Open Access

Comparison of Worm Control Strategies in Grazing Sheep in Denmark

  • ME Boa1,
  • SM Thamsborg2, 3,
  • AA Kassuku1 and
  • HO Bøgh3
Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica200142:57

https://doi.org/10.1186/1751-0147-42-57

Received: 11 April 2000

Accepted: 19 September 2000

Published: 31 March 2001

Abstract

Control of nematode parasites with reduced reliance on the use of anthelmintics was studied in 16 ewes with suckling twin lambs on contaminated pasture in Denmark. Ewes and lambs were treated with albendazole at turn-out 3 May. Ewes were removed from the groups on 26 July, and lambs were slaughtered on 11 October. The animals were allocated to 4 groups of 8 lambs and their 4 ewes. Group TS was treated with albendazole at weeks 3, 6 and 8 after turnout and set-stocked; group TM was similarly treated but moved to clean pasture in conjunction with the last drenching; group US was untreated and set-stocked, and group UM was left untreated but moved to clean pasture week 8 after turn-out. Supplementary feed was offered in June and August due to scarcity of pasture. Strategic treatments of ewes and lambs weeks 3, 6 and 8 after turn-out, with or without a move to clean pasture, were highly effective in controlling nematode infections for most of the season. This was reflected in better weight gains and carcass characteristics in the treated compared to untreated lambs, resulting in an average increase in the value of the product by 36%. The effect of moving without treatment (UM) on faecal egg counts was limited but peak pasture infectivity was reduced to less than 10% compared to the set-stocked group and weight gains of lambs were significantly better despite poor feed availability in late season. The study showed that under set-stocked conditions repeated anthelmintic treatments of both ewes and lambs in early season may ensure sufficient nematode control whereas moving animals to clean pasture without dosing was less efficient. The latter may, however, still be a viable option in organic and other production systems where routine use of anthelmintics is banned, particularly if weaning and moving are combined or a second move is performed.

Keywords

gastrointestinal nematodesparasite controlsheepruminantsgrazing management

Sammendrag

Strategier til forebyggelse af indvoldsorm hos græssende får i Danmark.

Forebyggelse af indvoldsorm med reduceret anvendelse af ormemiddel blev undersøgt under danske forhold. Moderfår med tvillingelam blev behandlet med albendazol og udbundet på smittet mark 3. maj. Dyrene blev fordelt på 4 hold bestående af 8 lam og deres 4 moderfår. Hold TS og TM blev behandlet med albendazol 3, 6 og 8 uger efter udbinding. Hold TS forblev på samme mark hele græsningssæsonen, mens hold TM blev flyttet til ren mark i forbindelse med sidste behandling (uge 8). Hold US og UM var ubehandlede. Hold US forblev på samme mark, mens hold UM blev flyttet til ren mark i uge 8. Moderfårene blev fjernet fra grupperne 26. juli, og alle lam blev slagtet 11. oktober. Tilskudsfoder blev tildelt i juni og august på grund af græsmangel. De strategiske ormebehandlinger af moderfår og lam uge 3, 6 og 8 efter udbinding, med eller uden flytning til ren mark, medførte en effektiv kontrol med indvoldsorm bedømt ud fra ægudskillelse og græsmarkssmitte. Dette afspejledes i statistisk signifikant bedre tilvækster og bedre slagtekvalitet sammenlignet med ubehandlede lam og dermed 36% bedre afregning af slagtekroppene. Flytning til ren mark uden behandling af moderfår og lam (hold UM) havde begrænset effekt på dyrenes ægudskillelse, men græssmitten var reduceret, og trods græsmangel sidst på sæsonen var lammenes tilvækster signifikant bedre end på det ikke flyttede hold (US). Forsøget viste, at flytning til ren mark uden ormebehandling ikke er så effektivt til kontrol med indvoldsorm som gentagne ormebehandlinger i forsommeren. Strategien “flytning uden behandling” (evt. gentagne flytninger) bør dog fortsat betragtes som et alternativ i økologiske og andre produktionssystemer, hvor anvendelse af ormemiddel ønskes begrænset.

Introduction

Gastrointestinal nematodes of sheep pose a major threat to welfare, good health and optimal growth of grazing lambs in most production systems. Control is essential and has for some decades relied entirely on the use of anthelmintics. However, routine and indiscriminate use of anthelmintics apart from being costly have resulted in the development of strains of nematodes resistant to anthelmintics, causing severe problems with control in major sheep raising areas. Recently, anthelmintic resistance in sheep has been demonstrated in Scandinavia [2, 20, 14]. The main objective of present day control is to maintain parasite populations at levels that do not significantly affect health of the host animal or severely limit the production and maintain drugs of high efficacy. This must be accomplished by introducing control programmes based on sound knowledge of the epidemiology of the parasites and of the susceptibility of the hosts. Programmes under Danish conditions should be based on pasture management with minimal use of anthelmintics, and in the future perhaps biological control like nematophagous fungi [9].

Pasture management specifically aiming at worm control includes clean-grazing systems [22] and dose-and-move strategies [5]. Both options rely on efficacious anthelmintics. The farmers' adoption rate of these principles has been low in Denmark, probably due to practical problems and because grazing livestock traditionally is moved according to availability of feed [15]. A major obstacle to clean-grazing in smaller enterprises and on farms having only permanent sheep pastures is provision of worm-free (clean) pastures at the time of turn-out. The rationale of the dose-and-move strategy is to extend the effectiveness of a single treatment by moving animals to a clean pasture in July to limit reinfection from the second wave of infection. Clean pastures at that time of the season can be acheived by refraining sheep from grazing the pastures the same year or by introducing other grazing livestock in spring. This may, however, also pose problems as most enterprises only have sheep, and facilities for hay or silage making may be lacking. Pasture spelling on its own would be uneconomical and perhaps not result in sufficient decline in number of infective larvae. The predominant species in northern temperate areas, Trichostrongylus and Ostertagia spp. have been shown to survive winter conditions in Denmark. This population of infective larvae gradually get killed by warm weather in spring until almost complete extinction in July whereas Nematodirus spp. larvae are more resistant to weather conditions or eggs hatch later [13, 21, 23]. In first year grazing heifers, a move to clean pasture without dosing has proved almost as effective as 'dose and move' [8, 19] but repeated moves may be necessary under practical conditions [7].

The aim of this study was to compare under northern temperate conditions the effectiveness of different worm control strategies, related to pasture management: strategic treatments and setstocking (group TS), strategic treatments and move to clean pasture (TM), no treatments and setstocking (US) and finally, no treatment and move to clean pastures (UM).

Materials and methods

Study area and pasture management

The study was conducted at the field station of the Royal Veterinary and Agricultural University, 15 km west of Copenhagen, in 1993. A permanent pasture of 1.2 ha grazed by nematode infected sheep for the last 4 years was divided into 4 equal sized paddocks (A, B, C and D). The pasture consisting of predominantly grasses (Lolium perenne, Festuca rubra, Poa pratensis, Festuca pratensis) and little white clover (Trifolium repens) was fertilized with complete fertilizer (NPK 21-4-10) at the rate of 120 kg and 60 kg N/ha on 23 March and 28 June, respectively. Hay was cut and removed from paddocks B and D on 1 June. Due to a very dry period and expected scarcity of grass, the grass was cut at a level of 8 cm. The amount of herbage on offer to animals was estimated using a rising plate meter constructed with modifications according to [4]. By lowering a circular aluminium plate (319 g, 0.42 g/cm2) sliding on a measuring stick, the height of the slightly compressed grass was measured. In each paddock being grazed, measurements were made fortnightly in 50 places randomly selected by walking in a W-shape manner similar to the method used for herbage sampling. Weekly precipitation as well as daily maximum and minimum temperatures were obtained from a meteorological unit within 1 km of the experimental plot.

Experimental design

Sixteen Leicester or Leicester crossbred ewes (52–62 kg) with twin lambs were allocated to 4 groups (TS, TM, US and UM) according to weight, age, sex and sire of lambs (Table 1). Each group comprised 3 ram and 5 ewe lambs and their ewes. At turn-out on 3 May, all animals (ewes + lambs) were dosed with albendazole (Valbazen®, Smith Kline) at the dose rate of 7.5 mg/kg body weight. Ewes and lambs in group TS and TM were further treated with albendazole at weeks 3, 6 and 8 after turnout, while group US and UM were left untreated. Two groups (TS and TM) were turned out onto paddock A while US and UM were put in paddock C. Groups TM and UM were moved to paddock B and D, respectively, on 28 June and consequently the stocking rate (SR) was halved in all the groups; from 52 lambs/ha to 26 lambs/ha. Moving the animals coincided with deworming of groups TM and TS i.e. 8 weeks post turnout. Groups TS and US were thus set-stocked on contaminated pastures. Lambs were weaned on 26 July (age approx. 4 1/2 mo.) by removing ewes from the paddocks. All lambs were slaughtered on 11 October at the end of study. Due to scarcity of grass in June and a marked decline in live weight of ewes, each group was fed 4 kg of whole barley per day from 14 June to 28 June. Lambs were supplemented post-weaning from 26 July to 6 September receiving 4 kg whole barley per group per day (0.5 kg/lamb/day).
Table 1

Experimental design and distribution of lambs according to breed, age and live weight (mean ± s.d.) at turn-out May 3.

Group

n

Strategic anthelmintic treatments (wks. 3+6–8)

Grazing management

Lambs at turn-out

    

Breed

Age (days)

Live weight (kg)

    

(L × F) × T1

L × F2

  

TS

8

+

Set-stocked (paddock A)

6

2

44 ± 8

10.6 ± 2.5

TM

8

+

Moved (paddock A to B)

4

4

43 ± 9

9.6 ± 2.1

US

8

-

Set-stocked (paddock C)

6

2

47 ± 4

10.1 ± 1.6

UM

8

-

Moved (paddock C to D)

4

4

45 ± 4

9.5 ± 2.1

1 (Leicester × Finn) × Texel. 2 Leicester × Finn.

TS = treated and set-stocked. TM = treated and moved. US = untreated and set-stocked. UM = untreated and moved.

Sampling and analyses

Rectal faecal samples and blood samples by jugular vein puncture together with live weights were obtained at 2 weeks intervals for each animal from turnout to the end of experiment (week 0–22). Animals were observed daily. Faecal egg counts were determined using a modified McMaster method [10]. Eggs were recorded as Other strongyles or Nematodirus spp. Eggs of Trichuris, Capillaria, and Strongyloides were disregarded in results presentation due to a very sporadic occurrence and expected low pathogenicity. Separate faecal cultures of ewes and lambs were set up. Faeces were pooled per group by mixing 1 g of faeces per animal with vermiculite and kept moist and aerated for 10–14 days [11]. Larvae were identified by morphological and morphometric features using keys of [1].

Every 2 weeks, 2 samples of herbage per paddock were analysed for infective larvae. In the morning (9–12 a.m.) a wisp of grass was plucked by hand or cut every 5 m, irrespective of any faecal deposit, when crossing the paddock in a W-shaped manner. The grass was soaked overnight in tap water and examined for the presence of infective larvae using the method of [18] without addition of bile. Infective larvae were counted and identified as above, although, larvae of Ostertagia spp. and Trichostrongylus spp. were not differentiated.

At slaughter, worm counts of the abomasum and small intestine were carried out according to [25]. Lamb carcasses were weighed and graded for body conformation (0–10, where 10 is prime quality and 5 medium) and fat layer (1–5, where 3 is normal fat layer and 5 too much fat) by experienced meat officers. Price per kg was determined according to market price.

Statistical analysis

Group means of lambs' weight gains, weight of carcass, conformation, fatness, carcass value and log-transformed worm counts were analysed by analysis of variance using GLM procedure of SAS (SAS, 1990) with the main factors moving (MOVE, +/-) and strategic treatments (TRT, +/-) and their interaction (MOVE*TRT). Sex, breed and age were included. Factors other than main factors were stepwise excluded from the model if p > 0.20.

Results

Meteorology and pasture availability

In early summer there was a severe shortage of rain followed by heavy rains from mid July to mid August. A short dry spell was observed in the second half of August. September and October were very wet (Fig. 1). The mean grass heights of paddocks A and C declined gradually from turnout to mid July due to the very dry weather and high stocking rate (Fig. 2). Thereafter, coinciding with weaning and supplementation of lambs and rainfall in late July, a gradual rise was observed in both paddocks up to late August and early September. From mid September to the end, mean grass height declined, probably due to cessation of growth. In paddocks B and D, the height was rising after cutting in June before grazing took place. In July, mean heights declined gradually followed by a small increase in August similar to paddock A and C. Paddocks B and D had consistently higher mean grass heights than in A and C, but wilted straw material constituted a much larger proportion from mid September to early October.
Figure 1

Meteorological observations made near experimental plot in 1993 (Courtesy of Dr. S. Jensen, Dept. of Agricultural Sciences, Section of Soil and Water and Plant Nutrition, The Royal Vet. and Agric. University, Copenhagen).

Figure 2

Mean grass heights of paddocks grazed by experimental animals.

Clinical observations

Diarrhoea was noted amongst ewes on 26 July in groups US and UM. Two cases of mild diarrhoea were seen in group TS, while no case in group TM. In lambs, diarrhoea was first noted on 26 July with 6 and 5 lambs in groups US and UM, respectively being affected. Mild cases of diarrhoea were observed in few lambs of groups TS and TM in August while most of the lambs in groups US and UM started to recover. At the end of September, the majority of lambs in all the groups had severe diarrhoea. Tapeworm (Moniezia expansa) segments in faeces of lambs were first observed at the end of July and by the end of the study, all lambs were infected.

Faecal egg counts of ewes

Mean faecal egg counts (FECs) of ewes in groups TS and TM were nil in May and below 100 epg for the rest of the study, apart from a brief rise to 250 epg in group TM in late July at the time of weaning. FECs of untreated groups (US+UM) rose to a peak of 375 epg in mid June and gradually decreased to nil at weaning in late July. In May and June approximately 60% of the larvae from cultures were Ostertagia spp., while 30% were Trichostrongylus spp. In July, Trichostrongylus spp. were predominant in all the groups (approx. 60%).

Faecal egg counts of lambs: Other strongyles and Nematodirusspp

A very pronounced rise in mean FEC of group UM observed in June-July was due to 3 animals only out of 8 lambs in the group (Fig. 3a). The 3 animals had FECs of 3000–4000 epg, while the FECs of the rest of the lambs were within the range 120–520 epg. During this period strategically treated groups (TS and TM) had lower FECs than untreated groups, whereas they rose in September to FEC levels comparable in all the 4 groups. In May and June, the eggs were predominantly Ostertagia spp. (approximately 60%) in groups US and UM but later in July, Trichostrongylus spp. were the predominant species in all 4 groups.
Figure 3

Mean faecal egg counts of lambs: (a) other strongyles; (b) Nematodirus spp. The moving of TM and UM on June 28 indicated by an arrow.

Very low mean Nematodirus spp. FECs were observed in groups TS and TM from early May to late July (Fig. 3b), but counts rose subsequently. Groups US and UM rose in mid June from negligible levels to levels around 150 epg in July/August. In late August group UM had a pronounced second rise, 3 animals only contributing with FECs of 1120, 820 and 820 epg. FECs for the rest of the lambs ranged between 120 and 340.

Pasture larval counts: Ostertagia/Trichostrongylus spp. and Nematodirusspp

Pasture contamination remained low in all 4 paddocks until late June, and there was no notable differences at the time of the move between paddocks whether grazed or cut for hay (Fig. 4a). Paddock B being grazed by group TM continued with very low counts (<500 L3/kg) until the end of the experiment. In paddock D, a minor rise was observed in late July, 4 weeks after introduction of infected animals (group UM). In paddock A which was grazed for the entire season by group TS, an increase occurred in mid July, 2 weeks after cessation of the strategic treatments. In paddock C grazed for the entire season by group US, a pronounced rise (maximum 65,000 L3/kg) was observed in July coinciding with rains on 23–26 July.
Figure 4

Herbage larval counts of the four paddocks: (a) Ostertagia/Trichostrongylus spp. (b). Nematodirus spp. Paddock A and C co-grazed by TS/TM and US/UM, respectively, before moving TM and UM on June 28.

From early May to mid June pasture larval counts of Nematodirus spp. were very low (Fig. 4b) followed by a sharp rise in late June in all the paddocks, including previously ungrazed paddocks (B and D). A dramatic synchronous decrease was seen in early August. Peak values were higher on paddocks C and D being grazed earlier in the same year.

Worm counts

O. circumcincta was the dominant species encountered with lesser numbers of O. trifurcata, T. vitrinus, N. spathiger, and N. filicollis encountered. Insignificant numbers of T. axei, N. helvetianus, Trichuris ovis and Chabertia ovina were found. The heaviest mean worm burdens were seen in untreated groups (US and UM) (Table 2). The ANOVA on log-transformed counts showed significant effects of strategic treatments on immature Ostertagia (p < 0.05), Trichostrongylus (p < 0.0001) and total counts (back-transformed least square (LS) means of treated: 4358 and untreated: 8102; p < 0.05). Higher Trichostrongylus numbers (p < 0.05) and marginally significant higher total worm counts (LS-means: 7375 vs. 4783; p = 0.09) were noted in the groups being moved. Ram lambs had more worms than ewe lambs (+63%; p = 0.06). The interaction between treatment and moving was not significant in any species.
Table 2

Worm counts of lambs at end of study (arithmetic means ± s.d.).

Group

n

Abomasum

Small intestine

Total

  

Ostertagia spp.

Digestion

T. vitrinus

N. spathiger

N. filicollis

Immatures

 

TS

8

1095 ± 565

1437 ± 801

37 ± 74

121 ± 159

38 ± 63

885 ± 2343

3615 ± 2759

TM

8

2690 ± 2650

2546 ± 2074

161 ± 162

296 ± 466

464 ± 556

735 ± 1017

6893 ± 4860

US

8

2328 ± 1909

4275 ± 3556

540 ± 260

83 ± 233

217 ± 382

1585 ± 1871

9028 ± 6524

UM

8

2828 ± 1320

4473 ± 3214

727 ± 426

166 ± 186

640 ± 1140

1343 ± 2179

10175 ± 4891

TS = treated and set-stocked. TM = treated and moved. US = untreated and set-stocked. UM = untreated and moved.

Weight gains of lambs

All groups showed a markedly reduced growth rate after 6 weeks on pasture (Fig. 5), probably related to the low availability of herbage and thus reduced lactation. The move to clean pastures of groups TM and UM was accompanied by a dramatic increase in mean daily weight gains compared to the set-stocked groups (week 8–12; 221 g/day vs.102 g/day; p < 0.0001), irrespective of treatments. After weaning in week 12 and until the end of the study, the moved groups had significantly lower growth rates compared to the set-stocked groups (149 g/day vs.191 g/day; p < 0.001). Thus, in the whole period from moving until end of study (week 8–22), the effect of moving was not significant but treated lambs performed better than untreated (p < 0.01) (Table 3). Two lambs in groups TS and UM, respectively, showed signs of ill thrift 2–4 weeks after turn-out and never exceeded a body weight of 27 kg. These lambs were probably mismothered and were excluded from the analysis. Over the entire grazing season (week 0–22), the treated lambs grew 13% better than untreated lambs (p < 0.001) but the effect of moving was not significant. Although moving to clean pasture had only a temporary effect on weight gains in treated lambs, untreated and moved lambs (UM) had 15% higher mean weight gain than untreated and set-stocked lambs (US) (comparison from week 8 to 22; repeated measures ANOVA; p < 0.05). Viewed over the entire season, the difference in weight gain between UM and US was 9%. In accordance with these findings, the interaction between treatment and moving was marginally significant (Table 3). Ram lambs performed generally better than ewe lambs (p < 0.01) whereas breed and age at turn-out did not influence the weight gains apart from initial 8 weeks.
Figure 5

Mean accumulated weight gains of lambs. The moving of TM and UM on June 28 indicated by an arrow.

Table 3

Summary of results of analysis of variance on lambs' performance in relation to moving and treatment: least square means for daily weight gains in different periods of the grazing season.

    

Turn-out to move (week 0–8) g/day

Move to slaughter (week 8–22) g/day

Entire season (week 0–22) g/day

  

Move

Yes

n.a.

 

170

NS

204

NS

   

No

n.a.

 

165

 

201

 
  

Treat

Yes

262

NS

185

p < 0.01

215

p < 0.001

   

No

257

 

150

 

190

 

Treat

Yes

Move

Yes

n.a.

 

181

Treatment × move

212

Treatment × move

   

No

n.a.

 

190

 

219

 
 

No

Move

Yes

n.a.

 

160

p = 0.13

198

p = 0.09

   

No

n.a.

 

140

 

182

 

NS = not significant. n.a.= not applicable

Lambs' carcass weight and classification

The analysis of variance showed that strategic treatments resulted in higher mean carcass weight (LS-means: +16%; p < 0.001), better fatness score (+22%; p = 0.05) and a 36% better market value of the carcasses (p < 0.01) compared to the untreated groups, irrespective of moving (Table 4). Moving resulted in poorer conformation (-17%; p < 0.05) which may be attributed to less Texel halfbreds in moved groups. The interaction between treatment and moving was not significant in any of the parameters whereas sex influenced carcass weight (p < 0.01) and breed strongly influenced conformation (p < 0.001) and market value (p < 0.001). In general, the ANOVA-models explained a considerable part of the variation (R2: 0.37–0.63).
Table 4

Carcass characteristics of lambs slaughtered at the end of the experiment (mean ± s.d. (least square means)).

Group

n

Carcass weight (kg)

Conformation (0–10)

Fatness (1–5)

Market value (DKK)

TS

7a

19.4 ± 2.4 (19.0)

6.1 ± 1.5 (5.8)

2.9 ± 0.4 (2.8)

329 ± 83 (304)

TM

8

18.4 ± 2.9 (18.6)

4.5 ± 1.4 (4.5)

2.6 ± 0.5 (2.6)

266 ± 113 (266)

US

8

15.8 ± 2.0 (15.4)

5.0 ± 0.8 (4.6)

2.5 ± 0.5 (2.4)

237 ± 60 (207)

UM

7a

16.7 ± 1.8 (17.0)

4.0 ± 1.4 (4.1)

2.0 ± 0.6 (2.0)

203 ± 81 (212)

a) one lamb excluded due to ill thrift from turn-out, probably mismothering

Discussion

Strategic treatments of ewes and lambs weeks 3, 6 and 8 after turn-out, with or without a move to clean pasture, were highly effective in controlling strongyle infections for most of the season. Faecal egg counts of weaned lambs were low until August. Herbage infectivity of Ostertagia/Trichostrongylus remained very low in the paddocks of both treated groups throughout the season, apart from a brief increase in July on the set-stocked paddock (A), probably derived from the ewes' egg output in May-June. Lower worm counts were found at slaughter compared to untreated lambs. The effect on Nematodirus spp. infections was less pronounced but similarly, faecal egg counts rose later and were generally lower. The effect on nematode infections was reflected in better weight gains post-weaning and better carcass weights and fat cover in the treated compared to untreated lambs, resulting in an average increase in the value of the product by 36%. However, it did not result in improved weight gains in the suckling lambs up till moving i.e. the first 8 weeks on pasture. It thus emerged from the study that a move to clean pasture combined with a single anthelmintic treatment would be as good as a strategic programme on set-stocked pastures. Despite the favourable responses, diarrhoea, most likely related to nematode infections, was prevalent in both groups (and in the untreated groups) at the end of the study.

It was, however, surprising to find that moving to clean pasture week 8 did not further enhance the favourable response to treatment. On the contrary, moving to clean pasture led to higher worm burdens at slaughter, although levels still were generally low, and lamb performance was similar or lower. There may be several reasons for this finding. Firstly, ewes and lambs were reinfected because the 'clean' pasture (paddock B) was not totally without infective larvae of Ostertagia/Trichostrongylus (61 L3/kg dry herbage) at the time of the move in week 8. [16, 17]made similar observations on farms practizing 'clean' grazing, where very low initial pasture larval counts (less than 200 L3/kg) resulted in high worm burdens in tracer lambs grazing those fields in August and in pasture larval counts in excess of 8000 L3/kg, emphasizing the dangers inherent to building-up of infections. In the present study, the level of 8 cm instead of 4 cm for cutting of hay, chosen because of risk of shortage of feed due to prevailing drought, did not leave the herbage sufficiently exposed to facilitate killing of infective larvae on pasture [13]. Also the contamination with Nematodirus was substantial. Secondly, the nutritional quality of forages in the paddocks may have been an important limiting factor in the moved groups. The move in early July from approx. 6 cm in paddock A to 13 cm sward height in paddock B immediately resulted in a doubling of lambs' growth rate (and ewes'!) (data not shown). However, in August with new rains and reduced grazing due to supplementation of lambs, the regrowth was substantial in paddock A with set-stocked lambs. The height increased dramatically and most likely the feed value of the juvenile sward was higher compared to paddock B where the sward height was generally decreasing and consisted mainly of senile, wilted material. The reason for this being lack of stocking in early season, the high cutting level, and that the paddock was never grazed down properly.

It is an intriguing question as to why animals moved to clean paddocks (groups TM and UM) were generally having high worm burdens at slaughter compared to the ones remaining on contaminated pastures (groups TS and US). A study by [27] suggested that lambs reared on 'clean' pasture up to weaning did not develop a significant level of acquired immunity to helminth infections, and when challenged by appreciable numbers of infective larvae for the first time will develop higher worm burdens than lambs which have been previously exposed to infection, having been reared on permanent pastures. The latter may indeed be the case in group US being exposed to high levels of pasture contamination for the whole season and building up immunity. [26] showed that lambs exposed to high levels of larval intake from pastures were able to express immunity by resisting establishment and later to expel adult worm burdens of T. axei and T. vitrinus by 5 months of age, while lambs exposed to lower larval intake were still accumulating burdens of both species at 7 months of age.

It may be regarded as coincidental that lambs of group UM when moved had significantly higher strongyle FECs compared to co-grazed group US. As already mentioned, the elevated mean FEC came from only 3 individual lambs, and the FECs fell within one month. It is thus difficult to judge whether moving of ewes and lambs without dosing does in fact result in lower faecal egg counts. It is, however, evident that peak herbage infectivity (in July/August) was reduced to less than 10% compared to the set-stocked group where the egg output of lambs and not least ewes in May and June caused very high levels of herbage infectivity. The lower level of exposure to nematode infections in group UM was reflected in significantly better weight gains and carcass weight, although the effect on performance was severely limited by the poor feed availability in the clean paddock (D) for reasons summarized above. From weaning to the time of slaughter, the moved lambs failed to maintain the impressive weight gains seen in July. In the present study, moving took place in early July and lambs were weaned a month later. If moving and weaning coincide or lambs at weaning are moved a second time to clean pasture, the ewes' egg output will not contribute to the increase in pasture contamination in late season and better control is likely to be achieved to avoid the late cases of diarrhoea and high numbers of immature nematodes. A second move may also be advisable under a 'dose and move' strategy, as suggested by [12] who observed a dramatic increase in pasture larval counts and weight loss in late season (September) after an initially favourable parasitological response to 'dose and move' of weaners on July 2. In regions where Haemonchus contortus is prevalent, this may indeed be the case due the notoriously rapid build-up of this infection. A 'dose and move' at weaning followed by two moves without treatments in a sheep-cattle rotation system proved to be as effective as combining all three moves with anthelmintic treatments [6]. [3] demonstrated that a change to clean pasture at weaning resulted in a production response similar to, or better than, an anthelmintic treatment without moving the lambs.

An interesting finding was the uniform pattern in pasture contamination with Nematodirus spp. in all paddocks from mid June to mid July irrespective of whether they were grazed in spring or left ungrazed until 28 June. This indicates that at least part of the pasture contamination is derived from hatching of overwintered eggs or less likely, from a reservoir of larvae [21]. The rapid decline in pasture strongyle larval counts in paddock C and D in late August can partly be explained by a substantial pasture regrowth and thus dilution. Whether a secondary peak would appear later in October, as a result of lambs' egg output in September, is likely but remains speculative. A secondary peak following a decline in August/September has been observed in other studies [25].

The present study confirmed that under set-stocked conditions, where other strategies for nematode control are not available, repeated anthelmintic treatments of both ewes and lambs in early season – often termed 'poor man's clean grazing' – will probably ensure sufficient nematode control. The use of this strategy may, however, be questionable due to the risk of developing anthelmintic resistance in the nematode population, although the evidence is conflicting [5]. In the present study, a 'dose and move' approach was likely to provide a similar level of control with a reduced number of treatments. In organic production systems prophylactic use of anthelmintics is banned [24]. Despite the lack of control of worm burdens, the present and earlier studies suggest that moving animals to clean pasture without anthelmintic treatment may also be an option for control, particularly if weaning and moving are combined or a second or more moves are performed. However, care must be exercised to have plenty of nutritive sward available at all times and farmers should be aware of the potential build-up of infections. The study emphasizes the need for including carcass quality at slaughter in studies of impact of parasitic infections.

Notes

Declarations

Acknowledgements

We are grateful for useful comments in planning the study from Drs. N. Maingi, H. Bjørn and Professor P. Nansen, and for the excellent technical assistance of N. Midtgaard and A. Pedersen. This study was supported by a grant from the Danish International Development Agency (DANIDA) under the auspices of the Ruminant Helminth Research Project. The Hede Nielsen Foundation supported S. M. Thamsborg.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Veterinary Microbiology & Parasitology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Sokoine University of Agriculture
(2)
Department of Animal Science and Animal Health, Organic Animal Health and Production, The Royal Veterinary and Agricultural University
(3)
Danish Centre for Experimental Parasitology, The Royal Veterinary and Agricultural University

References

  1. Anonymous: Manual of Veterinary Parasitological Laboratory Techniques. Technical Bulletin number 418. Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food, London. 1986Google Scholar
  2. Bjørn H, Monrad J, Nansen P: Anthelmintic resistance in nematodes of sheep in Denmark with special emphasis on levamisole resistance in Ostertagia circumcincta. Acta Vet Scand. 1991, 32: 145-154.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Brunsdon RV: Responses to the anthelmintic treatment of lambs at weaning: the relative importance of various sources of contamination in trichostrongyle infections. N Z J Exp Agric. 1976, 4: 275-279.Google Scholar
  4. Castle ME: A simple disc instrument for estimating herbage yield. J of the British Grassland Society. 1976, 31: 37-40.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Coles GC, Roush RT: Slowing the spread of anthelmintic resistant nematodes of sheep and goats in the United Kingdom. Vet Rec. 1992, 130: 505-510.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Donald AD, Morley FHW, Axelsen A, Donnelly JR, Waller PJ: Integration of grazing management and anthelmintic treatment for the control of nematode infections in young sheep. Temperate Pastures their Production, Use and Management. Edited by: Wheeler JL, Pearson CJ, Robards GE. 1987, Australian Wool Corporation/CSIRO, Leura, 567-569.Google Scholar
  7. Eysker M, van der Aar WM, Boersema JH, Githiori JB, Koyman FNJ: The effect of repeated moves to clean pasture on the build up of gastrointestinal nematode infections in calves. Vet Parasitol. 1998, 76: 81-94. 10.1016/S0304-4017(97)00211-2.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Foldager J, Sejrsen K, Brolund Larsen J, Nansen P, Jørgensen RJ, Hansen JW: Control of infection with gastrointestinal helminths in calves and heifers on pasture. 514. Beretning fra Statens Husdyrbrugsforsøg, Frederiksberg. 1981, 325-Google Scholar
  9. Githigia SM, Thamsborg SM, Larsen M, Kyvsgaard NC, Nansen P: The preventive effect of the fungus Duddingtonia flagrans on trichostrongyle infections of lambs on pasture. Int J Parasitol. 1997, 27: 931-939. 10.1016/S0020-7519(97)00065-9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Henriksen SA, Aagard K: A simple flotation and McMaster method. Nordic Vet Med. 1976, 28: 392-397.Google Scholar
  11. Henriksen SA, Korsholm H: A method for culture and recovery of gastrointestinal Strongyle larvae. Nord Vet Med. 1983, 35: 429-430.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Herd RP, Parker CF, McClure KE: Epidemiologic approach to the control of sheep nematodes. JAVMA. 1984, 184 (6): 680-687.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Kerboeuf D: Winter survival of Trichostrongyle larvae: A study using tracer lambs. Res Vet Sci. 1985, 38: 364-373.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Maingi N, Bjørn H, Thamsborg SM, Bøgh HO, Nansen P: Anthelmintic resistance in nematode parasites of sheep in Denmark. Small Rum Res. 1996, 23: 171-181. 10.1016/S0921-4488(96)00931-5.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Maingi N, Bjørn H, Thamsborg SM, Dangolla A, Kyvsgaard NC: Worm control pratices on sheep farms in Denmark and implications for the development of anthelmintic resistance. Vet Parasitol. 1996, 66: 39-52. 10.1016/S0304-4017(96)01005-9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Mitchell GBB, Fitzsimons J: Control of ovine gastrointestinal helminthiasis by the use of 'clean' grazing and strategic dosing in the field. Res Vet Sci. 1983, 35: 100-105.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Mitchell GBB, Fitzsimons J, Mathieson AO: Comparative study of gastrointestinal helminthiasis in sheep on 'clean' grazing and permanent pasture under field conditions. Res Vet Sci. 1984, 36: 364-369.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Mwegoha WM, Jørgensen RJ: Recovery of infective third stage larvae of Haemonchus contortus and Ostertagia ostertagi by migration in agar gel. Acta Vet Scand. 1977, 18: 293-299.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Nansen P, Foldager J, Hansen JW, Henriksen SA, Jørgensen RJ: Grazing pressure and acquisition of O. ostertagi in calves. Vet Parasitol. 1988, 27: 325-335. 10.1016/0304-4017(88)90046-5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Nilsson O, Rudby L, Lindquist Å, Schwan O: Benzimidazol resistant strains of Haemonchus contortus detected in sheeps in Sweden. Svensk Vet Tidn. 1993, 45: 303-307.Google Scholar
  21. Rose CH: Gastrointestinal nematodes of sheep in Greenland. A Study of the epidemiology, distribution and control of infection in domestic sheep in a sub-arctic climate. PhD Thesis. 1990, Dept of Vet Microbiol. The Royal Vet and Agric Univ, CopenhagenGoogle Scholar
  22. Rutter W, Black WJM, Fitzsimons J, Swift G: A clean grazing system for sheep – its development and extension. Research and Development in Agriculture. 1984, 1: 41-46.Google Scholar
  23. SAS Institute Inc: Statistical Analysis System. Users Guide, Release 6.03. 1990, 1028-Google Scholar
  24. Thamsborg SM, Roepstorff A, Larsen M: Integrated and biological control of parasites in conventional and organic farming systems. Vet. Parasitol. 1999, 84: 169-186.Google Scholar
  25. Thamsborg SM, Jørgensen RJ, Waller PJ, Nansen P: The influence of animal density on gastrointestinal nematodes of sheep over a two-year grazing period. Vet Parasitol. 1996, 67: 207-224. 10.1016/S0304-4017(96)01045-X.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Waller PJ, Thomas RJ: The natural regulation of Trichostrongylus spp. populations of young grazing sheep. Vet Parasitol. 1981, 9: 47-55. 10.1016/0304-4017(81)90006-6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Whitelaw A, Fawcett AR: Performance of lambs from a clean grazing system subsequently grazed on contaminated pasture. Vet Rec. 1982, 111: 224-225.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s) 2001

Advertisement