Skip to main content

The effect of antimicrobial treatment on mortality associated with urinary tract disease in mink kits (Neovison vison)

Abstract

Mink urinary tract disease (MUTD) often presents as urolithiasis and/or cystitis and is known as an important cause of mortality in mink kits during the early growth season. Antimicrobial flock treatment has been routinely applied as preventive/therapeutic protocol on Danish mink farms with increased mortality associated with MUTD. The therapeutic effect of this treatment strategy has not previously been investigated. In this study, we applied controlled parallel group treatment trials to assess the effect of sulfadiazine/trimethoprim and amoxicillin treatment on mortality associated with MUTD in mink kits. On farm A, eight mink kits were diagnosed with MUTD post mortem in the treatment group (n = 1920, sulfadiazine/trimethoprim treatment: 30 mg/kg, q 24 h, P.O for 5 days) compared to 16 in the untreated control group (n = 1920). No significant difference in mortality associated with MUTD were found between  the treatment and the control group using the Fisher’s exact test (P = 0.15). Treatment group 2 (n = 1920, amoxicillin treatment: 14 mg/kg q 24 h, P.O for 5 days) and treatment group 3 (n = 2088, amoxicillin treatment: 7.5 mg/kg q 24 h, P.O for 5 days) were investigated on farm B. Eight and four mink kits were diagnosed with MUTD post mortem in group 2 and 3, respectively. No difference between occurrence of MUTD were found between the control group and treatment group 2 (P = 0.42) or treatment group 3 (P = 0.75). No significant difference between final body weights or weight gain were found between treatment and control weighing groups on farm A or B. In conclusion, antimicrobial treatment administered in the feed showed no significant effect on weight gain or mortality associated with MUTD on the farms included in this study.

Findings

Mink urinary tract disease (MUTD) presents as urolithiasis and/or cystitis diagnosed post mortem in mink kits [1,2,3,4,5]. Both bacterial infection and struvite urolithiasis have been suggested as aetiological factors [1, 2, 6, 7]. Recent studies identified Staphylococcus delphini Group A as part of the mink skin microbiota and an opportunistic pathogen associated with MUTD [1, 8].

Use of antimicrobial flock treatment to target cystitis [9] and prevent MUTD is common veterinary practice in Denmark when MUTD associated mortality occurs. Considering the potential adverse effects and the lack of knowledge of the pathogenesis of MUTD, this treatment strategy is questionable. The aim of this study was to assess the effect of the currently applied treatment strategy on mink farms experiencing mortality associated with MUTD in mink kits.

Controlled parallel group treatment trials were performed on two Danish mink farms in Jutland during July–September 2018 (farm A) and July–August 2020 (farm B). The clinical trial protocol was approved by the Danish Medical Agency. Kits 2 months of age were included. Mink kits housed on farm A were of fur colour types brown and white and 1920 (n) of each type were included. Animals on farm B were of colour type brown and a total of 5976 was included. Mink kits were housed in traditional sheds with standard cages meeting the requirements of Danish law (one female and male kit in each). Animals were fed a standard mixed feed supplied daily from one local commercial feed kitchen. Farm A used a daily feed additive of ammonium chloride (2–3‰) from end of treatment to trial termination.

The farmers contacted their farm veterinarian because MUTD spontaneously occurred in early July. The farms met the inclusion criteria of the study specified in Table 1. During necropsy (at trial inclusion) bladder swabs (n = 4 from each farm) were collected from mink with lesions compatible with MUTD without visual signs of decomposition. The swaps were submitted to routine culture analysis and antimicrobial susceptibility test.

Table 1 Farm mortalities, sampling and necropsy results of MUTD (mink urinary tract disease) during study enrolment

Animals were randomly selected for trial groups by row (farm A) or house (farm B). Animal data is presented in Table 2. From each group 42 animals were randomly selected for weighing groups. Weight of the same animal was recorded at initiation and 12 weeks later and weight gain calculated. On farm A, treatment group 1 (n = 1920) were administered one daily dose of 30 mg/kg sulfadiazine/trimethoprim for 5 days. At farm B, treatment group 2 (n = 1920) were administrated a daily dose of 14 mg/kg amoxicillin for 5 days and treatment group 3 (n = 2088) received a daily dose of 7.5 mg/kg amoxicillin for 5 days. Treatment was administered in feed by adding a daily prepared stock solution to the water supply of the feeding machine at one daily feeding. Preparation and administration of the stock solution were supervised by the research group. The protocol included instruction for handling of kits with clinical signs of MUTD (the normal farm practice), but no cases were observed.

Table 2 Displaying trail groups at farm A and B including enrolled animals, treatment and weight groups

Throughout the study period all dead mink kits were collected and stored on − 20 °C until examination. Using previously described procedures [1] urinary organs were evaluated by gross pathological examination and swab samples were collected from the bladder mucosa and/or content of all mink with macroscopic lesions of the urinary tract. Two mink were excluded from sampling because of bladder rupture. Bladder specimens was subjected to microbiological culture and/or MALDI-TOF as previously described [1].

Results of post mortem examinations and statistical analysis of this data are presented in Tables 3 and 4. MUTD was less prevalent in the treatment group 1 (8/1920) compared to the control group (16/1920). There was a significant difference between starting weights of males on farm A. Likewise, there were a significant difference between starting weights of females in group 3 and the control group at farm B. Results of microbiological culture are presented in Table 5. Staphylococci were detected in 70% of mink kits with lesions in farm A and 44% in farm B. Isolates identified as S. delphini group A made up 83% of the staphylococci isolated. Antibiotic susceptibility test showed no resistance of cultured staphylococci to sulfadiazine trimethoprim at farm A or amoxicillin at farm B.

Table 3 Results of post mortem examination, animal body weights and statistical testing from farm A
Table 4 Results of post mortem examination, animal body weights and statistical testing from farm B
Table 5 Microbial findings of mink bladder specimens sampled post mortem from farm A (n = 23) and B (n = 16)

No significant difference was found between mortality associated with MUTD in the treatment and the control groups, by means of the Fisher’s exact test at a 5% significance level (results presented in Table 4). MUTD associated mortality is mainly seen in male mink kits [1, 2, 5]. It remains unknown if females may be subject to subclinical disease associated with MUTD. Also, because the male and female kits share cages and feed [10], the females are routinely included in the treatment and may be affected by this. Therefor females were also included in the study.

The antimicrobial flock treatment initiated after diagnosis of MUTD did not significantly reduce mortality associated with MUTD during the growth period. As illustrated in Figs. 1 and 2, mortality associated with MUTD occurred throughout the investigation period with no obvious culmination of disease. This result may have been affected by the relatively low post mortem prevalence of MUTD in the groups (1.9–8.3‰). Both farms presented with mortality associated with MUTD (0.6 and 0.7‰/day) at the time of inclusion. As a rule of thumb, kit mortality after weaning should not exceed 1‰ per week (0.14‰/day).

Fig. 1
figure1

Cumulative number of mink diagnosed with mink urinary tract disease (MUTD) at post mortem according to date. Farm A

Fig. 2
figure2

Cumulative number of mink diagnosed with mink urinary tract disease (MUTD) at post mortem according to date. Farm B

Both urolithiasis (56% and 65%) and infection with staphylococci (44% and 70%) were frequent findings. This is in agreement with previous studies investigating MUTD [1, 2, 4]. Urethral obstruction by purulent exudate or uroliths was reported as cause of death in MUTD [1, 2]. It is possible that a combination of antimicrobials and ammonium chloride can lower mortality more efficiently than antimicrobial treatment alone by reducing crystals/uroliths as well as bacterial burden. Similarly, recommendations for prevention of struvite urolithiasis in dogs include antimicrobial treatment in combination with dietary supplements aiming to dissolve uroliths [11,12,13].

One recent study reported mink of colour type black being predisposed to MUTD compared to brown mink [5]. In recent years numbers of black mink on Danish farms have decreased and there was no black mink on farms included in this study.

Sulfadiazine/trimethoprim and amoxicillin are first choice therapy for uncomplicated urinary tract infections in dogs and cats [14] and also used for treatment of MUTD, though no manufacturer recommendations for use in mink is available. The dose applied in treatment 1 was sufficient to treat S. delphini group A and E. coli mink infections [15]. The low dose of amoxicillin applied on farm B was included because a novel study suggest it is sufficient for S. delphini group A [16]. Long time storage of mink feed mixed with drugs may affect drug concentration [17]. It may take mink kits several hours to ingest all feed and there might be reduction in concentration through this period. Both antimicrobials applied are eliminated through urine which favors high antimicrobial concentration in the bladder [18, 19].

Weight gain in mink kits can be considered an indicator for health and thriftiness. In this study, there were no significant differences between groups when comparing final weights or average weight gain. Thus indicating, that the applied treatment did not affect general health and growth.

Isolates submitted for antimicrobial susceptibility testing were susceptible to the applied antimicrobial drugs, however, only few isolates were tested (n = 4 from each farm). We cannot rule out, that antimicrobial resistance may have contributed to the lack of treatment effect. Bacterial isolates from Danish mink have shown ampicillin resistance in up to 82.3% of E. coli isolates [9, 20]. There are no reports of ampicillin resistance in S. delphini group, though penicillin resistance were reported in 47% of isolates in a previous study [20]. S. delphini group A isolates have been reported to be susceptible to sulfadiazine/trimethoprim [20].

Prevalence of MUTD diagnosed post mortem ranged between 1.9 and 8.3‰ in study groups, which is consistent with previously reported mortality prevalences of MUTD on Danish mink farms [1]. It is always important to be aware of the potential adverse effects of the exposure of healthy mink to antimicrobials when applying flock treatment. This is emphasized by the low prevalence of MUTD recorded by post mortem examination in this and previous studies (implying that a larger proportion of clinically healthy mink is included in the treatment) and reports of frequent detection of antimicrobial resistance in bacterial mink pathogens [9, 20].

In conclusion, antimicrobial treatment had no significant effect on weight gain or mortality associated with MUTD in this study. While flock treatment of farms with MUTD is currently commonly applied, our results do not support this practice. More research is needed to ensure prudent and efficient use of antimicrobials and especially the use of flock treatment, which accounts for most of the antibiotics used for production animals. The results emphasize the need for improved and documented protocols for the prevention of MUTD.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. 1.

    Mundbjerg K, Pedersen PE, Sebbelov I, Honoré OL, Aalbæk B, Larsen C, et al. Urolithiasis and cystitis associated with Staphylococcus delphini group A and mortality in post-weaning mink kits (Neovison vison). Vet Microbiol. 2020;245:108706. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetmic.2020.108706.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Nielsen IM. Urolithiasis in mink: pathology, bacteriology and experimental production. J Urol. 1956;75:602–14.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Osborne CA, Albasan H, Lulich JP, Nwaokorie E, Koehler LA, Ulrich LK. Quantitative analysis of 4468 uroliths retrieved from farm animals, exotic species, and wildlife submitted to the Minnesota Urolith Center: 1981 to 2007. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract. 2009;39:65–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Witte W, Zimmermann H. Staphylococcus intermedius in urolithiasis of mink [in German]. Arch Exp Veterinarmed. 1985;39:560–4.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Mundbjerg K, Tolver A, Sebbelov I, Clausen T, Lundfold J, Hammer AS. Familial disease history and fur color type are associated with urinary tract disease in farmed mink (Neovison vison). Res Vet Sci. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rvsc.2020.10.026.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Sompolinsky D. Urolithiasis in mink. Cornell Vet. 1950;40:367–77.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Zimmerman H, Witte W. Bacteriological studies on urolithiasis in mink. Monatsh Veterinarmed. 1988;43:314–5.

    Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Guardabassi KR, Petersen TS, Espinosa-Gongora C, Moodley A, Agersø Y, Olsen JE, et al. Mustelidae are natural hosts of Staphylococcus delphini group A. Vet Microbiol. 2012;159:351–3.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Pedersen K, Hammer AS, Sørensen CM, Heuer OE. Usage of antimicrobials and occurrence of antimicrobial resistance among bacteria from mink. Vet Microbiol. 2009;133:115–22.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Axelsson HMK, Hansen SW, Loberg J, Lidfors L. Effects of group size on behaviour, growth and occurrence of bite marks in farmed mink. Appl Anim Behav Sci. 2017;194:112–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Lulich JP, Berent AC, Adams LG, Westropp JL, Bartges JW, Osborne CA. ACVIM Small animal consensus recommendations on the treatment and prevention of uroliths in dogs and cats. J Vet Intern Med. 2016;30:1564–74.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Palma D, Langston C, Gisselman K, Mccue J. Canine struvite urolithiasis. Compend Contin Educ Vet. 2013;35:E1-8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Bahador MMB, Bahador MMB, Tabrizi AS, Tabrizi AS, Kozachok VS, Kozachok VS. Effects of diet on the management of struvite uroliths in dogs and cats. Comp Clin Path. 2014;23:557–60.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Weese JS, Blondeau JM, Boothe D, Breitschwerdt EB, Guardabassi L, Hillier A, et al. Antimicrobial use guidelines for treatment of urinary tract disease in dogs and cats: antimicrobial guidelines working group of the international society for companion animal infectious diseases. Vet Med Int. 2011;2011:1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Ronaghinia AA, Nikolaisen NK, Hansen SG, Poulsen HH, Frandsen HL, Struve T, et al. Validating an empiric sulfadiazine-trimethoprim dosage regimen for treatment of Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus delphini infections in mink (Neovison vison). J Vet Pharmacol Ther. 2020;44:93–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Nikolaisen NK. Personal communication. Technical University of Denmark, Kemitorvet, Building 204, room 255, DK-2800 Kgs. Lyngby; 2020.

  17. 17.

    Lassen DCK, Nikolaisen NK, Ronaghinia AA, Damborg P, Kristensen KA, Chriél M, et al. Amoxicillin i minkfoder-stabilitet og resistens. Annu Rep 2018, Kopenhagen Res Agro Food Park 15, DK-8200 Aarhus N, Denmark. 2019. p. 132–5.

  18. 18.

    Bodey GP, Nance J. Amoxicillin: in vitro and pharmacological studies. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1972;1:358–62.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Männistö P, Tuomisto J, Saris N-E, Lehtinen T. Pharmacokinetic studies with trimethoprim and different doses of sulfadiazine in healthy human subjects. Chemotherapy. 1973;19:289–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Nikolaisen NK, Lassen DCK, Chriél M, Larsen G, Jensen VF, Pedersen K. Antimicrobial resistance among pathogenic bacteria from mink (Neovison vison) in Denmark. Acta Vet Scand. 2017;59:60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to the breeders involved in the project for their participation, for their indispensable help implementing treatments and weighing groups as well as for donating animal carcasses. In addition, we thank veterinarian Sanne Tygesen Skønager for assisting KM during trail implementation in 2018.

Funding

This study was co-funded by the Innovation Fund Denmark [grant number 7038-00033B and The Research Foundation of the Danish Fur Breeders Association. None of the funding sources were involved in design, collection of samples, analyses, interpretation or writing of the manuscript.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

KM executed trail treatments and sampled all data. KM analyzed data and discussed results with ASH and PEP. ASH and PEP helped KM design the study and guided through the whole trail. KM wrote the article. All authors participated and contributed to interpretation and discussion of the results. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Karin Mundbjerg.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

No ethical or laboratory animal permission was required as only spontaneous disease outbreaks were studied and as no experimental infection of animals took place. The animals were handled according to national legislation.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mundbjerg, K., Pedersen, P.E. & Hammer, A.S. The effect of antimicrobial treatment on mortality associated with urinary tract disease in mink kits (Neovison vison). Acta Vet Scand 63, 15 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13028-021-00581-3

Download citation

Keywords

  • Antibiotics
  • Cystitis
  • Treatment
  • Urolithiasis
  • Veterinary