Open Access

In vitro investigations on extracellular proteins secreted by Aphanomyces invadans, the causative agent of epizootic ulcerative syndrome

  • Muhammad Majeed1,
  • Gokhlesh Kumar1,
  • Sarah Schlosser2,
  • Mansour El-Matbouli1Email author and
  • Mona Saleh1
Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica201759:78

https://doi.org/10.1186/s13028-017-0347-3

Received: 1 June 2017

Accepted: 3 November 2017

Published: 9 November 2017

Abstract

Background

Proteases produced by many microorganisms, including oomycetes, are crucial for their growth and development. They may also play a critical role in disease manifestation. Epizootic ulcerative syndrome is one of the most destructive fish diseases known. It is caused by the oomycete Aphanomyces invadans and leads to mass mortalities of cultured and wild fish in many countries. The areas of concern are Australia, China, Japan, South and Southeast Asian countries and the USA. Extracellular proteases produced by this oomycete are believed to trigger EUS pathogenesis in fish. To address this activity, we collected the extracellular products (ECP) of A. invadans and identified the secreted proteins using SDS-PAGE and mass spectrometery. A. invadans was cultivated in liquid Glucose-Peptone-Yeats media. The culture media was ultra-filtered through 10 kDa filters and analysed using SDS-PAGE. Three prominent protein bands from the SDS gel were excised and identified by mass spectrometery. Furthermore, we assessed their proteolytic effect on casein and immunoglobulin M (IgM) of rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) and giant gourami (Osphronemus goramy). Antiprotease activity of the fish serum was also investigated.

Results

BLASTp analysis revealed that the prominent secreted proteins were proteases, mainly of the serine and cysteine types. Proteins containing fascin-like domain and bromodomain were also identified. We could demonstrate that the secreted proteases showed proteolytic activity against the casein and the IgM of both fish species. The anti-protease activity experiment showed that the percent inhibition of the common carp serum was 94.2% while that of rainbow trout and giant gourami serum was 7.7 and 12.9%, respectively.

Conclusions

The identified proteases, especially serine proteases, could be the potential virulence factors in A. invadans and, hence, are candidates for further functional and host–pathogen interaction studies. The role of identified structural proteins in A. invadans also needs to be investigated further.

Keywords

Aphanomyces invadans Epizootic ulcerative syndromeLC–MS/MSOomycetesProteasesVirulence

Background

Infection with Aphanomyces invadans, also known as epizootic ulcerative syndrome (EUS), is an OIE-listed disease [1]. It has historically caused mass mortalities in cultured and wild fish in Asia and Oceania and recently in North America and Africa. An EUS-like condition was first reported from Japan in farmed Ayu (Plecoglossus altivelis) [2, 3] and later from Australia. Initial symptoms are described as focal haemorrhages on fish skin with variable size of ulcerative lesions that may progress to necrotizing dermatitis resulting in deep dermal ulcer [4, 5]. The economic impact of this disease is huge. It has caused an estimated loss of US $110 million only in few countries of Asia–Pacific region during late 80’s and early 90’s [6]. Clinical EUS has not been reported from Europe so far, but A. invadans has been detected in imported ornamental fish species from different non-European countries [7].

EUS is a water-borne disease caused by A. invadans. It is a slow growing, thermolabile [8] and non-septate microorganism [9]. It lacks reproductive structures and belongs to the class Oomycota (water moulds) and order Saprolegniales [6, 10]. Oomycetes, including Aphanomyces and Saprolegnia species, have caused some of the most devastating fish diseases [11]. About 125 fish species have been confirmed to be affected by A. invadans [12] and the number is gradually increasing [13]. Recently, the mitochondrial genomes of A. invadans and Aphanomyces astaci were assembled and annotated, which provides good basis for further functional studies and development of diagnostic methods [14].

Proteases are vital for fungal physiology and development and digesting external proteins required for fungal growth [15]. However, many infectious microorganisms, including fungi and oomycetes, produce extracellular proteases or effector proteins that initiate the disease process [15].

Involvement of microbial proteases in disease development in humans and using these proteases as targets for development of therapeutic agents against such diseases has also been reported [16]. An important strategy in drug development is to focus on natural inhibitors of disease-involved proteases to counter their effects. Although natural antiproteases are present in every organism, they can be repressed by the pathogens, hence triggering disease development.

Extracellular proteases produced by the oomycete A. invadans have been suggested to play a part in EUS pathogenesis. Proteases have also been reported to affect the immune response of the host and support the invasion of the hyphae in host musculature [17]. In this study, we aimed at identifying A. invadans’ secreted proteases using SDS-PAGE and mass spectrometery and investigating their proteolytic activity against casein and fish immunoglobulin M (IgM). The results of this study suggest that the secreted proteases may be considered as potential virulence factors of A. invadans in EUS.

Methods

Oomycete culture and zoospore production

Aphanomyces invadans NJM 9701 was cultured on peptone glucose-1 (PG-1) agar (Fig. 1). Fungal plugs (6–7 cm2) were cut and placed on new PG-1 plates every 6–7 days as subculture and maintained at 25 °C. In parallel, the fungal plugs were grown at 25 °C for 6–7 days in glucose-peptone-yeast (GPY) broth. These fungal plugs were collected and placed in filtered autoclaved pond water (FAPW) pH 7.2 for 12–24 h at 22 °C for zoospore production [6]. Zoospores were observed under light microscope.
Fig. 1

Aphanomyces invadans culture. The PG-1 agar plate shows the growth of Aphanomyces invadans

Germination of zoospores and isolation of extracellular products

FAPW suspension containing zoospores was transferred to double strength GPY broth in 1:1 ratio and placed at 25 °C for 6–7 days for the germination of zoospores [6]. The contents of the plates were then pooled into a 50 mL tube and centrifuged to remove the fungal hyphae. The soluble fraction as a source of extracellular products was collected and subsequently filtered using 10 kDa Amicon Ultra-15 filters (Sigma, Germany) at 3220 g for 15 min. Retentate was collected as final extracellular product (hereafter referred as ECP).

SDS-PAGE

ECP samples (10 µL) in triplicate were subjected to 12% SDS-PAGE as described by Laemmli [18] and Kumar et al. [19] with some modifications. Samples were mixed with 2 × SDS gel-loading buffer and heated at 100 °C for 5 min. Electrophoresis was carried out at 60 V for 4 h (BIO-RAD). The gel was stained with Coomassie blue G-250. Three bands of interest were excised manually from the gel. After washing and destaining with methanol: acetic acid mixture, the proteins were reduced with dithiothreitol and alkylated with iodoacetamide [20]. In-gel digestion was performed with trypsin (Promega) for 8 h at 37 °C [21]. Peptides were extracted, dried and redissolved in 0.1% aqueous TFA prior to LC–MS injection.

nanoLC–MS/MS analysis

Sample pre-concentration and desalting was accomplished with a 5 mm Acclaim PepMap μ‑Precolumn (300 µm inner diameter, 5 µm particle size, and 100 Å pore size, Dionex). For sample loading and desalting 2% ACN in ultra pure water with 0.05% TFA was used as a mobile phase with a flow rate of 5 µL/min.

Separation of peptides was performed on a 25 cm Acclaim PepMap C18 column (75 µm inner diameter, 3 µm particle size, and 100 Å pore size) with a flow rate of 300 nL/min. The gradient started with 4% B (80% ACN with 0.1% formic acid) and increased to 35% B in 120 min. It was followed by a washing step with 90% B. Mobile Phase A consisted of ultra pure water with 0.1% formic acid. For mass spectrometric analysis the LC was directly coupled to a high resolution quadrupole time of flight mass spectrometer (Triple TOF 5600 + , Sciex) via nano electrospray source.

For information dependent data acquisition (IDA runs) MS1 spectra were collected in the range of 400–1500 m/z. The 25 most intense precursors with charge state 2–4, which exceeded 100 counts per second, were selected for fragmentation for 250 ms. MS2 spectra were collected in the range 100–1800 m/z for 110 ms. Precursor ions were dynamically excluded from reselection for 12 s. The nano-HPLC system was operated by Chromeleon 6.8 (Dionex) and the MS by Analyst Software 1.6 (Sciex). Database searches of raw files were processed with ProteinPilot Software version 5.0 (Sciex). The UniProt and NCBI database (Release 08_2016) was restricted to A. invadans. After having the result of mass spectrometer analysis, a BLASTp analysis was done using Uniprot and NCBI database.

Protease activity experiment using casein as substrate

To confirm the protease activity of the ECP, caseinolytic activity was assessed according to the method described by Cupp-Enyard [22]. Briefly, reaction mixture containing 0.5 mL ECP was added to 5 mL 0.65% casein solution in PBS pH 7.5 and incubated for 10 min at 37 °C. The reaction was stopped by adding 5 mL trichloroacetic acid (TCA). A blank tube was run in parallel. Appropriate volume of ECP was then added in both tubes to bring the final volume to 1 mL, incubated for 30 min at 37 °C and filtered afterwards. 2 mL filtrate was mixed with 5 mL Na2CO3 solution (500 mM) followed by the addition of 1 mL Folins-Ciocalteu’s (FC) reagent and incubated for 30 min at 37 °C. Tyrosine standard vials were also prepared side by side. The contents of these tubes were then filtered, the amount of tyrosine released was measured at 660 nm and protease activity in units/mL was calculated according to the formula by Cupp-Enyard [22].

Protease activity experiment using IgM as substrate

Rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) and giant gourami (Osphronemus goramy) were anaesthetized using ethyl 3-aminobenzoate methanesulfonate (Sigma, Darmstadt, Germany) (MS-222; 100 mg/L) and their blood was collected through caudal vein puncture using non-heparinized sterile syringe with 23G needle (B|Braun, Maria Enzersdorf, Austria). Serum was obtained by spinning the blood at 2000 g for 10 min. IgM precipitation was performed using ammonium sulfate as per the protocol described by Hay and Westwood [23]. Further, the activity of extracellular proteases was tested against fish IgM using dot blot analysis as per the protocol described by Jiang et al. [24] with slight modification. Briefly, 20 µL ECP as a source of secreted proteases were incubated overnight at 10 °C with 20 µL IgM (400 ng) from both fish species separately. EDTA (metalloproteinase inhibitor, 10 mM), E-64 (a cysteine protease inhibitor, 10 µM) and phenylmethanesulfonyl fluoride (PMSF) (serine protease inhibitor, 1 mM) were used to confirm that the proteases in the ECP were responsible for the observed proteolytic activity and to identify the classes of proteases. IgM with GPY broth and with water were separately incubated as negative controls. After overnight incubation, 2.5 µL sample volume from each reaction was spotted onto nitrocellulose membranes, dried for 45–50 min at room temperature and blocked with 5% dry milk for 30–40 min. Membranes were then accordingly dipped in anti-rainbow trout and anti-giant gourami monoclonal antibodies (Aquatic Diagnostics) for 10 min and washed four times with PBS for 15 min. Remaining IgM was detected using goat-anti-mouse HRP conjugated antibody (BIO-RAD).

Antiprotease activity of fish serum

The capacity of the fish serum to degrade the proteases was tested according to the method described by Zuo and Woo [25] with slight modifications. Briefly, sera from rainbow trout, giant gourami and common carp (Cyprinus carpio) were collected as described above. 10 µL test serum from each fish species was incubated with 100 µL trypsin (100 µg/mL) (bovine pancrease type I, Sigma, Germany) at 25 °C along with 110 µL PBS as negative control, 10 µL PBS and 100 µL trypsin as positive control and 10 µL serum and 100 µL PBS as serum blank. After 30 min incubation 1 mL 0.25% casein was added and incubated for 15 min at 25 °C. The reaction was stopped by adding 500 µL 10% TCA. Samples were then centrifuged to remove the precipitates. The absorbance (optical density; OD) of the supernatant was measured at 280 nm and anti-protease activity was calculated [17, 25]: Reference value (RV) = Absorbance of the positive control − Absorbance of the negative control Test value (TV) = Absorbance of the test sample − Absorbance of the serum blank Percent inhibition = ((RV − TV)/RV) × 100.

Results

Zoospores, proteases and the ECP

Thick-walled zoospores were observed under microscope (Fig. 2). Germinating zoospores produced hyphae that covered the entire surface area of the plate in 7–8 days. Filtering the soluble fraction using 10 kDa filters yielded 200–250 µL ECP.
Fig. 2

Different phases of germinating spores of Aphanomyces invadans. a Spore having thick cell wall. b Spore starts to germinate as the development of a small outgrowth (a bud-like structure) is seen. c Newly-formed small hyphae. d A long thread like structure (hyphae)

Identified proteins

SDS-PAGE showed three prominently expressed protein bands (Fig. 3). Using nano LC-MS/MS and subsequent BLASTp analyses, a total of 5, 13 and 12 proteins were identified in bands a, b and c, respectively (Table 1). These proteins were identified mainly as proteases including serine and cysteine. Proteins containing fascin-like domain and bromodomain were also identified.
Fig. 3

SDS-PAGE profile of extracellular products of Aphanomyces invadans. Lane 1, 2 and 3: Triplicate ECP samples showing three prominent protein bands (a, b and c). These protein bands were identified as proteases by mass spectrometer and subsequent BLASTp analysis. GPY broth and distilled water (DW) were used as negative controls

Table 1

List of hypothetical proteins identified in extracellular product of Aphanomyces invadans

Band

NCBI accession

Total ProtScore

Sequence coverage (%)

Confident peptides/protein

Conserved domain

a

gi|673043857

24

28.6

22

Peptidase_S8_S53 super family

gi|673054889

20.96

21.6

15

Fascin super family

gi|673023204

6

8.6

3

Trypsin_2

gi|673025822

4

4.6

2

Peptidase_S8_S53 super family

gi|673031752

2.04

7.5

6

Peptidase_S8_S53 super family

b

gi|673043857

17.69

25.8

22

Peptidase_S8_S53 super family

gi|673054889

15.29

19.1

9

Fascin super family

gi|673031752

14

20.6

10

Peptidase_S8_S53 super family

gi|673040359

9.29

27.5

5

Trypsin_2

gi|673039729

7.19

9.00

4

Peptidase_S8_S53 super family

gi|673049945

6

8.5

4

Glyco_hydro_1 super family

gi|673023204

6

8.6

3

Trypsin_2

gi|673036800

4

5.3

2

Peptidase_C1A

gi|673036298

4

8.1

3

a

gi|673036612

3

4.9

2

Peptidase_C1 super family

gi|673033024

2

0.3

2

Bromodomain super family

gi|673022270

2

2.5

2

S1-P1_nuclease

gi|673021356

2

2.5

3

Peptidase_C1

c

gi|673054889

28

39.8

35

Fascin super family

gi|673038963

14.04

15.3

8

Beta-lactamase

gi|673043857

14

15.2

11

Peptidase_S8_S53 super family

gi|673039719

8

13.5

4

Peptidase_S8_S53 super family

gi|673050561

6

5.3

3

Peptidase_C1

gi|673040359

4.03

12.3

2

Trypsin_2

gi|673050209

4

13.1

2

a

gi|673028596

4

13.8

2

a

gi|673025822

4

4.6

2

Peptidase_S8_S53 super family

gi|673039729

6

4.2

3

Peptidase_S8_S53 super family

gi|673051517

2

2.8

2

Peptidase_C1A

gi|673033024

2

0.3

2

Bromodomain super family

Conserved domain of each protein was identified using NCBI database. No conserved domain was found against the proteins/proteases marked witha

Protease activity experiments

Activity of protease sample using casein as substrate was calculated which was found to be 0.206 units/mL. Dot blot results showed that the proteases were able to degrade the IgM of both fish species (Fig. 4 spot-1) however inactivated proteases were unable to proteolyze the IgM (Fig. 4 spot-2). No color was seen when both IgM and proteases were heat inactivated (Fig. 4 spot-3). IgM in GPY and distilled water were used as positive controls (Fig. 4 spots-4 and 5, respectively). The protease inhibitors EDTA, E-64 and PMSF inhibited the protease activity (Fig. 4 spots-6, 7 and 8, respectively).
Fig. 4

Protease activity of Aphanomyces invadans secreted proteases against IgM of rainbow trout (RT) and giant gourami (GG). Spot 1: IgM was degraded by proteases as no dark spot is seen. Spot 2: IgM was intact when proteases were heat inactivated and upon addition of anti-antibodies and the substrate produced a dark spot. 3: ECP and IgM both were heat inactivated hence produced no dark spot. Spots 4 and 5: IgM was intact in GPY media and distilled water respectively hence produced dark spots. Spot 6: EDTA, Spot 7: E-64 protease inhibitor and Spot 8: phenylmethanesulfonyl fluoride inhibited the proteases hence dark spots are seen

Total anti-protease activity

Total anti-protease activity assay showed that the percent inhibition of the carp serum was 94.2% while that of rainbow trout and giant gourami serum was 7.7 and 12.9%, respectively.

Discussion

Aphanomyces were initially known as parasites of plants, small invertebrates and crustaceans. Probably the first case reported of fish being infected by Aphanomyces species was from guppy (Poecilia reticulata), Maxican blind cave (Astyanax mexicanus), a hybrid of platy (Platypoecilus maculatus) and swordtail (Xiphophorus hellerii) [26]. Aphanomyces, along with other oomycetes, e.g. Saprolegnia species have caused severe losses to aquaculture industry till to-date. From an evolutionary point of view it seems that the pathogenesis of plant oomycetes is mediated by effectors, while host invasion by animal pathogenic oomycetes is facilitated by expansion of proteases [24]. Many infectious microorganisms require proteases for replication or use proteases as virulence factors to cross proteinaceous barrier within the host. Proteases secreted by the fish oomycete Saprolegnia parasitica are suggested to be involved in attacking the host tissue and paving the way for further penetration of the fungus into the fish [24]. In the present study, we investigated A. invadans’ secreted proteases using SDS-PAGE and mass spectrometery followed by BLASTp analysis. 30 peptides belonging to eight major protein domains have been identified (Table 1). Identified proteases containing Trypsin_2 domain (gi|673023204 and gi|673040359) show sequence similarity to Aphanomyces astaci, Saprolegnia parasitica, Saprolegnia diclina, Achlya hypogyna and Thraustotheca clavata. Dubovenko et al. [27] have reported that most of the fungal species that have trypsin or similar-to-trypsin peptidases genes are pathogenic to animals, plant and fungi and suggested them as possible markers of pathogenicity. Extracellularly secreted trypsin-like proteases of A. invadans might have a similar role.

Identified protein with fascin-like domain (gi|673054889) was found in all three bands. Members of fascin-like domain are actin bundling proteins required for motility and invasion in Rickettsia conorii and Listeria [28, 29]. Actin polymerization is the main driving force for cell locomotion. It is used by the bacteria e.g. Listeria sp. and Shigella sp., and viruses e.g. vaccinia for intracellular and intercellular movements [30, 31]. We suggest that this protein may also be required for actin-bundling in A. invadans and has a conserved role in adhesion, mobility and invasion in oomycetes as in other pathogens [2831]. However, the functional mechanisms of protein members of the fascin-like domain and their role in adhesion, motility and invasion remain largely unknown in oomycetes.

Bromodomains are chromatin-associated proteins and are important mediators of gene expression. Such proteins are reported to be crucial in viability and virulence of protozoan parasites [32] and are reported to be essential in the pathogenesis of Plasmodium falciparum [33]. S1–P1 nucleases have been reported to be involved in the degradation of the genetic material in programmed cell death in plants [34]. In our study, the identified proteases that belong to bromodomain (gi|673033024) and S1–P1_nuclease domain (gi|673022270) might also have pathogenic as well as structural role in A. invadans as in other pathogens [32, 33]. Beta-lactamase, mostly produced by bacteria, have an indirect role in infection. These are mostly used against the broad-spectrum beta-lactam antibiotics and provide resistance [35]. Beta-lactamase (gi|673038963) identified in the ECP of A. invadans suggests that these proteins might have a similar role against beta-lactam broad-spectrum antibiotics and may promote resistance.

Glycoside hydrolase (GH) enzymes are one of the largest families of enzymes produced by the fungi to break down plant cell wall [36]. One GH enzyme, XEG1, from plant pathogenic oomycete Phytophthora sojae has been reported as a major virulence factor in soybean [37]. As animals, including fish, do not contain large amounts of cellulose on their skin, extracellular secretion of GH domain enzyme (gi|673049945) from an animal pathogen, A. invadans, mainly reflects the adaptation to nutrient supply [38].

The C1 group of peptidases belongs to the papain-like cysteine proteases. This type of proteases is important for parasites for their virulence and tissue and cell invasion [39]. Many plant pathogenic bacteria produce cysteine effectors to proteolyze the host substrate to alter the plant physiology [40]. Fish parasitic oomycete, S. parasitica, has been reported to secrete cysteine proteases, among others, that could function in virulence [41]. Cystein proteases identified in our study (gi|673036800, gi|673036612, gi|673021356, gi|673050561 and gi|673051517) may also be important in A. invadans virulence.

However, the most prominent identified protein in our results is the serine type peptidase as 10 out of 30 identified peptides belong to Peptidase_S8 domain with active serine motif. The S8 family has a catalytic triad similar to that found in trypsin-like proteases. BLASTp analysis against NCBI database suggested that the identified hypothetical proteins gi|673043857, gi|673025822, gi|673031752, gi|673039729 and gi|673039719 have significant sequence similarity to peptidase_S8 domain from a range of animal and plant parasitic oomycetes including A. astaci, S. parasitica, S. diclina, P. sojae, P. parasitica, Plasmopara halstedii and A. hypogyna and nonpathogenic saprophytic oomycete Teinoptila clavata. One of the important classes of this protease domain is subtilisin-like serine protease. These proteases have long been implicated as virulence factor in bacteria and true fungi [11]. A serine protease, SPRG_14567, secreted by oomycete S. parasitica has been reported to be able to degrade the rainbow trout IgM [24]. Our results suggest that at least one of these identified serine type proteases is also involved in degradation of rainbow trout and giant gourami’s IgM.

Involvement of extracellular serine protease of a nematophagous fungus Lecanicillium psalliotae in degradation of casein has been reported [42]. We found that the extracellular proteases secreted by A. invadans have actively degraded the casein. Consequently, we were encouraged to also investigate the proteolytic activity of these proteases against fish IgM. Fish depends mainly on its innate immunity as fundamental defense against antigens [43, 44]. IgM is the first antibody to be produced after an antigen attacks the host. These are also the natural antibodies of the innate immune system presented as an initial defense component. These immunoglobulins immediately recognize the invading pathogens and aim to destruct them [45, 46]. Banfield and Kamoun [47] have reported that degradation of IgM of rainbow trout by the proteases of S. parasitica is critical in order to cause the disease saprolegniasis. Jiang et al. [24] have also reported that at least one of the proteases produced by S. parasitica has the ability to degrade the IgM of rainbow trout, which suggests that the oomycete has the ability to manipulate and conquer the initial immune response of the fish.

We tested the secreted proteases of A. invadans against IgM of rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) and giant gourami (Osphronemus goramy) and found that the proteases were able to degrade the IgM of both fish species. These are involved in competing against the initial immune defense of the fish thus enables the oomycete to invade the host and play a part in EUS pathogenesis. Lilley et al. [48] suggested that the virulence of pathogenic A. invadans may be attributed to production of proteolytic enzymes.

Dot blot results showed that EDTA, PMSF and E-64 inhibited the protease activity of ECP suggesting that metalloproteinase, cysteine and serine proteases were secreted by A. invadans. These findings are in agreement with the results obtained by mass spectrometery and BLASTp analysis.

Fish plasma contains enzymes, or antiproteases, that play important role in degrading the proteases of invading pathogens. These are mainly α-1 antiprotease, α-2 antiplasmin and α-2 macroglobulin [25, 49]. These antiproteases have the ability to degrade the extracellular proteases secreted by pathogens hence restricting the entry of the pathogen. Results of our antiprotease activity experiment showed that common carp had the highest protease inhibition capacity as compared to rainbow trout and giant gourami. These findings could explain the resistance of common carp to infection with A. invadans [50, 51] and the susceptibility of the other two species tested. Consequently, the virulence of A. invadans could be reduced if protease secretion is affected or strong anti-proteases are used.

Our findings offer a baseline for further investigations on the role of the secreted proteases in EUS pathogenesis using genome editing tools, such as CRISPR/Cas9 system, and pave the way for the development of novel drugs to control the disease.

Conclusions

The ECP of A. invadans was collected and secreted proteins were identified using SDS-PAGE and mass spectrometery. BLASTp analysis revealed that the prominent secreted proteins were proteases, mainly the serine and cysteine type. These secreted proteases degraded the casein and the initial defense component (IgM) of rainbow trout and giant gourami. Dot blot results showed that inhibition of these proteases using various protease inhibitors resulted in reduced proteolytic activity. Our findings suggest that these extracellular proteases could potentially be involved in EUS virulence mechanisms. Hence, they may experimentally be targeted and explored for development of novel controlling methods and therapeutics for EUS.

Declarations

Authors’ contributions

MS and MEL designed the study and supervised the project. MM and GK performed the experiments and prepared the first draft. GK, MS and SS analysed and interpreted the results. MS, GK and MEL revised the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Acknowledgements

MM thanks the Higher Education Commission of Pakistan for providing the scholarship to study abroad and Österreichische Austauschdienst for their institutional support and guidance. The authors thank Dr. med vet. Eva Lewisch and Dr. Simon Menanteau-Ledouble for their help in obtaining the fish blood and Dr. med. vet. Andrea Dressler for maintaining A. invadans cultures.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Ethics approval

This study was approved by the institutional ethics committee of the University of Veterinary Medicine, Vienna and the national authority, according to §26 of the Austrian Law for Animal Experiments, Tierversuchsgesetz 2012 under Approval Number BMWFW-68.205/0014-WF/V/3b/2017.

Funding

This study was funded by the Austrian Science Fund (FWF) Project No. P29294-B25 and the University of Veterinary Medicine, Vienna (PP291-ELM).

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Clinical Division of Fish Medicine, University of Veterinary Medicine
(2)
VetCore Facility for Research, University of Veterinary Medicine

References

  1. OIE (World Organisation for Animal Health) Listed Diseases. 2017. http://www.oie.int/en/animal-health-in-the-world/oie-listed-diseases-2017/. Accessed Oct 31 2017.
  2. Egusa S, Masuda N. A new fungal disease of Plecoglossus altivelis. Fish Pathol. 1971;6:41–6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Kar D, Singha R, Das BK, John R, George R, Mansoor M, et al. Preliminary epidemiological studies on epizootic ulcerative syndrome (EUS) in freshwater fishes of Assam. Int J Sci Res Sci Eng Tech. 2015;1:256–63.Google Scholar
  4. Lilley JH, Roberts RJ. Pathogenicity and culture studies comparing the Aphanomyces involved in epizootic ulcerative syndrome (EUS) with other similar fungi. J Fish Dis. 1997;20:135–44.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Khoo L. Fungal diseases in fish. J Exot Pet Med. 2000;9(2):102–11.Google Scholar
  6. Lilley JH, Callinan RB, Chinabut S, Kanchanakhan S, Macrae IH, Phillips MJ. Epizootic ulcerative syndrome (EUS) technical handbook. Bangkok: Aquatic Animal Health Research Institute; 1998.Google Scholar
  7. El-Matbouli M, Saleh M, Soliman H. Biosecurity risks associated with epizootic ulcerative syndrome and iridovirus in ornamental fish imported into the European Union. Vet Rec. 2014;174:1–2.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Lilley JH, Roberts RJ. Pathogenicity and culture studies comparing the Aphanomyces involved in epizootic ulcerative syndrome (EUS) with other similar fungi. J Fish Dis. 1997;20:135–44.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Chinabut S. Epizootic ulcerative syndrome: information up to 1997. Fish Pathol. 1998;33:321–6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Kiryu Y, Blazer VS, Vogelbein WK, Kator H, Shields JD. Factors influencing the sporulation and cyst formation of Aphanomyces invadans, etiological agent of ulcerative mycosis in Atlantic menhaden. Brevoortia Tyrannus. 2005;97:569–75.Google Scholar
  11. Minor KL, Anderson VL, Davis KS, Van Den Berg AH, Christie JS, Lobach L, et al. A putative serine protease, SpSsp1, from Saprolegnia parasitica is recognised by sera of rainbow trout, Oncorhynchus mykiss. Fungal Biol. 2014;118:630–9.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  12. Kamilya D, Baruah A. Epizootic ulcerative syndrome (EUS) in fish: history and current status of understanding. Rev Fish Biol Fish. 2014;24:369–80.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Pradhan PK, Rathore G, Sood N, Swaminathan TR, Yadav MK, Verma DK, et al. Emergence of epizootic ulcerative syndrome: large-scale mortalities of cultured and wild fish species in Uttar Pradesh, India. Curr Sci. 2014;106:1711–8.Google Scholar
  14. Makkonen J, Vesterbacka A, Martin F, Jussila J, Diéguez-Uribeondo J, Kortet R, Kokko H. Mitochondrial genomes and comparative genomics of Aphanomyces astaci and Aphanomyces invadans. Sci Rep. 2016;6:36089. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep36089.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  15. Yike I. Fungal proteases and their pathophysiological effects. Mycopathologia. 2011;171(5):299–323.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Rao MB, Tanksale AM, Ghatge MS, Deshpande VV. Molecular and biotechnological aspects of microbial proteases. Miocrobiol Mol Bio Rev. 1998;62:597–635.Google Scholar
  17. Yadav MK, Pradhan PK, Sood N, Chaudhary DK, Verma DK, Debnath C, et al. Innate immune response of Indian major carp, Labeo rohita infected with oomycete pathogen Aphanomyces invadans. Fish Shellfish Immunol. 2014;39:524–31.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Laemmli UK. Cleavage of structural proteins during assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4. Nature. 1970;227:680–5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Kumar G, Rathore G, Sengupta U, Singh V, Kapoor D, Lakra WS. Isolation and characterization of outer membrane proteins of Edwardsiella tarda and its application in immunoassays. Aquaculture. 2007;272:98–104.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Jiménez CR, Huang L, Qiu Y, Burlingame AL. In-gel digestion of proteins for MALDI-MS fingerprint mapping. Curr Protoc Protein Sci. 2001;14:16–24.Google Scholar
  21. Shevchenko A, Wilm M, Vorm O, Mann M. Mass spectrometric sequencing of proteins from silver-stained polyacrylamide gels. Anal Chem. 1996;68:850–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Cupp-Enyard C. Sigma’s non-specific protease activity assay-casein as a substrate. J Vis Exp. 2008;19:1–2.Google Scholar
  23. Hay FC, Westwood OMR. Practical immunology. 4th ed. London: Blackwell Science; 2002.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Jiang RHY, de Bruijn I, Haas BJ, Belmonte R, Lobach L, Christie J, et al. Distinctive expansion of potential virulence genes in the genome of the oomycete fish pathogen Saprolegnia parasitica. PLoS Genet. 2013;9:e1003272.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  25. Zuo X, Woo PTK. Natural anti-proteases in rainbow trout, Oncorhynchus mykiss and brook charr, Salvelinus fontinalis and the in vitro neutralization of fish α2-macroglobulin by the metalloprotease from the pathogenic haemoflagellate, Cryptobia salmonicita. Parasitology. 1998;114:375–81.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Shanor L, Saslow HB. Aphanomyces as a fish parasite. Mycologia. 1944;36:413–5.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Dubovenko AG, Dunaevsky YE, Belozersky MA, Oppert B, Lord JC, Elpidina EN. Trypsin-like proteins of the fungi as possible markers of pathogenicity. Fungal Biol. 2010;114:151–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Gouin E, Egile C, Dehoux P, Villeirs V, Adams J, Gertler F, et al. The RickA protein of Rickettsia conorii activates theArp2/3 complex. Nature. 2004;427:457–61.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Brieher WM, Coughlin M, Mitchison TJ. Fascin-mediated propulsion of Listeria monocytogenes independent of frequent nucleation by the Arp2/3 complex. J Cell Biol. 2004;165:233–42.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  30. Frischknecht F, Way M. Surfing pathogens and the lessons learned for actin polymerization. Trends Cell Biol. 2001;11:30–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Pollard TD, Borisy GG. Cellular motility driven by assembly and disassembly of actin filaments. Cell. 2003;112:453–65.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Jeffers V, Yang C, Huang S, Sullivan WJ Jr. Bromodomains in protozoan parasites: evolution, function, and opportunities for drug development. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2017;81(1):e00047–116.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Josling GA, Petter M, Oehring SC, Gupta AP, Dietz O, Wilson DW, et al. A Plasmodium falciparum bromodomain protein regulates invasion gene expression. Cell Host Microbe. 2015;17:741–51.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Mochizuki-Kawai H, Niki T, Shibuya K, Ichimura K. Programmed cell death progresses differentially in epidermal and mesophyll cells of lily petals. PLoS ONE. 2015;. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0143502.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  35. Brook I. β-Lactamase-producing bacteria in mixed infections. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2004;10(9):777–84.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Murphy C, Powlowski J, Wu M, Butler G, Tsang A. Curation of characterized glycoside hydrolases of fungal origin. Database. 2011. https://doi.org/10.1093/database/bar020.Google Scholar
  37. Ma Z, Song T, Zhu L, Ye W, Wang Y, Shao Y, et al. A Phytophthora sojae glycoside hydrolase 12 protein is a major virulence factor during soybean infection and is recognized as a PAMP. Plant Cell. 2015;27:2057–72.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  38. Berlemont R, Martiny AC. Glycoside hydrolases across environmental microbial communities. PLoS Comput Biol. 2016. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005300.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  39. Sajid M, McKerrow JH. Cysteine proteases of parasitic organisms. Mol Biochem Parasitol. 2002;120:1–21.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Hotson A, Mudgett MB. Cysteine proteases in phytopathogenic bacteria: identification of plant targets and activation of innate immunity. Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2004;7:384–90.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Torto-Alalibo T, Tian M, Gajendran K, Waugh ME, van West P, Kamoun S. Expressed sequence tags from the oomycete fish pathogen Saprolegnia parasitica reveal putative virulence factors. BMC Microbiol. 2005;5:46.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  42. Yang J, Huang X, Tian B, Wang M, Niu Q, Zhang K. Isolation and characterization of a serine protease from the nematophagous fungus, Lecanicillium psalliotae, displaying nematicidal activity. Biotechnol Lett. 2005;27:1123–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Magnadottir B. Innate immunity of fish (overview). Fish Shellfish Immunol. 2006;20:137–51.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Uribe C, Folch H, Enriquez R, Moran G. Innate and adaptive immunity in teleost fish: a review. Vet Med. 2011;56(10):486–503.Google Scholar
  45. Boes M. Role of natural and immune IgM antibodies in immune responses. Mol Immunol. 2000;37:1141–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Panda S, Ding JL. Natural antibodies bridge innate and adaptive immunity. J Immunol. 2015;194(1):13–20.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Banfield MJ, Kamoun S. Hooked and cooked: a fish killer genome exposed. PLoS Genet. 2013;9(6):e1003590.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  48. Lilley JH, Thompson KD, Adams A. Characterization of Aphanomyces invadans by electrophoresis and western blot analysis. Dis Aquat Org. 1997;30:187–97.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  49. Yadav MK, Pradhan PK, Sood N, Chaudhary DK, Verma DK, Chauhan UK, et al. Innate immune response against an oomycete pathogen Aphanomyces invadans in common carp (Cyprinus carpio), a fish resistant to epizootic ulcerative syndrome. Acta Trop. 2016;155:71–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Wada S, Rha S-A, Kondoh T, Suda H, Hatai K, Ishii H. Histopathological comparison between ayu and carp artificially infected with Aphanomyces piscicida. Fish Pathol. 1996;31(2):71–80.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  51. Sharifpour I. Histology of the inflammatory response of the carp (Cyprinus carpio L.) to various stimuli. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Stirling, Scotland. 1997.Google Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s) 2017

Advertisement