Skip to content

Advertisement

  • Research
  • Open Access

Canine angiostrongylosis in Sweden: a nationwide seroepidemiological survey by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays and a summary of five-year diagnostic activity (2011–2015)

Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica201759:85

https://doi.org/10.1186/s13028-017-0351-7

  • Received: 13 March 2017
  • Accepted: 7 December 2017
  • Published:

Abstract

Background

For the first time in Sweden, Angiostrongylus vasorum was detected on the island of Sydkoster in foxes and dogs in 2003. After sporadic detection of the parasite in foxes in southern Sweden, the first positive canine faecal sample on the mainland was found in 2011. Since then a total of 2882 faecal samples have been analysed with the Baermann test at the National Veterinary Institute (SVA) during the years 2011–2015; 20 of them being positive. Contemporaneously, of over 525 fox necropsies, only three were found to be infected. To gather a more accurate knowledge of A. vasorum occurrence in Sweden, a large scale seroepidemiological survey was performed and totally 3885 serum samples from dogs were tested for both the presence of circulating antigens and of specific antibodies to A. vasorum.

Results

In total, 0.10% (n = 4, 95% Confidence Intervals, CI 0.03–0.26%) of the dogs were positive for both antigen and antibodies, whereas 0.51% (n = 20, CI 0.31–0.79%) of the tested dogs were only antigen positive and 0.88% (n = 34, CI 0.61–1.22%) only positive for specific antibodies. Seropositive animals, as well as the majority of A. vasorum-positive faecal samples tested during the same period, were spread over central and southern Sweden. Annual prevalence of positive faecal dog samples and of necropsied A. vasorum positive foxes (coming from southern Sweden) varied from 0.3 to 0.9% (overall: 0.7%, CI 0.4–1.1%) and 0.0 to 1.4% (overall: 0.3%, CI 0.1–0.9%), respectively.

Conclusions

The findings confirmed that A. vasorum has become established in various geographical areas of central and southern Sweden. Veterinarians and dog owners should be aware of the potential risks of infection in large areas of the country, since canine angiostrongylosis may be a fatal disease if left untreated.

Keywords

  • Angiostrongylus vasorum
  • Antigen
  • Antibodies
  • Serology
  • Dog

Background

Angiostrongylus vasorum, the French heartworm, is a nematode parasite of dogs. The worm resides in the right side of the heart and in the pulmonary arteries. The red fox (Vulpes vulpes) and other wild canids act as definitive hosts as do dogs, while intermediate hosts, terrestrial gastropod molluscs, are needed to complete the life cycle. Frogs and birds may be involved as paratenic hosts [14]. Although A. vasorum was reported from France in the 19th century [5], a more detailed characterization of the clinical features related to the infection as well as improvement of diagnostic methods mainly took place during the last 20 years.

Clinical signs may vary greatly but coagulopathy and lung lesions have been identified as the two main reasons for a potentially fatal outcome of the disease in dogs. Clinical manifestations of coagulopathy can range from subcutaneous haematomas, epistaxis to neurological signs depending on the site of bleeding. The lung damage is related to microinjuries and inflammatory processes taking place both when eggs of A. vasorum are caught in the lung capillaries and when the hatched larvae migrate to the air passages. Tissue injuries intensify and may lead to the classical textbook clinical presentation of the disease characterized by dyspnoea, exercise intolerance, coughing, followed by lethargy and weakness [6].

A more accurate description of the geographical distribution of A. vasorum can be obtained using detection methods characterized by high sensitivity and specificity; such a description can be useful to promote better prevention measures and to increase disease awareness in areas where the risk of infection is present [7]. Traditionally the diagnosis relies on the detection of first stage larvae (L1) from faeces, but the excretion of L1 only takes place when lung lesions have already developed and furthermore, the Baermann technique has limitations in sensitivity and specificity [7]. For these reasons, other techniques such as Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) and serology have been developed and tested on individuals and—in the case of serology—in large scale studies. A. vasorum PCR protocols using specific primers targeting the ITS-2 region are usually able to detect a single L1 of A. vasorum [810]. Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assays (ELISAs) have also developed to detect circulating parasite antigens [11] or antibodies against the parasite in serum samples [12, 13]. The diagnostic approach usually follows or completes a clinical assessment of individual patients, while large scale surveys are conducted on large numbers of randomly collected samples from individuals, distinguishing between infected and non-infected animals and therefore giving information on the occurrence and prevalence of A. vasorum in a given population.

During the past decades, the endemic foci of infection have expanded and new ones have been reported. The relative importance of different factors related to this apparent spread is still unclear. Increased urbanization of the red fox acting as wildlife reservoir [14] and increased movement of domestic dogs both within and between countries [15] are certainly involved. Climatic changes influencing the distribution of intermediate hosts may also play a role [16]. Beside historically endemic areas, like southern France, part of the British Isles and Denmark, there is a list of countries in South, Central and East Europe where the presence of the parasite has consistently been recorded. Recently an increased prevalence of the parasite in foxes [17, 18] and dogs [19, 20] has been reported in e.g. the United Kingdom (UK) and in Italy. Moreover, new autochthonous cases have been described in other countries such as Belgium [21], Slovakia [22] and Serbia [23]. During the past years, it has been possible to obtain a more complete picture of parasite prevalence in dog populations through large scale serological studies carried out in some countries, for example in Germany and UK [24], Italy [25], Switzerland [26], Poland [27], Hungary [7], Slovakia [28], Bulgaria [29], Belgium [30] and Portugal [31].

In Scandinavia, A. vasorum was initially detected in 1983 in Denmark in a dog that had travelled several times to southern France [32]. In Danish foxes, A. vasorum was first reported in 1992 [33], and the prevalence in foxes in the same area (northern Zealand) rose from 48.7% in 1993 [34] to 90% in 2002 [35]. Despite a prevalence of 9.7% of A. vasorum infections was found in Danish dogs in 2004 [36], an overall prevalence of 2.2% was reported in hunting dogs in 2013 [37]. In Norway the parasite was identified for the first time in a red fox in March 2016 [38]. In Sweden, A. vasorum infection was first diagnosed in 2003, both in a dog and in a red fox (Vulpes vulpes) from the island of Sydkoster (Västra Götaland county) [39], and since then further individual cases of A. vasorum infections have been identified in dogs and red foxes on the mainland as well.

The aim of the present study was to determine the prevalence and geographical distribution of A. vasorum in Swedish dogs by using serological analyses and data from routine diagnostic activity performed at the National Veterinary Institute (SVA).

Methods

Prevalence study using ELISAs

Sera of 3885 dogs were collected from the Clinical Chemistry Laboratory (CCL) of the University Animal Hospital (UDS-SLU, Uppsala) and from the SVA. Sera from CCL (n = 1212) were collected from February to April 2014, either from dogs attending the University Animal Hospital (n = 495) or were sent to CCL from other veterinary clinics of the country (n = 717). Sera collected from the SVA (n = 2674) were submitted from veterinary clinics during 2013 for the analysis of tick-borne bacterial pathogens such as Anaplasma phagocytophilum and Borrelia spp. For each sample the postal code of the residence of the dog owner was recorded. No other data could be retained due to confidentiality issues.

An aliquot of the samples was sent to the Institute of Parasitology, Vetsuisse Faculty, University of Zurich, Switzerland, for analysis for the presence of circulating A. vasorum antigens using monoclonal (mAb Av 56/1/2) and polyclonal antibodies in a sandwich ELISA with a sensitivity of 95.7% and a specificity of 94.0%, as previously described [11]. In brief, tests were performed in 96-well microtiter plates (Maxisorp, Nunc Roskilde, Denmark) coated overnight at 4 °C with 2.5 µg/mL of mAb Av 56/1/2 that had been obtained by the fusion of spleen cells of mice immunised against adult A. vasorum excretory/secretory (E/S) antigen with myeloma cells, based on the protocol of de StGroth and Scheidegger [40]. Plates were then washed and saturated for 30 min at 37 °C with PBS-Tween-20 (PBS-T). Serum dilutions (100 µL/well, 1:2 in PBS–T) were incubated for 1 h at 37 °C. After further washing steps, hyperimmune polyclonal rabbit serum (100 µL/well) from rabbits also immunised with adult A. vasorum E/S antigen was added in a concentration of 1:500, incubated for 1 h at 37 °C and plates again washed before adding 100 µL/well goat anti-rabbit IgG conjugated to alkaline phosphatase and diluted in PBS–T (1:2500). After the repetition of the incubation and washing steps, 100 µL/well of substrate (p-nitrophenyl phosphate) were added. Absorbance values were read at 405 nm (OD405) with a Multiscan RC ELISA reader (Thermo Labsystems, Helsinki, Finland). The ELISA has been shown to detect circulating antigens starting at 5 weeks post infection (wpi) and at 10 wpi virtually all dogs are persistently positive. After anthelmintic treatment, antigens can be detectable until 9 weeks post treatment [11]. Additionally, a sandwich ELISA (sensitivity 81.0%, specificity 98.8%) using A. vasorum adult somatic antigen purified by monoclonal antibodies (mAb Av 5/5) was used for specific antibody detection [14]. Briefly, plates were coated overnight at 4 °C with A. vasorum adult somatic antigen (5 µg/mL), washed and saturated. Sera were used in a standard dilution of 1:200 in PBS-T with 10% foetal calf serum; 100 µL diluted sera/well were incubated at 37 °C in a humid chamber for 1 h. After washing steps, specific affinity-purified, alkaline phosphatase conjugated goat anti-dog IgG (γ) antibodies were used at a dilution of 1:250 in PBS-T (100 µL/well). Substrate was added after the washing steps and absorbance values obtained as described above. The ELISA has been shown to detect antibodies from 3 to 6 wpi and to remain positive as long as the animal is infected. After anthelmintic treatment, antibodies may remain detectable until 9 weeks post treatment [13].

All test runs included a background control, a conjugate control, three positive control sera from three experimentally infected dogs and two negative control sera from uninfected dogs, as previously described [11, 13]. Test thresholds were regionally determined with 300 randomly selected samples based on the mean value of optical density (A405 nm) plus 3 standard deviations.

The collected data were embedded into a geographical information system (GIS) using the program RegioGraph 10 (GfK GeoMarketing, Bruchsal, Germany) to visualize the regional distribution of A. vasorum antigen- and/or antibody-positive samples. The locations of positive samples were displayed on maps with administrative and postcode boundaries based on the three-digit postcodes of Sweden as points of reference.

Excel 2007 for Windows (Microsoft Corporation, Redmond, USA) was used to calculate the prevalence values and the 95% confidence interval (CI) of prevalence values.

Data from routine diagnostic activity, 2011–2015

Dogs

Faecal samples (Table 2) submitted to the SVA by veterinary clinics or private dog owners were tested with a modified larval recovery method [41]. The SVA requires at least three samples from three different droppings collected over 3 days from each dog in order to perform the analysis. All samples originated from dogs showing clinical signs, either respiratory or other clinical signs compatible with A. vasorum infection, and therefore cannot be considered representative of the general canine population.

Red foxes

Red foxes (Table 2) received at the SVA for diagnostic necropsies or submitted by hunters for pathogen screening were examined specifically for A. vasorum and lungworms by visual inspection of the cardiovascular and respiratory systems. During 2011, 3000 hunted red foxes were submitted for the national Echinococcus multilocularis surveillance program. Over 500 heart and lung sets were examined for parasites that year. A joint database was created in order to produce Table 2.

Results

A total of 0.10% (n = 4, 95%, CI 0.03–0.26%) of the dogs were positive in both ELISAs, while 0.51% (n = 20, CI 0.31–0.79%) were antigen positive only and 0.88% (n = 34, CI 0. 1–1.22%) were positive for specific antibodies only (Table 1). The geographical distribution of positive samples is shown in Fig. 1. Samples positive in both tests were found only in the counties of Gävleborg, Uppsala and Kronoberg (Fig. 1).
Table 1

Serological results of 3885 dog serum samples from Sweden tested for the presence of circulating antigens of Angiostrongylus vasorum and of specific antibodies to A. vasorum

 

Positive samples (n)

%

95% confidence intervals

Antibody-positive

38

0.98

0.69–1.34

Antibody-positive only

34

0.88

0.61–1.22

Antigen positive

24

0.62

0.40–0.92

Antigen positive only

20

0.51

0.31–0.79

Antibody and antigen positive

4

0.10

0.03–0.26

Fig. 1
Fig. 1

Detection of Angiostrongylus vasorum circulating antigens and specific antibodies in serum samples from 3885 dogs from Sweden. Dark grey areas represent the origin of the tested dog sera. The first place of finding of A. vasorum in Sweden (island of Sydkoster) is marked with a yellow star

Endemic canine cases of A. vasorum were diagnosed once in 2011 and 2012, respectively. Subsequently, the parasite was sporadically found (4–9 times per year). A progressively increasing number of faecal samples was submitted to the SVA throughout this period.

Detailed figures on the number of examined faecal samples as well as the number of foxes necropsied at the SVA between 2011 and 2015 are provided in Table 2.
Table 2

Results from the diagnostic activity concerning A. vasorum related methodologies carried out at the SVA between 2011 and 2015

 

Year

Total

2011

2012

2013

2014

2015

Groups

Numbers

Dogs, Baermann tested samples

298

355

504

693

1032

2882

A. vasorum positive canine faecal samples (%)

1 (0.3; 0.0–1.9)

1 (0.3; 0.0–1.6)

4 (0.8; 0.2–2)

5 (0.7; 0.2–1.7)

9 (0.9; 0.4–106)

20 (0.7; 0.4–1.1)

County of origin*

M

O

M, S, K, Y

AB, C, D, H, M

AB, BD, E, O, M, Y, Z

Red foxes necropsied

525

88

164

70

100

947

A. vasorum positive foxes (%)

1 (0.2; 0–1.1)

0 (0.0; 0.3.3)

1 (0.6; 0.0–3.4)

1 (1.4; 0.0–7.7)

0 (0; 0.0–3.0)

3 (0.3; 0.1–0.9)

County of origin*

G

O

O

 

Codes for Swedish counties: AB: Stockholm, BD: Norrbotten; C: Uppsala, D: Södermanland, E: Östergötland, G: Kronoberg; H: Kalmar, K: Blekinge, M: Skåne; O: Västra Götaland; S: Värmland; Y: Västernorrland; Z: Jämtland

Discussion

The first Swedish fox being positive for A. vasorum was identified in 2003 on the island of Sydkoster, in the county of Västra Götaland (see Fig. 1). Six years later, in the beginning of 2009, the parasite was found in the lungs of four out of 269 foxes examined within an E. multilocularis surveillance program; again, the positive animals originated from Sydkoster. After this finding, a targeted survey aimed at finding other foci of A. vasorum was performed in 2009 on 137 foxes from south-western Sweden. Eight foxes were found to be infected, of which seven were from Sydkoster (64% of the foxes collected on this island within the survey) and one from the municipality of Osby (county of Skåne), which was the first A. vasorum case described on mainland Sweden [42]. Even though many red foxes have been necropsied thereafter, the parasite has been identified only three additional times, in 2011, 2013 and 2014 (Table 2). The fox that tested positive in 2011 is particularly interesting because it originated from the municipality of Kalvsvik (county of Kronoberg), in the same area where one of the four dogs being both positive for antibodies and antigen was found. No double positive samples were identified in the county where the majority of positive foxes were previously found (Västra Götaland).

The implications of positive results and the performance of the two assays used in the present study have been evaluated independently by determining sensitivities and specificities [11, 13]. In the present study, the number of sera positive for antibody or antigen detection only could indicate an apparently low correlation between the two ELISAs used. However, when combined, these test parameters change: using the OR rule (the combined results are considered positive if either individual test is positive), sensitivity increases by loss of specificity, while using the AND rule (the combined results are considered positive only if both individual tests are positive), specificity reaches 99.9%, while sensitivity decreases to 82.0% [24]. Importantly, these values are influenced by the prevalence of A. vasorum within a determined population: the positive predictive values of the serological tests, represented by the proportion of positive test results that indicate a truly positive sample, is highest with the AND rule and this may of particular value in study areas where little is known on the occurrence of the parasite: reliability of a positive sample is high. However, at low prevalence, such high positive predictive values are reached at the expense of low sensitivity [24].

Therefore, a combined positive result indicate a dog that harbours an active A. vasorum infection inducing the production of antibodies; it has higher specificity than that of a single positive test (for antigen or antibody detection), although sensitivity is lower. However, as such a test combination is reflected by high positive predictive values, its use is of particular interest in areas of expected low endemicity, as it may occur in countries with relatively new introduction of the parasite like in Sweden.

This is supported by large scale studies from Germany [24] and Poland [27]: applying similar methodologies, seroprevalences of A. vasorum were higher than the ones detected in Swedish dogs. Intermediate prevalence figures have been recorded in Italy [25] and in the UK [24], whereas the highest prevalence so far was recorded in Hungary [7]. The seroprevalence of antibody-positive dogs in Sweden was the lowest recorded so far. Dogs positive for antibodies only may have acquired the infection recently, i.e. 3 weeks before (while antigen is detected earliest 5 wpi), but they also could be parasite-free, i.e. after anthelmintic treatment or spontaneous clearance of infection. The data confirmed that the level of exposure to the parasite in Sweden is still quite low. This is in accordance with the extremely low number of infected foxes detected so far, which are considered as a reservoir contributing to the establishment of the parasite [26, 33], as supported by constantly higher prevalences in foxes is than in dogs in corresponding areas [43]. In this context it needs to be added that the difficulty to identify positive foxes with low worm burdens combined with low disease awareness in an early phase of investigations may have contributed missing positive foxes, and that dissection may not be considered as a gold standard [44].

Another indirect demonstration of the low endemic presence of the parasite in Sweden is given by the results of faecal examinations performed at the SVA, presupposing that samples obtained from clinically ill dogs do not represent the general canine population. After the first description of an autochthonous case in a dog in 2003, the first dog was not diagnosed until 2011 by a Baermann analysis. Because of the relatively common (8–9%) occurrence of Crenosoma vulpis, the fox lungworm, Baermann examinations are being regularly performed at the SVA. After the first report of A. vasorum in Sweden the number of examinations have steadily increased, however, despite this increase, the number of A. vasorum positive findings has remained low (Table 2).

Detection of the parasite both in foxes and dogs in Denmark and Sweden, but only one recent finding in a red fox in Norway and still no occurrence of the parasite in Finland suggest that A. vasorum may have been introduced from Denmark and/or Germany. Southern Sweden is often visited by tourists from these countries, especially during the summer, and they are often accompanied by their dogs. Another interesting aspect is the partial overlapping of geographical distribution of samples positive by serology with samples positive at coprological examination (data not shown). In fact, all the positive samples (faecal or serum samples) originated from geographic areas that in a prediction model have been shown to be suitable for the establishment of the parasite [16], although it cannot be excluded that some of the positive dog cases found in the present study are not endemic but may have been imported from other endemic foci instead. The presence of an abundant fox population especially in agricultural regions, coinciding with the well-established circulation of lungworms (C. vulpis) that use molluscan intermediate like A. vasorum, is a situation with high risk for spreading of the parasite in Scandinavia. This is for instance supported by data from neighbouring Denmark, where the occurrence of the parasite in foxes has increased rapidly during the last 20 years.

Conclusions

The results confirmed that A. vasorum is endemically present in Sweden: not limited to restricted areas such as the Island of Sydkoster and the municipality of Osby in Scania, but also in foci in widespread areas of the country. Since suitable conditions for the establishment of A. vasorum apparently exist in southern Sweden and potentially also in other areas of Sweden, disease awareness among practitioners, dog owners and hunters, and an according strategical deworming management is recommended, despite the currently low prevalence. This may be particularly important in the case of dogs living or visiting highly endemic areas, in order to avoid further introduction of the parasite into new areas (with the potential to create new foci), and to prevent clinical disease due to angiostrongylosis. Regular deworming should be considered in dogs which belong to “high risk categories”, such as young dogs and/or dogs having free roaming activity that show risk behaviour like indiscriminate ingestion of items from their environment.

Declarations

Authors’ contributions

GG, EOL and MS planned the study, GG collected the samples, MS analysed the samples and interpreted the results. RS provided graphical materials, GG and MS wrote the manuscript. EÅ provided data and wrote sections regarding wildlife surveillance programs and occurrence of A. vasorum in foxes. EOL, EÅ and RS commented on the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Acknowledgements

Henrik Uhlhorn, SVA, is thanked for the assistance in gathering data from red foxes and for comments on the manuscript. Inger Lilliehöök, Clinical Chemistry Laboratory of the University Animal Hospital is thanked for the permission and help given to collect part of serum samples; Susanne André and Therese Råsbäck are thanked for the assistance in collecting serum samples from the SVA. Charlotta Thornberg, SVA, is thanked for helping in recording sample data. Nina Gillis-Germitsch and Stefan Müller from the Institute of Parasitology in Zurich are acknowledged for their great support for laboratory analyses. Eva Wattrang (SVA) is acknowledged for language revision of the manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests. Roland Schaper is employee at Bayer Animal Health, Leverkusen, Germany.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Funding

This study was funded in part by “Jan Skogsborg” Foundation aimed at the improvement of research and education regarding canine diseases and in part by Bayer AB, Solna, Sweden. Both funding bodies contributed to cover the costs of the serological analyses. Bayer AB contributed also to the creation of the Figures of the present article.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Microbiology, National Veterinary Institute, Ulls väg 2B, SE-756 51 Uppsala, Sweden
(2)
Department of Biomedical Sciences and Veterinary Public Health (BVF), Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, PO Box 7028, Ulls väg 26, SE-757 56 Uppsala, Sweden
(3)
Bayer Animal Health GmbH, 51368 Leverkusen, Germany
(4)
Department of Pathology and Wildlife Diseases, National Veterinary Institute, Ulls väg 2B, SE-756 51 Uppsala, Sweden
(5)
Institute of Parasitology Vetsuisse Faculty, University of Zurich, Winterthurerstrasse 266a, 8057 Zurich, Switzerland

References

  1. Guilhon J. Research on the life cycle of the canine vascular strongyle [in French]. Bull Acad Vét. 1963;36:431–42.Google Scholar
  2. Guilhon J, Bressou C. Role of limacidae in the life cycle of Angiostrongylus vasorum (Baillet, 1866) [in French]. C R Acad Sc. 1960;251:2252–3.Google Scholar
  3. Bolt G, Monrad J, Frandsen F, Henriksen P, Dietz HH. The common frog (Rana temporaria) as a potential paratenic and intermediate host for Angiostrongylus vasorum. Parasitol Res. 1993;79:428–30.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Mozzer LR, Lima WS. Gallus gallus domesticus: paratenic host of Angiostrongylus vasorum. Vet Parasitol. 2015;207:81–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetpar.2014.11.003.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Serres E. Entozoa found in the right ear, the corresponding ventricle and the pulmonary artery of a dog [in French]. J Vétérinaires du Midi. 1854;7:70.Google Scholar
  6. Chapman PS, Boag AK, Guitian J, Boswood A. Angiostrongylus vasorum infection in 23 dogs (1999–2002). J Small Anim Pract. 2004;45:435–40.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Schnyder M, Schaper R, Lukacs Z, Hornok S, Farkas R. Combined serological detection of circulating Angiostrongylus vasorum antigen and parasite-specific antibodies in dogs from Hungary. Parasitol Res. 2015;114(Suppl 1):S145–54. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00436-015-4520-1.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Helm J, Gilleard JS, Jackson M, Redman E, Bell R. A case of canine Angiostrongylus vasorum in Scotland confirmed by PCR and sequence analysis. J Small Anim Pract. 2009;50:255–9. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-5827.2009.00741.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Jefferies R, Morgan ER, Shaw SE. A SYBR green real-time PCR assay for the detection of the nematode Angiostrongylus vasorum in definitive and intermediate hosts. Vet Parasitol. 2009;166:112–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetpar.2009.07.042.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Al-Sabi MN, Deplazes P, Webster P, Willesen JL, Davidson RK, Kapel CM. PCR detection of Angiostrongylus vasorum in faecal samples of dogs and foxes. Parasitol Res. 2010;107:135–40. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00436-010-1847-5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Schnyder M, Tanner I, Webster P, Barutzki D, Deplazes P. An ELISA for sensitive and specific detection of circulating antigen of Angiostrongylus vasorum in serum samples of naturally and experimentally infected dogs. Vet Parasitol. 2011;179:152–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetpar.2011.01.054.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Verzberger-Epshtein I, Markham RJ, Sheppard JA, Stryhn H, Whitney H, Conboy GA. Serologic detection of Angiostrongylus vasorum infection in dogs. Vet Parasitol. 2008;151:53–60.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Schucan A, Schnyder M, Tanner I, Barutzki D, Traversa D, Deplazes P. Detection of specific antibodies in dogs infected with Angiostrongylus vasorum. Vet Parasitol. 2012;185:216–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetpar.2011.09.040.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Deplazes P, Hegglin D, Gloor S, Romig T. Wilderness in the city: the urbanization of Echinococcus multilocularis. Trends Parasitol. 2004;20:77–84.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Bourne DE. Pet travel: should vets do more? Companion Anim. 2015;20:212–21.Google Scholar
  16. Morgan ER, Jefferies R, Krajewski M, Ward P, Shaw SE. Canine pulmonary angiostrongylosis: the influence of climate on parasite distribution. Parasitol Int. 2009;58:406–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.parint.2009.08.003.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Taylor CS, Garcia Gato R, Learmount J, Aziz NA, Montgomery C, Rose H, et al. Increased prevalence and geographic spread of the cardiopulmonary nematode Angiostrongylus vasorum in fox populations in Great Britain. Parasitology. 2015;142:1190–5. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0031182015000463.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Santoro M, D’Alessio N, Di Prisco F, Neola B, Restucci B, Pagano TB, et al. Angiostrongylus vasorum infection in red foxes (Vulpes vulpes) in southern Italy. Acta Parasitol. 2015;60:356–9. https://doi.org/10.1515/ap-2015-0050.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Aziz NA, Daly E, Allen S, Rowson B, Greig C, Forman D, et al. Distribution of Angiostrongylus vasorum and its gastropod intermediate hosts along the rural-urban gradient in two cities in the United Kingdom, using real time PCR. Parasit Vectors. 2016;9:56. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-016-1338-3.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  20. Traversa D, Di Cesare A, Meloni S, Frangipane di Regalbono A, Milillo P, Pampurini F, et al. Canine angiostrongylosis in Italy: occurrence of Angiostrongylus vasorum in dogs with compatible clinical pictures. Parasitol Res. 2013;112:2473–80. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00436-013-3412-5.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  21. Jolly S, Poncelet L, Lempereur L, Caron Y, Bayrou C, Cassart D, et al. First report of a fatal autochthonous canine Angiostrongylus vasorum infection in Belgium. Parasitol Int. 2015;64:97–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.parint.2014.10.008.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Miterpakova M, Hurnikova Z, Zalewski AP. The first clinically manifested case of angiostrongylosis in a dog in Slovakia. Acta Parasitol. 2014;59:661–5. https://doi.org/10.2478/s11686-014-0289-0.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Simin S, Spasojevic Kosic L, Kuruca L, Pavlovic I, Savovic M, Lalosevic V. Moving the boundaries to the South–East: first record of autochthonous Angiostrongylus vasorum infection in a dog in Vojvodina province, northern Serbia. Parasit Vectors. 2014;7:396. https://doi.org/10.1186/1756-3305-7-396.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  24. Schnyder M, Schaper R, Bilbrough G, Morgan ER, Deplazes P. Seroepidemiological survey for canine angiostrongylosis in dogs from Germany and the UK using combined detection of Angiostrongylus vasorum antigen and specific antibodies. Parasitology. 2013;140:1442–50. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0031182013001091.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  25. Guardone L, Schnyder M, Macchioni F, Deplazes P, Magi M. Serological detection of circulating Angiostrongylus vasorum antigen and specific antibodies in dogs from central and northern Italy. Vet Parasitol. 2013;192:192–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetpar.2012.10.016.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Lurati L, Deplazes P, Hegglin D, Schnyder M. Seroepidemiological survey and spatial analysis of the occurrence of Angiostrongylus vasorum in Swiss dogs in relation to biogeographic aspects. Vet Parasitol. 2015;212:219–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetpar.2015.08.017.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Schnyder M, Schaper R, Pantchev N, Kowalska D, Szwedko A, Deplazes P. Serological detection of circulating Angiostrongylus vasorum antigen- and parasite-specific antibodies in dogs from Poland. Parasitol Res. 2013;112(Suppl 1):109–17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00436-013-3285-7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Miterpáková M, Schnyder M, Schaper R, Hurníková Z, Čabanová V. Serological survey for canine angiostrongylosis in Slovakia. Helminthologia. 2015;52:205–10. https://doi.org/10.1515/helmin-2015-0034.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Pantchev N, Schnyder M, Vrhovec MG, Schaper R, Tsachev I. Current Surveys of the Seroprevalence of Borrelia burgdorferi, Ehrlichia canis, Anaplasma phagocytophilum, Leishmania infantum, Babesia canis, Angiostrongylus vasorum and Dirofilaria immitis in Dogs in Bulgaria. Parasitol Res. 2015;114(Suppl 1):S117–30. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00436-015-4518-8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Lempereur L, Martinelle L, Marechal F, Bayrou C, Dalemans AC, Schnyder M, et al. Prevalence of Angiostrongylus vasorum in southern Belgium, a coprological and serological survey. Parasit Vectors. 2016;9:533. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-016-1820-y.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  31. Alho AM, Schnyder M, Schaper R, Meireles J, Belo S, Deplazes P, et al. Seroprevalence of circulating Angiostrongylus vasorum antigen and parasite-specific antibodies in dogs from Portugal. Parasitol Res. 2016;115:2567–72. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00436-016-5001-x.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  32. Finnerup E. Angiostrongylus vasorum in dogs [in Danish]. Dansk VetTidsskr. 1983;66(8):338–40.Google Scholar
  33. Bolt G, Monrad J, Henriksen P, Dietz HH, Koch J, Bindseil E, et al. The fox (Vulpes vulpes) as a reservoir for canine angiostrongylosis in Denmark. Field survey and experimental infections. Acta Vet Scand. 1992;33:357–62.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Willingham AL, Ockens NW, Kapel CM, Monrad J. A helminthological survey of wild red foxes (Vulpes vulpes) from the metropolitan area of Copenhagen. J Helminthol. 1996;70:259–63.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Saeed I, Maddox-Hyttel C, Monrad J, Kapel CM. Helminths of red foxes (Vulpes vulpes) in Denmark. Vet Parasitol. 2006;139:168–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetpar.2006.02.015.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Tønsberg H, Saeed I, Koch J. Parasitological study of hunting dogs and foxes in Odsherred—an epidemiological study of the prevalence [in Danish]. Dansk VetTidsskr. 2004;87:14–8.Google Scholar
  37. Al-Sabi MN, Kapel CM, Johansson A, Espersen MC, Koch J, Willesen JL. A coprological investigation of gastrointestinal and cardiopulmonary parasites in hunting dogs in Denmark. Vet Parasitol. 2013;196:366–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetpar.2013.03.027.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. French heartworm [in Norwegian]. 2017. http://www.vetinst.no/sykdom-og-agens/fransk-hjerteorm. Accessed 21 Sept 2017.
  39. Åblad B, Christensson D, Osterman Lind E, Ågren E, Mörner T. Angiostrongylus vasorum established in Sweden [in Swedish]. Svensk VetTidn. 2003;55:11–5.Google Scholar
  40. de StGroth SF, Scheidegger D. Production of monoclonal antibodies: strategy and tactics. J Immunol Methods. 1980;35:1–21.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Deplazes P, Eckert J, Mathis A, von Samson-Himmelstjerna G, Zahner H. Parasitology in veterinary medicine. Wageningen Academic Publishers: Wageningen; 2016.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  42. Malmsten J, Ågren E. Disease situation in wildlife animals in Sweden in 2009—Annual report from the Wildlife Monitoring Program at the National Veterinary Institute. SVA:s rapportserie 19. 2009. p. 19.Google Scholar
  43. Koch J, Willesen JL. Canine pulmonary angiostrongylosis: an update [in Swedish]. Vet J. 2009;179:348–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tvjl.2007.11.014.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Gillis-Germitsch N, Kapel CMO, Thamsborg SM, Deplazes P, Schnyder M. Host-specific serological response to Angiostrongylus vasorum infection in red foxes (Vulpes vulpes): implications for parasite epidemiology. Parasitology. 2017;144:1144–53. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0031182017000427.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

Advertisement