Skip to main content
Download PDF

Enhancing canine semen quality through a second centrifugation after 48 hours of storage: a comparative study

Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica volume 66, Article number: 47 (2024) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Centrifugation is a common procedure to improve the quality of chilled and frozen canine semen by removing debris and seminal plasma and adding semen extenders. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and influence of a second centrifugation after 48 h of storage at 5 °C on the sperm quality of canine semen. The ejaculates of 45 healthy male dogs, divided into three groups according to body weight, were analyzed for macro- and microparameters such as ejaculate volume, sperm concentration, kinematic parameters, morphology, and integrity of plasma membrane. Samples were analyzed at baseline conditions (T0), after 24 h (T24) and after 48 h (T48) to assess the effects of the different treatments on sperm quality.

Results

The results showed a significant effect of a second centrifugation on the improvement of chilled sperm quality compared to the other techniques, especially up to 48 h.

Conclusions

Analysis of the data showed that the semen samples centrifuged and then cooled at 5 °C had acceptable semen parameters, especially in terms of motility, with a gradual decrease in serial evaluations after 24 and 48 h. A second centrifugation after 48 h of storage may lead to better semen quality and improve the kinetics of sperm parameters, the percentage of morphologically normal sperm and the percentage of sperm with intact membranes.

Background

Sperm evaluation includes both macro- and microanalysis, examining various factors such as volume, colour, pH, concentration, total sperm count (TSC), total sperm motility (TSM) and progressive sperm motility (PSM), as well as additional tests such as viability (using live-dead staining or the hypo-osmotic swelling test), morphological abnormalities, evaluation of other cell types and DNA analysis [1]. This evaluation technique is widely used to assess male fertility in both humans and animals [2,3,4,5].

With the increased use of artificial insemination (AI) techniques, the importance of sperm quality has grown, especially for cooled or frozen sperm. Indeed, better semen quality is associated with better fertility, in addition to optimal management factors and veterinary care [6]. The success of artificial insemination depends on the presence of a sufficient number of fertile sperm in the female genital tract [7]. To achieve favourable results, a minimum motility of 50% is required for fresh sperm in AI [8]. If only low-quality sperm is available, the increase in sperm concentration per dose of AI may result in litters comparable in size to those of females inseminated with high-quality semen [9]. One of the major advantages of cooled or frozen semen is the possibility to transport only the semen intended for AI to the recipient bitch, rather than the donor [10, 11]. Compared to freezing, refrigeration also offers a simpler cooling technique and cheaper transport [12]. However, sperm survival is reduced with chilling, compared to fresh semen [13]. On the other hand, sperm metabolism is highest at body temperature and starts to decrease at room temperature (24–29 °C); then it decreases to 50% every 10 °C and reaches the 10% of metabolism at 5 °C [14]. For this reason, in case of chilling and freezing semen, the addition of extenders is necessary to provide energy, maintain pH and osmolarity, and protect the acrosome and plasma membrane integrity against damage [10]. This can ensure the maintenance of the fertilizing ability of the sperm for a short period of time and achieve a success rate of 83.8% in artificial insemination [15].

The biochemical composition of seminal plasma is highly variable. There are controversial opinions in the literature regarding the preservation of seminal plasma together with spermatozoa [16]. In a study conducted in dogs it was reported that the percentage of morphologically intact spermatozoa after 6 h of incubation at 37 ºC was higher when treated with only the second fraction of the ejaculate than when treated with the first and third fractions [17]. However, studies in pigs suggest that seminal plasma contains factors that may alter spermatozoa, reducing their ability to freeze and fertilise after thawing [18]. Some studies suggest that seminal plasma may affect fertility through changes in the sperm membrane, such as changes in cholesterol levels [19].

Centrifugation is a physical method that removes most seminal plasma, although its effect on sperm quality in different species is controversial. One study reported that the use of centrifugation to remove seminal plasma had no negative effect on sperm quality parameters in dogs [20]. On the other hand, centrifugation is not considered to be completely harmless to the cell and can cause physical damage to cells, removal of capacitation inhibitors and prostaglandins [21].

Centrifugation is a widely used technique to improve sperm quality by selecting sperm with higher motility ratio, reducing abnormalities, and removing non-sperm cells [22]. Moreover, it is a critical step in many assisted reproduction techniques, such as freezing and preparing sperm for shipping in a refrigerated environment. Different centrifugation protocols have been described to improve semen quality using low, medium or high centrifugation intensities [11, 15, 22,23,24,25,26]. The effect of excessive centrifugation force on sperm recovery rates has been investigated, suggesting that high physical pressure against the tube wall may influence the outcome [27,28,29]. Consequently, some studies have investigated different centrifugation intensities and the addition of different extenders to optimize the process [30,31,32,33,34]. The purpose of this procedure is to remove prostatic fluid and seminal plasma from canine ejaculates in both clinical and experimental settings [35]. Indeed, centrifugation is widely used as the first step of sperm preparation in other species [29, 36,37,38]. Several studies have shown that equine, bovine and ovine sperm can withstand centrifugation better than human or rodent sperm [30, 39,40,41,42,43,44]. For example, stallion semen can be centrifuged at 1800–2400 g for 5 min without significant adverse effects on semen quality parameters [28, 41, 45, 46]. To note, most semen samples from these species are diluted with an extender prior to centrifugation, a practice not used in standard processing of canine ejaculates [28].

The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and influence of a second centrifugation after 48 h of storage at 5 °C on the sperm quality of canine semen. In clinical practice, shipments of semen material often do not arrive within twenty-four hours, so the authors’ intention was to optimise canine semen storage and handling procedures for practical purposes. In fact, 24 h after cooling, semen parameters are still acceptable for artificial insemination and centrifugation is not considered necessary during this period. After 48 h of cooling, sperm parameters begin to deteriorate, particularly motility, and with this work we have shown how a second centrifugation of the semen restores sperm parameters to the minimum values necessary to ensure an acceptable pregnancy rate. In addition, the correlation between the animal’s body weight and certain sperm parameters after centrifugation was investigated, in line with previous studies showing the variation of some semen parameters at different body weights.

Methods

Animals

A total of 45 adult male dogs were enrolled in this study from October 2022 to July 2023 at the Department of Veterinary Sciences of the University of Messina, Italy, for routine evaluation of potential fertility. Informed consent was obtained from the owner of each dog before its inclusion in the study. Inclusion criteria for the animals were based on clinical history, physical examination and reproductive ultrasound of the prostate and testes to exclude pathological conditions, complete blood count, biochemistry, and hormonal profiles. The average age of the animals was 7.3 ± 2.5 years. The subjects were divided into three groups according to their weight. The first group consisted of nine German Dachshunds and six Jack Russell Terriers weighing between 5 and 15 kg (Group 1), with an average age of 7.47 ± 2.26 kg. The second group consisted of ten English Setters and five Pointers, weighing between 15 and 25 kg (Group 2), with an average age of 7.60 ± 2.20 years. The third group consisted of eight Labrador Retrievers and seven German Shepherds, weighing between 25 and 35 kg (Group 3), with an average age of 7 ± 3 kg. Prior to data collection for the study, a detailed general and reproductive history was obtained from each subject.

Clinical examination and ultrasound findings

A comprehensive physical examination and complete blood analysis were conducted on each subject. In addition, a specific objective examination of the reproductive system was performed, including ultrasonography of male genital tract and semen evaluation. Ultrasound examinations of the testes, epididymis and prostate were performed once on each dog by the same operator using a Mindray M9 ultrasound machine (Mindray, Shenzhen, China) equipped with a linear transducer for the testes and epididymis, instead of micro-convex transducer for the prostate, operating in the frequency range 6.6 to 13.5 MHz. Standardized depth settings were used as much as possible, and overall gain, dynamic range, focal zone, and time-gain compensation were optimized.

Semen analysis

To minimize defects in the semen stored in the epididymis, such as reduced motility and increased debris [47], a preliminary semen collection was performed 48 h before the examination.

Semen collection was performed in a quiet and suitable environment with a non-slip floor, by manual collection and in the presence of a teaser bitch. The ejaculate was fractionated by discarding the third fraction and immediately examining the first two fractions. The collected semen sample (A) was examined immediately as fresh semen (AF). For macroscopic evaluation (volume, colour, odour, and pH), the semen was placed in a falcon tube and kept in a 37 °C water bath. For microscopic evaluation (motility, concentration, morphology and vitality), a 2 µL aliquot of seminal material was placed on a Leja chamber (SC 10-01-04-B, Leja, GN Nieuw-Vennep, NL) and analysed with the aid of a Nikon Eclipse Ni phase contrast optical microscope, equipped with a heated stage, 10x/0.25 Ph1 phase contrast objective, Blaser Scout sca780-54fc digital camera (resolution 782 × 582 pixels; 54 frames per second) and computerized automatic semen analysis system SCA (Sperm Class Analyzer, Microptic Automatic Diagnostic System). The concentration was evaluated either by the SCA system and with a photometer (Accucell IMV Technologies, L’Aigle, France), both of which calibrated for dogs by prior validation with a Makler chamber (Sefi-Medical Instruments, Haifa, Israel). From the results obtained with the spectrophotometric test and the SCA system, the mean concentration was calculated, and this represented the reference value expressed in x106/mL.Motility was analysed by the SCA system, evaluating the following sperm kinematics parameters: total sperm motility (TSM, %), progressive sperm motility (PSM, %), curvilinear velocity (VCL, µm/s), straight line velocity (VSL, µm/s), average path velocity (VAP, µm/s), linearity (LIN, %), straightness (STR, %) wobble (WOB, %).

After staining with eosin/nigrosin, cell morphology was assessed by examining at least 200 spermatozoa per slide in the field at 400x.

Vital-Test kit was used to assess sperm membrane integrity, which provides a green coloration (acridine orange, 1 µL) of nuclei of live spermatozoa with intact plasma membrane and a red coloration (propidium iodide, 1 µL) of dead sperm nuclei, visualized by a fluorescence microscopy (magnification x1000) [48]. For each sample, 200 spermatozoa were examined and the percentage of spermatozoa with an intact membrane was reported.

Experimental design

At the end of the macroscopic and microscopic evaluation of the sample AF (of each group) was diluted appropriately with CaniPRO™Chill10 extender (Minitüb, Germany) (AD). A portion of the diluted semen material was directly chilled by placing the sample at a temperature of 4–6 °C to assess longevity at 24 (T24) and 48 (T48) hours after chilling.

The remaining part was divided into four 15 mL Falcon tubes, placed in an ALC Pk 121R centrifuge (Thermo, electron corporation, Germany) and centrifuged at 1800 rpm (700x g) for 5 min at a temperature of 20 °C to separate the spermatozoa from the rest of the suspension (AC). After centrifugation, the spermatozoa formed a pellet at the apex of the tube cone. The supernatant was then aspirated using a vacuum pump (Minitube GmbH & CO, Germany), taking care not to aspirate the pellet, and leaving a minimum of 0.5 mL. After addition of the extender, the pellet was gently resuspended with a micropipette (Pipetman F1000, Gilson, France) until complete dissolution. After resuspension, a 2 µL aliquot of the diluted semen was reassessed under the microscope, while the remainder was stored in the refrigerator for longevity assessment at T24 and T48 after refrigeration.

The AC sample was submitted to a second centrifugation (A2C) after 48 h of storage, following the same procedure, aspirating the supernatant, and resuspending the pellet for a second microscopic evaluation.

The collected sperm samples were then analysed at the time of collection (T0) as fresh semen (AF), after dilution (AD) and after centrifugation (AC). After 24 (T24) and 48 h (T48), the refrigerated AD and AC samples were analysed. In addition, at T48, the AC semen sample was subjected to a second centrifugation (A2C) and then analysed (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Diagram of treatments and semen evaluations at different timepoints. AF = sample of fresh semen, AD = sample after dilution, AC = sample after centrifugation, A2C = sample after second centrifugation; T0 = moment of collection, T24 = after 24 h of storage, T48 = after 48 h of storage

Full size image

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis was performed using GraphPad Prism 7.0 for Windows (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA, USA). Mann-Whitney U test was used to compare TSM and PSM between: AF and AD; AF and AC; AD and AC at T0; AF and AD; AF and AC; AD and AC at T24; AF and AD; AF and AC; AF and A2C; AD and AC; AD and A2C; AC and A2C at T48; and to compare morphology and intact plasma membrane among the different groups of weight, among the different typologies of semen, and among different storage temperatures.

Kruskal-Wallis test and T-test were used to compare kinematic parameters between dogs of Group 1, 2 and 3 in AF, AD and AC at T0, AD and AC at T24 and AD, AC and A2C at T48. Spearman’s Rho test was used to measure the strength of correlation between concentration, total sperm count, TSM, PSM, ejaculate volume and body weight. Differences were considered significant if P values were < 0.05.

Results

General and reproductive system physical examinations, libido, blood tests, and ultrasound examinations of the 45 dogs showed no alterations. Body weights ranged from 5.5 to 35 kg (median = 24 kg; 25th percentile = 7.75 kg; 75th percentile = 29.5 kg).

Semen parameters including ejaculate volume (mL), sperm concentration (spz x106/mL), TSC (x109), TSM%, PSM%, VCL (µm/s), VSL (µm/s), VAP (µm/s), LIN%, STR%, and WOB%, sperm morphology and membrane integrity at baseline conditions in the three groups of weight are reported in Table 1.

Table 1 Semen parameters at baseline conditions in the three groups of weight
Full size table

At T24 TSM and PSM in both AD (TSM, P < 0.0001; PSM, P < 0.0001) and AC (TSM, P < 0.0001; PSM, P < 0.0001) were lower than in AF, however, both TSM and PSM were significantly higher in AC than in the AD (TSM, P < 0.0001; PSM, P < 0.0001) (Table 2). At T48, the TSM and PSM were significantly lower in the AD (TSM, P < 0.0001; PSM, P < 0.0001), AC (TSM, P < 0.0001; PSM, P < 0.0001) and A2C (TSM, P < 0.0001; PSM, P < 0.0001) when compared to the AF; however, TSM and PSM were significantly higher in the A2C semen compared to the AD (TSM, P < 0.0001; PSM, P < 0.0001) and AC (TSM, P < 0.0001; PSM, P < 0.0001), and in the AC when compared to the AD (TSM, P < 0.0001) (Table 2).

Table 2 Total sperm motility (TSM) and progressive sperm motility (PSM) at different time points
Full size table

Body weight was positively correlated with ejaculate volume (P < 0.0001; rs= 0.8), concentration, and, consequently, with total sperm count (P < 0.0001, rs = 0.86), while a negative correlation was found between body weight and total sperm motility (P < 0.0001, rs= -0.83) and progressive sperm motility (P < 0.0001; rs= -0.62) (Fig. 2).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Correlation of body weight with semen factors evaluated. Factors include ejaculate volume, concentration, TSC total sperm count, TSC total sperm motility, and PSM progressive sperm motility

Full size image

More specifically, compared to Groups 2 and 3, dogs in Group 1 had higher TSM and PSM in AC at T24, higher TSM in AC and A2C semen at T48 and higher PSM in AD semen at T0. In Group 3, PSM was higher in AD at T24 and in AD, AC and A2C at T48. The results of VCL, VSL and VAP are shown in Table 3.

Table 3 Kinematic seminal parameters at different time points in the three groups
Full size table

At T24 the percentage was higher in AC than in AD (P < 0.001). Finally, at T48 normal spermatozoa were higher in AC compared to AD (P < 0.001), but higher in A2C compared to AD (P < 0.001) and AC (P < 0.001). In the statistical comparison of these parameters between AC and A2C at T48 among the different groups of weight, only the percentage of intact membrane in the Group 3 was not significantly higher in A2C. Results are reported in Table 4.

Table 4 Mean percentage of normal sperm morphology and intact plasma membrane after different treatments of semen
Full size table

Discussion

Over the past few decades, there has been a significant increase in the demand for canine insemination and, consequently, an increase in the shipment of cooled and frozen canine semen. However, there are biological factors and handling conditions that can affect semen quality during the cooling and shipping process for insemination [49,50,51]. These factors include standard preparation procedures that can adversely affect sperm viability, motility, and potential fertility. In addition, the presence of prostatic fluid and other plasma components in the semen sample seemed to generate reactive oxygen species (ROS), which are known to be detrimental to spermatozoa [50,51,52,53]. However, a recent study has shown that there is no difference in the quality and oxidative stress of sperm cooled and stored at 5 °C for 7 days with or without seminal plasma preservation [54]. Consequently, the improvement of sperm parameters in the cooled seminal fluid after centrifugation was not due to the elimination of seminal plasma, but probably due to a mixture of glucose addition in the extender and the elimination of debris and degradation products to promote reactivation of motility and its maintenance after centrifugation [11].

In the present study, ejaculate volume, concentration, TSC, TSM, PSM, VSL, VCL, VAP, LIN, STR, WOB, percentage of spermatozoa morphology and percentage of intact plasma membrane of spermatozoa at T0 were consistent with baseline semen parameters previously reported in the literature [47, 55,56,57,58,59].

The centrifugation of fresh semen seems to reduce sperm quality, as showed by the lower kinematic sperm parameters in AC than AF and AD at T0, as already reported by some authors, who quantified the loss of spermatozoa in the supernatant as a function of centrifugation force and time [37]. Similar to our study, the authors added an extender (egg yolk-Tris) before and after centrifugation, before cooling and storage at 5 °C for three days. The sperm samples were centrifuged at 180 x g, 720 x g, 1620 x g, and 2880 x g for 5 min, resulting in sperm losses of 8.9%, 2.3%, 0.4% and 0.06%, respectively [37]. In our study, the percentage of sperm loss after centrifugation at 700 x g was 1.9%, slightly lower than previous results, possibly due to the different extender used and the slightly lower g-force. However, according to another study, the different centrifugation g-forces used did not seem to affect the kinematic parameters when 400, 720–900 g were compared [22]. Moreover, in this study the authors reported a decrease in sperm kinetic parameters (total and progressive motility) after cooling and storage for 24 and 48 h, similar to our results, as well as a decrease in membrane integrity and the percentage of morphologically normal sperm, regardless of the centrifugation technique used [22]. On the other hand, the improvement of sperm quality by centrifugation was evident after cooling and storage of the sperm at 5 °C. Indeed, at T24 motility of AD was significantly lower than AF, but AC showed better TSM and PMS than AD. These results were even more pronounced at T48, when a second centrifugation on the semen stored for 48 h (A2C) improved sperm kinetic parameters compared to AD and AC. All kinematics sperm parameters were significantly higher in A2C sperm compared to AD and AC. A significant increase of percentage of morphologically normal spermatozoa and spermatozoa with intact plasma membrane was also observed in A2C compared to AD and AC, probably due to the elimination of damaged spermatozoa.

The effects of centrifugation before, after, and before and after cooling was investigated in another study [33]. In contrast to our results, the authors found an improvement in semen that was centrifuged only after cooling compared to centrifugation before cooling and before and after cooling [33]. However, in the aforementioned study, a different extender was used and the second centrifugation on cooled semen was performed after 72 h of storage instead of 48 h, thus results are not perfectly comparable.

In our work, semen differences between breeds belonging to three classes of weight (5–15 kg, 15–25 kg and > 25 kg) have been considered. Indeed, there are numerous dog breeds that vary considerably in size. Several studies have shown an association between canine body weight and total sperm count, but differences in morpho-functional characteristics between breeds and their size remain a topic of debate in the scientific community [56, 60, 61]. It has been shown that there is a significant correlation between body weight and total sperm output (TSO) in dogs [56]. This positive correlation between body weight and TSO suggests that sperm production in dogs is mainly influenced by the total weight of functional testicular tissue, which is higher in larger dogs and lower in smaller dogs [62, 63]. In addition, one study found that dogs with a higher body weight also tended to produce ejaculates with a lower curvilinear velocity, suggesting that their spermatozoa have a lower intrinsic velocity [56]. As suggested in bovine males, increased body weight may interfere with scrotal or testicular thermoregulation, reducing the amount of heat that can be radiated and evaporated from the scrotum. As a result, the temperature of the testes and scrotum may increase, having a negative effect on sperm quality parameters [64, 65]. It is crucial to evaluate not only the different size categories (small, medium and large), but also individual breeds, as differences in semen parameters have been observed [60]. Therefore, further research should focus on specific breeds, taking into account the potential impact of the technical characteristics of computerized semen analysers [66, 67]. With increasing specialization in breed selection and breeding practices, the evaluation of semen handling in dogs becomes even more important to improve reproductive performance.

Some limitations are present in this study. First, no data on potential DNA damage are reported in this paper; second, sperm parameters were evaluated after cooling at T24 and T48, whereas no information are available on frozen semen and after long-term sperm storage. Thus, future approaches should investigate in detail the effects of a second centrifugation on long-term cryopreserved sperm, considering other sperm characteristics such as sperm membrane integrity, acrosome integrity, DNA fragmentation and kinematic parameters.

Conclusions

This article contains additional information on semen manipulation techniques. Centrifugation is a quick and easy method to select sperm with higher motility and remove debris. Analysis of the data shows that semen samples that were centrifuged and then cooled at 5 °C had acceptable semen parameters, especially in terms of motility, with a gradual decrease in the serial evaluations after 24 and 48 h, which can be improved by a second centrifugation of the cooled semen after 48 h of storage. This study shows that semen handling has undeniable advantages in terms of preserving the minimum semen characteristics necessary to achieve acceptable pregnancy rates, even beyond 24 h, using cooled semen stored at 5 °C. A limitation of this study may be the lack of data on sperm recovery rate, which may affect the overall understanding of the study results and conclusions. Future studies should evaluate the sperm recovery rate after a second centrifugation of semen refrigerated at 5 °C for 48 h.

Data availability

The datasets used during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. Root Kustritz MV. The value of canine semen evaluation for practitioners. Theriogenology. 2007;68:329–37.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Chong AP, Walters CA, Weinrieb SA. The neglected laboratory test. The semen analysis. J Androl. 1983;4:280–2.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Comhaire FH, Huysse S, Hinting A, Vermeulen L, Schoonjans F, Opinion. Objective semen analysis: has the target been reached? Hum Reprod. 1992;7:237–41.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Rijsselaere T, Van Soom A, Maes D, De Kruif A. Use of the sperm quality analyzer (SQA II-C) for the assessment of dog sperm quality. Reprod Domest Anim. 2002;37:158–63.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Vantman D, Koukoulis G, Dennison L, Zinaman M, Sherins RJ. Computer-assisted semen analysis: evaluation of method and assessment of the influence of sperm concentration on linear velocity determination. Fertil Steril. 1988;49:510–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Hesser A, Darr C, Gonzales K, Power H, Scanlan T, Thompson J, et al. Semen evaluation and fertility assessment in a purebred dog breeding facility. Theriogenology. 2017;87:115–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Den Daas JHG, De Jong G, Lansbergen LMTE, Van Wagtendonk-De Leeuw AM. The relationship between the number of spermatozoa inseminated and the reproductive efficiency of individual dairy bulls. J Dairy Sci. 1998;81:1714–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Concannon PW, Battista M. Canine semen freezing and artificial insemination. In: Kirk RW, Bonagura JD, editors. Current veterinary therapy X: small animal practice. Philadelphia: W. B. Saunders Co; 1989. pp. 1247–59.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Thomassen R, Sanson G, Krogenæs A, Fougner JA, Berg KA, Farstad W. Artificial insemination with frozen semen in dogs: a retrospective study of 10 years using a non-surgical approach. Theriogenology. 2006;66:1645–50.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Shahiduzzaman AKM, Linde-Forsberg C. Induced immotility during long-term storage at + 5°C does not prolong survival of dog spermatozoa. Theriogenology. 2007;68:920–33.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Verstegen JP, Onclin K, Iguer-Ouada M. Long-term motility and fertility conservation of chilled canine semen using egg yolk added tris–glucose extender: in vitro and in vivo studies. Theriogenology. 2005;64:720–33.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Ponglowhapan S, Essén-Gustavsson B, Linde Forsberg C. Influence of glucose and fructose in the extender during long-term storage of chilled canine semen. Theriogenology. 2004;62:1498–517.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Nguyen VV, Ponchunchoovong S, Kupittayanant S, Kupittayanant P. Effects of egg yolk and soybean lecithin on sperm quality determined by computer-assisted sperm analysis and confocal laser scanning microscope in chilled canine sperm. Vet Med Sci. 2019;5:345–60.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Martínez-Barbitta M, Rivera Salinas C. Evaluation of chilled dog semen extended with sperm activator. Front Vet Sci. 2022;8:764750.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Linde-Forsberg C, Ström Holst B, Govette G. Comparison of fertility data from vaginal vs intrauterine insemination of frozen-thawed dog semen: a retrospective study. Theriogenology. 1999;52:11–23.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Love CC, Thompson JA, Brinsko SP, Blanchard TL, Varner DD. Effect of inter-stallion seminal plasma variability on motility, viability, and DNA integrity of cauda epididymal sperm. Anim Reprod Sci. 2010;121:191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. England GCW, Allen WE. Factors affecting the viability of canine spermatozoa. Theriogenology. 1992;37:373–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Kawano N, Shimada M, Terada T. Motility and penetration competence of frozen–thawed miniature pig spermatozoa are substantially altered by exposure to seminal plasma before freezing. Theriogenology. 2004;61:351–64.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Gasset M, Magdaleno L, Calvete JJ. Biophysical study of the perturbation of model membrane structure caused by seminal plasma protein PDC-109. Arch Biochem Biophys. 2000;374:241–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Cunha ICN, Lopes MD. Effect of centrifugation on quality of canine semen. Arq Bras Med Vet Zootec. 2009;61:104–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Carrell DT, Kuneck PH, Peterson CM, Hatasaka HH, Jones KP, Campbell BF. A randomized, prospective analysis of five sperm preparation techniques before intrauterine insemination of husband sperm. Fertil Steril. 1998;69:122–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Sugai N, Werre S, Cecere J, Balogh O. Defining an optimal range of centrifugation parameters for canine semen processing. Animals. 2023;13:1421.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Farstad W, Berg KA. Factors influencing the success rate of artificial insemination with frozen semen in the dog. J Reprod Fertil Suppl. 1989;39:289–92.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Fougner JA. Artificial insemination in fox breeding. J Reprod Fertil Suppl. 1989;39:317–23.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Peña AI, Barrio F, Quintela LA, Herradón PG. Effect of different glycerol treatments on frozen-thawed dog sperm longevity and acrosomal integrity. Theriogenology. 1998;50:163–74.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Rota A, Iguer-Ouada M, Verstegen J, Linde-Forsberg C. Fertility after vaginal or uterine deposition of dog semen frozen in a tris extender with or without equex STM paste. Theriogenology. 1999;51:1045–58.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Thomas PGA, Larsen RE, Burns JM, Hahn CN. A comparison of three packaging techniques using two extenders for the cryopreservation of canine semen. Theriogenology. 1993;40:1199–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Hoogewijs M, Rijsselaere T, De Vliegher S, Vanhaesebrouck E, De Schauwer C, Govaere J, et al. Influence of different centrifugation protocols on equine semen preservation. Theriogenology. 2010;74:118–26.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Jasko DJ, Lein DH, Foote RH. The repeatability and effect of season on seminal characteristics and computer-aided sperm analysis in the stallion. Theriogenology. 1991;35:317–27.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Pickett BW, Sullivan JJ, Byers WW, Pace MM, Remmenga EE. Effect of centrifugation and seminal plasma on motility and fertility of stallion and bull spermatozoa. Fertil Steril. 1975;26:167–74.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Domain G, Ali Hassan H, Wydooghe E, Bogado Pascottini O, Johannisson A, Morrell JM, et al. Influence of single layer centrifugation with Canicoll on semen freezability in dogs. Animals. 2022;12:714.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Dorado J, Gálvez MJ, Demyda-Peyrás S, Ortiz I, Morrell JM, Crespo F, et al. Differences in preservation of canine chilled semen using simple sperm washing, single-layer centrifugation and modified swim-up preparation techniques. Reprod Fertil Dev. 2016;28:1545.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Gálvez MJ, Ortiz I, Hidalgo M, Morrell JM, Dorado J. Should single layer centrifugation of dog semen be done before or after the semen is cooled? Vet Rec. 2015;176:359–359.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Hidalgo M, Portero JM, Demyda-Peyrás S, Ortiz I, Dorado J. Cryopreservation of canine semen after cold storage in a Neopor box: effect of extender, centrifugation and storage time. Vet Rec. 2014;175:20–20.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Luño V, González N, Martínez F, Revert A, Morrell JM, Gil L. Colloid centrifugation reduces bacterial load in chilled dog semen. Anim Reprod Sci. 2020;219:106539.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Koderle M, Aurich C, Schäfer-Somi S. The influence of cryopreservation and seminal plasma on the chromatin structure of dog spermatozoa. Theriogenology. 2009;72:1215–20.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Rijsselaere T, Van Soom A, Maes D, De Kruif A. Effect of centrifugation on in vitro survival of fresh diluted canine spermatozoa. Theriogenology. 2002;57:1669–81.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Coetzee K, Franken DR, Kruger TF, Lombard CJ. Effect of multiple centrifugations on the evaluation of the acrosome reaction in human spermatozoa. Andrologia. 2009;24:331–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Alvarez JG, Lasso JL, Blasco L, Nuñez RC, Heyner S, Caballero PP, et al. Centrifugation of human spermatozoa induces sublethal damage; separation of human spermatozoa from seminal plasma by a dextran swim-up procedure without centrifugation extends their motile lifetime. Hum Reprod. 1993;8:1087–92.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Neila-Montero M, Riesco MF, Montes-Garrido R, Palacin-Martinez C, Chamorro C, de Paz P, et al. An optimized centrifugation protocol for ram sperm ensuring high sample yield, quality and fertility. Theriogenology. 2022;191:179–91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Ferrer MS, Lyle SK, Eilts BE, Eljarrah AH, Paccamonti DL. Factors affecting sperm recovery rates and survival after centrifugation of equine semen. Theriogenology. 2012;78:1814–23.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Zalata A, Hafez T, Comhaire F. Evaluation of the role of reactive oxygen species in male infertility. Hum Reprod. 1995;10:1444–51.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Zini A, Finelli A, Phang D, Jarvi K. Influence of semen processing technique on human sperm DNA integrity. Urology. 2000;56:1081–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Katkov II, Katkova N, Critser JK, Mazur P. Mouse spermatozoa in high concentrations of glycerol: chemical toxicity vs osmotic shock at normal and reduced oxygen concentrations. Cryobiology. 1998;37:325–38.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Knop K, Hoffmann N, Rath D, Sieme H. Evaluation of slow cooling after centrifugation and glycerol addition at 22 degrees C versus direct freezing of semen in stallions with good and poor sperm longevity. Anim Reprod Sci. 2005;89:299–302.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Len JA, Jenkins JA, Eilts BE, Paccamonti DL, Lyle SK, Hosgood G. Immediate and delayed (after cooling) effects of centrifugation on equine sperm. Theriogenology. 2010;73:225–31.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Johnston SD, Root Kustritz MV, Olson PS. Canine and feline theriogenology. 1st ed. Philadelphia, PA: Saunders; 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Dorado J, Gálvez MJ, Morrell JM, Alcaráz L, Hidalgo M. Use of single-layer centrifugation with Androcoll-C to enhance sperm quality in frozen-thawed dog semen. Theriogenology. 2013;80:955–62.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Hollinshead FK, Hanlon DW. Factors affecting the reproductive performance of bitches: a prospective cohort study involving 1203 inseminations with fresh and frozen semen. Theriogenology. 2017;101:62–72.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Goericke-Pesch S, Klaus D, Failing K, Wehrend A. Longevity of chilled canine semen comparing different extenders. Anim Reprod Sci. 2012;135:97–105.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Rota A, Ström B, Linde-Forsberg C. Effects of seminal plasma and three extenders on canine semen stored at 4°C. Theriogenology. 1995;44:885–900.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Tesi M, Sabatini C, Vannozzi I, Di Petta G, Panzani D, Camillo F, et al. Variables affecting semen quality and its relation to fertility in the dog: a retrospective study. Theriogenology. 2018;118:34–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Farstad W. Cryopreservation of canine semen - new challenges. Reprod Domest Anim. 2009;44:336–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Araujo MS, De Oliveira Henriques Paulo OL, Paulini F, De Souza Ramos Angrimani D, Tsunemi MH, De Dell’Aqua PF. Seminal plasma does not influence canine semen stored at 5°C for long-term conservation. Biopreserv Biobank. 2022;20:149–62.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. England GCW, von Heimendahl A. British Small Animal Veterinary Association. editors. BSAVA manual of canine and feline reproduction and neonatology. 2nd ed. Quedgeley, Gloucester [England]: British Small Animal Veterinary Association; 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  56. Rijsselaere T, Maes D, Hoflack G, De Kruif A, Van Soom A. Effect of body weight, age and breeding history on canine sperm quality parameters measured by the Hamilton-Thorne analyser. Reprod Domest Anim. 2007;42:143–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Thrall MA, editor. Veterinary hematology and clinical chemistry. 2nd ed. Ames, Iowa: Wiley-Blackwell; 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  58. Iguer-ouada M, Verstegen JP. Evaluation of the Hamilton Thorn computer-based automated system for dog semen analysis. Theriogenology. 2001;55:733–49.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Yeste M, Bonet S, Rodríguez-Gil JE, Rivera Del Álamo MM. Evaluation of sperm motility with CASA-Mot: which factors may influence our measurements? Reprod Fertil Dev. 2018;30:789.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Goericke-Pesch S, Failing K. Retrospective analysis of canine semen evaluations with special emphasis on the use of the hypoosmotic swelling (HOS) test and acrosomal evaluation using Spermac ®. Reprod Domest Anim. 2013;48:213–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Dahlbom M, Andersson M, Huszenicza G, Alanko M. Poor semen quality in Irish wolfhounds: a clinical, hormonal and spermatological study. J Small Anim Pract. 1995;36:547–52.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Olar TT, Amann RP, Pickett BW. Relationships among testicular size, daily production and output of spermatozoa, and extragonadal spermatozoal reserves of the dog. Biol Reprod. 1983;29:1114–20.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Hendrikse J, Antonisse HW. [Evaluation of dog sperm]. Tijdschr Diergeneeskd. 1984;109:171–4.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Coulter GH, Cook RB, Kastelic JP. Effects of dietary energy on scrotal surface temperature, seminal quality, and sperm production in young beef bulls. J Anim Sci. 1997;75:1048.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Hoflack G, Van Soom A, Maes D, De Kruif A, Opsomer G, Duchateau L. Breeding soundness and libido examination of Belgian Blue and Holstein Friesian artificial insemination bulls in Belgium and the Netherlands. Theriogenology. 2006;66:207–16.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Contri A, Valorz C, Faustini M, Wegher L, Carluccio A. Effect of semen preparation on casa motility results in cryopreserved bull spermatozoa. Theriogenology. 2010;74:424–35.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Gloria A, Carluccio A, Wegher L, Robbe D, Befacchia G, Contri A. Single and double layer centrifugation improve the quality of cryopreserved bovine sperm from poor quality ejaculates. J Anim Sci Biotechnol. 2016;7:30.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge the University of Messina for supporting the publication of this paper through the APC initiative.

Funding

The authors declare that there was no funding.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Veterinary Sciences, University of Messina, Viale Palatucci, 13, Messina, 98168, Italy

    Letizia Sinagra, Giulia Donato, Tiziana Caspanello, Giorgia Pettina, Massimo De Majo, Santo Cristarella, Marco Quartuccio & Viola Zappone

  2. Department of Veterinary Medicine, University of Perugia, Via San Costanzo 4, Perugia, 06126, Italy

    Angela Polisca & Sara Pastore

Authors
  1. Letizia Sinagra
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Angela Polisca
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Giulia Donato
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Tiziana Caspanello
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Giorgia Pettina
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Sara Pastore
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Massimo De Majo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Santo Cristarella
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Marco Quartuccio
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Viola Zappone
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Conceptualization was performed by LS, AP, MQ and VZ. All authors participated in the design of the study. Statistical analysis was performed by GD and TC. Semen collection and analysis was performed by LS, GP, SP, MQ and VZ; LS and VZ wrote the first drafts of the study, but all authors contributed to the writing process. Revision of the article was performed by AP, MDM, and SC. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tiziana Caspanello.

Ethics declarations

Ethical approval

This study did not require official or institutional ethical approval. The animals were handled according to high ethical standards and national legislation.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sinagra, L., Polisca, A., Donato, G. et al. Enhancing canine semen quality through a second centrifugation after 48 hours of storage: a comparative study. Acta Vet Scand 66, 47 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13028-024-00767-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13028-024-00767-5

Keywords

Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica

ISSN: 1751-0147