Skip to content

Advertisement

  • Research
  • Open Access

Excretion of Eimeria spp. oocysts in young lambs following iron supplementation

Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica201860:49

https://doi.org/10.1186/s13028-018-0404-6

  • Received: 5 April 2018
  • Accepted: 13 August 2018
  • Published:

Abstract

Background

Iron is an essential nutrient, and iron supplementation has been shown to reduce the incidence of abomasal bloat in lambs. Additionally, iron deficiency is linked to pica, which may increase uptake of Eimeria oocysts. Coccidiosis in sheep, caused by Eimeria spp., is an important infection, leading to reduced welfare and economic losses. The aims of our study were to investigate: (1) the use of iron supplementation in Norwegian sheep flocks using a questionnaire survey, and (2) whether iron supplementation reduced excretion of Eimeria oocysts and increased the growth rates of young lambs.

Results

A questionnaire regarding the use of iron supplementation, sent to all members of the Norwegian Sheep Recording System (n = 4993), showed that 152/1823 farmers iron-supplemented lambs, either orally (56.7%) or by injection (43.3%). The main purpose of supplementation was to prevent abomasal bloat (38.4%), coccidiosis (9.3%), or both (27.8%). In the field study, 102 twin lambs from five flocks were included: one twin (treated) received 600 mg of gleptoferron subcutaneously within 3 days of birth, whereas the control was given saline. McMaster analysis of individual faecal samples obtained at weekly intervals (n = 4 per lamb, starting at turnout) showed no significant difference in oocyst excretion between treatment groups at any sampling, except for one flock 14 days after turnout. Mean growth rates, measured at iron injection, 21 days after turnout, and in the autumn, differed significantly between treated and untreated lambs from iron injection to 21 days after turnout, however, no difference in growth rates was observed in the overall period from iron injection to autumn. Blood analysis suggested that the controls were at risk of developing iron deficiency anaemia during the housed period, but signs of anaemia were not observed.

Conclusion

Iron supplementation of lambs was used by 8.3% of the farmers responding to the questionnaire, mainly with the intention to prevent abomasal bloat, coccidiosis, or both. The field trial results indicate that iron supplementation of young lambs do not reduce oocyst excretion and only induced a transitory increase in weight gain. However further studies, including more flocks and possibly repeated iron injections, would provide more definitive information.

Keywords

  • Coccidiosis
  • Eimeria spp.
  • Iron supplementation
  • Norway
  • Sheep

Background

Iron is an essential element in all living organisms, including as an important component or cofactor in many proteins and enzymes, such as haemoglobin and myoglobin [1]. Due to rapid growth, low iron content in milk, and no access to soil, which is the main source of dietary iron for farm animals [24], housed lambs may develop anaemia. Iron deficiency anaemia is well recognised, both in housed piglets [57] and in housed lambs [812]. Dietary deficiency in iron may lead to pica, i.e. ingestion of material other than normal food, including soil [13]. In Norway, anaemia is occasionally seen in connection with abnormal appetite and development of abomasal bloat in lambs [11, 14]. Pica in lambs on spring pasture, leading to ingestion of excessive amounts of soil, could potentially result in uptake of high numbers of Eimeria spp. oocysts as they can survive for at least 1 year in soil under Norwegian conditions [15].

In Norway, most ewes are winter housed, and lambing occurs in March–May, followed by turnout to spring pastures 1–4 weeks post-partum [16, 17]. During summer, ewes and lambs normally graze on mountain, forest or otherwise uncultivated pastures, before the lambs are weaned in the autumn, at around 4–5 months of age [16]. Lambs become infected with Eimeria spp. either during the housed period or immediately after turnout [15]. Coccidiosis in sheep caused by Eimeria spp. leads to reduced welfare, increased mortality, and substantial production losses [1820]. Clinical signs of coccidiosis include abdominal pain, anorexia, diarrhoea (± haemorrhagic) and weight loss/reduced growth [21]. Control strategies include adequate nutrition, hygienic measures, and pasture rotation [22, 23]. However, prevention of outbreaks in Norway is largely based on chemoprophylaxis with anticoccidials, usually with toltrazuril treatment at turnout or about 1 week later [24, 25]. Resistance in poultry has been reported for several anticoccidials [26, 27]. In addition, toltrazuril resistance has been confirmed in a field isolate of Cystoisospora suis [28]. Widespread use of anticoccidials in Norway, combined with unverified reports of reduced anticoccidial efficacy in ovine Eimeria spp. [25, 29], accentuate the importance of alternative control strategies.

Previous research has indicated that iron supplementation of lambs might increase growth rates and prevent abomasal bloat [12, 14]. These results have prompted the current guidelines for iron supplementation in Norwegian sheep flocks, which recommend the use of iron supplementation for prevention of abomasal bloat [30]. The aims of our study were therefore: (1) to map the use of iron supplementation in Norwegian sheep flocks based on a questionnaire survey, and (2) to investigate whether iron supplementation of young lambs reduces the uptake and excretion of Eimeria oocysts and increases lamb growth rates, thus, potentially, reducing the need for treatment with anticoccidials.

Methods

Questionnaire

A questionnaire on iron supplementation in lambs was sent by email to all members of the Norwegian Sheep Recording System (NSRS) with a registered email address, using the Enalyzer Survey Solution (Enalyzer A/S). Membership in the NSRS is voluntary, and 36.5% of all farmers were members in 2016, representing 47.9% of all ewes in Norway and all sheep producing counties [2]. A translated copy of the questionnaire can be found as Additional file 1. Farmers (n = 4993) who received the questionnaire, represented 32.2% of all sheep flocks in Norway [31]. Non-responding farmers were reminded once.

Iron supplementation trial

The study on investigation of the effect of iron supplementation of young lambs on Eimeria oocyst excretion was approved by the Norwegian Animal Research Authority, ID 8535. The CONSORT statement was used as a guideline in the design of the study [32].

Five flocks (A–E) located in Rogaland County, in Southwest Norway, were included in the study, which was performed during April and May, 2017. Flocks were selected based on known clinical problems with coccidiosis (unpublished data), and proximity to the laboratory at Norwegian University of Life Sciences (NMBU), Sandnes, Norway. Twin pairs born within a period of 6 days were selected from each flock. The twins were randomly allocated (coin toss) to either iron supplementation (treated) or control groups. Treated lambs were injected with 600 mg gleptoferron (Gleptosil vet., Ceva Santé Animale, France) subcutaneously in the inguinal fold, 0–3 days after birth. At the same time, the twin was injected with a corresponding volume (3 mL) of 9 mg/mL sterile NaCl (B. Braun Melsungen AG, Germany). Lambs were housed with their dam for 16–31 days before turnout, which was considered day 0. All included lambs were kept on slatted floors (plastic in flocks A, B, and E, and expanded metal in flocks C and F). In flock C, 18 lambs (9 treated and 9 controls) were kept for about 1 week on solid floors with wood shavings after injection. All five flocks used cultivated pastures for spring grazing, and all pastures had been grazed by lambs during the previous year. The farmers treated against helminths at around 3 weeks after turnout using either benzimidazole or ivermectin.

Faecal samples were taken at day 0 (turnout), 7, 14 and 21 (Fig. 1). All samples were collected individually in zip-lock bags and vacuum packed (Fresh ‘n’ easy, OBH Nordica, Sweden) on the day of sampling, and stored at 4 °C until analysis within 28 days. Faecal samples were analysed using a modified McMaster technique with a minimum theoretical sensitivity of 5 oocysts per gram (OPG) [33, 34]. Eimeria were not identified to the species level. Additionally, the faecal consistency was scored visually on a scale from one to five: (1) normal, pelleted; (2) soft; (3) liquid; (4) watery; (5) watery with blood and/or intestinal tissue [35]. Scores ≥ 3 were regarded as diarrhoeic.
Fig. 1
Fig. 1

Sample protocol. Twin lambs (n = 20) in five flocks, injected with iron or saline 0–3 days after birth, were sampled according to the given protocol. Days are given as days after turnout

Weights were recorded at iron injection (day − 16 to − 31), day 21, and day 79–150. Blood were drawn from a jugular vein using a vacutainer system (plain and EDTA-treated, BD Company, USA) at day 0 and 14. Haematology was performed immediately using the ADVIA 120 Haematology system (Bayer Diagnostics, Germany). The main haematological parameters evaluated were red blood cell counts (RBC), haemoglobin (HGB), and haematocrit (HCT). Whole blood tubes were centrifuged within 2 h, and serum was stored at − 20 °C. Serum iron (Fe) was analysed by ABX Pentra 400 (Horiba, France). Internal reference limits (NMBU, Sandnes) for blood parameters were calculated based on previous results [36, 37].

Toltrazuril was administered to two lambs from flock D, both iron treated, at day 21 due to severe diarrhoea. No other lambs were treated with anticoccidials.

Statistical methods

Data were managed in Excel 2013 (Microsoft Inc., USA). Statistical analyses were performed in Stata 14 (Stata Statistical Software: Release 14. StataCorp LP, College Station, TX, USA), and graphs were made in R [38]. T-tests were used for calculations of significance based on means, except for oocyst counts for which Mann–Whitney U-tests were used, due to lack of normality. Fisher’s exact tests were used to evaluate correlations. P< 0.05 was considered significant.

Results

Questionnaire

The dataset from the questionnaire consisted of 1822 complete and 36 incomplete answers, corresponding to a response rate of 38.1%. When possible, data from the incomplete questionnaires were included in the analysis, and thus n varies between calculations. Iron supplementation in lambs were used by 152 of 1823 farmers (8.3%). Farmers using iron supplementation were mainly located in Oppland (40.1%), Rogaland (15.8%), or Hedmark (9.9%) counties. The mean flock size was 95.5 ± 1.9 winter-fed ewes (range 3–800), with a significant difference (P < 0.01) between non-supplementing (90.7 ± 1.8, range 3–610) and supplementing (148.9 ± 9.8, range 29–800) flocks. Table 1 shows the administration route and the purpose of the treatment.
Table 1

Questionnaire data from Norwegian sheep farmers supplementing with iron

 

%

n

Administration route

 Oral

56.7

85

 Injection

43.3

65

 Total

 

150

Purpose

 Abomasal bloat

38.4

58

 Abomasal bloat and coccidiosis

27.8

42

 Coccidiosis

9.3

14

 Other/uncertaina

24.5

37

 Total

 

151

Intend to supplement next year

 Yes

93.4

142

 No

6.6

10

 Total

 

152

aOther purpose/uncertain includes recommendations by veterinarian, experience of pica in lambs, and focus on increasing growth rates. n = number of farms

Iron supplementation trial

In total, 102 lambs were included in the trial (22 lambs from flock A and 20 lambs from each of the flocks B–E). Age at turnout of the lambs ranged from 16 to 31 days (Table 2). In flock B, one lamb from the control group died 17 days after turnout, and post mortem revealed pneumonia associated with Mannheimia haemolytica. In flock E, two lambs were treated for pneumonia, one around turnout and another 14 days after turnout. These lambs were excluded from evaluation of growth rates and faecal analysis. In flock D, one lamb from the treated group died of unknown reasons on summer pasture.
Table 2

Twin lambs from five flocks (A–E) located in Rogaland County, Norway, included in an iron injection field trial

Flock

Number of lambs

Treated

Control

Age at iron injection (days)

Age at turnout (days)

Breeda

Rams

Ewes

Rams

Ewes

A

22

3

8

9

2

1–3

16–18

NWS

B

20

5

5

6

4

0–2

20–23

NWS

C

20

5

5

5

5

1–3

29–31

NWS and NST

D

20

4

6

4

6

0–3

16–21

NWS

E

20

4

6

5

5

2–3

16–17

NWS and NST

Lambs were either supplemented with 600 mg gleptoferron (treated) or physiological saline (controls) subcutaneously

aNWS Norwegian White Sheep, NST Norwegian Short Tail

There was a significant difference in mean growth rates (g/day) between treated and untreated lambs in the period from iron injection to 21 days post turnout, where treated lambs had higher mean growth rates than controls. However, at the flock level, this difference was only found in flock E (Table 3). There were no differences in mean growth rates from day 21 after turnout to autumn or from iron injection to autumn (day 79–150). The two lambs from flock D treated with toltrazuril at day 21 was not removed from calculation of growth in the autumn, as their growth rate was not significantly different from the other iron treated lambs.
Table 3

Mean growth rates (g/day, mean ± SEM) of iron supplemented lambs and controls in the five flocks (A–E)

 

Iron injectiona—21 days after turnout

21 days after turnout—autumnb

Iron injection—autumnb

Treated

Control

Treated

Control

Treated

Control

A

392 ± 19

357 ± 19

177 ± 12

203 ± 14

224 ± 12

238 ± 14

B

394 ± 14

371 ± 12

294 ± 17

324 ± 37

324 ± 14

334 ± 22

C

374 ± 11

332 ± 25

248 ± 28

251 ± 25

287 ± 19

276 ± 16

D

410 ± 13

423 ± 22

252 ± 12

249 ± 10

293 ± 12

295 ± 13

E

367 ± 17*

311 ± 15

345 ± 27

367 ± 26

351 ± 21

351 ± 20

All flocks

388 ± 7*

359 ± 10

262 ± 12

274 ± 13

295 ± 9

296 ± 9

Treated lambs were subcutaneously supplemented with iron within 3 days of birth. Turnout was considered day 0

* P < 0.05

aIron injection: days − 31 to − 16

bAutumn: days 79 to 150

Four of the five flocks were infected with Eimeria spp. during the housed period, i.e. oocysts were detected at turnout (day 0) (Fig. 2), and lambs in all five flocks excreted Eimeria oocysts (range 10–1,043,000 OPG) 14 days after turnout. Although OPG counts were lower in treated lambs than in untreated lambs at day 14 in all flocks, this difference was not statistically significant in any of the flocks, except flock B. In addition, there was no statistical significant difference in OPG between the treated and control lambs in any of the flocks at the other sampling dates. Maximum oocyst excretion for both groups of lambs and in all five flocks was observed at day 14 or 21.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2

Mean oocyst excretion in 102 twin lambs supplemented subcutaneously with iron (red) or saline (blue). Lambs from five Norwegian sheep flocks (A–E) with known coccidiosis problems were sampled at day 0, 7, 14 and 21 after turnout. *P< 0.05

Diarrhoea was observed during the study period. At turnout, one treated lamb from flock D had diarrhoea, whereas two lambs (one treated and one control) from flock C had diarrhoea on day 14. On day 21, the mean faecal score was < 2, except for in the control group in flock A, where the mean faecal score was 2.1 ± 0.3 (mean ± SEM). However, there was no significant difference in the faecal scores between treated and control lambs in any of the flocks at any sampling time.

Two flocks were positive for Nematodirus battus at day 21; in flock B, 77.8% of the lambs were positive (range 20–310 EPG) and in flock D, 25.0% were positive (range 10–50 EPG). However, presence of diarrhoea was not associated with detection of N. battus. Diarrhoea was only seen in two of the lambs diagnosed with N. battus in flock B, but in none of the N. battus-positive lambs in flock D. No other helminths were detected.

Except for in flock C, there was a significant difference in blood iron content between treated and control lambs at day 0 (Fig. 3), and the mean blood iron values in the control groups of flocks A, C, and E were below the reference limit of 25.0 µmol/L (internal references, NMBU, Sandnes). However, at day 14 after turnout, there was no difference in mean blood iron concentrations between treated and control groups in any of the flocks. In addition, a significant reduction in blood iron was seen in the treated group from turnout to day 14 in flocks B, E, and the whole dataset. A similar significant reduction between the treated groups’ samples was seen between day 0 and day 14 for HGB in flocks D, E, and the whole dataset, and for HCT in flocks D, E, and the whole dataset.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3

Mean blood levels of red blood cells, iron, haemoglobin and haematocrit with 95% confidence intervals for twin lambs in the five included flocks (A–E) at day 0 and 14 after turnout. Half of the lambs were supplemented with iron 16–31 days before turnout. Red: iron supplemented lambs, blue: control lambs, green line: lower reference limit (internal references). *Significant difference in the treated group between samplings (P< 0.05)

Discussion

According to the questionnaire, iron supplementation was performed in 8.3% of the sheep flocks, amongst which more than 90% of the farmers intended to continue this practice. Moreover, more than 30% of the farmers that supplemented lambs with iron did so with the intention of preventing coccidiosis. An important finding from the questionnaire was the significant difference in flock size between flocks receiving iron supplementation and flocks that did not, with larger flocks more likely to practice iron supplementation than smaller flocks. The reason for this is unknown, but might reflect a shifted focus in the sheep industry from treatment of individual animals to a more preventive, flock health approach. Especially as the average flock size has increased in Norway over the last decade [31].

Few studies have investigated the effect of iron treatment of lambs on the excretion of Eimeria spp. and development of clinical coccidiosis. However, unpublished data (Vatn, personal communication) indicated a significant reduction in Eimeria oocyst excretion three to 5 weeks after turnout that was associated with iron supplementation. These findings were not supported by the present study, in which iron supplementation of lambs did not reduce excretion of Eimeria oocysts 3 weeks after turnout. This may indicate that reduction of geophagia by iron supplementation is not an efficient way to reduce Eimeria oocyst uptake and excretion in lambs. Regardless of the reason for decreased oocyst excretion in the study by Vatn, a similar reduction in oocyst excretion did not occur in our study despite the larger number of animals and farms included. There was however, an apparent reduction in oocyst excretion in iron supplemented lambs 2 weeks after turnout. Although this was mostly non-significant, the potential that this may reflect a delay in uptake and excretion of Eimeria oocysts might suggest that development of immunity could be affected. However, whether this occurred and whether this could confer some protection on the lambs is unknown.

Clinical signs of coccidiosis in lambs in Norway tend to occur 2–3 weeks after turnout, and it has been assumed that the lambs are primarily infected following ingestion of oocysts on permanent spring pastures [15, 39, 40]. Nevertheless, the present study shows that indoor infection with Eimeria spp. may not be unusual in Norway, as oocysts were detected in the faecal samples at turnout in four of the five flocks.

All five flocks participating in the treatment trial experienced diarrhoea and perianal soiling, signs related to both coccidiosis and nematodirosis [21, 41]. However, based on the parasitological analyses, the diarrhoea was not correlated with nematodirosis. Other gastrointestinal pathogens, such as rotavirus, coronavirus, Cryptosporidium spp., and Salmonella sp. are not commonly diagnosed in lambs in Norway and were not investigated in our study, and we cannot rule out that they may have had a role in the observed clinical signs.

Previous studies investigating effects of iron supplementation of lambs have used various dosages and iron preparations: e.g., Bassett et al. [8] administered 200 mg iron dextran intramuscularly within 24 h of birth, Vatn and Torsteinbø [14] injected 300 mg iron dextran subcutaneously to lambs within 1 week of birth, and in our study we used 600 mg gleptoferron subcutaneously within the first 3 days of life. In addition, Pollmann et al. [42] showed that there was no difference in serum Fe concentrations, serum Fe-binding capacities, RBC, HGB or HCT between piglets supplemented with iron dextran, compared to piglets supplemented with gleptoferron. The dose employed might be of importance, as the need for iron is largely dependent on growth rates; i.e., rapidly growing animals require iron to maintain haematopoiesis during the 1st weeks of life [9, 43]. The dose used in our study, 600 mg gleptoferron, should be sufficient to cover the lambs’ requirements. However, treated lambs showed significantly lower levels of iron, HGB and HCT at day 14, compared with their blood samples from day 0, indicating that their iron storage was low, and that higher or repeated doses of iron might have been beneficial. Should an increased or repeated iron dose be used, then the risk of reaching toxic levels must be evaluated. Clinical signs of acute iron toxicity in ruminants include anorexia, respiratory distress, icterus and central nervous signs [1, 44]. In our study, no signs related to iron toxicity were observed.

Iron supplementation of lambs may have a variable effect on lamb growth rates [8, 11, 14, 4547]. In the present study, weight gain was not significantly affected by iron supplementation in any of the flocks when considering the growth period from birth to autumn. The difference in growth rates in the period from iron injection to 21 days post turnout (lamb age: 37–52 days) might be the result of iron supplementation, as control lambs in many cases showed blood values for iron below the reference level at turnout. However, although no significant differences were found, the control lambs grew better than the iron-supplemented lambs in four out of five flocks during the subsequent summer grazing period. This might be explained by the lambs’ capacity for compensatory growth [48]. In addition, it is important to remember that lamb growth is dependent on several other factors, such as nutrition [49], mastitis in the dam [50], and gastrointestinal helminths [51].

Blood values from the field trial lambs suggest that without iron supplementation, the lambs were at risk of developing anaemia, although none of the flocks showed associated clinical signs [52]. The significant difference in blood iron content between treated and untreated lambs at turnout, was largely absent 14 days later, indicating that the control lambs ingested iron and started producing red blood cells. In one of the flocks (C), differences in blood parameters between treated and untreated lambs could not be demonstrated. The lambs from this flock were around 1.5 weeks older than lambs from the other flocks, and might have started ingesting solid feed, such as concentrates, prior to turnout. Additionally, these lambs had access to wood shavings during the indoor period, which may also have affected the blood parameters.

The farmers reporting use of iron supplementation in the questionnaire were mainly located in the inland, mountainous areas (Oppland and Hedmark counties), whereas the field trial was performed in the Southwest coastal area (Rogaland county). This geographical difference might have affected our findings, as significant climatic variations between the regions are known [53]. Likewise, differences in the iron concentration of feed crops may vary between areas [54]. However, this is unlikely to have had a significant effect on the iron levels of the young lambs in this study.

Conclusion

Iron supplementation was used by less than 10% of the sheep farmers responding to the questionnaire, and the purpose of treatment was mainly to prevent abomasal bloat, but also coccidiosis. However, in the field study, iron supplementation did not affect excretion of Eimeria oocysts by lambs, nor was it associated with increased growth rates. These results indicate that iron supplementation of young lambs does not provide an appropriate alternative control strategy for prevention of coccidiosis. However, further studies are needed in order to verify this statement by including more flocks, preferably from different geographical regions, and using higher or repeated doses of iron.

Declarations

Authors’ contributions

All authors participated in the planning of the study. AO and SKN performed the study. AO did the statistical analysis and drafted the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to acknowledge the farmers involved in this study, and Wenche Okstad, Solfrid Nevland and Siri B. Hamre for skilful laboratory work.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and analysed during the current study is available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study was approved by the Norwegian Animal Research Authority (ID 8535).

Funding

This work was supported by The Foundation for Research Levy on Agricultural Products/Agricultural Agreement Research Fund, Grant No. 244162 and Animalia (Norwegian Meat and Poultry Research Centre).

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Production Animal Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, Kyrkjevegen 332/334, 4325 Sandnes, Norway
(2)
Animalia Norwegian Meat and Poultry Research Centre, P.O. Box 396 Økern, 0513 Oslo, Norway
(3)
Department of Animal Pathology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Arucas, 35416 Las Palmas, Spain
(4)
Department of Food Safety and Infection Biology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, P.O. Box 8146 Dep, 0033 Oslo, Norway
(5)
Department of Animal Health and Food Safety, Norwegian Veterinary Institute, Ullevålsveien 68, P.O. Box 750 Sentrum, 0106 Oslo, Norway

References

  1. Weiss DJ. Iron and copper deficiencies and disorders of iron metabolism. In: Weiss DJ, Wardrop KJ, editors. Schalm’s veterinary hematology. 6th ed. Ames: Blackwell Publishing Ltd; 2010. p. 167–71.Google Scholar
  2. National Sheep Recording System. The Norwegian Sheep Recording System’s yearly report 2016 [Sauekontrollens årsmelding 2016]. Animalia; 2016. https://www.animalia.no/globalassets/sauekontrollen—dokumenter/arsmelding-2016-endelig.pdf. Accessed 13 Aug 2018.
  3. Elvehjem CA, Herrin RC, Hart EB. Iron in nutrition: III. The effects of diet on the iron content of milk. J Biol Chem. 1927;71:255–62.Google Scholar
  4. Hinds FC. Dietary management of lambs. In: Howard JL, editor. Current veterinary therapy, food animal practice. 4th ed. Philadelphia: WB Saunders Company; 1999. p. 211.Google Scholar
  5. Egeli AK, Framstad T. An evaluation of iron-dextran supplementation in piglets administered by injection on the first, third or fourth day after birth. Res Vet Sci. 1999;66:179–84.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Radostits OM, Gay CC, Hinchcliff KW, Constable PD. Iron deficiency. In: Radostits OM, Gay CC, Hinchcliff KW, Constable PD, editors. Veterinary medicine: a textbook of the diseases of cattle, hoses, sheep, pigs, and goats. 10th ed. Philadelphia: Saunders Elsevier; 2007. p. 1725–9.Google Scholar
  7. Venn JAJ, McCance RA, Widdowson EM. Iron metabolism in piglet anaemia. J Comp Pathol Ther. 1947;57:314–25.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Bassett JM, Borrett RA, Hanson C, Parsons R, Wolfensohn SE. Anaemia in housed newborn lambs. Vet Rec. 1995;136:137–40.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Green LE, Berriatua E, Morgan KL. Anaemia in housed lambs. Res Vet Sci. 1993;54:306–11.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Ullrey DE, Miller ER, Long CH, Vincent BH. Sheep hematology from birth to maturity. I. Erythrocyte population, size and hemoglobin concentration. J Anim Sci. 1965;24:135–40.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Øverås J, Ulvund MJ, Waldeland H. Anaemia in neonatal lambs [Anemi hos spedlam]. Nor Vet Tidsskr. 1988;100:257–64.Google Scholar
  12. Vatn S, Framstad T. Anaemia in housed lambs: effects of oral iron on clinical pathology and performance. Acta Vet Scand. 2000;41:273–81.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Radostits OM, Gay CC, Hinchcliff KW, Constable PD. Disturbances of appetite, food intake and nutritional status. In: Radostits OM, Gay CC, Hinchcliff KW, Constable PD, editors. Veterinary medicine: a textbook of the diseases of cattle, hoses, sheep, pigs, and goats. 10th ed. Philadelphia: Saunders Elsevier; 2007. p. 112–5.Google Scholar
  14. Vatn S, Torsteinbø WO. Effects of iron dextran injections on the incidence of abomasal bloat, clinical pathology and growth rates in lambs. Vet Rec. 2000;146:462–5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Helle O. Winter resistant oocysts in the pasture as a source of coccidial infection in lambs. Acta Vet Scand. 1970;11:545–64.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Vatn S. The sheep industry in the Nordic countries. Small Rumin Res. 2009;86:80–3.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Domke AV, Chartier C, Gjerde B, Leine N, Vatn S, Østerås O, Stuen S. Worm control practice against gastro-intestinal parasites in Norwegian sheep and goat flocks. Acta Vet Scand. 2011;53:29.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  18. Foreyt WJ. Coccidiosis and cryptosporidiosis in sheep and goats. Vet Clin North Am Food Anim Pract. 1990;6:655–70.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Alzieu JP, Mage C, Maes L, de Mûelenaere C. Economic benefits of prophylaxis with diclazuril against subclinical coccidiosis in lambs reared indoors. Vet Rec. 1999;144:442–4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Chartier C, Paraud C. Coccidiosis due to Eimeria in sheep and goat, a review. Small Rumin Res. 2012;103:84–92.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Wright SE, Coop RL. Cryptosporidiosis and coccidiosis. In: Aitken ID, editor. Diseases of sheep. 4th ed. Oxford: Blackwell; 2007. p. 179–85.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Daugschies A, Najdrowski M. Eimeriosis in cattle: current understanding. J Vet Med B Infect Dis Vet Public Health. 2005;52:417–27.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Taylor M. Protozoal disease in cattle and sheep. In Pract. 2000;22:604–17.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Animalia. Coccidia [Koksidier]; 2017. https://www.animalia.no/no/Dyr/sauehelsenett/sjukdommer/fordoyelseskanalen/koksidier/. Accessed 13 Aug 2018.
  25. Odden A, Enemark HL, Robertson LJ, Ruiz A, Hektoen L, Stuen S. Treatment against coccidiosis in Norwegian lambs and potential risk factors for development of anticoccidial resistance—a questionnaire-based study. Parasitol Res. 2017;116:1237–45.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  26. Chapman HD. Biochemical, genetic and applied aspects of drug resistance in Eimeria parasites of the fowl. Avian Pathol. 1997;26:221–44.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Stephan B, Rommel M, Daugschies A, Haberkorn A. Studies of resistance to anticoccidials in Eimeria field isolates and pure Eimeria strains. Vet Parasitol. 1997;69:19–29.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Shrestha A, Freudenschuss B, Jansen R, Hinney B, Ruttkowski B, Joachim A. Experimentally confirmed toltrazuril resistance in a field isolate of Cystoisospora suis. Parasite Vectors. 2017;10:317.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Gjerde B, Enemark JMD, Apeland MJ, Dahl J. Reduced efficacy of diclazuril and toltrazuril against Eimeria species of sheep on a farm in Rogaland county, Norway [Redusert effekt av diclazuril og toltrazuril mot Eimeria-infeksjoner hos lam i en besetning i Rogaland]. Nor Vet Tidsskr. 2010;122:301–4.Google Scholar
  30. Animalia. Abomasal bloat [Løpetympani]; 2017. https://www.animalia.no/no/Dyr/sauehelsenett/sjukdommer/fordoyelseskanalen/lopetympani/. Accessed 13 Aug 2018.
  31. Statistics Norway. Livestock husbandry; 2017. https://www.ssb.no/en/jord-skog-jakt-og-fiskeri/statistikker/jordhus/aar. Accessed 13 Aug 2018.
  32. Schulz KF, Altman DG, Moher DCONSORT. Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. BMJ. 2010;2010:340.Google Scholar
  33. Henriksen SA, Aagaard K. A simple flotation and McMaster method [En enkel flotations- og McMastermetode]. Nord Vet Med. 1976;28:392–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Henriksen SA, Korsholm H. Parasitological examination of faecal samples—the construction and use of a simple counting chamber [Parasitologisk undersøgelse af fæcesprøver—Konstruksjon og anvendelse af et enkelt opbygget tællekammer]. Dan Vet Tidsskr. 1984;67:1193–6.Google Scholar
  35. Holm SA, Sorensen CR, Thamsborg SM, Enemark HL. Gastrointestinal nematodes and anthelmintic resistance in Danish goat herds. Parasite. 2014;21:37.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  36. Vatn S. Abomasal disease in lambs—Aetiological and predisposing factors associated with bloat, haemorrhage and ulcers. Sandnes/Oslo: Norwegian School of Veterinary Science; 1999.Google Scholar
  37. Vatn S, Framstad T, Torsteinbo WO. Hematologic evaluation of normal and anemic lambs with the Technicon H*1 using EDTA or heparin as anticoagulants. Vet Clin Pathol. 2000;29:62–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. R Core Team. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria; 2017. https://www.R-project.org. Accessed 13 Aug 2018
  39. Helle O, Hilali M. Differentiation of Eimeria species infecting sheep during the grazing season on permanent and new pastures under Norwegian conditions. Acta Vet Scand. 1973;14:57–68.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Gjerde B, Helle O. Efficacy of toltrazuril in the prevention of coccidiosis in naturally infected lambs on pasture. Acta Vet Scand. 1986;27:124–37.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Deplazes P, Eckert J, Mathis A, von Samson-Himmelstjerna G, Zahner H. Family trichostrongylidae. In: Deplazes P, Eckert J, Mathis A, von Samson-Himmelstjerna G, Zahner H, editors. Parasitology in veterinary medicine. Wageningen: Wageningen Academic Publishers; 2016. p. 287–301.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  42. Pollmann DS, Smith JE, Stevenson JS, Schoneweis DA, Hines RH. Comparison of gleptoferron with iron dextran for anemia prevention in young pigs [Iron supplement]. J Anim Sci. 1983;56:640–4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Lawlor MJ, Smith WH, Beeson WM. Iron requirement of the growing lamb. J Anim Sci. 1965;24:742–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Holter JA, Carson TL, Witte ST. Acute iron intoxication in a herd of young bulls. J Vet Diagn Invest. 1990;2:229–30.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Tait RM, Dureski PL. Response of newborn lambs to iron-dextran injection. Can J Anim Sci. 1979;59:809–11.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  46. Carlson RH, Swenson MJ, Ward GM, Booth NH. Effects of intramuscular injections of iron-dextran in newborn lambs and calves. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 1961;139:457–61.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Holz RC, Perry TW, Beeson WM. Hemoglobin levels of lambs from birth to eight weeks of age and the effects of iron-dextran on suckling lambs. J Anim Sci. 1961;20:445–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  48. Kabbali A, Johnson WL, Johnson DW, Goodrich RD, Allen CE. Effects of compensatory growth on some body component weights and on carcass and noncarcass composition of growing lambs. J Anim Sci. 1992;70:2852–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Owens FN, Dubeski P, Hanson CF. Factors that alter the growth and development of ruminants. J Anim Sci. 1993;71:3138–50.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Grant C, Smith EM, Green LE. A longitudinal study of factors associated with acute and chronic mastitis and their impact on lamb growth rate in 10 suckler sheep flocks in Great Britain. Prev Vet Med. 2016;127:27–36.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Jackson F, Coop RL. Gastrointestinal hemlinthosis. In: Aitken ID, editor. Diseases of sheep. 4th ed. Oxford: Blackwell; 2007. p. 185–95.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  52. Radostits OM, Gay CC, Hinchcliff KW, Constable PD. Disorders of red cell number or function: anemia. In: Aitken ID, editor. Veterinary medicine: a textbook of the diseases of cattle, hoses, sheep, pigs, and goats. 10th ed. Philadelphia: Saunders Elsevier; 2007.Google Scholar
  53. The Norwegian Meteorological Institute. The climate in Norway and the world; 2017. https://www.yr.no/klima/. Accessed 13 Aug 2018.
  54. Sivertsen T, Garmo TH, Lierhagen S, Bernhoft A, Steinnes E. Geographical and botanical variation in concentrations of copper, molybdenum, sulphur and iron in sheep pasture plants in Norway. Acta Agric Scand A Anim Sci. 2014;64:178–87.Google Scholar

Copyright

Advertisement