Brief communication | Open | Published:
Changes in canine C-reactive protein levels following orthopaedic surgery: a prospective study
Acta Veterinaria Scandinavicavolume 61, Article number: 33 (2019)
C-reactive protein (CRP) is a powerful biomarker for inflammation, infection and sepsis. However, no reports have investigated canine CRP (c-CRP) concentration changes after orthopaedic procedures. If c-CRP changes were better characterized, it may be possible to identify postoperative complications more quickly. The purpose of this study was to clarify the characteristic changes in serum c-CRP after orthopaedic surgery in dogs. Blood samples were collected from 98 dogs on Day 0 (preoperatively), and then on Days 1, 4, 7, 10 and 13 postoperatively. Day 1 blood sampling was performed 12–24 h postoperatively. We classified the dogs into four groups based on changes in c-CRP pre- to postoperatively. Group 1 dogs showed a peak c-CRP concentration on Day 1, followed by decreases of ≥ 1 mg/dL. Group 2 dogs showed changes in c-CRP concentration by Day 4 that were within ± 1 mg/dL compared with Day 1. Dogs in Group 3 showed a peak c-CRP concentration on Day 4, followed by decreases of ≥ 1 mg/dL. Group 4 dogs showed an initial decrease in c-CRP, then an increase of ≥ 1 mg/dL. Group 1 was the largest group, with 63 dogs. c-CRP on Days 0, 1, 4, 7, 10 and 13 was 0.83 ± 1.03 mg/dL, 8.10 ± 3.15 mg/dL, 3.76 ± 1.94 mg/dL, 1.63 ± 0.92 mg/dL, 0.96 ± 0.70 mg/dL and 0.68 ± 0.51 mg/dL, respectively. Serum c-CRP concentration on Day 1 was significantly higher than at every other timepoint (P < 0.001). In Group 2, surgical site complications were confirmed in 9/15 dogs. In Group 3, surgical site complications were confirmed in 7/14 dogs. In Group 4, two surgical site problems and three surgical site infections were observed, and visceral disease was found in one dog. In Group 1, peak c-CRP was seen on Day 1 postoperatively in 63 dogs (64%), with c-CRP level decreasing by half at each subsequent measurement, which may describe a typical c-CRP change in orthopaedic patients. If deviation from this typical change is observed postoperatively, as in Groups 2–4, this may suggest possible complications.
In small animal orthopaedic surgery, it is important to diagnose postoperative complications early. Overall, surgical site infection rates in small animals range from 2.83 to 5.8% [1,2,3]. C-reactive protein (CRP) is a powerful biomarker for inflammation, infection and sepsis, and is widely used in both human and veterinary medicine . Clinical serum canine CRP (c-CRP) measurement has been performed for over 30 years , and increased serum c-CRP concentrations are known to occur with several types of infection [6,7,8].
Concentrations of c-CRP begin to increase less than 6 h postoperatively, and maximum concentrations have been observed approximately 12–24 h postoperatively [9,10,11]. If normal changes in c-CRP after orthopaedic surgery were better characterized, it may be possible to identify postoperative complications more quickly.
The purpose of the present study was to characterize the changes in c-CRP after orthopaedic surgery in dogs. We expected to see maximum c-CRP concentrations in the first 12–24 h after surgery, followed by a gradual decrease.
This was a prospective study. Data were collected from 98 dogs treated for orthopaedic disorders at our institution between February 2014 and September 2016. The dog breeds varied, with a predominance of Toy Poodles (n = 30). Other breeds included Labrador Retriever (n = 8), mixed breed (n = 8), Miniature Dachshund (n = 6), Bernese Mountain Dog (n = 5), Pomeranian (n = 5), Chihuahua (n = 4), Border Collie (n = 3), Golden Retriever (n = 3), Italian Greyhound (n = 3), Jack Russell Terrier (n = 3), Shiba Inu (n = 3), Beagle (n = 2), Siberian Husky (n = 2), Welsh Corgi (n = 2), Yorkshire Terrier (n = 2) and English Bulldog, Cavalier King Charles Spaniel, French Bulldog, German Shorthaired Pointer, Great Dane, Maltese, Shetland Sheepdog, St. Bernard and White Shepherd (n = 1 each).
Blood samples were collected on Day 0 (before surgery), then on Days 1, 4, 7, 10 and 13 postoperatively. Day 1 blood sampling was performed 12–24 h postoperatively. Blood samples were collected slowly from the jugular vein or lateral saphenous vein into serum separating tubes (Insepack SMD760CG; Sekisui Medical, Tokyo, Japan). Serum samples were then centrifuged at 2000g for 8 min (Tabletop centrifuge-4200; Kubota, Japan). c-CRP levels were measured using a latex agglutination immunoassay method with an automatic analyser (Hitachi Automatic Analyser 7180; Hitachi, Tokyo, Japan). The reagent used in the present study was the Canine CRP NEO (canine C-Reactive Protein Measurement Kit; Shima Laboratories Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan). The assay range of this kit is 0.2–20 mg/dL ; the reference value for c-CRP in our institution is ≤ 1.0 mg/dL.
All dogs were cared for according to the perioperative care protocol of the Veterinary Medical Teaching Hospital, Nippon Veterinary and Life Science University for postorthopaedic patients (Table 1). Bandages were applied for 1 week but were applied longer when the surgeon determined it was necessary. Radiographic evaluations were performed immediately after surgery, and on Day 7 and Day 14. If the patient was discharged earlier than 14 days after surgery, the radiographic evaluations were performed on the day of discharge. After at least 10 days postoperatively, and once the surgical incision was healed, we removed the sutures 1 day before or on the day of discharge from hospital.
This research was approved by the ethics committee of the Veterinary Medical Teaching Hospital, Nippon Veterinary and Life Science University, Japan.
We classified the dogs into one of four groups based on changes in c-CRP. Group 1 dogs showed a peak c-CRP on Day 1, and then levels continued to decrease during each subsequent measurement period. Group 2 dogs showed changes in c-CRP concentration by Day 4 that were within ± 1 mg/dL compared with Day 1. Group 3 dogs showed a peak c-CRP on Day 4 followed by decreasing levels during each subsequent measurement period. Group 4 dogs showed a peak c-CRP on Day 1 or Day 4, which decreased then increased again.
Statistical analysis was performed between measurement days within Groups 1, 2 and 3 and between Groups 1, 2 and 3 for each measurement day. The normality of each c-CRP concentration in Group 1, 2 and 3 was confirmed using the Shapiro–Wilk’s test. The homoscedasticity of each value was then examined using Levene’s test. Homoscedasticity was confirmed for each value, then significant differences were confirmed using Tukey’s honestly significant difference test. When homoscedasticity was not observed for a value, significant differences were confirmed using the Games–Howell test. Data were expressed as the mean ± standard deviation, and P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. The Statistical Package for the Social Sciences version 16.0.1 (SPSS, IBM Inc., Armonk, NY, USA) was used to perform all statistical analyses.
The pre- and postoperative c-CRP concentrations, number of dogs, and the surgical procedures in Groups 1, 2 and 3 are shown in Table 2. Table 2 also includes the events that may have affected the c-CRP concentrations. Group 4 dogs’ characteristics, surgical procedures, postsurgical findings and the pre- and postoperative c-CRP concentrations are summarized in Table 3.
In Group 1, c-CRP concentration on Day 1 was significantly higher than at all other timepoints (P < 0.001). Additionally, c-CRP concentrations on Day 10 and Day 13 were not significantly different from those on Day 0 (Table 2). There were no confirmed events that could have affected the postoperative c-CRP concentrations. However, two dogs had confirmed bacterial infection based on the culture and sensitivity of bone fragments collected during surgery, and both dogs underwent surgical repair of a nonunion. In Group 2, 12/15 dogs experienced events that may have affected the c-CRP concentrations (Table 2). Diarrhoea, vomiting and haematuria were confirmed as signs of visceral disease in these 12 dogs. No dogs in Group 2 were suspected of having surgical site infections. In Group 3, 12/14 dogs experienced events that may have affected the c-CRP concentrations (Table 2). Gastric dilation was confirmed in addition to diarrhoea, vomiting and haematuria, which were signs of visceral disease. Surgical site problems included self-injury and partial necrosis of the suture line of the bipedicle flap that was used to repair radioulnar nonunion. Additionally, inflammation of the intravenous catheter site was identified as a nonsurgical site problem. Swelling and heat at the surgical site and visceral disease both occurred in one dog.
Group 4 included six dogs, numbered 2, 5, 10, 13, 59 and 64 (Table 3). For all dogs except dog 64, antibiotics were based on drug susceptibility tests or clinical symptoms. A decline in c-CRP concentration was observed after treatment in all dogs.
Sixty-three dogs (64%) showed a peak c-CRP concentration on Day 1 after surgery, consistent with previous studies of patients undergoing soft tissue surgery or spinal surgery [9,10,11]. Additionally, the c-CRP concentration in Group 1 decreased to preoperative levels within 10 days postoperatively. Studies evaluating postoperative c-CRP levels in orthopaedic surgery have shown a peak at 24 h postoperatively, and a marked decrease by Day 8 after surgery [13, 14]. c-CRP concentrations 7 days after surgery were significantly higher than preoperative levels, in our study. The postoperative c-CRP concentration decreased by approximately half at every measurement after Day 1, in our study, which may define typical c-CRP changes in orthopaedic patients.
A total of 35.7% (35/98) of the dogs did not belong to Group 1, and 86% (30/35) of these dogs had problems associated with changes in c-CRP. A previous study measured c-CRP in dogs undergoing ovariohysterectomy for pyometra . This previous study showed that dogs with infections and postoperative complications showed significantly higher postoperative c-CRP concentrations compared with dogs without such complications . Five dogs in our study had confirmed bacterial infection based on specimens collected during surgery; two of these dogs were classified into Group 1, while three dogs were classified into Group 4. One of the two dogs classified into Group 1 had tibial nonunion, and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus was isolated from bone chips collected during surgery. In this dog, 25 mg/kg cefmetazole sodium (CMZ) was administered twice a day intravenously intra- and postoperatively, based on culture and sensitivity. The other dog, which had a radioulnar nonunion, received 25 mg/kg CMZ twice daily intravenously and 5 mg/kg enrofloxacin once daily subcutaneously. Pseudomonas aeruginosa was isolated from a bone chip collected during surgery, and the antibiotic was changed to ceftazidime hydrate 25 mg/kg three times a day intravenously over 1 h; however, the antibiotic sensitivity testing did not include CMZ and enrofloxacin, so it is unclear whether these antibiotic agents were effective for P. aeruginosa. Postoperative c-CRP levels in the two dogs in Group 1 may have decreased over time because of the dogs’ response to the intra- and postoperative antibiotics.
Changes in postoperative c-CRP are likely to be affected by the presence of surgical site infections; however, it was not possible to evaluate the influence of surgical site infection on postoperative c-CRP changes because of the small number of dogs, in our study. However, a recent study that measured c-CRP after tibial plateau levelling osteotomy reported that c-CRP levels in dogs with clinical signs of postoperative infection deviate from expected levels on postoperative Day 6 .
Dogs with elevated c-CRP with concurrent marked swelling and/or heat at the surgical site were observed in Groups 2 and 3 in 60.0% and 35.7% of dogs, respectively, and visceral disease was observed in 20.0% and 28.6% of dogs, respectively. This suggests that if the Day 4 c-CRP concentration does not decrease compared with that on Day 1, clinicians should consider the presence of visceral disease, as well as contamination of the surgical site. In fact, c-CRP concentration on Day 4 in Group 1 was significantly lower compared with Group 2 and 3, in this study. In other words, we may be able to classify dogs regarding the presence or absence of complications by observing the pattern of c-CRP change between Day 0–1, and between Day 1–4, postoperatively. However, our results also indicate that it is difficult to identify the type of complication from the pattern of c-CRP change.
There are certain limitations in the present study. First, 22 dogs had preoperative c-CRP concentrations higher than the reference value, namely 14, 4, 1 and 3 dogs in Group 1, 2, 3 and 4, respectively. Events with a possible effect on preoperative c-CRP levels included five bone fractures, four infections and one revision surgery. However, in the other 12 dogs, the cause of the higher preoperative c-CRP concentration could not be identified. Second, we were not able to clarify how preoperative inflammation affects changes in c-CRP concentration after surgery. Third, we did not evaluate liver function, which is the organ that produces c-CRP. Fourth, we focused only on c-CRP concentration as an inflammatory marker, in this study; therefore, white blood cell counts, fibrinogen, serum amyloid A protein and α1-acid glycoprotein, which are known to increase with inflammation, were not included in our evaluations, and it is unclear if these inflammatory markers change similarly to c-CRP concentration after orthopaedic surgery in dogs. Fifth, anti-inflammatory drugs such as nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and steroids were not permitted within the measurement period. Therefore, the number of dogs in our study was relatively small, and it was impossible to compare all procedures. Additionally, the effect on c-CRP of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, which are often used in orthopaedic patients, could not be determined. However, one report suggests that carprofen or meloxicam administration in dogs undergoing elective ovariohysterectomy does not affect postoperative c-CRP concentrations .
The present study showed a characteristic pattern of c-CRP changes after orthopaedic surgery. If deviation from this characteristic change is observed, clinicians should suspect the possibility of complications such as surgical site infections, and further assess the patient.
Availability of data and materials
The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
canine C-reactive protein
Vasseur PB, Levy J, Dowd E, Eliot J. Surgical wound infection rates in dogs and cats. Data from a teaching hospital. Vet Surg. 1988;17:60–4.
Eugster S, Schawalder P, Gaschen F, Boerlin P. A prospective study of postoperative surgical site infections in dogs and cats. Vet Surg. 2004;33:542–50.
Garcia Stickney DN, Thieman Mankin KM. The impact of postdischarge surveillance on surgical site infection diagnosis. Vet Surg. 2018;47:66–73.
Canalias F, Piñeiro M, Pato R, Peña R, Bosch L, Soler L, et al. Preparation of canine C-reactive protein serum reference material: a feasibility study. Vet Clin Pathol. 2018;47:122–9.
Kjelgaard-Hansen M, Strom H, Mikkelsen LF, Eriksen T, Jensen AL, Luntang-Jensen M. Canine serum C-reactive protein as a quantitative marker of the inflammatory stimulus of aseptic elective soft tissue surgery. Vet Clin Pathol. 2013;42:342–5.
Ceron JJ, Eckersall PD, Martýnez-Subiela S. Acute phase proteins in dogs and cats: current knowledge and future perspectives. Vet Clin Pathol. 2005;34:85–99.
Karnezi D, Ceron JJ, Theodorou K, Leontides L, Siarkou VI, Martinez S, et al. Acute phase protein and antioxidant responses in dogs with experimental acute monocytic ehrlichiosis treated with rifampicin. Vet Microbiol. 2016;184:59–63.
Seo KW, Lee JB, Ahn JO, Lee HW, Hwang CY, Youn HY, et al. C-reactive protein as an indicator of inflammatory responses to experimentally induced cystitis in dogs. J Vet Sci. 2012;13:179–85.
Freeman LJ, Rahmani EY, Sherman S, Chiorean MV, Selzer DJ, Constable PD, et al. Oophorectomy by natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery: feasibility study in dogs. Gastrointest Endosc. 2009;69:1321–32.
Nevill B, Leisewitz A, Goddard A, Thompson P. An evaluation of changes over time in serum creatine kinase activity and C-reactive protein concentration in dogs undergoing hemilaminectomy or ovariohysterectomy. S Afr Vet Assoc. 2010;81:22–6.
Saunders AB, Hanzlicek AS, Martinez EA, Stickney MJ, Steiner JM, Suchodolski JS, et al. Assessment of cardiac troponin I and C-reactive protein concentrations associated with anesthetic protocols using sevoflurane or a combination of fentanyl, midazolam, and sevoflurane in dogs. Vet Anaesth Analg. 2009;36:449–56.
SHIMA Laboratories Co., Ltd. Canine C-Reactive Protein Measurement Kit. Canine CRP Neo. 2017. http://www.shimalab.co.jp/EN/PDF/Canine_CRP_EN.pdf. Accessed 5 Apr 2019.
Yamamoto S, Shida T, Miyaji S, Santsuka H, Fujise H, Mukawa K, et al. Changes in serum C-reactive protein levels in dogs with various disorders and surgical traumas. Vet Res Commun. 1993;17:85–93.
Sibanda S, Hughes JM, Pawson PE, Kelly G, Bellenger CR. The effects of preoperative extradural bupivacaine and morphine on the stress response in dogs undergoing femoro-tibial joint surgery. Vet Anaesth Analg. 2006;33:246–57.
Dabrowski R, Kostro K, Lisiecka U, Szczubiał M, Krakowski L. Usefulness of C-reactive protein, serum amyloid A component, and haptoglobin determinations in bitches with pyometra for monitoring early post-ovariohysterectomy complications. Theriogenology. 2009;72:471–6.
Zhang SX, Wang HB, Zhang JT, Zhang N, Pan L. Laparoscopic colopexy in dogs. J Vet Med Sci. 2013;75:1161–6.
Löfqvist K, Kjelgaard-Hansen M, Nielsen MBM. Usefulness of C-reactive protein and serum amyloid A in early detection of postoperative infectious complications to tibial plateau leveling osteotomy in dogs. Acta Vet Scand. 2018;60:30.
Kum C, Voyvoda H, Sekkin S, Karademir U, Tarimcilar T. Effects of carprofen and meloxicam on C-reactive protein, ceruloplasmin, and fibrinogen concentrations in dogs undergoing ovariohysterectomy. Am J Vet Res. 2013;74:1267–73.
We thank Catherine Barnette, DVM, and Jane Charbonneau, DVM, from Edanz Group (http://www.edanzediting.com/ac) for editing a draft of this manuscript.
Data have not been published previously.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Consent to the use of each dog’s data was confirmed by the owner’s signature. Because the blood collection protocol used in this study was used in our veterinary medical teaching hospital before planning this study, the ethics committee of our teaching hospital judged that ethical review was unnecessary. The animals were handled according to high ethical standards and national legislation.
Consent for publication
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.