar

Copyright

© Bjerregaard; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Advertisement