Skip to main content

Clinical, laboratory and ultrasonographic findings in 38 calves with type-4 abomasal ulcer



Type-4 abomasal ulcers (U4) are perforated ulcers causing diffuse peritonitis. This retrospective study describes the clinical, laboratory and ultrasonographic findings in 38 calves with U4. The medical records of 38 calves aged three days to 20 weeks with U4 were scrutinised.


The most common clinical findings were poor general health (95%), reduced skin elasticity (95%), rumen atony (91%), abdominal guarding (76%) and positive percussion auscultation and/or swinging auscultation on the right side of the abdomen (75%). The most frequent laboratory findings were increased numbers of segmented neutrophils (87%), eosinopenia (87%), acidosis (84%), azotaemia (79%) and hyponatraemia (79%). The most frequent abdominal ultrasonographic findings were intestinal atony (68%), fluid (67%) and fibrin deposits (58%) in the abdomen. Thirty-five calves were euthanased and three calves died spontaneously. All calves underwent pathological examination. Diffuse peritonitis caused by a transmural abomasal ulcer was the principal diagnosis in all calves.


Perforated abomasal ulcers cause severe illness, and a thorough clinical examination combined with ultrasonographic abdominal examination should lead to a tentative diagnosis.


Postmortem studies have shown that perforated abomasal ulcers are an important cause of death in veal calves, and in one report accounted for 22% of all losses [1]. However, fatal ulceration is merely one part of the problem but has serious consequences [2, 3] because the prevalence of non-fatal, non-perforated ulcers is high and ranges from 16.7% (fundic region [2]) to 36% (fundic or pyloric region) [4], 59.3% (fundic or pyloric region) [5], 74.1% (pyloric region) [6] and 80% (fundic or pyloric region) [7]. Abomasal ulcerative lesions in veal calves are classified as erosions, ulcers and scars [3, 8] but in principle could also be divided into types 1 (U1) to 5 (U5) analogous to what was recently described in detail for U1 [9], U2 [10], U3 [11], U4 [12] and U5 [13] in cows. Abomasal ulcers of veal calves are divided into pyloric and fundic ulcers [3, 14]. A detailed overview of risk factors for abomasal ulcers in calves, including nutritional aspects, stress, comorbidity and medical treatment, was recently published [3].

A study of 118 calves with abomasal ulceration identified an increased prevalence in calves aged 5–12 weeks [15]. At that time, the calves were weaned and had started to eat larger amounts of solid feed. It was therefore surmised that the incompletely developed forestomachs allowed the transport of poorly digested feed into the abomasum causing damage to the mucosa. The notion that abomasal overloading associated with feeding large amounts of milk favours the development of abomasal ulcers [16, 17] is not supported by scientific evidence [3]. An experimental study [18] and a risk assessment study [6] did not support the notion that overloading of the abomasum by high milk volumes delivered in a small number of meals per day was responsible for abomasal ulcers. The prevalence of abomasal lesions was also increased in calves on a high nutritional plane and with a high carcass weight [19, 20]. Low feeding frequency (twice daily versus ad libitum) [21] and feeding of straw [22, 23] or corn silage [24, 25] are other risk factors for abomasal ulceration. Veal calves raised in production programs that are in compliance with increased animal welfare requirements had significantly fewer ulcers in the fundic part of the abomasum than calves raised conventionally under conditions with minimal animal welfare standards [20]. Use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) has also been associated with an increased prevalence of abomasal ulcers in calves [26, 27]. The role of microbials such as Clostridium perfringens and Campylobacter jejuni in the pathogenesis of abomasal ulcers is controversial and shall not be discussed here.

This study is limited to calves affected by type-4 abomasal ulcers (U4), which are perforated ulcers causing diffuse peritonitis. The main clinical findings of 299 calves [15] and the laboratory and pathological findings of 81 [25] and 80 calves [28] with perforated ulcers have been described, and other older publications on these topics reviewed [29]. The diagnosis of perforated abomasal ulcer in calves is not always straightforward and even though the clinical signs are severe, they are often misinterpreted. Therefore, the goal of this study was to describe the clinical, laboratory and ultrasonographic findings in 38 calves with U4 to facilitate rapid diagnosis and humane euthanasia in the field.



This was a retrospective study of 38 calves with a main diagnosis of U4. The calves had been admitted to the Veterinary Teaching Hospital, University of Zurich, from January 1, 1992 to December 31, 2017. The final diagnosis of U4 was based on the results of postmortem examination. The methods and the results were described in detail in a Master’s thesis [30]. The calves ranged in age from 3 days to 20 weeks (median  =  8 weeks). Breeds included Brown Swiss (n  =  23, 61%), Swiss Fleckvieh (n  =  4, 10%), Holsteins (n  =  3, 8%) and crossbred cattle (n  =  8, 21%). Twenty-three calves (61%) were replacement dairy heifers, 10 (26%) were veal calves and 5 (13%) were nursing beef calves. All calves underwent the same structured clinical and laboratory examination procedures. The ultrasonographic examination was less structured; intestinal motility was monitored in only 28 of 36 scanned calves.


Thirty-six calves were not weaned and fed milk or milk replacer. Thirty-three calves had a complete feeding history with regard to other feeds; 27 of these were fed hay (n  =  25), grass and/or corn silage (n  =  9), mixed grain (n  =  8) or grass (n  =  3), whereas the remaining six calves did not receive additional feeds. Twenty-five calves received veterinary treatment before admission, which included antibiotics (n  =  14), NSAIDs (n  =  20) or corticosteroids (n  =  5). The duration of illness at the time of admission ranged from 6 to 21 days (median  =  1 day) but exceeded 4 days in only 3 calves.

Inclusion criteria

Calves between 1 day and 6 months of age, in which U4 was diagnosed during laparotomy and/or pathological examination, were included in this study.

Clinical examination

Clinical examination was done as described [31]. Rumen fluid was collected from 27 calves, and the physical characteristics including colour, odour and pH were determined. Voided urine from 20 calves was analysed using test strips (Combur9®, Roche, Basel).

Haematological examination

The following blood samples were collected from the jugular veins of 37 calves: 5 ml of EDTA blood for haematological analysis, 5 ml of whole blood for serum biochemistry and 2 ml of whole blood mixed with 0.2 ml heparin for venous blood gas analysis. Haematological analysis included the determination of haematocrit and total leukocyte count using an automated blood analyser (CELL-Dyn 3500, Abbott Diagnostics Division, Baar, Switzerland). A white blood cell count differential was done in 23 calves. The concentrations of total protein, fibrinogen, serum urea, bilirubin, sodium, potassium, chloride, calcium, magnesium and inorganic phosphorus were determined at 37 °C using an automated analyser (Cobas-Integra-800-Analyser, Roche Diagnostics, Basel, Switzerland) and the manufacturer’s reagents (Roche Reagents) according to the International Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (IFCC). Venous blood gas analysis was done using an automated analyser (RapidLab 248, Siemens Schweiz AG, Zurich, Switzerland).

Ultrasonographic examination of the abdomen and abdominocentesis

Abdominal ultrasonography was done in 36 calves using a 5.0–7.5-MHz linear or convex transducer [32], and ultrasound-guided abdominocentesis was carried out in 15 calves.

Euthanasia and postmortem examination

Thirty-five calves were euthanased using pentobarbital administered intravenously at 80 mg/kg body weight (Esconarkon®, Streuli Pharma AG, Uznach, Switzerland), 12 of these underwent exploratory laparotomy to obtain or confirm a diagnosis of U4. Three calves died spontaneously during or after the examination. All calves underwent pathological examination.

Statistical analysis

All records were stored as PDF files, and the key findings and diagnoses were also stored in a FileMaker database. This allowed straightforward identification of calves with U4 from the more than 30,000 records. The clinical, laboratory and ultrasonographic findings of the calves were transferred to specifically designed protocol charts and analysed using SPSS Statistics 25.0 (IBM Corp. 2017, USA). First, the frequency distributions for all variables were calculated. The Shapiro–Wilk test was used to test data for normality; normal data are shown as means  ±  standard deviation, and non-normal data as median and 25th and 75th percentiles.


Clinical findings

The most common clinical findings in decreasing frequency were poor general health (95%), reduced skin elasticity (95%), rumen atony (91%), abdominal guarding (76%) and positive swinging auscultation, percussion auscultation or both on the right side of the abdomen (75%) (Fig. 1). The general condition was moderately (n  =  2, 5%) or severely affected (n  =  36, 95%) in all calves; 25 (65.8%) were listless, one calf (2.6%) was comatose and ten (26.3%) were recumbent. Four calves (10%) were thin, 14 (37%) had moderate and 20 (53%) good body condition. Nineteen (50%) calves had abdominal dilatation. The heart rate ranged from 68 to 180 beats/min (mean  ±  standard deviation: 124  ±  30 beats/min), the respiratory rate ranged from 20 to 102 breaths/min (median: 40 breaths/min) and the rectal temperature ranged from 35.8 to 40.1 °C (median: 39.2 °C) (Table 1). The heart rate was increased in 25 (66%), the respiratory rate in 13 (35%) and the rectal temperature in 8 (21%) calves. The rectal temperature was subnormal in 10 (26%) calves.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Abnormal clinical findings in 38 calves. Most common abnormal clinical findings in 38 calves with type-4 abomasal ulcer. PA/SA Percussion auscultation/swinging auscultation on the right side

Table 1 Clinical findings in 38 calves with type-4 abomasal ulcer

Thirty-two of 35 (91%) calves had rumen atony (Table 1), and 20 (63%) calves had ruminal tympany. At least one foreign body test (back grip, pole test, pain percussion) was positive in 15 of 23 (65%) calves. Percussion and simultaneous auscultation and/or ballottement and simultaneous auscultation were positive on the right side in 27 (75%) and positive on the left side in 25 (66%) calves. Intestinal motility was reduced or absent in 33 (89%) calves.

The rectum was empty in 8 (21%) calves and contained dark or black faeces in 6 (16%) and loose or watery faeces in another 4 (11%). Blood, mucus or fibrin was found in the rectum of 13 (34%) calves.

Other abnormal findings were enophthalmus (n  =  22, 73%), prolonged capillary refill time (n  =  24, 71%), congested scleral vessels (n  =  25, 70%), dry and/or cold muzzle (n  =  21, 70%), decreased skin surface temperature (n  =  25, 66%) and pale oral mucosa (n  =  20, 53%).

Non-specific signs of pain including spontaneous grunting and bruxism were seen in 14 (37%) and 4 (11%) calves, respectively, and signs of parietal pain including abdominal guarding, arched back and tucked-up abdomen occurred in 29 (76%), 6 (16%) and 3 (8%) calves, respectively.

Urine pH was between 5 and 6 in 17 (85%) and between 7 and 8 in 3 (15%) calves. Five urine samples (25%) contained  ++  protein (approximately 100 mg protein/100 mL), and 6 (30%) were positive for erythrocytes or haemoglobin/myoglobin.

The ruminal fluid from 7 of 25 (28%) calves had a milky grey discolouration and a sour odour, and the pH was in the acidic range at 3.5–6.0 in 9 of 27 (33%) samples.

Laboratory findings

The most common laboratory findings were increased numbers of segmented neutrophils (87%), eosinopenia (87%), acidosis (84%), azotaemia (79%) and hyponatraemia (79%) (Fig. 2). Haemoconcentration was seen in 22 (59%), hypoproteinaemia in 23 (62%) and hyperfibrinogenaemia in 10 (30%) calves (Table 2). The serum urea concentration was increased in 27 (79%) calves, and the most prevalent serum electrolyte imbalances were besides hyponatraemia in 26 (79%) hyperphosphataemia in 20 (69%) and hypokalaemia in 19 (63%) calves.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Abnormal blood variables in 38 calves. Most common abnormal laboratory findings in 38 calves with type-4 abomasal ulcer

Table 2 Haematological and blood biochemical findings in calves with type-4 abomasal ulcer

Twenty-three (67%) calves had leukocytosis (Table 3), and 20 of 23 (87%) calves had increased numbers of segmented neutrophils and 18 (78%) had increased numbers of band neutrophils (left shift). Regenerative left shift was detected in 14 (61%) calves and degenerative left shift in 4 (17%). Eosinopenia was seen in 20 (87%), monocytosis in 11 (48%) and lymphocytosis in 8 (35%) calves.

Table 3 White blood and differential blood count in calves with type-4 abomasal ulcer

Venous blood gas analysis showed acidosis in 26 (84%) and decreased base excess in 15 (48%) calves (Table 4).

Table 4 Venous blood gas analysis in calves with type-4 abomasal ulcer

Abdominal ultrasonography and abdominocentesis

The most frequent abdominal ultrasonographic findings were intestinal atony (68%), fluid (67%) (Fig. 3) and fibrin deposits or fibrin strands (58%) (Fig. 4) (Table 5). The abomasum was dilated in 13 of 36 (36%) calves and displaced to the left in two (6%). Thirteen (41%) calves had dilated small intestines, and four (11%) had gas inclusions in the abdomen. Of the 15 peritoneal fluid samples, 10 were turbid, 12 had brownish red, white or green discolouration and 12 were malodourous or had a sour smell.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Ultrasonogram in a calf with diffuse peritonitis. Abdominal ultrasonogram of a three-month-old calf with diffuse peritonitis as a result of type-4 abomasal ulcer. The image was obtained from the right flank using a 5-MHz convex transducer. The abdomen contains a massive amount of fluid with gas inclusions (echogenic stippling). The small intestines are contained within the omental bursa. 1 Abdominal wall, 2 Abdominal fluid, 3 Greater omentum, 4 Small intestines, Ds Dorsal, Vt Ventral

Fig. 4
figure 4

Ultrasonogram in a calf with diffuse peritonitis. Abdominal ultrasonogram of a 5-month-old calf with diffuse peritonitis as a result of a perforated abomasal ulcer. The image was obtained from the right flank using a 5-MHz convex transducer. The abdomen contains a large amount of fluid and fibrin septa. The small intestines are contained within the omental bursa. 1 Abdominal wall, 2 Abdominal fluid, 3 Fibrin strands, 4 Thickened greater omentum, 5 Small intestines, Ds Dorsal, Vt Ventral

Table 5 Ultrasonographic findings in calves with type-4 abomasal ulcer

Pathological findings

All calves had at least one perforated abomasal ulcer (Fig. 5) and diffuse peritonitis; 3 calves had two perforated ulcers. 23 (61%) calves had one, five (13%) had two, three (8%) had three and seven (18%) had more than three additional non-perforated (type-1) ulcers (Table 6). Of 37 calves, the diameter of the perforated ulcers ranged from 0.6 to 1.5 cm in six (16%); from 1.6 to 2.5 cm in nine (24%); from 2.6 to 3.5 cm in 10 (27%) and was more than 3.5 cm in 12 (32%). The abomasal mucosa was haemorrhagic in 13 (34%) calves and hypertrophied and oedematous in six (16%) calves each. Three calves had left displaced abomasum, and one calf had abomasal volvulus. The abomasal content was milky and had a green tinge in 34 calves and haemorrhagic in three, and one calf had a trichobezoar. In three calves the rumen contained milk, and in two a trichobezoar. Five calves had bronchopneumonia, two had lice and one had omphalitis.

Fig. 5
figure 5

Postmortem findings in a calf with type-4 abomasal ulcer. Type-4 abomasal ulcer in a 6-week-old Fleckvieh bull calf. There is severe erythema and oedema of the abomasal mucosa

Table 6 Postmortem findings in 38 calves with type-4 abomasal ulcer

Final diagnosis

In all calves, the principal diagnosis was diffuse peritonitis associated with U4. Seventeen (45%) calves had one (n  =  16) or two comorbidities (n  =  1), which included bronchopneumonia (n  =  5), abomasal displacement/volvulus (n  =  4), ruminal drinking syndrome (n  =  3), pediculosis (n  =  2), persistent bovine viral diarrhoea virus infection (n  =  1), omphalitis (n  =  1) and enteritis (n  =  1).


Diagnosis of a perforated abomasal ulcer in a calf less than a week old was striking but has been described before [33]. The pathogenesis is not clear but it is conceivable that the ulcer started in utero. A report in human medicine described a 1-day-old term baby with melaena and haematemesis born to a woman who had suffered severe psychosocial stress in the second trimester [34]. Abomasal ulceration in a neonatal calf was attributed to stress of the dam, which was recumbent before parturition and then required veterinary assistance because of dystocia [33]. A relevant history was not available in the present case, and thus prenatal stress could not be determined. Two thirds of the calves described in this report were less than 2 months of age, which was in agreement with another study, in which most of the beef calves with abomasal ulcers were younger than two months [35]. In another study, more than half of 118 affected calves were less than eight weeks old, a third were between eight and 12 weeks and only about 10% were older than 12 weeks [15]. Of the calves in the present study, close to 20% were older than 3 months.

Several risk factors thought to be associated with abomasal ulceration were also encountered in this study. Just over half of the calves had received an NSAID, and approximately 13% had received a corticosteroid; both types of drugs have been associated with abomasal ulceration [15, 26, 27]. The risk of ulceration increases when these drugs are overdosed, administered for a prolonged period or given in combination. Detailed accounts of risk factors for abomasal ulceration have been published [3, 36].

Typical clinical signs of perforated abomasal ulcers in calves include abnormal posture (arched back, tucked-up abdomen and lowered head carriage) and an enlarged and tense abdomen, but signs of pain are noticeably absent [29]. These authors reported that 78% of affected calves held their muzzle in water without drinking and that a wet muzzle and submandibular area were common clinical signs in the calves at admission. In ten calves with U4, recumbency, tachycardia, hypothermia and pale mucous membranes were the predominant clinical signs [37]. In our study, the main clinical signs were poor general health and ensuing rumen atony and abdominal guarding because of diffuse peritonitis. A tense abdominal wall, an arched back and tucked-up abdomen reflect parietal pain, which is typical of peritonitis. Signs of visceral pain, such as colic or the assumption of a “sawhorse” stance, were relatively rare and were seen in 13 and 8% of calves, respectively. Cows with U4 have a similar clinical presentation that included illness associated with poor appetite or anorexia (100%), abdominal guarding (81%), congested scleral vessels (77%), rumen atony (73%) and tachycardia (68%) [12]. The principal clinical signs of the calves in the present study were related to shock caused by diffuse peritonitis. In addition to poor general health, we noted dehydration (reduced skin elasticity in 95% and enophthalmus in 73% of the calves) and lowered skin surface temperature (66%) and tachycardia (66%); the latter two signs were thought to be caused by centralisation of circulation. Other authors reported that signs of shock are rare in calves with U4 [15].

The laboratory findings were in agreement with published data [25, 28, 37] and included haemoconcentration, hypoproteinaemia, hyperfibrinogenaemia, azotaemia, leukocytosis and hyponatraemia [25, 28, 37, 38]. The most frequent laboratory abnormalities of this study were increased numbers of segmented neutrophils (87%) and eosinopenia (87%); the former reflected severe inflammation, and the latter, together with leukocytosis, neutrophilia, lymphopenia and monocytosis were consistent with a stress leukogram [39, 40]. In 78% of calves the increased number of segmented neutrophils was accompanied by an increase in band neutrophils, which indicated that the bone marrow was functional and capable of meeting the increased demand for leukocytes caused by peritonitis. In many cases, cattle with severe inflammation are not able to meet the demand for leukocytes and therefore develop leukopenia, often associated with a degenerative left shift [41]. Degenerative left shift was seen in 44.5% of cows with toxic mastitis [42] but in only 17% of calves of the present study. Not surprisingly, 61% of the calves had a regenerative left shift compared with only 16.4% of cows with toxic mastitis. This suggests that leukocyte consumption exceeded bone marrow production in cows with toxaemia, whereas an equilibrium between production and consumption occurred in calves with U4. At the time of sampling, most calves were peracutely affected, whereas most of the cows had acute to subacute toxic mastitis. It is likely that the total leukocyte count of calves in a later stage of the disease would have reflected bone marrow exhaustion similar to cows with toxaemia. Another possible explanation for the leukopenia seen in cows with toxic mastitis is that experimental intramammary infection with Escherichia coli or Klebsiella pneumoniae was shown to cause a decrease in neutrophils within 16 h of infection [43, 44]. Other laboratory abnormalities, subsequent to shock-related centralisation of circulation, were increased haematocrit in 59% and azotaemia in 79% of the calves. Haemoconcentration is usually accompanied by increased total protein concentration but this was not so in cows with U4; 69% of cows had haemoconcentration but only 11% had increased total protein concentration [12], 29% had concomitant hypoproteinaemia and 20% had increased haematocrit and concurrent hypoproteinaemia [12]. Haemoconcentration accompanied by hypoproteinaemia was seen in only 32% of the calves. Haemoconcentration combined with normo- or hypoproteinaemia is associated with a loss of protein-rich fluid [45], and in cattle with clinical signs of peritonitis provides important diagnostic information reflecting the massive loss of fluid and protein into the abdominal cavity [46]. Fibrinogen was increased in only 30% of the calves. Fibrinogen is an acute-phase protein that can increase in blood within two to three days of the onset of acute inflammation [47]. However, at the time of sampling, the median duration of illness was only 1 day. In contrast, hyperfibrinogenaemia was seen in 45% of cows with U4 after a median duration of illness of 2 days [12], in 39% of cows with acute mastitis after a median duration of illness of 2 days [42] and in 69% of cows with traumatic reticuloperitonitis after a median duration of illness of 4 days [48]. Thus, fibrinogen concentration is not a reliable indicator of peritonitis caused by a U4 in calves because the clinical signs usually precede hyperfibrinogenaemia. In contrast to an earlier study [28], acidosis was a common finding and was seen in 84% of the calves compared with 49% of cows with type-4 ulcer [12]. Acidosis is attributed to dehydration and shock-related anaerobic metabolism [49]. However, the diagnostic utility of metabolic acidosis for practitioners is limited because point-of-care venous blood gas analysis is not usually available and acidosis also occurs in calves with diarrhoea or ruminal drinker syndrome.

The main ultrasonographic finding in calves with U4 was free fluid in the abdomen, which was seen in 24 of 36 calves. However, the ulcer itself could not be visualized in any of the calves. The ultrasonographic visualisation of a perforated abomasal ulcer in a cow was only recently reported [50]. Fibrin deposits and/or fibrin strands were seen in 21 calves reflecting the severity of peritonitis. Of 75 cows with perforated abomasal ulcers, 87% had ultrasonographic evidence of localised or diffuse peritonitis [12]. Even though these ultrasonographic findings are near pathognomonic for peritonitis, a sample of fluid should be aspirated and analysed [51]; the samples obtained in the present study without exception were characterised by inflammatory changes. Even though the perforated ulcers could not be directly visualised, the ultrasonographic findings facilitated diagnosis and were a prognostic aid. Diffuse fibrinous peritonitis almost always has a poor prognosis and therefore this finding aids in decision making; the only feasible option in such cases is euthanasia, and other measures such as exploratory laparotomy or medical treatment can be forgone. Ultrasonographic examination of the abdomen is straightforward and should always be carried out when abomasal ulcer is the tentative diagnosis. A recent experiment designed to investigate whether the measurement of sucrose in blood after oral administration in calves would allow an in-vivo diagnosis of abomasal ulcers—based on the hypothesis that affected calves have increased gastric permeability—showed no difference in sucrose concentration between calves with and without abomasal ulcers [52].


Perforated abomasal ulcers are associated with severe illness in calves. Clinical examination and measurement of the haematocrit and plasma protein combined with abdominal ultrasonography allow a presumptive diagnosis in most cases. Exploratory laparotomy may be used to confirm the diagnosis.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and analysed for this study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.


  1. Bähler C, Steiner A, Luginbühl A, Ewy A, Posthaus H, Strabel D, et al. Risk factors for death and unwanted early slaughter in Swiss veal calves kept at a specific animal welfare standard. Res Vet Sci. 2012;92:162–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Valgaeren BR, Pardon B, Flahou B, Verherstraeten S, Goossens E, Timbermont L, et al. Prevalence and bacterial colonisation of fundic ulcerations in veal calves. Vet Rec. 2013;172:269.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Bus JD, Stockhofe N, Webb LE. Invited review: abomasal damage in veal calves. J Dairy Sci. 2019;102:943–60.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Braun U, Wiest A, Lutz T, Riond B, Stirn M, Hilbe M, et al. Hair cortisol concentration in veal calves reared under different welfare production labels. Res Vet Sci. 2019;123:286–92.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Hund A, Beer T, Wittek T. Labmagenulzera bei Schlachtrindern in Österreich. Tierärztl Prax. 2016;44(G):279–85.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Brscic M, Heutinck LFM, Wolthuis-Fillerup M, Stockhofe N, Engel B, Visser EK, et al. Prevalence of gastrointestinal disorders recorded at postmortem inspection in white veal calves and associated risk factors. J Dairy Sci. 2011;94:853–63.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Bähler C. Risk factors and prevalence of non-perforating abomasal lesions in Swiss veal calves at slaughter. Dr Med Vet Thesis. Bern: University of Bern; 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Webb LE, Bokkers EAM, Heutinck LFM, Engel B, Buist WG, Rodenburg TB, et al. Effects of roughage source, amount, and particle size on behavior and gastrointestinal health of veal calves. J Dairy Sci. 2013;96:7765–76.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Braun U, Gerspach C, Reif C, Hilbe M, Nuss K. Clinical, laboratory and ultrasonographic findings in 94 cows with type-1 abomasal ulcer. Schweiz Arch Tierheilk. 2020;162:235–44.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Braun U, Gerspach C, Nuss K, Hässig M, Hilbe M, Reif C. Clinical and laboratory findings, treatment and outcome in 145 cows with type-2 abomasal ulcer. Res Vet Sci. 2019;124:366–74.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Braun U, Gerspach C, Hilbe M, Devaux DJ, Reif C. Clinical and laboratory findings in 60 cows with type-3 abomasal ulcer. Schweiz Arch Tierheilk. 2019;161:523–31.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Braun U, Reif C, Nuss K, Hilbe M, Gerspach C. Clinical, laboratory and ultrasonographic findings in 87 cows with type-4 abomasal ulcer. BMC Vet Res. 2019;15:100.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Braun U, Reif C, Hilbe M, Gerspach C. Type-5 abomasal ulcer and omental bursitis in 14 cows. Acta Vet Scand. 2020;62:4.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Lorch A, Rademacher G. Pathologisch-anatomische Befunde bei Kälbern mit perforierendem Labmagengeschwür. Tierärztl Umschau. 2001;56:572–81.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Dirksen G, Doll K, Einhellig J, Seitz A, Rademacher G, Breitner W, et al. Labmagengeschwüre beim Kalb: klinische Untersuchungen und Erfahrungen. Tierärztl Prax. 1997;25:318–28.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Degen B. Pathologisch-anatomische und—histologische Untersuchungen zur Pathogenese der Pylorusgeschwüre bei Mastkälbern. Dr Med Vet Thesis. Berlin: University of Berlin; 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Krauser K. Untersuchungen zur Pathogenese der Pylorusulzera beim Mastkalb. Berl Münch Tierärztl Wschr. 1987;100:156–61.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Berends H, Van den Borne JJGC, Mollenhorst H, Van Reenen CG, Bokkers EAM, Gerrits WJJ. Utilization of roughages and concentrates relative to that of milk replacer increases strongly with age in veal calves. J Dairy Sci. 2014;97:6475–84.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Welchman DD, Baust GN. A survey of abomasal ulceration in veal calves. Vet Rec. 1987;121:586–90.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Bähler C, Regula G, Stoffel MH, Steiner A, Von Rotz A. Effects of the two production programs ‘Naturafarm’ and ‘conventional’ on the prevalence of non-perforating abomasal lesions in Swiss veal calves at slaughter. Res Vet Sci. 2010;88:352–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Ahmed AF, Constable PD, Misk NA. Effect of feeding frequency and route of administration on abomasal luminal pH in dairy calves fed milk replacer. J Dairy Sci. 2002;85:1502–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Mattiello S, Canali E, Ferrante V, Caniatti M, Gottardo F, Cozzi G, et al. The provision of solid feeds to veal calves: II. Behavior, physiology, and abomasal damage. J Anim Sci. 2002;80:367–75.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Räber R, Kaufmann T, Regula G, Von Rotz A, Stoffel MH, Posthaus H, et al. Effects of different types of solid feeds on health status and performance of Swiss veal calves. II. Basic feeding with whole milk. Schweiz Arch Tierheilk. 2013;155:283–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Wensing T, Breukink HJ, Van Dijk S. The effect of feeding pellets of different types of roughage on the incidence of lesions in the abomasum of veal calves. Vet Res Commun. 1986;10:195–202.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Einhellig J. Retrospektive Analyse anamnestischer und klinischer Daten von Kälbern mit Ulcus abomasi. Dr Med Vet Thesis. Munich: University of Munich; 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Walsh P, Carvallo Chaigneau FR, Anderson M, Behrens N, McEligot H, Gunnarson B, et al. Adverse effects of a 10-day course of ibuprofen in Holstein calves. J Vet Pharmacol Therap. 2016;39:518–21.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Fubini SL, Yeager AE, Divers TJ. Abomasal ulcers. In: Peek SF, Divers TJ, editors. Rebhun’s diseases of dairy cattle. St. Louis: Elsevier; 2018. p. 210–20.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Lorch A. Retro-und prospektive Untersuchungen zu klinischer Symptomatik und pathologisch-anatomischen Befunden bei Kälbern mit perforierendem Labmagengeschwür. Dr Med Vet Thesis Dissertation. Munich: University of Munich; 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Rademacher G, Lorch A. Verlauf und klinische Symptomatik bei Kälbern mit perforierendem Labmagengeschwür. Tierärztl Umschau. 2001;56:563–71.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Widmer C. Befunde bei Kälbern mit Labmagenulzera. Masterthesis: University of Zurich; 2019.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Rosenberger G. Clinical examination of cattle. Hamburg: Paul Parey; 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Braun U, Krüger S, Hässig M. Ultrasonographic examination of the reticulum, rumen, omasum and abomasum during the first 100 days of life in calves. Res Vet Sci. 2013;95:326–33.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Mee JF. Neonatal abomasal ulceration in a young calf. Vet Rec. 1992;131:496.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Kataria-Hale J, Febo-Rodriguez L, Parmekar S. Hematemesis in a newborn: a case report. Cureus. 2020;12:e6784.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Jelinski MD, Ribble CS, Campbell JR, Janzen ED. Descriptive epidemiology of fatal abomasal ulcers in Canadian beef calves. Prev Vet Med. 1996;26:9–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Hund A, Wittek T. Abomasal and third compartment ulcers in ruminants and south American camelids. Vet Clin North Am Food Anim Pract. 2018;34:35–54.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Tulleners EP, Hamilton GF. Surgical resection of perforated abomasal ulcers in calves. Can Vet J. 1980;21:262–4.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Marshall TS. Abomasal ulceration and tympany of calves. Vet Clin North Am Food Anim Pract. 2009;25:209–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Anderson BH, Watson DL, Colditz IG. The effect of dexamethasone on some immunological parameters in cattle. Vet Res Commun. 1999;23:399–413.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Tornquist SJ, Rigas J. Interpretation of ruminant leukocyte responses. In: Weis DJ, Wardrop KJ, editors. Schalm’s Veterinary Hematology. Ames-Iowa: Wiley-Blackwell; 2010. p. 307–13.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Weiser G. Interpretation of leukocyte responses in disease. In: Thrall MA, Weiser G, Allison RW, Campbell TW, editors. Veterinary Hematology and Clinical Chemistry. Ames-Iowa: Wiley-Blackwell; 2012. p. 127–39.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Braun U, Gerspach C, Riond B, Oschlies C, Corti S, Bleul U. Haematological findings in 158 cows with acute toxic mastitis with a focus on the leukogram. Acta Vet Scand. 2021;63:11.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Bannerman DD, Paape MJ, Lee JW, Zhao X, Hope JC, Rainard P. Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus elicit differential innate immune responses following intramammary infection. Clin Diagn Lab Immunol. 2004;11:463–72.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Bannerman DD, Paape MJ, Hare WR, Hope JC. Characterization of the bovine innate immune response to intramammary infection with Klebsiella pneumoniae. J Dairy Sci. 2004;87:2420–32.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Fecteau G, Desrochers A, Francoz D, Nichols S. Diagnostic approach to the acute abdomen. Vet Clin North Am Food Anim Pract. 2018;34:19–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Palmer JE, Whitlock RH. Perforated abomasal ulcers in adult dairy cows. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 1984;184:171–4.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Francoz D, Guard CL. Abomasal ulcers. In: Smith BP, editor. Large Animal Internal Medicine. St. Louis: Elsevier Mosby; 2015. p. 815–7.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Braun U, Warislohner S, Torgerson P, Nuss K, Gerspach C. Clinical and laboratory findings in 503 cattle with traumatic reticuloperitonitis. BMC Vet Res. 2018;14:66.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Smith DF, Munson L, Erb HN. Abomasal ulcer disease in adult dairy cattle. Cornell Vet. 1983;73:213–24.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Gerspach C, Oschlies C, Kuratli J, Braun U. Ultrasonographic documentation of type-3 abomasal ulcer in a cow with left displacement of the abomasum. Acta Vet Scand. 2020;62:29.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  51. Braun U. Ascites in cattle: ultrasonographic findings and diagnosis. Vet Clin North Am Food Anim Pract. 2016;32:55–83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Hund A, Schaffer A, Dolezal M, Mascher H, Wittek T. Measuring sucrose in blood after oral administration to detect abomasal ulcers in calves. J Vet Diagn Invest. 2019;31:737–41.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references


The authors thank the technicians of the Medical Laboratory for the haematological and biochemical analysis and the agricultural assistants for their help with the clinical examinations.


Not applicable since it was a retrospective analysis of medical records.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations



UB initiated, planned and supervised the study and prepared the manuscript. CW carried out the study as part of her master thesis. KN and CG were involved in the clinical examination and treatment of the calves. MH was responsible for the postmortem examination. All authors made contributions to acquisition and interpretation of data and were involved in drafting the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ueli Braun.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study was not submitted to our institutional ethics committee, because it was a retrospective study using medical records of calves that had been referred to our clinic for examination and treatment. No experimental animals were used. Under these circumstances, ethical approval is not required in Switzerland.

Consent for publication

All owners signed a consent form allowing us to use the animals and all the associated medical data for scientific analysis and publication.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Braun, U., Widmer, C., Nuss, K. et al. Clinical, laboratory and ultrasonographic findings in 38 calves with type-4 abomasal ulcer. Acta Vet Scand 63, 38 (2021).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI:


  • Abomasum
  • Calf
  • Peritonitis
  • Type-4 ulcer