Skip to content

Advertisement

  • Review
  • Open Access

Environmental resistance development to influenza antivirals: a case exemplifying the need for a multidisciplinary One Health approach including physicians

Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica201860:6

https://doi.org/10.1186/s13028-018-0360-1

  • Received: 3 November 2017
  • Accepted: 17 January 2018
  • Published:

Abstract

A multidisciplinary approach is a prerequisite for One Health. Physicians are important players in the One Health team, yet they are often hard to convince of the benefits of the One Health approach. Here, the case for multidisciplinarity including physicians is made using the example of environmental resistance development to influenza antivirals. Neuraminidase inhibitors are the major class of anti-influenza pharmaceuticals, and extensively stockpiled globally as a cornerstone of pandemic preparedness, especially important in the first phase before vaccines can be mass-produced. The active metabolite of oseltamivir that is excreted from treated patients degrades poorly in conventional sewage treatment processes and has been found in river waters. Dabbling ducks constitute the natural influenza A virus reservoir and often reside near sewage treatment plant outlets, where they may be exposed to neuraminidase inhibitor residues. In vivo experiments using influenza-infected Mallards exposed to neuraminidase inhibitors present in their water have shown resistance development and persistence, demonstrating that resistance may be induced and become established in the influenza strains circulating in natural hosts. Neuraminidase inhibitor resistance genes may become part of a human-adapted influenza virus with pandemic potential through reassortment or direct transmission. A pandemic caused by a neuraminidase inhibitor-resistant influenza virus is a serious threat as the first line defense in pandemic preparedness would be disarmed. To assess the risk for environmental influenza resistance development, a broad multidisciplinary team containing chemists, social scientists, veterinarians, biologists, ecologists, virologists, epidemiologists, and physicians is needed. Information about One Health early in high school and undergraduate training, an active participation of One Health-engaged physicians in the debate, and more One Health-adapted funding and publication possibilities are suggested to increase the possibility to engage physicians.

Keywords

  • Avian influenza
  • Drug residue
  • Influenza A virus
  • Lanamivir
  • Mallard
  • Neuraminidase inhibitor
  • Oseltamivir
  • Pandemic preparedness
  • Peramivir
  • Zanamivir

Introduction

Although the One Health approach has recently gained increasing traction, engaging physicians remains a challenge. Whereas veterinarians generally have a thorough understanding of the association of animal and human health—introduced already at an early stage of their training—physicians tend to struggle appreciating humans as yet another animal species and tend to have an overly anthropocentric view. A multitude of professionals need to work together in One Health and are equally important; the multidisciplinarity per se is an important feature of the One Health concept. Yet, engaging specifically physicians in One Health issues is important for several reasons such as: (1) their expertise is needed to plan and evaluate projects from a human health perspective; (2) the engagement of physicians is needed to underscore and give credibility to the human health impact of the issue in question; (3) engagement of physicians can help bring the issue in question to the attention of policy makers and the general public; and (4) engagement of physicians can help open doors to funding aimed primarily at human health. Likely, engaging physicians in One Health is a long, multi-step process that involves interventions at an early phase of their training as well as making already practicing physicians aware of the concept and its importance. In this literature review, environmental resistance development to influenza antivirals will be used as an example to illustrate the importance of multidisciplinarity and engagement of physicians.

Influenza in the avian-human interface

Influenza A virus (IAV) is a pathogen with major economic and health implications in both human and veterinary medicine. Stamping out interventions cost animal lives and cause huge economic losses to the poultry industry, and seasonal as well as pandemic outbreaks in humans strain health care budgets and organizations. Though important to human health, IAV is a zoonotic virus; dabbling ducks and other waterfowl constitute the natural reservoir [1, 2]. Occasional spill-over events occur to other species, humans included. Thus, genetic material from avian IAVs is the basis for human IAVs. The transfer of IAV genetic material from avian sources to humans can occur through two entirely different routes, direct transmission and reassortment. Direct transmission means that an avian IAV infects humans without previous adaptation in a non-avian host. This is exemplified by transmission of highly-pathogenic avian influenza viruses (HPAIVs) such as H5N1 from infected poultry to humans. Reassortment on the other hand occurs when two or more IAVs infect the same host cell simultaneously. There is no proofing mechanism to sort genetic segments from the respective parental IAV strain into coherent viral offspring, and thus reassortants containing all different variations of the gene segments from each parental strain will be formed. In the context of avian-to-human spread, reassortment is mostly a slow and stepwise process involving several reassortment events over time. As an example, the 2009 pandemic H1N1 IAV was formed from genetic segments from three different IAVs circulating in swine, initially originating from avian sources 1918–1998 and formed through multiple reassortment events [3].

The potential for environmental resistance development in the natural influenza host

Given the connection of IAVs in the avian reservoir and in humans, resistance development to antiviral drugs in naturally circulating avian IAVs is a potential concern also for human health. Pandemic preparedness plans rely heavily on antivirals in the first phase before vaccines can be mass-produced, and antivirals are stockpiled extensively [4]. Experiences from the 2009 IAV pandemic demonstrate that the timely global production and distribution of vaccines was even more difficult to achieve that previously estimated [5]. Thus, antiviral drugs play a crucial role in the beginning of a new IAV outbreak, regardless if the origin is reassortment (like the last four pandemics) or direct transmission (e.g. a human-adapted HPAIV). To date, neuraminidase inhibitors (NAIs) constitute the absolute majority of anti-influenza drugs used. The other, older class of anti-influenza antivirals on the market, adamantanes, are largely abandoned due to side effects and resistance development [6]. The most used NAI, oseltamivir (Tamiflu ©), is administered as a prodrug, oseltamivir phosphate, and rapidly converted in the human body to oseltamivir carboxylate (OC), the active metabolite. OC is excreted mainly via urine and remains stable in surface water and sewage treatment processes [7]. Thus, there is a risk that discharge of OC from sewage treatment plants (STPs) pollutes water bodies downstream of the STP outlets. Dabbling ducks such as the Mallard constitute the natural influenza reservoir, and often reside in waters downstream of STPs. Therefore, dabbling ducks may be exposed to OC in their water environment. IAV is a gastrointestinal infection in Mallards [8] and hence replicating IAV and low levels of OC could co-exist in the intestine of the Mallard, creating a risk for resistance development. If OC-resistant- or NAI-resistant-strains are established among IAVs circulating in the natural reservoir, resistance could be an inherent property of newly human-introduced IAVs, either through reassortment or direct transmission. This is a worrisome scenario given the crucial importance of NAIs in pandemic preparedness. The environmental resistance development hypothesis and its potential connection to humans is depicted in Fig. 1, and has also previously been reviewed [9, 10].
Fig. 1
Fig. 1

As OC degrades poorly in STPs and surface waters, it can enter aquatic environments where dabbling ducks can be exposed to the substance. Dabbling ducks constitute the natural influenza reservoir and have a perpetual circulation of influenza A virus in their population. Thus, there is a risk of resistance development in the intestine of the ducks where replicating virus and OC co-exist. Through reassortment or direct transmission, an oseltamivir-resistant influenza virus could spread to humans. OC oseltamivir carboxylate, OP oseltamivir phosphate, STP sewage treatment plant

Occurrence of neuraminidase inhibitors in the environment

Ample evidence has accumulated to demonstrate the poor degradation of NAIs in STPs, and the occurrence of NAIs in the environment. OC has been demonstrated in effluent water from STPs [11], as have the newer NAIs zanamivir (Relenza©) [12], peramivir [13], and lanamivir [13]. All four NAIs have also been detected in river water; OC up to 865 ng/L [12, 14], zanamivir 59 ng/L [12, 15], peramivir 11 ng/L [13], and lanamivir 9 ng/L [13]. The highest NAI levels have been found in Japan, the top world-wide per-capita consumer, but OC has also been found in river waters in Europe, e.g. in the UK up to 193 ng/L [16]. One study has also highlighted discharge from drug production facilities as a potential contributing factor to environmental pollution of oseltamivir [17]. To analyze degradation and presence of antiviral drugs in the environment, as well as assessing the implications, environmental chemists are vital in understanding and combatting environmental IAV resistance.

A prerequisite for the occurrence of NAIs in the environment is that the drugs are being used. In most parts of the world, use is regulated through prescription by physicians. Thus, involvement of physicians in a One Health approach, enabling them to appreciate the risks with NAI prescription in a broader perspective, is important to obtain a prudent use of NAIs. Multiple studies, many of them drug company-sponsored, have failed to demonstrate effects of oseltamivir and zanamivir (the second most used NAI) on uncomplicated influenza in otherwise healthy patients than simply shortening of length of clinical disease (symptoms) by 1 day (e.g. [18]). Hence, liberal use of NAIs to for uncomplicated influenza can be questioned, and should definitely be avoided if symptoms have been present > 48 h before treatment, as the effect of NAIs is much dependent of early start of treatment. To implement these guidelines, participation of other health professionals such as nurses and medical practitioners is important. A special case is NAI use in parts of the world where antiviral drugs are sold over the counter (without prescription). Under these circumstances, self-medication with NAIs without previous medical consultation is likely a major driver for NAI pollution. Thus, educating the general public about One Health, as well as strengthening local health systems are important measures in this setting. Social science professionals, e.g. behavioral scientists, are especially important to help understand prescriptions/drug use in a cultural context.

Resistance development in LPAIVs infecting Mallards exposed to NAIs

As NAIs are present in river water, what is the risk of IAV resistance development in the natural reservoir? Mallards perpetuate low pathogenic IAVs (LPAIVs) with a pronounced spatial and temporal prevalence variation; in the Northern Hemisphere the prevalence is typically high (up to 60%) during fall migration and low (0.4–2%) at wintering grounds [19]. Several in vivo studies using LPAIV-infected Mallards subjected to low levels of OC in their water have demonstrated resistance development. Exposure of a H1N1 LPAIV to 0.95 µg/L of OC resulted in the well-known resistance mutation H275Y [20], H5N2 exposure to 1 µg/L in E199V [21], H6N2–12 µg/L in R292K [22], and H7N9–2.5 µg/L in I222T [23]. At least for the H1H1 and H5N2 IAVs, detected OC levels in river water are of the same magnitude as where resistance development occurred. Similar in vivo Mallard studies addressing the risk of resistance development to other NAIs are important, especially as these drugs may be more widely used in the future in case of oseltamivir resistance. To assess the risk for resistance development, several players in the One Health team are needed; bird ecologists to understand migration patterns and behavior of dabbling ducks, virologists to elucidate resistance development at a molecular and functional level, and veterinarians to investigate the aspect of influenza disease in birds.

Persistence of resistance without drug pressure

Once resistance is induced among LPAIVs circulating among wild birds, it is imperative to assess if the resistance can persist without drug pressure. Influenza outbreaks are sporadic, and thus NAIs are not constantly present in the environment. Further, the NAI resistance dogma has been that resistance can quite easily develop during treatment but that resistance development is of less concern, as mutants have decreased fitness—as noted in e.g. early in vitro oseltamivir studies [24]. However, a human seasonal H1N1 IAV strain resistant to oseltamivir through the H275Y mutation spread globally during the 2007–2009 influenza seasons, and the spread was not correlated to oseltamivir use [25]. This demonstrated that in certain genetic backgrounds, NAI resistance do not cause decreased IAV fitness. Several compensatory mutations likely contributed to the ability of the seasonal H1N1 IAV to harbor H275Y without fitness loss [26, 27]. Interestingly, Mallard in vivo experiments demonstrate that in a H1N1 LPAIV that acquired H275Y when infected Mallards were subjected to OC in their water [20], resistance persisted despite removal of OC from the water of the Mallards and subsequent IAV replication and transmission [28]. On the contrary, in a H6N2 virus harboring the R292K mutation from an in vivo experiment [22], resistance did not persist without drug pressure [29], illustrating the impact of different IAV genetic backgrounds. Thus, both from human epidemiological data and in vivo studies, there is evidence that in certain genetic backgrounds, IAV resistance mutations do not result in decreased viral fitness. Here, public health/epidemiology expertise is important to successfully assess spread of resistant strains in the human population and the relation to NAI use. Clinical pharmacists can contribute to NAI prescription analysis and physicians can provide expertise in human influenza disease and drug use from a prescriber’s perspective.

Risk of resistance transmission to humans

Reassortment

If resistance to NAIs can develop in IAVs circulating in the natural host, and in certain genetic backgrounds persist without drug pressure, what is the risk that the resistant NA gene becomes part of a human IAV? All four pandemic IAVs seen during the last century were formed through reassortment and all of them were formed by genetic material of avian origin [30, 31]. Thus, it is possible that a NAI-resistant NA gene originating from the natural host can form part of a new pandemic IAV through reassortment. However several factors can influence the likelihood of this event: (1) How prevalent are NAI-resistance among IAVs circulating in the natural host? (2) Is there a loss of fitness when the NAI-resistant NA gene reassorts with other IAVs, i.e. is there a barrier for reassortment? (3) For how long is the NAI-resistant IAV circulating in other hosts (e.g. swine) before it spills over to humans, i.e. what delay is there from resistance development in the environment/natural host until human introduction? To start answering these questions several actions and professionals are needed – such as IAV surveillance in wild waterbirds by biologists and experimental studies regarding reassortment including a NAI-resistant NA gene by virologists. To keep the research questions linked to the human health perspective, involvement of physicians is important.

Direct transmission

There is a barrier for direct transmission of avian-adapted IAVs to humans. The virus must overcome several hurdles such as differences in host body temperature, receptor architecture, and immune response. To date, this has precluded efficient human-to-human transmission of directly transmitted IAVs. However, two research groups have found that small changes in a H5N1 HPAIV allowed for mammal-to-mammal transmission [32, 33]. In one of the studies five point mutations were sufficient to enable transmission, and a subsequent study demonstrated that some circulating H5N1 strains already carried two out of the five point mutations and has modelled factors that can increase the probability for acquisition of the last three [34]. Thus, the genetic barrier for direct transmission may not be as protective as previously thought, and given the high morbidity and mortality for H5N1 and H7N9 IAVs [35], sustained human-to-human transmission is a serious threat. NAI-resistance in such an IAV would make matters much worse; preparedness plans initially rely on stockpiles of NAIs and resistance could render them useless. To assess the risks for human health and to guide pandemic preparedness planning, physicians are crucial. Other important players include virologists to assess the genetic barrier for direct transmission in different IAV genetic backgrounds and environmental settings, immunologists to provide knowledge of human and avian immune defenses and their differences, and professionals with skills in logistics and societal structure to implement the findings into pandemic preparedness.

A summary of key players in a One Health team investigating environmental resistance development to influenza antivirals is depicted in Fig. 2.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2

An example of key players in the One Health team needed to successfully tackle NAI resistance development in the environment

Conclusions

Multidisciplinarity is a key element of the One Health approach, and it is imperative to engage physicians as one of several key players in One Health questions. The example of environmental resistance development in influenza demonstrates this, but it is true for most other One Health questions as well. Engaging physicians in One Health is a challenging task—it is the author’s opinion that information and discussion activities early in high school and undergraduate training, a more active voice of One Health-engaged physicians, and funding and publication possibilities more suited to One Health research are important factors in the process.

Abbreviations

HPAIV: 

highly pathogenic avian influenza virus

IAV: 

influenza A virus

LPAIV: 

low-pathogenic avian influenza virus

NA: 

neuraminidase

NAI: 

neuraminidase inhibitor

OC: 

oseltamivir carboxylate

STP: 

sewage treatment plant

Declarations

Authors’ information

JJ is an infectious disease physician and researcher in the field of antimicrobial resistance, with a focus on the animal/human/environment interface. He did his Ph.D. on resistance development to oseltamivir in the environment and has since mentored several Ph.D. students in further studies in the area of environmental resistance development to NAIs and the risk of transmission to humans. JJ works as a consultant in infectious diseases at Uppsala University Hospital, Sweden and an Associate Professor in infectious diseases at Uppsala University.

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The author declares that he has no competing interests.

Availability of data and materials

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Funding

Dr. Järhult’s research is funded by the Swedish Research Council VR (Grant No. 2016-02606) and Swedish Research Council FORMAS (Grants Nos. 211-2013-1320 and 2016-00790).

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Zoonosis Science Center, Department of Medical Sciences, Uppsala University, 75185 Uppsala, Sweden

References

  1. Olsen B, Munster VJ, Wallensten A, Waldenstrom J, Osterhaus AD, Fouchier RA. Global patterns of influenza a virus in wild birds. Science. 2006;312:384–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Webster RG, Bean WJ, Gorman OT, Chambers TM, Kawaoka Y. Evolution and ecology of influenza A viruses. Microbiol Rev. 1992;56:152–79.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  3. Garten RJ, Davis CT, Russell CA, Shu B, Lindstrom S, Balish A, et al. Antigenic and genetic characteristics of swine-origin 2009 A(H1N1) influenza viruses circulating in humans. Science. 2009;325:197–201.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  4. Wan Po AL, Farndon P, Palmer N. Maximizing the value of drug stockpiles for pandemic influenza. Emerg Infect Dis. 2009;15:1686–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Partridge J, Kieny MP. Global production of seasonal and pandemic (H1N1) influenza vaccines in 2009–2010 and comparison with previous estimates and global action plan targets. Vaccine. 2010;28:4709–12.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Nelson MI, Simonsen L, Viboud C, Miller MA, Holmes EC. The origin and global emergence of adamantane resistant A/H3N2 influenza viruses. Virology. 2009;388:270–8.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  7. Fick J, Lindberg RH, Tysklind M, Haemig PD, Waldenstrom J, Wallensten A, et al. Antiviral oseltamivir is not removed or degraded in normal sewage water treatment: implications for development of resistance by influenza A virus. PLoS ONE. 2007;2:e986.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  8. Daoust PY, Kibenge FSB, Fouchier RAM, van de Bildt MWG, van Riel D, Kuiken T. Replication of low pathogenic avian influenza virus in naturally infected mallard ducks (Anas platyrhynchos) causes no morphologic lesions. J Wildl Dis. 2011;47:401–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Gillman A. Risk of resistant avian influenza A virus in wild waterfowl as a result of environmental release of oseltamivir. Infect Ecol Epidemiol. 2016;6:32870.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Järhult JD. Oseltamivir (Tamiflu(R)) in the environment, resistance development in influenza A viruses of dabbling ducks and the risk of transmission of an oseltamivir-resistant virus to humans—a review. Infect Ecol Epidemiol. 2012;2:18385.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Leknes H, Sturtzel IE, Dye C. Environmental release of oseltamivir from a Norwegian sewage treatment plant during the 2009 influenza A (H1N1) pandemic. Sci Total Environ. 2012;414:632–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Takanami R, Ozaki H, Giri RR, Taniguchi S, Hayashi S. antiviral drugs zanamivir and oseltamivir found in wastewater and surface water in Osaka, Japan. J Water Environ Technol. 2012;10:57–68.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Azuma T, Ishiuchi H, Inoyama T, Teranishi Y, Yamaoka M, Sato T, et al. Detection of peramivir and laninamivir, new anti-influenza drugs, in sewage effluent and river waters in Japan. PLoS ONE. 2015;10:e0131412.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  14. Takanami R, Ozaki H, Giri RR, Taniguchi S, Hayashi S. Detection of antiviral drugs oseltamivir phosphate and oseltamivir carboxylate in Neya River, Osaka Japan. J Water Environ Technol. 2010;8:363–72.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Azuma T, Nakada N, Yamashita N, Tanaka H. Mass balance of anti-influenza drugs discharged into the Yodo River system, Japan, under an influenza outbreak. Chemosphere. 2013;93:1672–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Singer AC, Jarhult JD, Grabic R, Khan GA, Lindberg RH, Fedorova G, et al. Intra- and inter-pandemic variations of antiviral, antibiotics and decongestants in wastewater treatment plants and receiving rivers. PLoS ONE. 2014;9:e108621.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  17. Prasse C, Schlusener MP, Schulz R, Ternes TA. Antiviral drugs in wastewater and surface waters: a new pharmaceutical class of environmental relevance? Environ Sci Technol. 2010;44:1728–35.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Jefferson T, Jones MA, Doshi P, Del Mar CB, Hama R, Thompson MJ, et al. Neuraminidase inhibitors for preventing and treating influenza in healthy adults and children. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014:CD008965.Google Scholar
  19. Latorre-Margalef N, Tolf C, Grosbois V, Avril A, Bengtsson D, Wille M, et al. Long-term variation in influenza A virus prevalence and subtype diversity in migratory mallards in northern Europe. Proc Biol Sci. 2014;281:20140098.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  20. Järhult JD, Muradrasoli S, Wahlgren J, Söderström H, Orozovic G, Gunnarsson G, et al. Environmental levels of the antiviral oseltamivir induce development of resistance mutation H274Y in influenza A/H1N1 virus in mallards. PLoS ONE. 2011;6:e24742.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  21. Achenbach JE, Bowen RA. Effect of oseltamivir carboxylate consumption on emergence of drug-resistant H5N2 avian influenza virus in Mallard ducks. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2013;57:2171–81.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  22. Gillman A, Muradrasoli S, Soderstrom H, Nordh J, Brojer C, Lindberg RH, et al. Resistance mutation R292K is induced in influenza A(H6N2) virus by exposure of infected mallards to low levels of oseltamivir. PLoS ONE. 2013;8:e71230.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  23. Gillman A, Nykvist M, Muradrasoli S, Soderstrom H, Wille M, Daggfeldt A, et al. Influenza A(H7N9) virus acquires resistance-related neuraminidase I222T substitution when infected mallards are exposed to low levels of oseltamivir in water. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2015;59:5196–202.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  24. Xu KM, Li KS, Smith GJ, Li JW, Tai H, Zhang JX, et al. Evolution and molecular epidemiology of H9N2 influenza A viruses from quail in southern China, 2000 to 2005. J Virol. 2007;81:2635–45.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Moscona A. Global transmission of oseltamivir-resistant influenza. NEngl J Med. 2009;360:953–6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Abed Y, Pizzorno A, Bouhy X, Boivin G. Role of permissive neuraminidase mutations in influenza A/Brisbane/59/2007-like (H1N1) viruses. PLoS Pathog. 2011;7:e1002431.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  27. Bloom JD, Gong LI, Baltimore D. Permissive secondary mutations enable the evolution of influenza oseltamivir resistance. Science. 2010;328:1272–5.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  28. Gillman A, Muradrasoli S, Soderstrom H, Holmberg F, Latorre-Margalef N, Tolf C, et al. Oseltamivir-resistant influenza A (H1N1) virus strain with an h274y mutation in neuraminidase persists without drug pressure in infected mallards. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2015;81:2378–83.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  29. Gillman A, Muradrasoli S, Mardnas A, Soderstrom H, Fedorova G, Lowenthal M, et al. Oseltamivir resistance in influenza A(H6N2) Caused by an R292K substitution in neuraminidase is not maintained in mallards without drug pressure. PLoS ONE. 2015;10:e0139415.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  30. Cox NJ, Subbarao K. Global epidemiology of influenza: past and present. Annu Rev Med. 2000;51:407–21.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Guan Y, Vijaykrishna D, Bahl J, Zhu H, Wang J, Smith GJ. The emergence of pandemic influenza viruses. Protein Cell. 2010;1:9–13.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  32. Herfst S, Schrauwen EJ, Linster M, Chutinimitkul S, de Wit E, Munster VJ, et al. Airborne transmission of influenza A/H5N1 virus between ferrets. Science. 2012;336:1534–41.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  33. Imai M, Watanabe T, Hatta M, Das SC, Ozawa M, Shinya K, et al. Experimental adaptation of an influenza H5 HA confers respiratory droplet transmission to a reassortant H5 HA/H1N1 virus in ferrets. Nature. 2012;486:420–8.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  34. Russell CA, Fonville JM, Brown AE, Burke DF, Smith DL, James SL, et al. The potential for respiratory droplet-transmissible A/H5N1 influenza virus to evolve in a mammalian host. Science. 2012;336:1541–7.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  35. WHO. Influenza at the human-animal interface. 2017. http://www.who.int/influenza/human_animal_interface/Influenza_Summary_IRA_HA_interface_09_27_2017.pdf?ua=1.

Copyright

Advertisement