Skip to main content
  • Brief communication
  • Open access
  • Published:

Prevalence of Coxiella burnetii and Brucella spp. in tissues from subsistence harvested northern fur seals (Callorhinus ursinus) of St. Paul Island, Alaska

Abstract

Background

The northern fur seal (Callorhinus ursinus) is an important cultural and nutritional resource for the Aleut community on St. Paul Island Alaska. In recent years, an increasing number of zoonotic pathogens have been identified in the population, but the public health significance of these findings is unknown. To determine the prevalence of Coxiella burnetii and Brucella spp. in northern fur seal tissues, eight tissue types from 50 subsistence-harvested fur seals were tested for bacterial DNA by real-time polymerase chain reaction.

Findings

Of the 400 samples tested, only a single splenic sample was positive for Brucella spp. and the cycle threshold (ct) value was extremely high suggesting a low concentration of DNA within the tissue. C. burnetii DNA was not detected.

Conclusions

Findings suggest that the risk of humans contracting brucellosis or Q fever from the consumption of harvested northern fur seals is low.

Findings

On St. Paul Island Alaska, one of the Pribilof Islands, the northern fur seal (NFS, Callorhinus ursinus) is culturally significant to the Aleut community and an important traditional food. Historically infectious diseases have been considered an uncommon cause of mortality in this species [1], however since 2010 an increasing number of infectious agents have been identified [2]-[4], some of which are zoonotic.

In 2010 and 2011 Coxiella burnetii was identified in ~75% of the NFS placentas collected from a NFS rookery [3],[5]. C. burnetii is a zoonotic bacterium that can cause a wide range of disease in humans including generalized malaise, severe multi-systemic disease and chronic valvular endocarditis [6]. Inhalation is thought to be the most common mode of transmission, but the organism can also be spread by tick vectors and ingestion [6]. Milk is the primary source of food-borne C. burnetii; an infection source that had decreased with pasteurization but has recently been increasing with the ‘raw milk‘ movement [7]. While the risk of contracting disease following consumption, or handling, of other tissues is less understood, disease outbreaks have occurred in slaughterhouse and meat processing facilities [8].

Brucella has also recently been identified in NFS placentas and in serum from an individual animal that was harvested for human consumption [2]. The Brucella genus includes a number of pathogenic species that have the ability to cause disease in both humans and animals. Brucella spp. have been isolated from a number of marine mammal species (recently reviewed in [9]) and marine mammal isolates have been shown to be pathogenic in people [10]-[12]. Brucellosis has been described as one of the most important infectious diseases in Alaska [13].

In humans and animals, Brucella spp. can persist in cells of the mononuclear phagocyte system such as the bone marrow, lymph nodes, spleen and liver [14]. Similarly, chronic infection and long-term persistence of C. burnetii has been identified in the bone marrow and liver of humans many years after primary bacteremia [15],[16]. It is presumed that a similar pathogenesis exists in marine mammals, but this has not been substantiated. The objective of this study was to determine the tissue distribution and prevalence of C. burnetii and Brucella spp. in tissues from NFS harvested for consumption on St. Paul Island, Alaska as these zoonotic pathogens may present a human health risk.

From July 5th to August 7th 2013 tissues were collected from 50 sub-adult male NFS during the St. Paul community harvest. Fresh samples of muscle, liver, kidney, spleen, testicle, lymph node, lung and bone marrow were collected and frozen at -80°C in 1.5 ml cryovials until testing. Bone marrow impression smears were made from the femur within 5 hours of the animals’ death and stored dry until transferred to the laboratory where they were stained with Wright-Giemsa Stain (Volu-Sol Inc., Salt Lake City Utah, USA). A fresh dog bone marrow sample was stained with the NFS samples as a positive staining control and samples were excluded when ≥ 75% of the cells were autolytic. A section of formalin fixed bone marrow was routinely processed and examined histologically.

The eight tissue types (n = 400 samples) were individually tested for both C. burnetii and Brucella spp. by real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR). DNA was extracted from all tissues using the QIAamp DNA Mini Kit (Qiagen, Valencia, California, USA) according to manufacturer’s directions with the following exceptions: 80-120 mg of tissue was used as the starting sample and the sample was incubated at 56°C in proteinase K overnight for 16-18 hours. Real-time PCR was conducted as previously described for the C. burnetii IS1111 and COM1 gene target regions [3] and Brucella spp. IS711 gene target region [2]. A sample was considered positive at a cycle threshold (ct) value of less than or equal to 40. Marine mammal origin C. burnetii and B. pinnipedialis positive amplification controls, and a no template negative control, were used for the Coxiella and Brucella real-time PCR respectively.

A single splenic sample was positive for Brucella (ct value 38.52); this result was repeatable but all other tissue types from this individual were negative. Of the remaining 399 samples, all were negative for both bacteria. Results of the bone marrow cytology are presented in Table 1. A single animal had a significantly higher myeloid: erythroid (M:E) ratio suggestive of granulocytic hyperplasia but this animal was PCR negative on all tissues. No histologic lesions were identified in the bone marrow of any animals.

Table 1 Nucleated cell differential counts from 20 sub-adult male NFS bone marrow samples examined cytologically

Results of this study suggest that the risk of exposure to C. burnetii and Brucella spp. through subsistence harvesting of male NFS on St. Paul Island is extremely low; only 0.25% of tested samples (one animal) had evidence of bacterial DNA in tested tissues. The single Brucella positive spleen sample had a high ct value suggesting a low quantity of DNA within the tissue; follow up attempts to culture Brucella from the splenic tissue of this animal were unsuccessful. Given that no other tissues from this animal were positive it is doubtful that this animal had an active infection, although the positive result could represent inactive DNA persisting within a splenic macrophage. As the spleen is not routinely collected or consumed by the Aleut people, this finding is of minimal public health concern. The apparent Brucella prevalence of 2% in this study is consistent with the previously reported placental prevalence (5%) and seroprevalence (2.5%) in this species [2]. While brucellosis has been identified as an important zoonotic disease in Alaska, the public health risk is thought to be from the hunting of infected terrestrial, and not marine, mammals [13].

That all samples were negative for C. burnetii was unexpected. The 2011 C. burnetii seroprevalence in subadult males was 73% [17] suggesting that exposure is high in the cohort of animals included in the present study. Failure to identify any tissues positive by PCR suggests that for exposed NFS the infection rate is low, infection is transient or the bacteria persists in tissues other than those tested in this study. The negative findings were also surprising given recent reports of human exposure in the area. Archived serum from residents of St. Paul Island had C. burnetii antibodies in 12% of the samples (titer ≥ 1:64) [18], which is significantly higher than the general US population (3% at titer ≥ 1:16) [19]. The present study suggests that this differential exposure is unlikely to be from consumption of NFS, however discordance between sampling timeframes that makes it challenging to compare these results. The archived human serum tested was collected between 1980-2000 and individuals included in that study may have had more opportunities for C. burnetii exposure. The commercial NFS harvest was active on St. Paul Island until 1985, with tens of thousands of animals killed annually for furs providing considerably more human-animal interaction [20]. Following the ban on commercial hunting, the Aleut people continued to hunt NFS for subsistence use although the average annual harvest has been less than 500 sub adult males over the last 15 years. Another possibility for the discordant results is that human exposure is coming from inhalation of aerosolized organisms arising from the contaminated birthing rookeries of the NFS. While it is illegal to disrupt federally protected rookeries during June to Mid Oct while NFS are on land, the organism can persist year round in these locations [5] allowing for exposure opportunities even during periods when no animals are on the island.

Bone marrow was examined both cytologically and histologically in this study because chronic C. burnetii infection in humans has been associated with bone marrow pathology such as ‘doughnut ring’ granulomas [21],[22] and an acute hemophagocytic syndrome [23]. While neither of these lesions were observed, results of the bone marrow analysis may be helpful as a reference range for this species given the paucity of baseline information on many free ranging pinnipeds. The results of the cytologic examination of the bone marrow were similar to the reference ranges for other common domestic species. In addition, the good preservation of many of the bone marrow samples collected up to 5 hours postmortem suggests that significant autolysis may not occur as quickly in this species as compared to others.

While the present study suggests that there is little risk of human exposure to C. burnetii and Brucella spp. through the subsistence harvest of NFS on St. Paul Island, there remain some unanswered questions regarding the source of human exposure to C. burnetii on the Pribilof Islands of Alaska. Given that little is known about this zoonotic agent in the marine and coastal environment, further investigation into the epidemiology and ecology of this pathogen will help to guide public health recommendations.

References

  1. Spraker TR, Lander ME: Causes of mortality in northern fur seals (Callorhinus ursinus), St. Paul Island, Pribilof Islands, Alaska, 1986-2006. J Wild Dis. 2010, 46: 450-473. 10.7589/0090-3558-46.2.450.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Duncan CG, Tiller R, Mathis D, Stoddard R, Kersh GJ, Dickerson B, Gelatt T:Brucella placentitis and seroprevalence in northern fur seals (Callorhinus ursinus) of the Pribilof Islands, Alaska. J Vet Diag Invest. 2014, 26: 507-512. 10.1177/1040638714532647.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Duncan C, Kersh GJ, Spraker T, Patyk KA, Fitzpatrick KA, Massung RF, Gelatt T:Coxiella burnetii in northern fur seal (Callorhinus ursinus) placentas from St. Paul Island, Alaska. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2012, 12: 192-195. 10.1089/vbz.2011.0715.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Duncan C, Goldstein T, Hearne C, Gelatt T, Spraker T: Novel polyomaviral infection in the placenta of a northern fur seal (Callorhinus ursinus) on the Pribilof Islands, Alaska, USA. J Wild Dis. 2013, 49: 163-167. 10.7589/2012-04-101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Duncan C, Savage K, Williams M, Dickerson B, Kondas AV, Fitzpatrick KA, Guerrero JL, Spraker T, Kersh GJ: Multiple Strains of Coxiella burnetii are present in the environment of St. Paul Island, Alaska. Transbound Emerg Dis. 2013, 60: 345-350. 10.1111/j.1865-1682.2012.01353.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Maurin M, Raoult D: Q fever. Clin Microbiol Rev. 1999, 12: 518-553.

    PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Signs KA, Stobierski MG, Gandhi TN: Q fever cluster among raw milk drinkers, Michigan, 2011. Clin Infect Dis. 2012, 55: 1387-1389. 10.1093/cid/cis690.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Aw TC, Ratti N: Occupational infection in an offal porter: a case of Q fever. Occ Med. 1997, 47: 432-434. 10.1093/occmed/47.7.432.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Hernandez-Mora G, Palacios-Alfaro JD, Gonzalez-Barrientos R: Wildlife reservoirs of brucellosis: Brucella in aquatic environments. Rev Sci Tech. 2013, 32: 89-103.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Sohn AH, Probert WS, Glaser CA, Gupta N, Bollen AW, Wong JD, Grace EM, McDonald WC: Human neurobrucellosis with intracerebral granuloma caused by a marine mammal Brucella spp. Emerg Infect Dis. 2003, 9: 485-488. 10.3201/eid0904.020576.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Brew SD, Perrett LL, Stack JA, MacMillan AP, Staunton NJ: Human exposure to Brucella recovered from a sea mammal. Vet Rec. 1999, 144: 483-

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. McDonald WL, Jamaludin R, Mackereth G, Hansen M, Humphrey S, Short P, Taylor T, Swingler J, Dawson CE, Whatmore AM, Stubberfield E, Perrett LL, Simmons G: Characterization of a Brucella sp. strain as a marine-mammal type despite isolation from a patient with spinal osteomyelitis in New Zealand. J Clin Microbiol. 2006, 44: 4363-4370. 10.1128/JCM.00680-06.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Brubaker M, Berner J, Butler J, Bradley M: Brucellosis: Understanding an Important Arctic Infectious Disease. 2010, Center for Climate and Health, Anchorage Alaska

    Google Scholar 

  14. Atluri VL, Xavier MN, de Jong MF, den Hartigh AB, Tsolis RM: Interactions of the human pathogenic Brucella species with their hosts. Annu Rev Microbiol. 2011, 65: 523-541. 10.1146/annurev-micro-090110-102905.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Harris RJ, Storm PA, Lloyd A, Arens M, Marmion BP: Long-term persistence of Coxiella burnetii in the host after primary Q fever. Epidemiol Infect. 2000, 124: 543-549. 10.1017/S0950268899003763.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Marmion BP, Storm PA, Ayres JG, Semendric L, Mathews L, Winslow W, Turra M, Harris RJ: Long-term persistence of Coxiella burnetii after acute primary Q fever. QJM. 2005, 98: 7-20. 10.1093/qjmed/hci009.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Minor C, Kersh GJ, Gelatt T, Kondas AV, Pabilonia KL, Weller CB, Dickerson BR, Duncan CG:Coxiella burnetii in northern fur seals and steller sea lions of Alaska. J Wildlife Dis. 2013, 49: 441-446. 10.7589/2012-09-226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Brubaker M, Berner J, Crowder C, Pletnikoff K, Duncan C: Q Fever in Alaska - update.Alaska Epi Bull 2014. ., [http://www.epi.hss.state.ak.us/bulletins/docs/b2014_01.pdf]

  19. Anderson AD, Kruszon-Moran D, Loftis AD, McQuillan G, Nicholson WL, Priestley RA, Candee AJ, Patterson NE, Massung RF: Seroprevalence of Q fever in the United States, 2003-2004. J Trop Med Hyg. 2009, 81: 691-694. 10.4269/ajtmh.2009.09-0168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. National Marine Fisheries Service: Conservation plan for the eastern pacific stock of northern fur seal (Callorhinus ursinus).National Marine Fisheries Service 2007, [http://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/pr/pdfs/conservation/plan_nfs_dec2007.pdf]

  21. Kreisel F: Doughnut Ring—shaped epithelioid granulomas in the bone marrow of a patient with Q fever. Int J Surg Pathol. 2007, 15: 172-173. 10.1177/1066896906299074.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Bottieau E, De Raeve H, Colebunders R, Van den Ende J, Vervoort T, Van Marck E: Q fever after a journey in Syria: a diagnosis suggested by bone marrow biopsy. Acta Clin Belg. 2000, 55: 30-33.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Chen TC, Chang K, Lu PL, Liu YC, Chen YH, Hsieh HC, Yang WC, Lin WR, Tsai JJ, Lin SF: Acute Q fever with hemophagocytic syndrome: case report and literature review. Scand J Infect Dis. 2006, 38: 1119-1122. 10.1080/00365540600684405.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

All animal tissue samples were collected under authorization of U.S. Marine Mammal Protection Act Permit #s 14327, issued to the National Marine Mammal Laboratory, Alaska Fisheries Science Center, Seattle, WA, USA. The authors thank The Tribal Government of St Paul Island for their collaboration in sample collection, the North Pacific Research Board for funding and Christina Weller for technical assistance.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Colleen Duncan.

Additional information

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors’ contributions

CD, BD and TG designed the study and saw it through to completion. CD and BD collected biological samples. KP optimized and conducted molecular testing. AM conducted the cytological evaluations and CD conduced histological evaluations. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Rights and permissions

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Duncan, C., Dickerson, B., Pabilonia, K. et al. Prevalence of Coxiella burnetii and Brucella spp. in tissues from subsistence harvested northern fur seals (Callorhinus ursinus) of St. Paul Island, Alaska. Acta Vet Scand 56, 67 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13028-014-0067-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13028-014-0067-x

Keywords