Skip to main content
Download PDF

Comparison of tension band wiring and other tibial tuberosity advancement techniques for cranial cruciate ligament repair: an experimental study

Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica volume 61, Article number: 44 (2019) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Cranial cruciate ligament (CCL) rupture is one of the most common causes of limb lameness in dogs. Surgical techniques based on tibial osteotomies such as tibial plateau leveling osteotomy and tibial tuberosity advancement are used to eliminate dynamic thrust. Tibial tuberosity advancement (TTA) uses an osteotomy fixated by cage, plates, forks and screws to change the relationship of the patellar tendon and tibial plateau angle. Tension band wiring technique is one of the most common surgical methods used to treat a tension fracture and remains the gold standard for the treatment of tibial tuberosity fractures. In this study, we compared experimentally the biomechanical effect of application of tension band wiring compared to other techniques for the fixation of the TTA osteotomy. The techniques compared to are standard commercially available systems for TTA fixation.

Results

Tension band wiring (TBW) presented the higher resistance to failure compared to all the other surgical procedures, with the highest values found in the TBW group with 1.47 ± 0.07 N and the lowest in the TTA cage (0.82 ± 0.08) and TTA-2 (0.85 ± 0.06) groups with statistically significant differences in all cases (P < 0.001). TTA rapid and TTA plate groups exhibited a similar strength, and same happened between TTA-2 and TTA cage groups. All the other comparisons by pair were significantly different with P < 0.001.

Conclusions

Results suggest that fixating the osteotomy with tension band wiring increases the strength of the fixation and decrease the risk of implant failure. Further clinical studies are needed to demonstrate in vivo reliability and to test different variables such as size and weight of dogs. These results could have important clinical implications in the treatment of CCL ruptures.

Background

Cranial cruciate ligament rupture (CCL) is one of the most common cause of pelvic limb lameness in dogs [1,2,3]. In most cases, CCL rupture happens as a result of long-term degeneration and weaken of ligament over time due to genetic factors [3]—with certain breeds such as Labrador being predisposed [1,2,3,4]—obesity and certain joint inflammatory conditions may also play a role. CCL rupture is associated with meniscal damage and degenerative joint diseases [5].

The surgical techniques described to stabilize the unstable stifle joint in dogs include static—intraarticular or extraarticular stabilization—and dynamic or tibial osteotomy techniques [6].

Tibial plateau leveling osteotomy (TPLO) and tibial tuberosity advancement (TTA)—both based on tibial osteotomies—are the most common surgical methods to provide dynamic stability during weight bearing by altering the geometry of the stifle joint [7, 8]. TPLO treats CCL rupture by neutralizing the cranial tibial thrust through an osteotomy rotated and fixated at a new plateau angle [9]. TTA—rooted on the Maquet procedure [10]—is based on the theory that the angle between the tibia plateau and the patellar ligament influences the production of tibio-femoral shear forces during limb loading [11]. Changing the angle between the patellar ligament and the tibial alignment to 90° shifts forces and eliminates stifle thrust [12, 13] providing good clinical outcomes [14]. Thus, performing the mediolateral osteotomy and advancing the tibial tuberosity cranially renders dynamic stability to the stifle joint [13, 15].

Experimental in vitro studies [16] and clinical information have proved the biomechanics and satisfactory limb function after TTA surgery [14]. In the conventional TTA technique description, after osteotomy the fixation was by forks and titanium cages of different sizes—from 3 to 12 mm [14, 16].

Other variations of TTA have been described and are currently been used. In 2014 the TTA Rapid technique-based on the Maquet technique [7]—was reported as a surgical method for dogs with CCR where the distal cortex of the tibial crest remains intact [17]. This variant of TTA is an alternative treatment for CCL rupture with good short- and medium-term outcomes, and low rate of complication [18, 19].

Studies support the hypothesis that the conformation of the tibial tuberosity has an influence on the advancement in TTA surgery, and the cage size and position relative to the tibial tuberosity also matters [20]. TTA-2 is a simplified variation of TTA that consists in a Maquet-like osteotomy, fixated with a new cage that eliminates stress risers created by the plate, fork, and screws, rendering plate and fork fixation unnecessary [21]. Stress risers were proven to occur in the osteotomized piece of bone as the holes are drilled perpendicular in the mediolateral plane for screw and fork placement [22].

Tension band wiring (TBW) technique is one of the most common surgical method used to treat a tension fracture [23,24,25,26,27]. TBW involves the use of two K-wires (1.1–2 mm) placed parallel to each other and a cranial anterior tension band of stainless steel wire in a vertically oriented figure-of-8 pattern [28], resulting in neutralization of tensile forces.

There is no study in the literature that has compared TBW with TTA for CCL rupture. To further clarify the role and effect of concurrent application of wire on the treatment outcomes, we designed a study comparing different used techniques (variations of TTA) with TBW to surgically treat CCL rupture. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report to determine the impact of concurrently applying pins and wire as part of a TTA procedure on the treatment of CCL rupture.

TBW technique has been a well-documented surgical method. The role of concurrently applying a wire band on the tension surface to fractured patella to the osteotomy repair fixation is intended to help fracture stabilization. The purpose of this study was therefore to determine the impact of concurrent application of wire loop fixated on the tensile plane of the tibial tuberosity to stabilize the stifle joint.

Methods

An experimental study with artificial composite bone analogues (Sawbones®, Uppsala, Sweden)—validated to simulate human bone characteristics for fracture toughness, tensile strength, compressive strength, fatigue crack resistance and implant subsidence—was designed and performed to examine how the maximum failure strength varied between five different types of surgical fixation for CCR repair. Each sample was placed in a jig with a simulated quadriceps force (Fig. 1). To simulate the tibial tuberosity fixation a block of artificial bone was cut as if the fixation was a Macquet style repair, however the imitate the ventral fixation a 3.5 mm screw was inserted from the tuberosity into the main block.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Image of the tensile testing machine used to measure tensile strenght in the experimental samples

Full size image

Design

For testing, 8 samples were randomly assigned to 5 different groups: (1) TTA rapid group: osteotomy was held with cage and 6 screws [17]; (2) TBW group: osteotomy was held with pins and wire and cage and 2 screws [29]; 2 pins placed dorsal to cage, 1 screw caudal in the cage and one cerclage wire over pins on cranial aspect; cage is more dorsal and is at the top of the osteotomy (easy to remove then) and pins are ventral to cage; the pins do not interfere with the cage at all; (3) TTA cage group: osteotomy was held by cage and 2 screws only attached to the bone [30]; (4) TTA-2 group: osteotomy held by modified cage and staple [31]; and (5) TTA plate group: with cage and 2 screws, and plate and 5 screws [32]; this was used as control group. The different surgical techniques are shown in Fig. 2.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Pattern of suture used. Pictures show different surgical procedures: a TTA rapid; b TBW; c TTA cage; d TTA-2; e TTA plate

Full size image

All cages used for the experimental design were the same (width—9 mm), and all screw in cage holes were 2 mm. The TTA plate was fixed with 2.7 mm screws to the main fragment.

The Sawbone blocks were cut to simulate a Maquet-like osteotomy with the distal part of the osteotomy fixated by a 3.5 mm screw. The elasticity of the artificial bone did not allow for retained fixation at the ventral aspect therefore a screw was placed to imitate this. Pins were drilled at an oblique angle into the cranial fragment just below the cage which was positioned more dorsally than would normally be. Distal hole for the passage of the wire was drilled ventral to the osteotomy line end 2 mm caudally into the cranial edge of the tibia.

The five groups of samples treated with different surgical technique were prepared for biomechanical analysis. Application of each of the TTA systems was carried out in line with manufacturer’s instructions. The samples were then fixed in a jig and tested to single cycle to fail in an Instron materials testing machine (Fig. 1) to test strength and resistance of the fixation technique using 1.5 N preload and test speed of 50 mm/min. All samples that underwent the biomechanical laboratory test were positioned in the testing jig and subjected to continuous increasing tension until the failure of fixation occurred in the sample using tension testing equipment. Maximum load at failure (N)—or strength of the fixation—was evaluated for each of the surgical technique used and compared statistically.

Statistical methods

Statistical analysis was used to compare the strength of the five fixation types. Due to the continuous nature of the outcome variable, the values were compared between the five types of surgical fixations using Analysis of Variance (ANOVA). In addition to the overall comparison between the five groups, post hoc tests were used to compare between pairs of fixations. Since multiple comparisons for each fixation were executed, a Bonferroni adjustment was used to inflate the P-values in order to allow for multiple testing. Judging distribution in small sample sizes was by graphical and visible inspection to look for any non-normal patterns.

Models were implemented in commercially available software (IBM SPSS Statistics Version 23, International Business Machines Corp., Armonk, NY, USA) and results were considered to be of statistical significance if P-value < 0.05.

Results

TBW presented the higher resistance to failure when loaded, compared to all the other surgical procedures, while the other techniques have a similar behaviour in pairs (TTA rapid and TTA plate were alike, while TTA cage and TTA-2 displayed similar strength). The highest values were found in the TBW group with 1.47 ± 0.07 N, with the lowest mean value in the TTA cage and TTA2 groups. The differences were statistically significant in all cases with P < 0.001, suggesting that a highly significant overall difference in strength between the five groups. Table 1 shows the results from the experiment comparing the different surgical technique used. Data is expressed as the mean and standard deviation strength values in each group.

Table 1 Strength values of the groups treated with different surgical techniques used
Full size table

Four groups exhibited a comparable behaviour by pairs—TTA rapid and TTA plate performed in a similar way, while TTA cage and TTA-2 also acted alike—TBW displayed a completely different pattern of conduct.

Further pair-wise comparisons were performed to examine the difference between specific groups. These analyses found no significant differences between the TTA rapid and TTA plate groups, or between the TTA-2 and TTA cage groups (both with P = 1.00). However, all other pair of groups were significantly different with P < 0.001. A graphical illustration of the results in the five groups is shown in Fig. 3.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Dotplot representing the distribution of the samples treated with each surgical technique at failure

Full size image

The properties of artificial bone are manufactured to be similar to bone but it is only an approximation. Also achieving the exact shape of the real proximal tibia was not possible therefore the shape is also an approximation. These factors do not allow for the different breeds, shapes and sizes of real tibias. However, the positive aspect of using artificial bone is that it is consistent in its properties and best for comparative tests such as the study performed here.

Discussion

Our study showed that TBW provides greater strength than any of the other techniques used for treating CCL rupture when biomechanically tested to failure. Tension band wiring (TBW) in combination with a plate has been traditionally used in arthrodesis and is also employed in osteosynthesis [33] and symphysis procedures [34]. However, TBW is not a technique typically used in CCL rupture. TTA plate—used as control—displayed 16.66% less strength than the TBW technique and 3.96% less than TTA rapid sampled, but exhibited more resistance than TTA cage and TTA-2 (34.93% and 32.54%, respectively). However, when compared to TBW, all the other techniques decreased substantially demonstrated that they weaker fixation when tested to failed (TTA rapid: 10.89%; TTA cage: 44.22%; TTA-2: 42.18%; and TTA plate 14.29%). To our knowledge, this is the first time that TTA and its variations has been compared to TBW as a surgical procedure to repair CCL.

Regarding the tibial osteotomy techniques, subjectively, TTA appears to be a useful alternative in the management of CCL rupture and can effectively change the degree and direction of the tibiofemoral shear force, counteracting cranial subluxation of the tibia during simulated weight-bearing in biomechanical studies [13], and providing stability in CCL-deficient stifle joint [15].

Experimental and retrospective studies showed that TTA significantly improved the lameness, activity level [35], and limb function in dogs with CCL disease [36], but did not result in complete return to function, and only approximately 90% of normal can be expected in dogs with CCL disease undergoing TTA. Experimental biomechanical studies showed that TTA restored the normal femorotibial joint and patellofemoral alignment, and reduced the retropatellar force [37], the patellar tendon load, and the cranial tibial thrust in the CCL-deficient stifle joint through an alteration of tibial plateau angle in CCL deficient stifles of dogs [38].

Skinner et al. [39] assessed femorotibial joint alignment under static weight-bearing conditions in dogs treated for CCL insufficiency with TTA, and although TTA did not normalize sagittal plane femorotibial stability, most dogs returned to good limb function regardless of femorotibial alignment.

Variables that influence the outcome of TTA include high body weight and preoperative patellar tendon angle [40]. Although some complications adversely affected functional outcome [19], in a retrospective study, Steinberg et al. [41] concluded that TTA had a complication rate and owner satisfaction similar to other tibial osteotomies for the surgical correction of CCL disease. Complications encountered included implant failure, tibial crest displacement and medial meniscal tears [40, 42, 43].

The occurrence of intraoperative fracture during advancement of an elongated bi-directional hinged osteotomy for TTA in dogs of the tibial tuberosity is less when a hemicerclage suture is placed [44]. The tendency to failure is because the traditional fixation methods rely on mediolateral fixation [22] whereas the TBW is situated on the cranial plane, and therefore in line with the pull of the quadriceps.

Edwards et al. [45] reported major complications in a large cohort of dogs following TTA using either a fork-based or a screw-based implant system. Amongst the variables evaluated that might have influenced this result were the implant type and body weight. The incidence of complications associated with TTA surgical procedures—including tibial tuberosity fractures—appear to be predominant in certain dog breed such as Boxer, as shown in a retrospective study.

Skytte et al. [46] showed that an early treatment of partially ruptured CCL with a TPLO or TTA provides a better long-term result with the remaining CCL staying intact in most cases providing the affected stifle with stability. Major complications occurred frequently following TTA and TPLO treatment of CCL disease in heavier dogs (over 50 kg).

Our study suggests that fixating the osteotomy with a TBW technique would increase the strength of the fixation and decreased complication rate of CCL rupture repair compared to other TTA surgical procedures, especially in a scenario of extra loading. This is because the rate of implant failure would be reduced and would be particularly suitable for large or overweight dogs or bilateral cases where loading would be very high. Further in vivo studies are necessary to confirm these results and incorporate TBW as a preferred surgical technique to treat CCL rupture.

Korvic et al. [47] showed that the patellar force in goats weighing approximately 60 kg during standing in place was 207 N and 1000 N during a trot. The force to failure of the goat patella tendon is 3100 N. In comparison to our results the force to failure was at its highest at 1.47 N which although not near 3100 N it is closer to the normal loading force at 1000 N. To our knowledge, there is no such study in dogs, so it is difficult to extrapolate to real values. In addition, we are using an artificial model, and therefore, a limitation of the study would be the possibility that the forces acting on the tibial tuberosity might be higher than those calculated with our device. However, our purpose was to compare different surgical techniques for CCL repair and find out was the strongest, and that purpose was achieved, since all the samples underwent the same experimental tensional force. The main limitation of the study is that we are using artificial bone, but we think that its consistency outweighs the limit. Other limitations are related to the forces generated and the lack of patellar tendon insertion.

Conclusions

The results of the experiment on CCL rupture in an artificial bone model revealed that TBW procedure was the most resilient surgical fixation for CCL repair presenting the higher strength when tested to failure. Orienting the fixation onto the cranial tensile plane optimizes the fixation behavior. Further clinical studies are needed to demonstrate in vivo reliability and to test different variables such as size and weight of dogs.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analyzed in the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

CCL:

cranial cruciate ligament (proper terminology in dogs)

TBW:

tension band wire

TPLO:

tibial plateau leveling osteotomy

TTA:

tibial tuberosity advancement

References

  1. Kowaleski MP, Bourdrieau RJ, Pozzi A. Stifle joint. In: Tobias KM, Johnston SA, editors. Veterinary surgery: small animal. St Louis: Elsevier; 2012. p. 906–98.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Muir P, Schwartz Z, Malek S, Kreines A, Cabrera SY, Buote NJ, et al. Contralateral cruciate survival in dogs with unilateral non-contact cranial cruciate ligament rupture. PLoS ONE. 2011. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0025331.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Witsberger TH, Villamil JA, Schultz LG, Hahn AW, Cook JL. Prevalence of and risk factors for hip dysplasia and cranial cruciate ligament deficiency in dogs. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2008;232:1818–24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Gianotti SM, Marshall SW, Hume PA, Bunt L. Incidence of anterior cruciate ligament injury and other knee ligament injuries: a national population-based study. J Sci Med Sport. 2009;12:622–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Johnson JM, Johnson AL. Cranial cruciate ligament rupture pathogenesis, diagnosis, and postoperative rehabilitation. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract. 1993;23:717–33.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. von Pfeil DJF, Kowaleski MP, Glassman M, Dejardin LM. Results of a survey of Veterinary Orthopedic Society members on the preferred method for treating cranial cruciate ligament rupture in dogs weighing more than 15 kilograms (33 pounds). J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2018;253:586–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Boudrieau RJ. Tibial plateau leveling osteotomy or tibial tuberosity advancement? Vet Surg. 2009;38:1–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Leighton R. Preferred method of repair of cranial cruciate ligament rupture in dogs: a survey of ACVS diplomats specializing in canine orthopedics. Vet Surg. 1999. https://doi.org/10.1053/jvet.1999.0194.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Slocum B, Slocum TD. Tibial plateau leveling osteotomy for repair of cranial cruciate ligament rupture in the canine. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract. 1993;23:777–95.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Maquet P. Advancement of the tibial tuberosity. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1976;115:225–30.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Dennler R, Kipfer N, Tepic S, Hassig M, Montavon PM. Inclination of the patellar ligament in relation to flexion angle in stifle joints of dogs without degenerative joint disease. Am J Vet Res. 2006;67:1849–54.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Nisell R. Mechanics of the knee: a study of joint and muscle load with clinical applications. Acta Orthop Scand. 1985;56(216):1–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Tepic S, Damur DM, Montavon PM. Biomechanics of the stifle joint. In: Proceedings 1st world orthopaedic veterinary congress. Munich: ESVOT-VOS; 2002. p. 189–90.

  14. Lafaver S, Miller NA, Stubbs WP, Taylor RA, Boudrieau RJ. Tibial tuberosity advancement for stabilization of the canine cranial cruciate ligament-deficient stifle joint: surgical technique, early results, and complications in 101 dogs. Vet Surg. 2007;36:573–86.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Montavon PM, Damur DM, Tepic S. Advancement of the tibial tuberosity for the treatment of cranial cruciate deficient canine stifle. In: Proceedings 1st world orthopedic veterinary congress. Munich: ESVOT-VOS; 2002. p.152.

  16. Apelt D, Kowaleski MP, Boudrieau RJ. Effect of tibial tuberosity advancement on cranial tibial subluxation in canine cranial cruciate-deficient stifle joints: an in vitro experimental study. Vet Surg. 2007;36:170–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Samoy Y, Verhoeven G, Bosmans T, Van der Vekens E, de Bakker E, Verleyen P, et al. TTA rapid: description of the technique and short term clinical trial results of the first 50 cases. Vet Surg. 2015;44:474–84.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Butterworth SJ, Kydd DM. TTA-rapid in the treatment of the canine cruciate deficient stifle: short- and medium-term outcome. J Small Anim Pract. 2017;58:35–41.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Dyall B, Schmökel H. Tibial tuberosity advancement in small-breed dogs using TTA rapid implants: complications and outcome. J Small Anim Pract. 2017;58:314–22.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Meeson RL, Corah L, Conroy MC, Calvo I. Relationship between tibial conformation, cage size and advancement achieved in TTA procedure. BMC Vet Res. 2018;20(14):104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Kyon Pharma I: TTA-2. Zurich: KYON Pharma, Inc.; 2012. https://www.kyon.ch/current-products/tibial-tuberosity-advancement-tta.

  22. McCartney WT, Galvin E, MacDonald BJ, Comiskey D. Analysis of plate bone construct failure following tibial tuberosity advancement. J Appl Res Vet Med. 2011;9:193–7.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Chalidis BE, Sachinis NC, Samoladas EP, Dimitriou CG, Pournaras JD. Is tension band wiring technique the “gold standard” for the treatment of olecranon fractures? A long term functional outcome study. J Orthop Surg Res. 2008;3:9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Maranho DA, Pagnano RG, Volpon JB. Tension band wiring for proximal femoral varus osteotomy fixation in children. Medicine (Baltimore). 2014. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000000061.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Petit GB, Slatter DHJS. Tension band wiring for fixation of avulsed canine tibial tuberosity. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 1973;163:242–4.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Withrow S, DeAngelis M, Arnoczky S, Rosen H. Treatment of fracture of the tibial tuberosity in the dog. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 1976;168:122–4.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Gower JA, Bound NJ, Moores AP. Tibial tuberosity avulsion in dogs: a review of 59 cases. J Small Anim Pract. 2008;49:490–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Muller ME, Algöwer M, Schneider R. Manual of internal fixation. 3rd ed. Berlin: Springer; 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Barnes DC, Knudsen CS, Gosling M, McKee M, Whitelock RG, Arthurs GI, et al. Complications of lateral plate fixation compared with tension band wiring and pin or lag screw fixation for calcaneoquartal arthrodesis. Treatment of proximal intertarsal subluxation occurring secondary to non-traumatic plantar tarsal ligament disruption in dogs. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol. 2013;26:445–52.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Barnhart MD, Watson AT, Thatcher LG, Wotton H, Naber SJ. Prospective randomized clinical and radiographic evaluation of a novel bioabsorbable biocomposite tibial tuberosity advancement cage implant. Vet Surg. 2016;45:651–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Kyon Pharma I: TTA-2. Zurich: KYON Pharma, Inc.; 2009. https://www.kyon.ch/current-products/tibial-tuberosity-advancement-tta/tta-2-development-technique.

  32. Bisgard SK, Barnhart MD, Shiroma JT, Kennedy SC, Schertel ER. The effect of cancellous autograft and novel plate design on radiographic healing and postoperative complications in tibial tuberosity advancement for cranial cruciate-deficient canine stifles. Vet Surg. 2011;40:402–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Saragaglia D, Pison A, Rubens-Duval B. Acute and old ruptures of the extensor apparatus of the knee in adults (excluding knee replacement). Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2013;99(Suppl):S67–76.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Park MS, Yoon SJ, Choi SM, Lee K. Is there a clinical benefit of additional tension band wiring in plate fixation of the symphysis? BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2017;18:40.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Stein S, Schmoekel H. Short-term and eight to 12 months results of a tibial tuberosity advancement as treatment of canine cranial cruciate ligament damage. J Small Anim Pract. 2008;49:398–404.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Dymond NL, Goldsmid SE, Simpson DJ. Tibial tuberosity advancement in 92 canine stifles: initial results, clinical outcome and owner evaluation. Aust Vet J. 2010;88:381–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Guerrero TG, Pozzi A, Dunbar N, Kipfer N, Haessig M, Beth Horodyski M, et al. Effect of tibial tuberosity advancement on the contact mechanics and the alignment of the patellofemoral and femorotibial joints. Vet Surg. 2011;40:839–48.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Hoffman DE, Kowaleski MP, Johnson KA, Evans RB, Boudrieau RJ. Ex vivo biomechanical evaluation of the canine CrCL deficient stifle with varying angles of stifle joint flexion and axial loads after TTA. Vet Surg. 2011;40:311–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Skinner OT, Kim SE, Lewis DD, Pozzi A. In vivo femorotibial subluxation during weight-bearing and clinical outcome following tibialtuberosity advancement for cranial cruciate ligament insufficiency in dogs. Vet J. 2013;196:86–91.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Wolf RE, Scavelli TD, Hoelzler MG, Fulcher RP, Bastian RP. Surgical and postoperative complications associated with tibial tuberosity advancement for cranial cruciate ligament rupture in dogs: 458 cases (2007–2009). J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2012;240:1481–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Steinberg EJ, Prata RG, Palazzini K, Brown DC. Tibial tuberosity advancement for treatment of CrCL injury: complications and owner satisfaction. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc. 2011;47:250–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. MacDonald TL, Allen DA, Monteith GJ. Clinical assessment following tibial tuberosity advancement in 28 stifles at 6 months and 1 year after surgery. Can Vet J. 2013;54:249–54.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Costa M, Craig D, Cambridge T, Sebestyen P, Su Y, Fahie MA. Major complications of tibial tuberosity advancement in 1613 dogs. Vet Surg. 2017;46:494–500.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Bleakley S, Palmer RH, Bresina S, Roca SP, Tepic S. The effect of polydioxanone hemicerclage suture on the occurrence of fracture during tibialtuberosity advancement with an elongated bi-directional hinged osteotomy. Vet Surg. 2017;46:486–93.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Edwards GA, Hosgood G, Hancock RB, Stubbs WP, Jackson AH. Major complications associated with fork-based and screw-based tibial tuberosity advancement implants: 438 cases. Can Vet J. 2016;57:415–20.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. Skytte D, Schmökel H, Miles J. Partial rupture of the cranial cruciate ligament treated with tibial tuberosity advancement without debridement of the remaining ligament: a clinical study of 18 cases. Schweiz Arch Tierheilkd. 2014;156:447–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Korvick DL, Cummings JF, Grood ES, Hoidw JP, Feder SMA, Butler DL. The use of an implantable force transducer to measure patellar tendon forces in goats. J Biomech. 1996;29:557–61.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This project is funded by the Ministry of Research and Innovation through Program 1—Development of the National Research and Development System, Subprogram 1.2—Institutional Performance—Projects for Financing the Excellence in CDI, Contract no. 37PFE/06.11.2018. Title of the project: “Increasing the institutional performance through consolidation and development of research directions within the USAMVCN”.

Funding

This project is funded by the Ministry of Research and Innovation through Program 1—Development of the National Research and Development System, Subprogram 1.2—Institutional performance—Projects for Financing the Excellence in CDI, Contract no 37PFE/06.11.2018. Title of the project: Increasing the institutional performance through consolidation and development of research directions within the USAMVCN.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. NOAH, 38 Warrenhouse Road, Baldoyle, Dublin 13, Ireland

    William McCartney

  2. School of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineer, Dublin City University, Dublin, Ireland

    William McCartney & Bryan MacDonald

  3. University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine, Calea Manastur 3-5, Cluj-Napoca, Romania

    Ciprian Ober

  4. Sandyford, Dublin 18, Ireland

    Maria Benito

Authors
  1. William McCartney
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ciprian Ober
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Maria Benito
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Bryan MacDonald
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

WMC, CO and BMC contributed to sample preparation, study design and construct assembly. MB contributed to the writing of the manuscript for publication. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ciprian Ober.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Written consent for the treatment of the animal and the use of anonymized data for research was obtained from the owner before surgeries.

Consent for publication

The owners gave their written informed consent for publication by means of signing our official client acceptance form.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

McCartney, W., Ober, C., Benito, M. et al. Comparison of tension band wiring and other tibial tuberosity advancement techniques for cranial cruciate ligament repair: an experimental study. Acta Vet Scand 61, 44 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13028-019-0481-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13028-019-0481-1

Keywords

Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica

ISSN: 1751-0147