Open Access

Bovine trypanosomosis: changes in parasitemia and packed cell volume in dry and wet seasons at Gidami District, Oromia Regional State, western Ethiopia

  • Efrem Degneh1,
  • Workineh Shibeshi2,
  • Getachew Terefe1Email author,
  • Kaleab Asres3 and
  • Hagos Ashenafi1
Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica201759:59

https://doi.org/10.1186/s13028-017-0327-7

Received: 24 February 2017

Accepted: 6 September 2017

Published: 11 September 2017

Abstract

Background

Animal trypanosomosis is one of the major disease problems affecting agricultural productivity in Ethiopia. The impact of the disease is believed to vary with season and agro-ecologies in line with fly vector distribution. A cross-sectional study on bovine trypanosomosis was conducted from November 2015 to June 2016, in seven selected villages of Gidami district, Oromia Regional State, western Ethiopia. A total of 930 blood samples were collected and subjected to parasitological and hematological analysis.

Result

The overall prevalence of bovine trypanosomosis was 14.1%. The seasonal prevalence shows 9.06% in early dry and 18.4% in early rainy seasons. Three trypanosome species, Trypanosoma congolense, Trypanosoma vivax and Trypanosoma brucei were identified in the examined animals. T. congolense followed by T. vivax were the predominant species (respectively 59.0 and 35.9% in early dry season and 62.0 and 22.8% in early rainy season). The prevalence of T. vivax remained similar in both early dry and early rainy seasons in both lowland and midland agroecologies whereas T. congolense was more dominant in the lowland area in both seasons compared to mid land study sites. The disease was more prevalent in lowland (23.9%) compared to midland (11.1%) during early rainy season (P < 0.001) whereas no significant difference was observed between the two agroecologies during early dry season (P = 0.165). Packed cell volume (PCV) was much lower in parasitemic animals than in aparasitemic cattle whereas the mean PCV value for parasitemic animals (20.36%; 95% CI 19.56 to 21.16) in early dry season was similar to values in early rainy season (20.46%, 95% CI 18.84 to 21.08%). A similar situation was noticed for animals in both low land and mid land study sites.

Conclusion

Overall, the detection of trypanosomes in blood was significantly affected by agro-ecology, season and body condition of the animals. Special emphasis should be given to integrated trypanosomosis management in early rainy months where fly population is believed to start increasing.

Keywords

Agro-ecology Gidami PCV Prevalence Season Bovine trypanosomosis Western Ethiopia

Background

African animal trypanosomosis (AAT) is the most important constraint to livestock production in tropical Africa [13], and considered as a threat to poverty alleviation programs in the continent [4]. The disease is widely distributed with about 50 million heads of cattle and other livestock species being at risk [5]. It is cyclically transmitted by tsetse flies [6] and mechanically by a number of biting flies [7]. Animal trypanosomosis is most important in cattle, but can also cause serious losses in camels, equines, goats and sheep. In Africa the annual direct and indirect losses due to this disease for livestock are estimated at 4.5 billion USD [8].

Ethiopia is believed to have the largest livestock population in Africa, which is currently estimated to be 54 million cattle, 25.5 million sheep and 24.1 million goats [9]. However, the livestock industry of the country is suffering from debilitating diseases such as trypanosomosis with approximately 15% of all arable land or 220,000 km2 area infested with tsetse flies [10]. Morbidity and mortality losses from ruminant livestock alone are estimated to be USD 200 million [11].

Although a number of studies have reported the prevalence of the disease in many places of the country [1214], data on the seasonal dynamics of the problem and associated risk factors is scanty for the Gidami district of the Oromia Regional State, western Ethiopia. The Gidami district is one of the districts richly endowed with livestock resources but is ravaged by animal trypanosomosis (District office of Livestock and Fisheries: personal communication). Therefore, the present study was aimed at assessing the prevalences of bovine trypanosomosis and associated risk factors in early dry and early rainy seasons, in order to provide baseline data that can be used in planning and implementation of disease control program in this area.

Methods

Study area

This study was conducted from November 2015 to June 2016 in the Gidami District of West/Kellem Wollega Zone of the Oromia Regional State (western Ethiopia). The Gidami district is located 670 km to the west of the capital, Addis Ababa (Fig. 1). The area has two distinct seasons: a dry season extending from November to May; and a wet season which extends from June to September. It has a total area of 219,641 hectares. The altitude of the area ranges from 1200 to 2200 m above sea level. Based on the altitude the area is subdivided into three climatic zones: highland (8%), midland (75%) and lowland (17%). The mean annual rainfall and temperature ranges of the area are 1200 to 2000 mm and 15 to 25 °C respectively. Mixed crop-livestock farming is the main source of livelihoods. The vegetation cover is dominated by savanna grassland, forest, riverine and bush lands. Wild games like buffalos, bush pig, warthog, lions, antelopes, leopard, hyena and monkeys are commonly found in the area. The livestock population of the district has been estimated to be around 73,000 cattle, 47,000 sheep, 24,000 goats, 12,000 equines and 140,000 chickens [9]. Communal grazing without any supplementary feeding is the major livestock husbandry system throughout the year.
Fig. 1

Map showing the location of the study area in western Ethiopia

Study design and sampling methods

A cross-sectional study was conducted to estimate the prevalence of bovine trypanosomosis in the study area. Seven peasant associations were selected purposively based on livestock population and accessibility from two agro-climatic zones: four from lowland (<1600 m above sea level) and the rest three from midland (>1600 m above sea level). Animals were bled during early dry (November and December) and early rainy (May and June) seasons of the year. A systematic random sampling technique was employed to sample every other individual animal caught at communal grazing points of each village. The sample size was determined based on the expected prevalence of 16.9% as previously reported by Kebede [15] for the nearby district, Sayo Nole in West Wollega, and absolute desired precision of 5% at 95% confidence level as described by Thrusfield [16]. Accordingly, 215 animals were required to be sampled in each study season (total = 430). However, because of adequate availability of animals, this number was increased to 930 to improve the precision. Accordingly, a total of 514 animals from the lowland area (230 and 284 in dry and wet season respectively) and 416 animals from the midland areas (200 and 216 in dry and wet season respectively) were sampled.

Study population

The study population consisted of all zebu cattle above 1 year of age, which were usually kept under an extensive husbandry system. A total of 930 animals (500 males and 430 females) were systematically selected in early dry and early rainy seasons. The age of animals was determined by dentition [17] and conventionally categorized as young (1 to 3 years) and adult (>3 years). The body condition score of animals was recorded by classifying animals into three groups as good, medium, and poor based on the appearance of ribs and vertebral spinous processes [18].

Blood sampling and examination

Blood samples were collected by puncturing the superficial ear vein of each animal into heparinized capillary tubes and centrifuged immediately in a hematocrit centrifuge. Packed cell volume (PCV) was measured for each sample. Animals with PCV less than 24% were considered to be anemic [19, 20]. The contents of the capillary tubes (including about 1 mm above and below the buffy coat) were examined using buffy coat technique to reveal trypanosomes under 40× magnifications under the light microscope [2123]. From trypanosome positive samples thin blood smears were made and stained with Giemsa for species identification by light microscopy. The trypanosome species were distinguished using their size, position of the kinetoplast, presence of undulating membranes and length of the free flagella according to [20, 24].

Data analysis

Data collected from each study animal and laboratory analyses were entered into a Microsoft excel spreadsheet and un-coded. SPSS version 20 was used for the analysis and interpretation of the data. The prevalence of trypanosomosis was calculated as the number of infected individuals divided by the number of individuals examined and multiplied by 100. The difference in prevalence between altitude, season, sex, age and body condition score was compared by Chi square test. Student’s t-test was used to compare the mean PCVs between parasitemic and aparasitemic animals, among seasons and agroecologies. Generally, P < 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.

Results

Parasitological findings

Out of 930 examined cattle, 131 were positive for trypanosomosis using the buffy coat technique with an overall prevalence of 14.08% (95% CI 11.9 to 16.5%). The prevalence was significantly higher in low land than in mid land, during early rainy season than in early dry season and in animals with poor and moderate body condition compared to those with good body condition (P < 0.001). Similarly, the prevalence of the infection in poor body conditioned animals was significantly higher than in animals with medium body condition (Table 1). There was a notable increase in the prevalence of bovine trypanosomes in low land areas during early rainy season as compared to the mid land (P < 0.001) whereas no significant difference was detected between low land and mid land areas during early dry season (P = 0.165) (Table 2). Three trypanosome species, T. congolense, T. vivax and T. brucei were identified in the study animals. T. congolense was the predominant species (59 and 62%) followed by T. vivax (35.9 and 22.8%) in early dry and early rainy seasons respectively (Fig. 2).
Table 1

Prevalence of bovine trypanosomosis with different potential risk factors in Gidami district, Oromia Regional State, western Ethiopia

Potential risk factors

No of animals

Prevalence (%)

95% CI

χ2 value

P-value

Altitude

 Low land

514

18.09

14.76 to 21.42

15.24

0.0001

 Middle land

416

9.13

6.36 to 11.9

Season

 Early dry

430

9.07

6.36 to 11.78

16.61

<0.0001

 Early rainy

500

18.4

15 to 21.80

Body condition

 Poor

294

27.9

22.77 to 33.03

39.16

14.95

<0.0001

0.0001

 Medium

458

10.3

7.52 to 13.08

 Good

177

1.1

−0.44 to 2.64

Sex

 Male

500

14.4

11.32 to 17.48

0.09

0.766

 Female

430

13.72

10.47 to 16.97

Age

 1–3 years

291

11.34

7.7 to 14.98

2.64

0.104

 >3 years

639

15.34

11.55 to 16.73

Table 2

Prevalence of bovine trypanosomosis during early rainy and early dry seasons in low land and midland areas of Gidami district, western Ethiopia

Season

No. of animals

Prevalence (%)

95% CI

χ2 value

P-value

Early rainy season

0.0003

 Low land

284

23.9

18.94 to 28.86

13.36

 Mid land

216

11.11

6.92 to 15.30

Early dry season

0.1649

 Low land

230

10.86

6.84 to 14.88

1.93

 Mid land

200

7

3.46 to 10.54

Fig. 2

Trypanosome species identified during the study period in Gidami District, western Ethiopia

Packed cell volume

Statistical analysis of the PCV values indicated that the overall mean PCV was significantly lower for trypanosomosis positive animals (20.48%, 95% CI 19.97 to 20.99%) compared with that of negative animals (25.77%, 95% CI 25.48 to 26.07%) irrespective of season of sampling and agro-ecology (P < 0.001). On the other hand, there was no notable difference between mean PCVs of trypanosomosis positive animals when lowland and midland agroecologies (P = 0.331) as well as early rainy and early dry seasons (P = 0.379) were compared (Table 3). Strong association between prevalence of trypanosomosis and anemia (expressed in terms of reduction in PCV below 25%) was observed (P < 0.001) in both sampling seasons and agroecologies (Table 4). Among the trypanosomosis positive animals, 92.3 and 91.3% fall in anemic category in early dry and early rainy seasons respectively while 90.3 and 94.7% of them were anemic respectively in lowland and midland sampling sites.
Table 3

Comparison of PCV of parasitologically positive animals according to sampling season and agro-ecology

Risk factors

Category

No. of parasitemic animals

% PCV

95% CI

t. value

P-value

Season

Early dry

39

20.36

19.53 to 21.19

−0.308

0.379

Early rainy

92

20.53

19.89 to 21.17

Agro-ecology

Low land

93

20.41

19.81 to 21.00

−0.439

0.331

Mid land

38

20.66

19.64 to 21.68

Table 4

Comparison of trypanosome prevalence between anemic and non-anemic cattle during early dry and early rainy seasons from lowland and midland study areas

Category

Anemia statusa

No. of animals examined

% positive animals

95% CI

χ 2 value

P-value

Early dry

Anemic

179

20.10

14.20 to 26.0

36.51

<0.0001

Non-anemic

251

1.20

0.0 to 2.5

Early rainy

Anemic

274

30.66

25.2 to 36.1

60.03

<0.0001

Non-anemic

226

3.54

1.1 to 5.9

Low land

Anemic

271

31.00

25.5 to 36.5

67.87

<0.0001

Non-anemic

243

3.70

1.20 to 5.50

Mid land

Anemic

182

19.78

14.00 to 25.60

44.178

<0.0001

Non-anemic

234

0.85

0.00 to 2.00

aAnemic: PCV ≤24%, non-anemic: PCV >24%

Discussion

The present study revealed that trypanosomosis is widespread in Gidami District with an overall prevalence of 14.08% (95% CI 11.9 to 16.5%). This result was slightly lower than the findings of Kebede [15] who reported an overall prevalence of 16.9% in the nearby Sayo Nole District. The fact that there were no vector control intervention practices in the study area during the study period suggest that any reduction could be attributed to difference in season of sampling and/or changes in ecological/climatic conditions that affect vector fly density/distribution overtime [25]. Higher prevalence values were also reported by Cherenet et al. [26] and Mulaw et al. [27] respectively with 25.7 and 28.1% proportions from different parts of Ethiopia. On the other hand, the prevalence reported here is in close agreement with the report of Feyissa et al. [28] in selected Villages of Humbo District, southern Ethiopia (14.2%) and higher than the 2.86% reported by Biyazen et al. [29]. Such variations may exist because of differences in agro-ecology, sampling season, vector infection rate, animal susceptibility and practice of trypanocidal drug use and fly control operations which may obviously impact on epidemiological situations of the disease [3032].

The findings in the present study is in agreement with the fact that the most pathogenic trypanosome species for cattle, i.e., T. congolense and T. vivax, are abundant in most parts of western Ethiopia ([10, 27], in Ethiopia in general as well as in other parts of Africa [3335]. The high proportion of T. congolense is similar with the previous report of Duguma et al. [36] in south-western Ethiopia (76%), Ameen et al. [37] in Ogbomoso Area of Oyo State, Nigeria who reported only T. congolense infection and Dawud and Molalegne [38] at Mao-Komo district of Benshangul Gumuz regional state (63.2%). The high ratio of T. congolense may be ascribed to the more efficient transmission of this species by major cyclical vectors (tsetse flies) than T. vivax in tsetse infested areas [33].

Although the rate of infection with trypanosomes was high in both study periods, it was significantly higher at the beginning of the rainy season, particularly with T. congolense. This agrees with the reports of Majekodunmi et al. [31]. Although fly burden was not assessed in this study, the high incidence of trypanosome infections at the beginning of the rainy season may be explained by the increasing density of tsetse and other biting flies during this time of the year [39]. It is also possible that the cumulative effect of feed shortage during the dry season preceding the sampling may have reduced immunity of the animals while favoring higher infection prevalence. Holmes et al. [40] and Katunguka-Rwakishaya et al. [41] reported that high protein intake reduces the pathologic effect of trypanosomosis and enhances recovery following treatment with trypanocidal drugs. On the other hand, our finding does not agree with the report of Ameen et al. [37] which indicated higher rate of T. congolense infection in dry season than in wet season which probably is explained by the reason given by the authors. They suggested that presence of few ponds in the dry season might have forced the animals to come close together and also created a favorable ground for the tsetse flies.

The prevalence of bovine trypanosomosis is also known to be affected by agro-ecological conditions such as altitude [42]. In this study, the prevalence of trypanosomosis was significantly higher in lowland areas compared to those in mid-land study sites during the early rainy season. This suggests the possible development of optimum vegetation, temperature and humidity favorable for tsetse fly breeding and survival [35]. This finding agrees with other studies done elsewhere [43]. The absence of difference in prevalence of the disease during early dry season may suggest that the two agro-ecologies did have adequate vegetation for the animals to graze and exposure to fly infestation have started declining.

Body condition of the cattle was another factor that has shown strong association with trypanosomosis prevalence. Animals with poor body condition were found more affected by trypanosomes than other cattle with good body condition. This finding is in line with previous reports [4447]. This might be attributed to reduced resistance of those animals having poor body condition or related to the progressive weight loss arising from debilitating nature of the disease itself [48].

In line with other previous studies on bovine trypanosomosis [42, 44, 49, 50], anemia was significantly more severe in trypanosome infected cattle (as evidenced by lower mean PCV) compared to trypanosomosis negative animals. This is further supported by the fact that majority of trypanosomosis positive animals had PCV values lower than 25% and the non-anemic category had very low proportion of trypanosome positive cases. On the other hand, the majority of the animals classified as anemic had no detectable trypanosomes suggesting that other anemia causing factors such as poor nutrition, helminthiasis etc. could be responsible for the reduction in PCV. In this regards, our findings agree with the reports in other previous studies [5153]. It may also be partly due to the low sensitivity of parasitological diagnostic method used in this study [49, 54, 55] which has resulted in some trypanosome positive animals with lower PCV to be wrongly categorized as negative for trypanosomes. Trypanosomes become very difficult to detect when the parasitemia is lower than 60 trypanosomes/mL blood [56, 57].

Conclusions

The current study indicated that the prevalence of trypanosomosis is significant to the level that it can limit livestock production in the Gidami District of Ethiopia. Two pathogenic species, T. congolense and T. vivax were mainly responsible for the disease in the study area. Significant variation in prevalence was also observed between seasons, agro-ecology and animal body condition scores. Anemia was characteristic of the infection in both lowland and mid land agroecologies irrespective of the sampling season. The situation warrants the initiation and intensification of tsetse fly control activities especially in the early wet season where T. congolense is most dominant.

Declarations

Authors’ contributions

ED drafted the proposal and the manuscript, collected, analyzed and interpreted the data. WS supervised the project and edited the manuscript. GT supported the analyses and interpretation of the results and edited the manuscript. KA drafted the proposal and edited the manuscript. HA supervised the project and edited the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Wollega University and Addis Ababa University (College of Health Sciences, School of Pharmacy: Trypanosomosis thematic research project) for the finical support to conduct this investigation. We also thank management and technical staff of Bedele Regional Veterinary Laboratory for allowing access to laboratory facility and cooperation during sample collection from the field. Gidami district Livestock Development and Health Office is also acknowledged for its invaluable support and collaboration during the study period.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Availability of data and materials

The data sets of the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Ethical considerations

The objectives of this study were well explained to all selected farmers and those who expressed their consent to participate were recruited for blood sampling from their cattle. The identity of study participants and data on their livestock population were kept confidential. This research was approved by the Animal Research Ethics Committee of the College of Veterinary Medicine and Agriculture of the Addis Ababa University, Ethiopia (Ref. No. VM/ERC/004/08/07/2015).

Funding

This research was part of a PhD research project and was partially supported by the Office of the Director for Graduate programs (Addis Ababa University) and the thematic research project, Trypanosomosis, located at the College of Health Sciences (Addis Ababa University).

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Pathology and Parasitology, College of Veterinary Medicine and Agriculture, Addis Ababa University
(2)
Department of Pharmacology and Clinical Pharmacy, School of Pharmacy, College of Health Sciences, Addis Ababa University
(3)
Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry and Pharmacognosy, School of Pharmacy, College of Health Sciences, Addis Ababa University

References

  1. Courtin F, Jamonneau V, Duvallet G, Garcia A, Coulibaly B, Doumenge JP, et al. Sleeping sickness in West Africa (1906–2006): changes in spatial repartition and lessons from the past. Trop Med Int Health. 2008;13:334–44.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Holt HR, Selby R, Mumba C, Napier GB. Guitian assessment of animal African trypanosomiasis (AAT) vulnerability in cattle-owning communities of sub-Saharan Africa. Parasit Vectors. 2016;9:53. doi:10.1186/s13071-016-1336-5.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  3. Shaw AP. Assessing the economics of animal trypanosomosis in Africa-history and current perspectives. Onderstepoort J Vet Res. 2009;76:27–32.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Oluwafemi RA. Tsetse/trypanosomosis challenges and rural poverty in Africa: implications for food security and MDG1, Review. RJAEM. 2014;3:158–61.Google Scholar
  5. Mattioli RC, Feldmann G, Hendrickx W, Wint J, Jannin J, Slingenbergh J. Tsetse and trypanosomiasis intervention policies supporting sustainable animal agricultural development. Food Agric Environ. 2004;2:310–4.Google Scholar
  6. Steverding D. The history of African trypanosomiasis. Parasit Vectors. 2008;1:3. doi:10.1186/1756-3305-1-3.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  7. Desquesnes M, Dia ML. Trypanosoma vivax: mechanical transmission in cattle by one of the most common African tabanids, Atylotus agrestis. Exp Parasitol. 2003;103:35–43.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Affognon HD. Economic analysis of trypanocide use in villages under risk of drug resistance in West Africa, PhD Thesis, University of Hannover, Germany. 2007.Google Scholar
  9. CSA (Central Statistical Agency). Agricultural sample survey, volume II: report on livestock and livestock characteristics (Private peasant holdings). statistical bulletin 570. Addis Ababa: Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia; 2013.Google Scholar
  10. Abebe G. Trypanosomosis in Ethiopia. Ethiop J Biol Sci. 2005;4:75–121.Google Scholar
  11. Abebe G, Jobre Y. Trypanosomosis: a threat to cattle production in Ethiopia. Rev Med Vet. 1996;147:897–902.Google Scholar
  12. Birhanu H, Fikru R, Said M, Kidane W, Gebrehiwot T, Hagos A, et al. Epidemiology of Trypanosoma evansi and Trypanosoma vivax in domestic animals from selected districts of Tigray and Afar regions, Northern Ethiopia. Parasit Vectors. 2015;8:212. doi:10.1186/s13071-015-0818-1.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  13. Lelisa K, Shimelis S, Bekele J, Shiferaw D. Bovine trypanosomosis and its fly vectors in three selected settlement areas of Hawa-Gelan district, western Ethiopia. Onderstepoort J Vet Res. 2014;81:715. doi:10.4102/ojvr.v81i1.715.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Leta S, Alemayehu G, Seyoum Z, Bezie M. Prevalence of bovine trypanosomosis in Ethiopia: a meta-analysis. Parasit Vectors. 2016;9:139. doi:10.1186/s13071-016-1404-x.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  15. Kebede B. Prevalence of bovine trypanosomosis and apparent density of tsetse flies in Sayo nole District Western Oromia. Ethiop Vet Sci Tech. 2015;6:254. doi:10.4172/2157-7579.1000254.Google Scholar
  16. Thrusfield M. Veterinary Epidemiology. 3rd ed. Blackwell science Ltd: London; 2005. p. 228–46.Google Scholar
  17. DeLahunta A, Hable RE. Teeth. In: DeLahunt A, Hable RE, editors. Applied veterinary anatomy. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders Company; 1986.Google Scholar
  18. Nicholson MJ, Butterworth MH. A guide to condition scoring of zebu cattle. ILCA: Addis Ababa Ethiopia; 1986. p. 212–35.Google Scholar
  19. Van den Bossche P, Shumba W, Makhambera P. The distribution and epidemiology of bovine trypanosomosis in Malawi. Vet Parasitol. 2000;88:163–76.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. OIE. Standardized techniques for the diagnosis of tsetse transmitted trypanosomiasis. In: OIE Terrestrial ManualRome, Italy. 2008: 49.Google Scholar
  21. Eisler MC, Brandt J, Bauer B, Clausen PH, Delespaux V, Holmes PH, et al. Standardized tests in mice and cattle for the detection of drug resistance in tsetse-transmitted trypanosomes of African domestic cattle. Vet Parasitol. 2001;97:171–82.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Chappuis F, Loutan L, Simarro P, Lejon V, Buscher P. Options for the field diagnosis of human African trypanosomiasis. Clinic Microbiol Rev. 2005;10:133–46.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Murray M, Murray PK, Mclntyre WIM. An improved technique for the diagnosis of African trypanosomosis. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 1977;71:325–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Picozzi K, Tilly A, Fevre EM, Coleman P, Magona JW, Odiit M, et al. The diagnosis of trypanosome infections: applications of novel technology for reducing disease risk. Afr J Biotechnol. 2002;1:39–45.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Patz JA, Graczyk TK, Geller N, Vittor AY. Effects of environmental change on emerging parasitic diseases. Int J Parasitol. 2000;30:1395–405.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Cherenet T, Sani RA, Speybroeck N, Panandam JM, Nadzr S, Van den Bossche P. A comparative longitudinal study of bovine trypanosomiasis in tsetse-free and tsetse-infested zones of the Amhara region, northwest Ethiopia. Vet Parasitol. 2006;140:251–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Mulaw S, Addis M, Fromisa A. Study on the prevalence of major trypanosome affecting bovine in tsetse infested Asosa District of Benshagul-Gumuz Regional State, western Ethiopia. Global Vet. 2011;7:330–6.Google Scholar
  28. Feyissa B, Samson A, Mihreteab B. Bovine trypanosomosis in selected villages of Humbo District. South Ethiop Global Vet. 2011;7:192–8.Google Scholar
  29. Biyazen H, Duguma R, Asaye M. Trypanosomosis, its risk factors, and anemia in cattle population of Dale Wabera District of Kellem Wollega Zone, Western Ethiopia. J Vet Med. 2014;. doi:10.1155/2014/374191.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  30. Geiger A, Ponton F, Simo G. Adult blood-feeding tsetse flies, trypanosomes, microbiota and the fluctuating environment in Sub-Saharan Africa. ISMEJ. 2015;9:1496–507.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Majekodunmi AO, Fajinmi A, Dongkum C, Picozzi K, Thrusfield MV, Welburn SC. A longitudinal survey of African animal trypanosomiasis in domestic cattle on the Jos Plateau, Nigeria: prevalence, distribution and risk factors. Parasit Vectors. 2013;6:239. doi:10.1186/1756-3305-6-239.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  32. Reifenberg JM, Cuisance D, Frezil JL, Cuny G, Uvallet GD. Comparison of the susceptibility of different Glossina species to simple and mixed infections with Trypanosoma (Nannomonas) congolense savannah and riverine forest types. Med Vet Entomol. 1997;11:246–52.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Leak SGA. Tsetse Biology and Ecology: their role in the epidemiology and control of trypanosomosis. Wallingford: CABI publishing in association with the ILRI; 1999. p. 152–210.Google Scholar
  34. McDermott JJ, Woitag T, Sidibe I, Bauer B, Boucader D, Ouedrago D, et al. Field studies on drug- resistant animal trypanosomes in Kenedogou province, Burkina Faso. Acta Trop. 2003;86:93–103.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Cherenet T, Sani RA, Panandam JM, Nadzr S, Speybroeck N, Van Den Bossche P. Seasonal prevalence of bovine trypanosomiasis in a tsetse-infested zone and a tsetse-free zone of the Amhara region, north-west Ethiopia. Onderstepoort J Vet Res. 2004;71:307–12.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Duguma R, Tasew S, Olani A, Damena D, Alemu D, Mulatu T, et al. Spatial distribution of Glossina sp. and Trypanosoma sp. in south-western Ethiopia. Parasit Vectors. 2015;8:430. doi:10.1186/s13071-015-1041-9.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  37. Ameen SA, Joshua RA, Adedeji OS, Raheem AK, Akingbade AA, Leigh OO. Preliminary studies on prevalence of ruminant trypanosomosis in Ogbomoso Area of Oyo State, Nigeria. Middle East J Sci Res. 2008;3:214–8.Google Scholar
  38. Dawud A, Molalegne B. Epidemiological study of bovine trypanosomosis in Mao-Komo. Special District, Benishangul Gumuz Regional State, Western Ethiopia. Global Vet. 2011;6:402–8.Google Scholar
  39. Van den Bossche P, De Deken R. Seasonal variations in the distribution and abundance of the tsetse fly, Glossina morsitans morsitans in eastern Zambia. Med Vet Entomol. 2002;16:170–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Holmes PH, Katunguka-Rwakishaya E, Bennison JJ, Wassink GJ, Parkins JJ. Impact of nutrition on the pathophysiology of bovine trypanosomiasis. Parasitology. 2000;120(Suppl):S73–85.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Katunguka-Rwakishaya E, Parkins JJ, Fishwick G, Murray M, Holmes PH. The pathophysiology of Trypanosoma congolense infection in Scottish Blackface sheep. Influence of dietary protein. Vet Parasitol. 1993;47:189–204.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Sinshaw A, Abebe G, Desquesnes M, Yoin W. Biting flies and Trypanosoma vivax infection in three highland district bordering Lake Tana, Ethiopia. Vet. Parasitol. 2006;142:35–46.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Mamoudou A, Zoli A, Mbahin N, Tanenbe C, Clausen BP, Marcotty H, et al. Prevalence and incidence of bovine trypanosomosis on the Adamaoua plateau in Cameroon 10 years after the tsetse eradication campaign. Vet Parasitol. 2006;142:16–22.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Molalegne B, Yeshitila A, Asmamaw A. Prevalence of bovine trypanosomosis in selected areas of Jabi Tehnan District, West Gojjam of Amhara Regional State, North-western Ethiopia. Global Vet. 2010;5:243–7.Google Scholar
  45. Teka W, Terefa D, Wondimu A. Prevalence study of bovine trypanosomiasis and tsetse density in selected villages of Arbaminch, Ethiopia. J Vet Med Anim Health. 2012;4:36–41.Google Scholar
  46. Dinka H, Abebe G. Small ruminants trypanosomosis in southwest of Ethiopia. Small Rumin Res. 2005;57:239–43.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  47. Tafese W, Melaku A, Fentahun T. Prevalence of bovine trypanosomosis and its vectors in two districts of East Wollega Zone, Ethiopia. Onderstepoort J Vet Res. 2012;79:385. doi:10.4102/ojvr.v79i1.385.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  48. Radostits OM, Gay CC, Hinchcliff KW, Constable PD. Veterinary medicine: a text book of diseases of cattle, horses, sheep, pigs and goats. 10th ed. New York: Saunders-Elsevier; 2007. p. 1536–96.Google Scholar
  49. Marcotty T, Simukoko H, Berkvens D, Vercruysse J, Praet N, Van Den Bossche P. Evaluating the use of packed cell volume as an indicator of trypanosomal infections in cattle in eastern Zambia. Prev Vet Med. 2008;87:288–300.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Degu F, Ayalew B, Tewodros F, Mersha C. Occurrence of bovine trypanosomosis, in the Blue Nile river basin, Northwest Ethiopia. Europ J Appl Sci. 2012;4:129–35.Google Scholar
  51. Magona JW, Walubengo J, Olaho-Mukani W, Revie CW, Jonsson NN, Eisler MC. A Delphi survey on expert opinion on key signs for clinical diagnosis of bovine trypanosomosis, tick-borne diseases and helminthoses. Bull Anim Health Prod Afr. 2004;52:130–40.Google Scholar
  52. Zinsstag J, Ankers P, Ndao M, Bonfoh B, Pfister K. Multiparasitism, production and economics in domestic animals in sub-Saharan West Africa. Parasitol Today. 1998;14:46–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Mbewe NJ, Namangala B, Sitali L, Vorster I, Michelo C. Prevalence of pathogenic trypanosomes in anemic cattle from trypanosomosis challenged areas of Itezhi-Tezhi district in central Zambia. Parasit Vectors. 2015;8:638. doi:10.1186/s13071-015-1260-0.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  54. Simukoko H, Marcotty T, Vercruysse J, Van den Bossche P. Bovine trypanosomiasis risk in an endemic area on the eastern plateau of Zambia. Res Vet Sci. 2011;90:51–4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Naessens J. Bovine trypanotolerance. A natural ability to prevent severe anaemia and haemophagocytic syndrome. Int J Parasitol. 2006;36:521–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. Desquesnes M. Evaluation of a simple PCR technique for the diagnosis of Trypanosoma vivax infection in the serum of cattle in comparison to parasitological techniques and antigen-enzyme-linked-immunosorbent assay. Acta Trop. 1997;65:139–48.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. Luckins AG. Methods for diagnosis of trypanosomiasis in livestock. FAO corporate document repository. 2010. http://www.fao.org/DOCRDP.

Copyright

© The Author(s) 2017

Advertisement