Skip to main content

Short-term survival rates of 1397 horses referred for colic from 2010 to 2018

Abstract

Background

Up-to-date and hospital-specific knowledge of prognoses for horses with various forms of colic is essential for helping to guide owners’ decisions on costly treatments, and for assessing the continuous development of standards of care in the hospital. This study aimed to determine the short-term survival rates of horses admitted with colic to the University Hospital for Large Animals (UHLA), University of Copenhagen, Denmark, from 2010 to 2018, and to compare these to a previous local study as well as recent, comparable international studies.

Short-term survival rates were calculated for horses grouped by treatment (surgical, medical) and diseases. Results were compared to the selected studies using Chi-square tests.

Results

A total of 1752 horses were admitted with colic during the period, of which 355 were excluded for reasons such as economic restrictions or immediate euthanasia. Short-term survival of the remaining 1397 cases was significantly higher (83.0% (95% CI 81.1–85.0%)) than a previous local study (76%) and a recent Dutch study (80%). Medical treatment was carried out in 77.1% of cases, and surgery in 22.9% of the cases. Short-term survival for medically (89.7%) and surgically (60.6%) treated horses was significantly higher in the present study compared to the previous study (87% and 42%, respectively), but was similar to that found in the Dutch study. Significantly fewer horses were euthanised during surgery than in the previous study (17.2 vs. 40%), and significantly more horses recovered from surgery (79.1 vs. 56%). Short-term survival rate of surgically treated horses (60.6%) did not differ from other European studies (55–62%).

Conclusions

Short-term survival rates have increased since the previous study at UHLA, mainly due to a decrease in intraoperative euthanasia. Survival rates in this study are similar to those found in recent comparable colic studies.

Background

Colic is one of the most common health problems and causes of mortality in horses [1,2,3,4]. Colic is characterised by abdominal pain and covers a wide range of diseases related to the abdomen and gastrointestinal tract [5,6,7]. In general, colic accounts for 13.8–35.2% of all hospitalised horses, and surgical treatment is needed in approximately 19.0–43.3% of hospitalised cases [1, 5, 6, 8,9,10]. Short-term survival (STS) has been defined as survival until discharge from the hospital [11] and the overall STS for all colic cases at equine hospitals has been reported at 68–70% [5, 6, 12]. However, the STS varies according to the specific diagnosis, severity, and required treatment [5, 6, 13]. Few studies have researched the STS of medically treated colic in hospital populations [5, 6], whereas the STS of surgically treated cases has been studied more thoroughly [5, 6, 13,14,15]. Colic is a high-ranking health concern for horse owners, and both medical and surgical treatment can have considerable economic costs, even when treatment is futile [2, 14, 16,17,18]. Therefore, up-to-date and disease-specific knowledge, as well as evidence-based guidance with regard to the prognosis are of great importance before a decision is made to continue with either surgery or intensive medical treatment [18,19,20,21,22].

The aim of the present study was to determine the overall, medical, and surgical STS of colic cases admitted to the University Hospital for Large Animals (UHLA), University of Copenhagen, Denmark, during the period 2010–2018. Furthermore, this study evaluated the development in STS over time and in comparison to other university hospitals. The three main hypotheses were: (1) STS for both medically and surgically treated colic cases was higher in the present study (2010–2018) than in the previous study at UHLA (2000–2009) [5]; (2) STS for colic cases at UHLA increased within the period examined in the present study (2010–2018), with a higher STS in the latter half (mid-2014 onwards); (3) STS for colic cases at UHLA is comparable to the STS published from equine hospitals in The Netherlands, Norway and Finland [12, 13, 15, 22].

Methods

Study population and variables

Data were obtained from medical records of adult (> 1 year old) horses admitted to UHLA for colic between 1st January 2010 and 31st December 2018. Demographic data (gender, age and breed), history, disease process, diagnosis, treatment and outcome were entered into an Access database. Colic was defined as acute abdominal pain [1, 5]. Cases were excluded if they were: dead or moribund upon arrival, diagnosed with colic of extra-enteral origin, or if colic developed during hospitalisation for another disease. Cases where the owner elected euthanasia due to financial or personal concerns other than poor prognosis were also excluded.

Cases with chronic or recurrent colic were included only if they were hospitalised due to an acute episode of colic. In cases of multiple colic episodes or readmission within 30 days, only the first case was included. When repeated episodes were more than 30 days but less than 6 months apart, subsequent cases were only included if the diagnosis was unrelated to the first episode. Similarly, for horses undergoing colic surgery more than once during the same period of hospitalisation, only the first surgery was included. Cases were categorised as surgical when surgery was performed at any point during hospitalisation, and medical when no surgery was performed.

Diagnosis was based on records of clinical and laboratory data, as well as surgical and post-mortem examination where available. When no diagnosis could be concluded due to insufficient or contradictory data in the medical records, the diagnosis was set as unknown. For cases with more than one diagnosis, the primary diagnosis was chosen. The primary diagnosis was defined as that most likely to cause the clinical signs present at the time of admission, and with the highest impact on the outcome. Diagnosis was recorded by anatomical location (e.g., stomach, small intestine, and cecum) and disease process (e.g., simple obstruction, strangulating obstruction, entero-colitis), with a specific diagnosis registered where possible (e.g., epiploic foramen entrapment).

The outcome was categorised as either survival until discharge from the hospital or non-survival (death or euthanasia). The surgically treated cases were also categorised by surgical outcome (“Euthanised or died during surgery”, “Euthanised or died in recovery stall”, or “Recovered”). Recovery was defined as the horse walking out of the recovery stall. The recovered surgical cases were further categorised into non-survival and survival until discharge from the hospital. As the present study included only treated cases, the overall STS was compared to that of treated cases in other studies.

Statistical methods

Data analysis was performed using R studio version 1.2.5019 for Windows 10 [23] and Microsoft Excel 2016. Numerical data were tested for normality using the D’Agostino-Pearson omnibus test.

Descriptive parameters were evaluated non-statistically. Survival rates and the distribution of breeds, diagnoses and treatments were calculated using Pivot Tables in Microsoft Excel 2016. Annual STS was calculated to evaluate progress over time. Furthermore, data were split into two equal time periods to evaluate the significance of progress within the study period. A Chi-square test was used to compare STS results from two time periods—1st January 2010 to 30th June 2014 (Period A) and 1st July 2014 to 31st December 2018 (Period B)—and to compare the results to other recent studies [12, 13, 24], including the previous study at UHLA [5]. The level of significance was set to P < 0.05.

Results

In total, 1752 horses over 1 year old were referred to UHLA for colic during the study period. A total of 8898 horses were admitted to UHLA over the same period, giving an overall colic incidence of 19.7% (95% Confidence Interval (CI) 18.9–20.5%). The total number of colic cases in the database before exclusion (n = 1752) was used, since the 8898 cases included both new admissions and readmissions, as did the total number of horses in the database before exclusion. For this STS study, 355 horses were excluded, resulting in 1397 remaining cases (Fig. 1). Demographic data are given in Additional file 1.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Overview of included and excluded cases. A total of 1752 horses were referred with colic, and 355 of these were excluded from the study for various reasons, resulting in a total of 1397 included horses. The short-term survival rate of medically treated horses was 89.7% (CI 87.9–91.5%). Short-term survival for surgically treated horses was 60.6% (CI 55.3–66.0%). Of those that recovered from surgery, 76.7% survived until discharge from the hospital (CI 71.5–81.9%). DOA Dead on arrival

The overall STS was 83.0% (CI 81.1–85.0%), as 1160 out of 1397 horses survived until discharge from the hospital, while 237 were euthanised or died during hospitalisation. Medical treatment was performed in 77.1% (CI 74.9–79.3%) of the cases and surgical treatment in 22.9% (CI 20.7–25.1%) of the cases (Fig. 1). The STS was significantly (P = 0.001) lower in period A (1st January 2010 to 30th June 2014) (78.8%; CI 75.2–82.3%) than in period B (1st July 2014 to 31st December 2018) (85.5%; CI 83.2–87.8%).

The distribution of medically and surgically treated cases did not differ from the previous local study [5] (P = 0.7) nor the Dutch study [12] (P = 0.6), as shown in Table 1. The STS of all treated, medically treated, and surgically treated horses increased significantly from the previous local study [5], but did not differ from that of other recent European studies [12, 13, 24] (Table 1).

Table 1 Distribution of treatment and short-term survival rate for the present and comparable studies

The ascending colon was the most commonly affected portion of the intestine (n = 749; 53.6%; CI 51.0–56.2%). The small intestine was affected in 15.0% (n = 209; CI 13.1–16.8%) of cases in the present study. Anatomical location could not be determined in 17.1% of cases (n = 239; CI 15.1–19.1%). The most prevalent disease process was simple obstruction (n = 604; 43.2%; CI 36.3–41.4%; Table 2). An overview of the specific diagnoses of obstruction in the ascending colon and strangulations of the small intestine can be seen in Table 3.

Table 2 Distribution of treatment and outcome for disease process and affected portion for all 1397 horses
Table 3 Distribution of treatment and outcome for selected diagnosis codes

Discussion

This study retrospectively investigated the STS of 1397 horses with colic admitted to the UHLA during the period 2010–2018.

The overall STS was 83.0%. This rate was significantly higher than the STS of treated horses found in a previous study at UHLA [5], but similar to that of another recent study [12]. However, it is necessary to be cautious when comparing survival rates from different studies and hospitals due to differences in study design and inclusion/exclusion criteria. The overall STS could not be compared directly, as unlike other studies, the present study did not include horses euthanised without treatment.

Treatments

The STS of medically treated horses is generally higher than that of surgically treated horses due to the generally lower severity of medically treated disease processes such as simple obstructions compared to surgically treated disease processes such as strangulating obstructions [5, 6, 12, 25]. The distribution of diagnoses and treatments at a hospital or within a study population will therefore have a considerable effect on the total STS. In the present study, horses receiving no treatment were excluded prior to evaluation of STS, in contrast to other studies [5, 13]. To help with comparisons, distributions and STS were calculated and compared only to treated cases from other studies (Table 1). The distribution of treatments (77.1% medical and 22.9% surgical) did not differ among studies, which supports the comparison of overall STS.

The owner’s ethical beliefs about animal suffering often influence the decision of whether or not to euthanise. These beliefs vary from country to country, which may complicate the comparison of survival rates if these cases are included in survival studies. In Israel, for instance, euthanasia is rare due to religious beliefs, while it is more common in Scandinavia [5, 13, 26]. The present study excluded all horses euthanised for reasons other than poor prognosis, such as concomitant disease or financial or personal concerns, in order to limit this bias and to obtain results that can be used to give realistic advice to owners. Including these cases in an outcome analysis may create a vicious cycle, as the choice to euthanise will lower survival rates, resulting in even more owners choosing to euthanise [5]. Excluding these cases will minimise the effect of the owners’ concerns, thus providing more accurate survival rates. The other studies did not exclude these cases [5, 12].

The STS of medically treated horses was significantly higher (P = 0.02) in the present (89.7%) compared to the previous (86.6%) study at UHLA [5] (Table 1). This suggests an improvement over time, which may indicate advances in the diagnostics, level of care and treatment of medical colic. UHLA moved to new premises in February 2008, and the improved facilities might also have increased the survival rate of medical and surgical cases. It is, however, also possible that the horses were less severely affected, perhaps due to an earlier referral.

While many studies have evaluated the survival rates of horses with colic requiring surgery, only a limited number have reported the survival of medical colic cases. The reason may be that a diagnosis is often given in cases requiring surgical treatment, whereas in many medical cases, the diagnosis remains unknown. Furthermore, the medical treatment of colic is based on analgesics and fluids, and is therefore largely symptomatic and supportive rather than a specific intervention, so the effects are less easily investigated than surgical techniques [27]. A variety of different drugs and treatments are often used, and protocols may differ among hospitals and attending veterinarians. Although the overall STS of medically treated colic approaches 90% in the present study, further improvements should still be sought, especially for severe and specific diseases such as enterocolitis, where the STS remains relatively low (67%).

The STS of surgically treated horses in the present study (60.6%) was significantly (P < 0.001) higher than in the previous study at UHLA [5] (42%), but similar to other studies (Table 1) [12, 13, 15, 24]. The improvement in overall STS at UHLA was largely due to a decrease in the proportion of horses that died or were euthanised during surgery (17.2%), which was significantly lower than the previous study [5] (39.8%; P < 0.001) and a recent Norwegian study [14] (26.2%; P < 0.05), but similar to a Finnish study [24] (17.4%; P > 0.9). This indicates an improvement over time at UHLA and other hospitals, yet differences among hospitals, studies, and horse populations, may also influence these results. It is likely that the difference in the number of horses euthanised intraoperatively could be related to the general advance in surgeons’ skill and attitude in terms of attempting surgical procedures that were previously not considered possible, such as intestinal resection [28]. In addition, early referral and surgical intervention have been found to improve survival rates [29,30,31]. However, as the duration of colic pre-referral was not always available from the medical records used in the present study, the effect of this could not be determined. The proportion of horses that were euthanised or died in the recovery stall (3.8%) in the present study did not differ significantly from the previous study at UHLA [5] (3.9%; P = 0.9). Likewise, the STS of horses that recovered from surgery (76.7%) did not differ significantly from the previous UHLA study (74.6%, P = 0.6) [5].

Diagnoses

The distribution of diagnoses in the present study differed somewhat from comparable studies, mainly due to differences in categorisation and exclusion criteria impeding comparison. In the present study, lesions were categorised by the disease process, anatomical location in the gastrointestinal tract and specific diagnosis code, resulting in a large number of categories. However, the categorisation used in the present study was considered more applicable in clinical practice and allowed the data to be included in more suitable categories. However, due to the complicated nature of equine colic and the lack of consensus in terms of categorisation, it is difficult to know which cases were included in specific categories in other studies, thus complicating comparisons further.

Survival rates have been shown to vary according to both anatomical location and the character of the disease. Since small intestinal lesions are often associated with a lower survival rate than large intestinal lesions, higher proportions of small intestinal lesions will result in a lower overall STS [5, 32, 33]. In the present study, small and large intestinal lesions accounted for 15.0% and 59.5% of cases, with an STS of 60.8% and 84.5%, respectively. In comparison, Christophersen et al. [5] found small intestinal lesions in 14% of cases and large intestinal lesions in 54% of cases, of which 34% and 78% survived. The present study therefore found a similar proportion of cases but with higher survival rates compared to the previous study at UHLA [5], especially for small intestinal lesions.

Improvement in short term survival over time

The STS of 78.8% in Period A was significantly lower than the 85.5% observed in Period B (P = 0.001), which suggests an improvement over time. Comparing two periods within the same study limits the number of external factors that can influence survival rates (e.g., exclusion criteria and categorisation). The study period is relatively long, and there have been many advances in clinical and laboratory examinations, as well as treatment protocols over the course of the study. One measure that is likely to have improved decision making and survival rates is the evaluation of peritoneal fluid lactate, which has improved the diagnosis of ischemic lesions and early decision making in relation to surgery [28, 34,35,36,37,38,39,40]. Peritoneal fluid lactate measurement was introduced as a standard protocol in cases of colic at UHLA in July 2013. Another modality that may have contributed to improving diagnostics is the increasing use of transabdominal ultrasonography. Ultrasonography can be useful in diagnosing intraabdominal abnormalities like dilated small intestines in horses with small intestinal strangulating obstructions before they can be palpated rectally, thereby allowing for earlier decisions on surgery [41,42,43,44,45,46]. However, the present study did not interpret these factors and thus cannot determine the effect of each of these advances.

The use of head and tail rope-assisted recovery was implemented at UHLA in 2014 with the aim of reducing complications during recovery, and subsequently reducing mortality in surgical patients. The present study did find an apparent reduction in the proportion of horses that died or were euthanised during recovery from the period spanning 2010–2013 (5.1%, n = 7) to the period spanning 2014–2018 (2.7%, n = 5), however this reduction was not significant (P = 0.5). A recent paper from our hospital evaluated the effect of head and tail rope-assisted recovery and indicated reduced complication rates. In that study, both emergency abdominal surgery (P = 0.004) and a longer duration of surgery (P = 0.0001) increased the risk of fatal complications. Assisted recovery significantly (P = 0.02) reduced the risk of fatal complications after colic surgery [47].

Conclusion

The STS of horses admitted to UHLA has improved over time and is currently similar to that of other recent European STS studies of equine colic. This improvement in the STS of surgically treated horses was largely due to a decrease in the number of horses that died or were euthanised during surgery. This might be due to improved pre-surgical diagnostic evaluation leading to more rapid decisions about surgery, as well as improved surgical skills and positive attitudes among the surgeons performing intestinal resections.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. Tinker MK, White NA, Lessard P, Thatcher CD, Pelzer KD, Davis B, et al. Prospective study of equine colic incidence and mortality. Equine Vet J. 1997;29:448–53.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Kaneene JB, Ross WA, Miller R. The michigan equine monitoring system. II. frequencies and impact of selected health problems. Prev Vet Med. 1997;29:277–92.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Leblond A, Villard I, Leblond L, Sabatier P, Sasco AJ. A retrospective evaluation of the causes of death of 448 insured french horses in 1995. Vet Res Commun. 2000;24:85–102.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Penell JC, Egenvall A, Bonnett BN, Olson P, Pringle J. Specific causes of morbidity among Swedish horses insured for veterinary care between 1997 and 2000. Vet Rec. 2005;157:470–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Christophersen MT, Dupont N, Berg-Sørensen KS, Konnerup C, Pihl TH, Andersen PH. Short-term survival and mortality rates in a retrospective study of colic in 1588 Danish horses. Acta Vet Scand. 2014;56:20.

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. van der Linden MA, Laffont CM, van Oldruitenborgh-Oosterbaan MMS. Prognosis in equine medical and surgical colic. J Vet Intern Med. 2003;17:343–8.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Smith BP, Magdesian KG. Alterations in alimentary and hepatic function. In: Smith BP, editor. Large Anim Intern Med. 5th ed. Missouri: Elsevier Inc; 2015. p. 88–106.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Thoefner MB, Ersbøll AK, Jensen AL, Hesselholt M. Factor analysis of the interrelationships between clinical variables in horses with colic. Prev Vet Med. 2001;48:201–14.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Hillyer MH, Taylor FGR, French HNP. A cross-sectional study of colic in horses on thoroughbred training premises in the British Isles in 1997. Equine Vet J. 2001;33:380–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Mezerova J, Zert Z, Kabes R, Ottova L. Analysis of clinical and perioperative findings in 576 horses subjected to surgical treatment of colic. Vet Med. 2008;53:29–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Morton AJ, Blikslager AT. Surgical and postoperative factors influencing short-term survival of horses following small intestinal resection: 92 cases (1994–2001). Equine Vet J. 2002;34:450–4.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. van den Boom R, van Oldruitenborgh-Oosterbaan MS. Retrospective evaluation of treatment of horses with colic over a period of 15 years. Pferdeheilkunde. 2018;34:447–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Wormstrand BH, Ihler CF, Diesen R, Krontveit RI. Surgical treatment of equine colic - a retrospective study of 297 surgeries in Norway 2005–2011. Acta Vet Scand. 2014;56:38.

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Traub-Dargatz JL, Kopral CA, Seitzinger AH, Garber LP, Forde K, White NA. Estimate of the national incidence of and operation-level risk factors for colic among horses in the United States, spring 1998 to spring 1999. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2001;219:67–71.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. van Loon JPAM, Visser EMS, de Mik-van MM, Kerbert P, Huppes T, Menke ES. Colic surgery in horses: a retrospective study into short- and long-term survival rate, complications and rehabilitation toward sporting activity. J Equine Vet Sci. 2020;90:1–7.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Egenvall A, Penell J, Bonnett BN, Blix J, Pringle J. Demographics and costs of colic in Swedish horses. J Vet Intern Med. 2008;22:1029–37.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Barker I, Freeman SL. Assessment of costs and insurance policies for referral treatment of equine colic. Vet Rec. 2019;185:508.

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Blikslager AT, Mair TS. Trends in the management of horses referred for evaluation of colic: 2004–2017. Equine Vet Educ. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1111/eve.13244.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Mair TS. Contributions to an evidence-based medicine approach to colic. Equine Vet J. 2002;34:428–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Mair TS, Smith LJ, Sherlock CE. Evidence-based gastrointestinal surgery in horses. Vet Clin North Am Equine Pract. 2007;23:267–92.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Krista KM, Kuebelbeck KL. Comparison of survival rates for geriatric horses versus nongeriatric horses following exploratory celiotomy for colic. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2009;235:1069–72.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Davis W, Fogle CA, Gerard MP, Levine JF, Blikslager AT. Return to use and performance following exploratory celiotomy for colic in horses: 195 cases (2003–2010). Equine Vet J. 2013;45:224–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Team RC. R: A language and environment for statistical computer R.Foundation for statistical computing, Vienna; 2017. https://www.r-project.org/.

  24. Immonen IAM, Karikoski N, Mykkänen A, Niemelä T, Junnila J, Tulamo RM. Long-term follow-up on recovery, return to use and sporting activity: a retrospective study of 236 operated colic horses in Finland (2006–2012). Acta Vet Scand. 2017;59:1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Abutarbush SM, Carmalt JL, Shoemaker RW. Causes of gastrointestinal colic in horses in western Canada: 604 cases (1992 to 2002). Can Vet J. 2005;46:800–5.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Sutton GA, Ertzman-Ginsburg R, Steinman A, Milgram J. Initial investigation of mortality rates and prognostic indicators in horses with colic in Israel: a retrospective study. Equine Vet J. 2009;41:482–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Mair TS. Medical management of gastrointestinal diseases. In: Blikslager AT, White NA, Moore JN, Mair TS, editors. The equine acute abdomen. 3rd ed. Wiley & Blackwell; 2017. p. 313–30.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Freeman DE. Fifty years of colic surgery. Equine Vet J. 2018;50:423–35.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Freeman DE, Schaeffer DJ, Baker GJ. A clinical grading system for intraoperative assessment of small intestinal viability in the horse. AAEP Proc. 2001;47:105–9.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Mair TS, Smith LJ. Survival and complication rates in 300 horses undergoing surgical treatment of colic. Part 2: short-Tem complications. Equine Vet J. 2005;37:304–9.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Freeman DE, Schaeffer DJ, Cleary OB. Long-term survival in horses with strangulating obstruction of the small intestine managed without resection. Equine Vet J. 2014;46:711–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. van den Boom R, van Oldruitenborgh-Oosterbaan MS. Retrospective evaluation of treatment of horses with colic over a period of 15 years. Pferdeheilkd - Equine Med. 2018;34:447–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Mair TS, Smith LJ. Survival and complication rates in 300 horses undergoing surgical treatment of colic. Part 3: Long-term complications and survival. Equine Vet J. 2005;37:310–4.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Latson KM, Nieto JE, Beldomenico PM, Snyder JR. Evaluation of peritoneal fluid lactate as a marker of intestinal ischaemia in equine colic. Equine Vet J. 2005;37:342–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Delesalle C, Dewulf J, Lefebvre RA, Schuurkes JAJ, Proot J, Lefere L, et al. Determination of lactate concentrations in blood plasma and peritoneal fluid in horses with colic by an accusport analyzer. J Vet Intern Med. 2007;21:293–301.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. van den Boom R, Butler CM, Sloet van Oldruitenborgh-Oosterbaan MM. The usability of peritoneal lactate concentration as a prognostic marker in horses with severe colic admitted to a veterinary teaching hospital. Equine Vet Educ. 2010;22:420–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Yamout SZ, Nieto JE, Beldomenico PM, Dechant JE, LeJeune S, Snyder JR. Peritoneal and plasma d-lactate concentrations in horses with colic. Vet Surg. 2011;40:817–24.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Pihl TH, Scheepers E, Sanz M, Goddard A, Page P, Toft N, et al. Influence of disease process and duration on acute phase proteins in serum and peritoneal fluid of horses with colic. J Vet Intern Med. 2015;29:651–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Petersen MB, Tolver A, Husted L, Tølbøll TH, Pihl TH. Repeated measurements of blood lactate concentration as a prognostic marker in horses with acute colitis evaluated with classification and regression trees (CART) and random forest analysis. Vet J Elsevier Ltd. 2016;213:18–23.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Shearer TR, Norby B, Carr EA. Peritoneal fluid lactate evaluation in horses with nonstrangulating versus strangulating small intestinal disease. J Equine Vet Sci. 2018;61:18–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jevs.2017.11.005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Biscoe EW, Whitcomb MB, Vaughan B, Dechant JE, Magdesian KG. Clinical features and outcome in horses with severe large intestinal thickening diagnosed with transabdominal ultrasonography: 25 cases (2003–2010). J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2018;253:108–16.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Busoni V, Busscher VD, Lopez D, Verwilghen D, Cassart D. Evaluation of a protocol for fast localised abdominal sonography of horses (FLASH) admitted for colic. Vet J. 2011;188:77–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tvjl.2010.02.017.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Paulussen E, Broux B, van Bergen T, Lefère L, De Clercq D, van Loon G. Caecal intussusception in the horse: Ultrasonographic findings and survival to hospital discharge of 60 cases (2009–2013). Equine Vet Educ. 2018;30:241–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Pease AP, Scrivani PV, Erb HN, Cook VL. Accuracy of increased large-intestine wall thickness during ultrasonography for diagnosing large-colon torsion in 42 horses. Vet Radiol Ultrasound. 2004;45:220–4.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Beccati F, Pepe M, Gialletti R, Cercone M, Bazzica C, Nannarone S. Is there a statistical correlation between ultrasonographic findings and definitive diagnosis in horses with acute abdominal pain? Equine Vet J. 2011;43:98–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Klohnen A. Abdominal ultrasonography in the equine patient with acute signs of colic. Proc 58th Annu Conv. 2012;56:11–8.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Nicolaisen A, Nygaard AB, Christophersen MT, Jensen D, Lindegaard C. Effect of head and tail rope assisted recovery of horses after elective and emergency surgery under general anaesthesia. Equine Vet Educ. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1111/eve.13397.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Annette Larsen and Jeanne Pilegaard for their help in locating journals in hospital archives, as well as Frida Henriksson and Melissa Dahl for their help in data collection from journals. We further thank the clinical staff at UHLA for handling of patients and clinical data collection.

Funding

Not applicable since the study was a retrospective analysis of medical records.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

ED and KFS collected, analysed and interpreted the data, wrote the manuscript, and contributed to the study design. MLH and MAD contributed to conception and design of the study as well as data collection. MTC contributed to conception and design of the study, analysis and interpretation of data, and revising the manuscript. TLP contributed to conception and design of the study, created the database, acquired data and was a major contributor in collection, analysis and interpretation of data as well as manuscript revision. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tina Holberg Pihl.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study was approved by The Local Ethical and Administrative Committee of the Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences (approval no 2019–018).

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1.

Distribution of age (years), bodyweight (kg), sex, breed and type for all horses referred to the hospital due to colic.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Dybkjær, E., Steffensen, K.F., Honoré, M.L. et al. Short-term survival rates of 1397 horses referred for colic from 2010 to 2018. Acta Vet Scand 64, 11 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13028-022-00631-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13028-022-00631-4

Keywords

  • Colic
  • Diagnosis
  • Equine
  • Gastro-intestinal
  • Medical
  • Outcome
  • Surgery